EPTIt's not gonna change tho, we already told blizzard about it.
Heroes Large General Thread - Page 432
| Forum Index > Heroes of the Storm |
Add yourself in the TL Player list if you want to play with TL people, and /join teamliquid channel ingame. Also check out the new Heroes Liquipedia. | ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10134 Posts
It's not gonna change tho, we already told blizzard about it. | ||
|
Pwere
Canada1557 Posts
Worth 1-2k gold, stuff like: - Complete one objective on each map. - Win a game with 5 different heroes. - Play 5 QM or HL games with friends. - Travel x distance using a mount/ability. - Deal 1M damage. With a new 10k hero every month and old heroes apparently staying expensive, new players are gonna feel overwhelmed really fast. Just look at how bad it is in hearthstone. | ||
[Phantom]
Mexico2170 Posts
I have an alt account and yeah you get gold faster, but starting from the bottom is terrible. If you thought the people you played with were bad, just wait to see the people you'll play with. Right now, after the initial gold, you get a little more than 10k (it varies a little) just by completing your dailies and the games they take you to complete them. But after a while youn get kinda all the heroes you want, and then just buy the new releases if you are interested in them. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45182 Posts
On June 08 2015 00:20 synapse wrote: Enjoying the gameplay but I hate how expensive all the heroes are... it's even worse than league once you get past the initial level up gold =_= It'd be nice to get a bit more gold, but I've bought nearly every hero after about 2 months of playing... and unlocked all the ones I *actually liked to play with* after about 2 weeks lol. Not a big deal for me. | ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
I'm not quite sure how much I could put that knowledge to use, as it's already understood on an intuitive level, but it might make the difference between going for a camp or deciding there isn't time. On another topic, they should increase the free hero pool as more heroes get added. | ||
|
RouaF
France4120 Posts
I still have no idea why they nerfed gazlowe though, he was already really weak last patch :/ | ||
|
JimmyJRaynor
Canada17164 Posts
On June 07 2015 07:07 Stratos_speAr wrote: A lot of the hate for HotS (not including legitimate gripes like gated talents and the slow grind for gold) comes from DotA/LoL (but mostly DotA) diehards that bitch about the things that make HotS different, and yet this game would be widely panned if it tried to be a simple copy of DotA/LoL. these guys also complain about whatever their favourite game is .. non-stop as well... just do some digging. when i played a lot of C&C the Starcraft guys would drop in and hate on C&C. then i'd see them on TL talking about how crap Starcraft is. its just a non-stop stream of angry, hatred and negativity. C&C sucks AoE sucks.. CoH1 sucks.. everything sucks... any how, its nice to see that HotS is doing well out of the gate. i was concerned about the low viewer totals on twitch and a few other metrics which appeared low. some of these journalist luminaries like Force expressed similar thoughts. however, now that its in general release activity looks really solid... other metrics like reddit activity look really good. also a command i can use in my LotV beta to see how many HotS matches are going on. No idea if it is accurate though. finally, regarding that IGN review of HotS.  | ||
|
ETisME
12628 Posts
Having more stats really allows us to know how good X merc camp is for example. | ||
|
malcram
2752 Posts
edit: or griefers for that matter. will there be low priority or a search ban of some sort | ||
|
Crownlol
United States3726 Posts
On June 08 2015 02:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: It'd be nice to get a bit more gold, but I've bought nearly every hero after about 2 months of playing... and unlocked all the ones I *actually liked to play with* after about 2 weeks lol. Not a big deal for me. I just wish I'd known that Master skins can *only* be bought with gold. I have Kael'Thas and Jaina at 10, but one night I spent all my gold willy-nilly on some new heroes. I then wanted to buy the master skins, and was pretty sad to see I'd just wasted all my gold. | ||
|
Seuss
United States10536 Posts
I think my favorite feature in HotS is the "Towns, not Towers" concept. It could easily have been mostly meaningless, but it isn't. It adds more progression to pushing, especially with ammo on the structures. You can't really afford to leave someone out in the cold in a horribly mismatched lane for too long or else you just cede the first Fort and an experience advantage to the enemy. Shared experience is also an interesting concept. It creates some unique dynamics and helps prevent individual players/lanes from getting absolutely crushed when they make a few mistakes. Where things break down are in Talents. It's not that Talents themselves are bad, though sometimes the choices feel a little uninspired, but that they are supposed to replace item builds. Talents simply don't match the depth of choice or the feeling of in-game progression/development that items provide. I can respect Blizzard's decision to eschew items entirely, they can be a very significant hurdle for players new to the genre, but Talents don't do enough to replace that depth. I also think the objectives can be a bit overbearing at times. That may be an indication the game is simply not designed to my tastes, but I like the idea of winning fights and outplaying your opponents as worthy objectives in and of themselves. The map objectives pull the focus away from that significantly. Overall I don't think HotS is a bad game, it's just not my preferred MOBA. I don't think 6.5 is a fair rating for the game unless you want to make a statement about its rather steep F2P climb. | ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On June 08 2015 04:44 RouaF wrote: Matchmaking seems to have gotten a lot better, I play almost only with ranks1 and most games make sense. I still have no idea why they nerfed gazlowe though, he was already really weak last patch :/ Yeah, the matchmaker has been noticeably better over the past month. My hotslog MMR has jumped 400 points during that timespan (I'm getting closer to where I was at the end of Alpha), which I doubt is a coincidence. | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45182 Posts
On June 08 2015 21:42 Crownlol wrote: I just wish I'd known that Master skins can *only* be bought with gold. I have Kael'Thas and Jaina at 10, but one night I spent all my gold willy-nilly on some new heroes. I then wanted to buy the master skins, and was pretty sad to see I'd just wasted all my gold. Yeah that sucks  The only thing I was aware of that can *only* be bought with gold was that piggy bank mount iirc. Haven't paid that much attention to the skins (although some are creepy as hell). | ||
|
Crownlol
United States3726 Posts
On June 08 2015 04:44 RouaF wrote: Matchmaking seems to have gotten a lot better, I play almost only with ranks1 and most games make sense. I still have no idea why they nerfed gazlowe though, he was already really weak last patch :/ When did Gazlowe get nerfed? I'm loving OP'arak lately, hope he doesn't get nerfbatted. | ||
|
ivancype
Brazil485 Posts
| ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
Was playing with a friend who is forced to get to level 20 by his girlfriend (WoW Pet). But his ancient computer that is probably worse then an xbone isn't really suited for real opponents. So went coop. I now know why there are losses. People change lanes on a whim and no one fills them and suddenly the bots are 2 levels ahead and players start feeding them. If the objective is not a kill a monster that has stuns, the bots can actually win. It is a good way to change to quick cast though. Really curious when Heroes will hit the console market seeing that you could basically play it with a controller. | ||
|
Valiver
Caldeum1977 Posts
| ||
|
lestye
United States4186 Posts
On June 09 2015 00:20 ivancype wrote: So, Blizzard just detailed the Diablo stuff they promised before, not any really new content was revealed this weekend, right? I mean, I would consider it new content... they literally only showed the model of Butcher and the basic map at Blizzcon. At the ANZ event, they confirmed we should be getting voice chat by the end of the year. | ||
|
Kupon3ss
時の回廊10066 Posts
On June 09 2015 01:35 Valiver wrote: Zero chance hots is going to be played on console, I hope you are joking. remember diablo? | ||
|
Valiver
Caldeum1977 Posts
Diablo is much simpler than HotS, can easily be made into a single player game (everyone was crying for that anyway), and had an established name to back it up and get people to buy it. HotS is free to play, and so their model of income on console would have to be an upfront cost of the game to pay for them making it console supported, and then it would have to sell a lot keep players interested or the ladders would be desolate. | ||
| ||
