EPTthis game is beyond retarded
Hearthstone QQ Therapy - Page 12
| Forum Index > Hearthstone General |
|
kongoline
6318 Posts
this game is beyond retarded | ||
|
Aceace
Turkey1305 Posts
Edit: HRRR!!!!!! Lost against a idiot mage. I'm a Druid. 2nd turn blood mage thalnos... I thought "OMG!! He IS "The worst player". Then he throwed me Sylvanas, Cairne, Ragnaros and Antonidas.... That was too much for me..  | ||
|
e4e5nf3
Canada599 Posts
On October 26 2013 02:02 Oukka wrote: I hate the stupid priest double the health of something twice and then raise attack as high as the health things. Especially with decks where I have very few ways of removing a creature outright. I've had several priests do this to me using those Gurobashi (sp?) Berserker things aided with 1-2 taunted minions. Really sucks when your insta-kill cards don't show up for a long time. | ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
On October 27 2013 10:22 ShivaN wrote: If you're referring to Kungen, I'd like to know that as well.  A lot of streamers have a ton of gold because they spent money pre-wipe which got reimbursed as gold. So they're either too lazy to open that many packs again, or are saving it for arena runs. | ||
|
Skithiryx
Australia648 Posts
On October 27 2013 14:18 NeoIllusions wrote: What? Mage can beat Priest. So can aggro Paladin. 1TK Hunter is cheese. It can technically beat anything with the right draw. zz Control Shaman also rolls them over pretty hard. | ||
|
Kyhron
United States945 Posts
| ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
Went 8-3 though so it was a good run. | ||
|
RiZu
Singapore5715 Posts
| ||
|
Rokevo
Finland1033 Posts
Imagine Starcraft where 50% of the players offensive gg every game, but you cant respond in any way. | ||
|
scDeluX
Canada1341 Posts
On October 27 2013 10:22 ShivaN wrote: If you're referring to Kungen, I'd like to know that as well. I think at some point in the beta they did a reset a gave gold for the money spent. My QQ : Playing against a mage in arena, I have total board control by turn 6 but he fires 4 fireball in my face, gg by turn 7. | ||
|
RolleMcKnolle
Germany1054 Posts
On October 28 2013 22:45 Rokevo wrote: Can the 'well played' button be deleted please, or at least give me a 'fuck off' button to compensate. Imagine Starcraft where 50% of the players offensive gg every game, but you cant respond in any way. I actually mean it most of the time, when I say well played. And I also don't feel offended by other people doing this. I just think they really wanted to say that. | ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
On October 28 2013 23:49 RolleMcKnolle wrote: I actually mean it most of the time, when I say well played. And I also don't feel offended by other people doing this. I just think they really wanted to say that. Sometimes someone wants to say something like 'Good Luck' and just choose the closest thing they have. Kind of strange how they chose some of the emotes... 'Thank you' is super situational (after a "sorry", certain 'well played' or opponent's misplay only?) | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
On October 28 2013 23:49 RolleMcKnolle wrote: I actually mean it most of the time, when I say well played. And I also don't feel offended by other people doing this. I just think they really wanted to say that. Which of the following is less offensive. "offensive" wellplayed. Sorry>wellplayed(when you're going to kill them) Silence I've tried all 3, although silence is generally reserved for bullshit. | ||
|
Jetaap
France4814 Posts
| ||
|
N1k0
Uruguay1075 Posts
| ||
|
Wuster
1974 Posts
On October 28 2013 22:45 Rokevo wrote: Can the 'well played' button be deleted please, or at least give me a 'fuck off' button to compensate. Imagine Starcraft where 50% of the players offensive gg every game, but you cant respond in any way. Thing is, it's not necessarily an offensive GG, because unlike Starcraft the majority of HS games end when one player pulls a trick out to beat you, rather than you conceding. In other similar games I play, it's the same way, you say GG right before you're about to win otherwise there's no chance to say that (yes HS gives you time to state a last minute emote, but it's a really short window). I guess it's best to wait until you reveal the killing blow to say GG, then you'd avoid the are "you conceding or about to kill me" moment? | ||
|
SOB_Maj_Brian
United States522 Posts
On October 28 2013 13:04 Kyhron wrote: Done 8 or 9 arena runs none have done better than 3 wins. I can't draft for shit and it annoys the hell out of me. I focus way too hard on making a even mana curve and not enough about what the deck lacks I have done only a few Arena runs and have gotten either 4 or 5 (mostly 5). If you draft purely to this guide (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=430203) or the other ones like it (they are mostly the same); I think you would get the same results. Most games I placed were fairly close until 4 or 5 wins and then you end up playing some crazy deck and it makes me wonder how someone got such good cards in arena or that they must have a crazy good draw (b/c I doubt my deck had a chance at all). I saw Hunter decks that were nearly OTK and crazy Priest decks that looked nearly identical to their constructed counter-parts. | ||
|
Glacierz
United States1244 Posts
On October 29 2013 04:28 SOB_Maj_Brian wrote: I have done only a few Arena runs and have gotten either 4 or 5 (mostly 5). If you draft purely to this guide (http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=430203) or the other ones like it (they are mostly the same); I think you would get the same results. Most games I placed were fairly close until 4 or 5 wins and then you end up playing some crazy deck and it makes me wonder how someone got such good cards in arena or that they must have a crazy good draw (b/c I doubt my deck had a chance at all). I saw Hunter decks that were nearly OTK and crazy Priest decks that looked nearly identical to their constructed counter-parts. I just drafted this 4 polymorph + 4 flamestrike deck, pretty sure that beats constructed even with mediocre creatures (I actually came across 6 polys, but had to draft bigger creatures after realizing there arent enough dmg). To people who think arena takes more skill, try playing against this. It's basically a faceroll 9-0. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=433055¤tpage=3#56 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=433055¤tpage=3#57 | ||
|
willoc
Canada1530 Posts
On October 29 2013 04:37 Glacierz wrote: I just drafted this 4 polymorph + 4 flamestrike deck, pretty sure that beats constructed even with mediocre creatures (I actually came across 6 polys, but had to draft bigger creatures after realizing there arent enough dmg). To people who think arena takes more skill, try playing against this. It's basically a faceroll 9-0. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=433055¤tpage=3#56 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=433055¤tpage=3#57 You're sure posting this around a lot on the forums. Why in this thread though? | ||
|
Glacierz
United States1244 Posts
On October 29 2013 05:05 willoc wrote: You're sure posting this around a lot on the forums. Why in this thread though? To QQ about the imbalanced drafting mode? I can't really post imba decks I play against since I don't have a full list. Since I got lucky once, this will serve as an example for what's wrong with the current format. | ||
| ||
