• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:40
CET 07:40
KST 15:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies3ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career !11Weekly Cups (Dec 8-14): MaxPax, Clem, Cure win4Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2
StarCraft 2
General
ComeBackTV's documentary on Byun's Career ! Team TLMC #5: Winners Announced! What's the best tug of war? The Grack before Christmas Weekly Cups (Dec 15-21): Classic wins big, MaxPax & Clem take weeklies
Tourneys
OSC Season 13 World Championship $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship $100 Prize Pool - Winter Warp Gate Masters Showdow Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Winter Warp Gate Amateur Showdown #1
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 505 Rise From Ashes Mutation # 504 Retribution Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion How soO Began His ProGaming Dreams Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recommended FPV games (post-KeSPA)
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] LB SemiFinals - Saturday 21:00 CET [BSL21] WB & LB Finals - Sunday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta Fighting Spirit mining rates
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread 12 Days of Starcraft The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
National Diversity: A Challe…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1431 users

.docX is dead! Yay! - Page 2

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Grimatoma2
Profile Joined June 2009
United States68 Posts
August 12 2009 18:40 GMT
#21
why are you guys complaining about the size of a document? we have drives with 1 terabyte, and u guys r talking about the different of a few killabytes???

imo microsoft should do make msoffice open source and give it free with windows and just lol like what they did with internet explorer
:o hi mom
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 12 2009 18:41 GMT
#22
The irony is that MS went to OOXML to increase compatibility with third party software instead of the old binary format, but general computer users have been too stupid to understand what to do (even though their files have gotten 10x smaller.) Google it, people.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Last Romantic
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
United States20661 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-12 18:44:48
August 12 2009 18:41 GMT
#23
Agreed with Jibba, Insane, and azndsh.

Insofar as ubiquity goes, sure, .doc is more common, but .docx is.... better. This is even more ridiculous than Cisco's suit against Apple due to its ownership of the name "iPhone". Delay of technological advance due to some petty detail is... well. A bit silly.

@grimatoma, have you worked in a large tech firm? Those few 'killabytes' total up to a few million... what would you call them.... 'giggabytes'. And then you have to buy more storage, and service that storage, and all sorts of useless spending that can easily be prevented.

Microsoft is a profit-making venture. Asking them to give away their hard work for free is despicable. As a Microsoft shareholder I encourage them to make money in as many ways as possible.
ㅋㄲㅈㅁ
Husky
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States3362 Posts
August 12 2009 18:42 GMT
#24
Yeah this is definitely going to get overturned. This is like saying Ford can no longer make trucks.
Commentaries: youtube.com/HuskyStarcraft
PianoMan
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
Pakistan54 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-12 18:43:43
August 12 2009 18:43 GMT
#25
On August 13 2009 03:40 Grimatoma2 wrote:
why are you guys complaining about the size of a document? we have drives with 1 terabyte, and u guys r talking about the different of a few killabytes???

imo microsoft should do make msoffice open source and give it free with windows and just lol like what they did with internet explorer

Yeah man, rage against the man, man. Microsoft should just give away everything for free and pull money out of their hats.

P i a n o M a n
Az the Donkey
ParasitJonte
Profile Joined September 2004
Sweden1768 Posts
August 12 2009 18:44 GMT
#26
On August 13 2009 03:32 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2009 03:02 cgrinker wrote:
Source

A Judge on Tuesday ordered Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) to stop selling its popular Word document creation application in the United States after finding that the software contains technology that violates a patent held by a third party.

Microsoft Office, which includes Word, accounted for more than $3 billion in worldwide sales in Microsoft's most recent fiscal year and is used by literally millions of businesses and consumers for everyday tasks like word processing and making spreadsheets and presentations.

The judge said the ruling, which applies to Word 2003 and Word 2007, takes effect in 60 days.

Investors shrugged off the news—perhaps in anticipation of a higher court overturning the ruling, which arose from the plaintiff-friendly Eastern Texas federal jurisdiction. Microsoft shares were up 1.6% to $23.50 in early trading Wednesday.

Judge Leonard Davis, of U.S. District Court for Eastern Texas, said Microsoft "unlawfully infringed" on a patent that describes how programs go about "manipulating a document's content and architecture separately." The patent, No. 5,787,449, is held by Toronto-based i4i, Inc. i4i develops "collaborative content solutions," according to its Web site.

i4i originally sued Microsoft for patent infringement in 2007. Microsoft officials said the company plans to appeal, adding that the software maker is "disappointed by the court's ruling." The company said it believes i4i's patent is "invalid."

Davis on Tuesday ordered Microsoft to pay $240 million in damages to i4i, plus court costs and interest. More significantly, he enjoined Microsoft from continuing to sell Microsoft Word, in its current form, in the U.S.

Specifically, Davis said Microsoft can't sell versions of Word that can open documents saved in the .XML, .DOCX, or .DOCM formats that contain custom XML. Those formats were at the heart of the patent dispute. .DOCX is the default format for the most current version of Word, which is included in Microsoft Office 2007. Custom XML is used by businesses to link their corporate data to Word documents.

"Microsoft Corporation is hereby permanently enjoined" from selling Word 2003 and Word 2007 in the U.S. Davis, wrote in his order.

Davis also prohibited Microsoft from providing technical support for infringing products sold after the injunction takes effect, or from "testing, demonstrating, or marketing the ability of the infringing and future Word products to open an XML file containing custom XML."

Davis said the injunction does not apply to versions of Word that open an XML file as plain text or which apply a transform that removes all custom XML elements—possibly paving the way for Microsoft to issue a patch that rectifies the problem.


Have you ever been at school and someone would be like "I can't open this Word Document because I run Windows Vista," and you thought to yourself "You are a fucking idiot." Well now those days are over since a Texas court ruled that Microsoft infringed upon a patent with their custom XML stuff for the .docX format. Which is good because it make the documents twice the size and doesn't do anything.

What? The XML files are superior in every way (especially size.) There's a compatability pack for older versions of Office so they read .docx without having to convert anything. You guys are dum.


Thank you.

And no there's no reason to be happy about this. Some stupid company (i4i -> lol?) taking advantage of stupid rules and possibly forcing Microsoft to change the format in which word documents are saved. For portability issues I always use this http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/thankyou.aspx?familyId=f1fc413c-6d89-4f15-991b-63b07ba5f2e5&displayLang=en and export my .docx files to pdf.
Hello=)
StorrZerg
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States13919 Posts
August 12 2009 18:47 GMT
#27
On August 13 2009 03:42 HuskyTheHusky wrote:
Yeah this is definitely going to get overturned. This is like saying Ford can no longer make trucks.


yeah sums it up pretty well.

just give the guy his millions and let Microsoft be Microsoft.
Hwaseung Oz fan for life. Swing out, always swing out.
Aerox
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Malaysia1213 Posts
August 12 2009 18:50 GMT
#28
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!! THANK YOU!
"Eyes in the sky."
-fj.
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
Samoa462 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-12 18:53:58
August 12 2009 18:50 GMT
#29
Patent law -_-

Esp. When it is applied to computers, it mostly just prevents people from doing the best work they can... Its like a limit on what you can make, for example people have to use worse / less efficient methods of rendering shadows in 3D games because the best ways are patented.

Capitalism does this all the time.. Makes things shitty for everyone just so 1 person can make money. Planned obsolescence, anyone?
Ganfei
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
Taiwan1439 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-12 18:52:30
August 12 2009 18:51 GMT
#30
On August 13 2009 03:41 Last Romantic wrote:
Agreed with Jibba, Insane, and azndsh.

Insofar as ubiquity goes, sure, .doc is more common, but .docx is.... better. This is even more ridiculous than Cisco's suit against Apple due to its ownership of the name "iPhone". Delay of technological advance due to some petty detail is... well. A bit silly.

@grimatoma, have you worked in a large tech firm? Those few 'killabytes' total up to a few million... what would you call them.... 'giggabytes'. And then you have to buy more storage, and service that storage, and all sorts of useless spending that can easily be prevented.

Microsoft is a profit-making venture. Asking them to give away their hard work for free is despicable. As a Microsoft shareholder I encourage them to make money in as many ways as possible.


uh where exactly is this "free" part that you are gleaning from the article? And quite regardless of whether or not it's good, worked, or doesn't work, if Microsoft did in fact steal another company's idea or programming or whatever the fuck it is, then Microsoft needs to pay that company. I don't know if they did or not...but if they did, then they should.
You are crushing me like a cheese sandwich
fusionsdf
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada15390 Posts
August 12 2009 18:51 GMT
#31
as much as I dislike microsoft, this is retarded

just another patent troll
SKT_Best: "I actually chose Protoss because it was so hard for me to defeat Protoss as a Terran. When I first started Brood War, my main race was Terran."
fusionsdf
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada15390 Posts
August 12 2009 18:54 GMT
#32
On August 13 2009 03:25 Nytefish wrote:
I always wonder about these kind of rulings. How much does the judge understand the technology? Was the patent stupidly vague in the first place? Should I be happy that Microsoft is on the losing end?


not at all
yes
no
SKT_Best: "I actually chose Protoss because it was so hard for me to defeat Protoss as a Terran. When I first started Brood War, my main race was Terran."
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 12 2009 18:55 GMT
#33
On August 13 2009 03:50 -fj. wrote:
Patent law -_-

Esp. When it is applied to computers, it mostly just prevents people from doing the best work they can... Its like a limit on what you can make. People have to use worse / less efficient methods of rendering shadows in 3D games because the best ways are patented.

Capitalism does this all the time.. Makes things shitty for everyone just so 1 person can make money. Planned obsolescence, anyone?

Uh... if you create something you deserve to profit off of it. If patent holders couldn't make money off their inventions, those rendering methods wouldn't have been created in the first place.

The problem is when the law is stretched to an unreasonable extent, and this is one of them.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 12 2009 19:04 GMT
#34
On August 13 2009 03:51 NoobsOfWrath wrote:
if Microsoft did in fact steal another company's idea or programming or whatever the fuck it is, then Microsoft needs to pay that company. I don't know if they did or not...but if they did, then they should.

Patent

Method and system for manipulating the architecture and the content of a document separately from each other


Abstract
A system and method for the separate manipulation of the architecture and content of a document, particularly for data representation and transformations. The system, for use by computer software developers, removes dependency on document encoding technology. A map of metacodes found in the document is produced and provided and stored separately from the document. The map indicates the location and addresses of metacodes in the document. The system allows of multiple views of the same content, the ability to work solely on structure and solely on content, storage efficiency of multiple versions and efficiency of operation.
Basically a file with metacodes.

The fun thing is that MS is just being singled out for $$$. Apple, IBM, Sun, etc. are all using the same format.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
fusionsdf
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
Canada15390 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-08-12 19:07:00
August 12 2009 19:04 GMT
#35
On August 13 2009 03:55 Jibba wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2009 03:50 -fj. wrote:
Patent law -_-

Esp. When it is applied to computers, it mostly just prevents people from doing the best work they can... Its like a limit on what you can make. People have to use worse / less efficient methods of rendering shadows in 3D games because the best ways are patented.

Capitalism does this all the time.. Makes things shitty for everyone just so 1 person can make money. Planned obsolescence, anyone?

Uh... if you create something you deserve to profit off of it. If patent holders couldn't make money off their inventions, those rendering methods wouldn't have been created in the first place.

The problem is when the law is stretched to an unreasonable extent, and this is one of them.


computer patents have a whole host of other problems since a) the turn over is a lot faster than in other fields. Having a company able to sit on a patent for 17 years is pretty ridiculous. b)when you do a patent, you are patenting an algorithm, which is just a generic way to accomplish a task. The vast majority of tech patents are ridiculous for this reason.
The company can make money off the program itself.


If patent holders couldn't make money off their inventions, those rendering methods wouldn't have been created in the first place.


its more than a bit flimsy to say that by itself without justification. Of course those rendering methods would still be used. You use those algorithms to produce a superior product which you then sell. Someone using the same/similar algorithms doesnt mean they will have the same product.
SKT_Best: "I actually chose Protoss because it was so hard for me to defeat Protoss as a Terran. When I first started Brood War, my main race was Terran."
Jibba
Profile Blog Joined October 2007
United States22883 Posts
August 12 2009 19:17 GMT
#36
The problem is they give out patents too generally. If you're John Carmac and you build a whole freaking engine, then yes you get control of it. If you're talking about a singular algorithm or method, then I think it's a bit silly.
ModeratorNow I'm distant, dark in this anthrobeat
andiCR
Profile Blog Joined March 2008
Costa Rica2273 Posts
August 12 2009 19:33 GMT
#37
This appeal is retarded. Its a custom usage of a doc format. Every damn software vendor can make their own format and even compress it and distribute it with their application. Common sense.
Now its as if they try to sue Microsoft into bankrupcy just for the sake of.. what??? This makes no sense to me. I find it malicious. I dont care if docx is not "portable" enough, it's their fucken software..
Nightmare1795 wrote: I played a guy in bronze who said he was Japanese. That was the only game I ever dropped a nuke, which was purely coincidental.
BBS
Profile Joined September 2008
Germany204 Posts
August 12 2009 19:44 GMT
#38
FUCK YES, THAT IS SO AWESOME! sorry for caps, but am really celebrating this :D
azndsh
Profile Blog Joined August 2006
United States4447 Posts
August 12 2009 19:50 GMT
#39
LR, aren't you a mod? where are your ban powers T_T
Last Romantic
Profile Blog Joined June 2006
United States20661 Posts
August 12 2009 19:52 GMT
#40
On August 13 2009 03:51 NoobsOfWrath wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 13 2009 03:41 Last Romantic wrote:
Agreed with Jibba, Insane, and azndsh.

Insofar as ubiquity goes, sure, .doc is more common, but .docx is.... better. This is even more ridiculous than Cisco's suit against Apple due to its ownership of the name "iPhone". Delay of technological advance due to some petty detail is... well. A bit silly.

@grimatoma, have you worked in a large tech firm? Those few 'killabytes' total up to a few million... what would you call them.... 'giggabytes'. And then you have to buy more storage, and service that storage, and all sorts of useless spending that can easily be prevented.

Microsoft is a profit-making venture. Asking them to give away their hard work for free is despicable. As a Microsoft shareholder I encourage them to make money in as many ways as possible.


uh where exactly is this "free" part that you are gleaning from the article? And quite regardless of whether or not it's good, worked, or doesn't work, if Microsoft did in fact steal another company's idea or programming or whatever the fuck it is, then Microsoft needs to pay that company. I don't know if they did or not...but if they did, then they should.


Not from the article, from the previous poster who said that Office should be open source/free to download like internet explorer is.
ㅋㄲㅈㅁ
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft590
RuFF_SC2 271
NeuroSwarm 196
StarCraft: Brood War
actioN 2275
Shuttle 128
Larva 60
eros_byul 0
NotJumperer 0
League of Legends
JimRising 671
C9.Mang0494
Other Games
summit1g9199
XaKoH 172
minikerr53
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1040
BasetradeTV61
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 46
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki37
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22090
League of Legends
• Rush1375
• Lourlo1130
Other Games
• Scarra1783
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3h 20m
Krystianer vs Classic
TriGGeR vs SKillous
Percival vs Ryung
ByuN vs Nicoract
OSC
11h 20m
BSL 21
13h 20m
Cross vs Dewalt
Replay Cast
1d 2h
Wardi Open
1d 5h
OSC
2 days
Solar vs MaxPax
ByuN vs Krystianer
Spirit vs TBD
OSC
5 days
Korean StarCraft League
5 days
OSC
6 days
OSC
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S1: W1
WardiTV 2025
META Madness #9

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
BSL Season 21
CSL Season 19: Qualifier 2
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025

Upcoming

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
Escore Tournament S1: W2
Escore Tournament S1: W3
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
OSC Championship Season 13
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.