![[image loading]](http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?image=redsnl2.jpg)
EDIT: Not sure why pic isn't working but heres the link:
http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?image=redsnl2.jpg
Forum Index > General Forum |
BuGzlToOnl
United States5918 Posts
![]() EDIT: Not sure why pic isn't working but heres the link: http://img118.imageshack.us/my.php?image=redsnl2.jpg | ||
![]()
jhNz
Germany2762 Posts
08 barrack(s) ftw | ||
MoltkeWarding
5195 Posts
On November 05 2008 03:25 Hans-Titan wrote: Just a note on prop. 8 in Cali. My uncle, who is a homesexual, got married today ![]() Also I don't buy the crap about gay-marriage destroying the family. Just because there's two men married, the entire family breaks apart? Come on.. The bonds of any decent family are way stronger than that, and my family has NOT suffered from having a gay couple in the house. NO on PROP 8 YES to Obama EDIT: Found this image was fitting... ![]() It's arguable that the abolitionist and empancipation movements are an outgrowth of Christian ethics, the notion of either being an absurdity in the Greco-Roman world in which Christian ethics first originated. Although Paul and the early Patristic Fathers did not insist on an outright abolition of slavery, they regarded the insitituion as a regrettable reality showing the fallen state of man. Paul in his epistles admonished his followers against treating slaves cruely and advised that they be treated as part of the family. This was a shift, if not outright reversal of the notion of natural slavery prevalent in the ancient world. Slavery was a universal institution in the ancient world, it was Christianity which, if it did not quite abolish it, at least provided the intellectual basis for it through its insistence on the inherent dignity of all human life. Christian ethics contributed to the empancipation of women too, in the ancient world, by viewing marriage as a mutually binding commitment, encompassing the same obligations for man and women. It's known that women played a prominent role in the leadership of the early church, and were important patronesses of the movement in its infancy. The Pauline comments about the relationships between man and women must be contrasted with Roman Patria Potestas- the Roman patriarchal order. Most of our modern sentiments about enfranchisement of the poor and wretched would probably not exist had the Roman Empire not become aligned with the Christian religion in the 4th century. This alignment of course changed Christian doctrine in fundamental ways too, of course, which became partially romanized, but it's wrong for secularized thinkers to accuse Christianity of being the source modern moral problems, when all people, especially those on the left (with the exception of certain disciples of Nietzsche or Social Darwinists,) are indebted to its influence. P.S. The comic above cites mosaic law, and it would be lying to say that mosaic law has not been adopted, in some historic instances by Christianity, but the prevailing view since Aquinas has been that the judiciary function of mosaic law were temporary, as opposed to its moral function, and ceased to be binding since the new covenant with Christ. That is, mosaic law was applicable only for the pre-Christian era. | ||
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
Does anyone besides me not completely trust those voting machines? You don't even have to put the paper in a certain way, I just feel like there's no accountabiity ![]() | ||
HonestTea
![]()
5007 Posts
It'd be nice to vote | ||
![]()
Carnac
Germany / USA16648 Posts
On November 05 2008 04:58 HonestTea wrote: Man, I really wish I weren't a convicted felon. It'd be nice to vote what did you do :O | ||
NastyMarine
United States1252 Posts
On November 05 2008 04:46 iNfuNdiBuLuM wrote: I voted for Obama. I wanted to vote for Barr, but he wasn't even on the ballot in my state. I don't think they read write-in votes, so I bit the bullet and did what I had to do. Does anyone besides me not completely trust those voting machines? You don't even have to put the paper in a certain way, I just feel like there's no accountabiity ![]() In reality, you cant trust any of them. Whether they are lying or simply cannot implement what they wanted to do in policy (whether congress votes against it etc) | ||
Hans-Titan
Denmark1711 Posts
On November 05 2008 04:32 MoltkeWarding wrote: Show nested quote + On November 05 2008 03:25 Hans-Titan wrote: Just a note on prop. 8 in Cali. My uncle, who is a homesexual, got married today ![]() Also I don't buy the crap about gay-marriage destroying the family. Just because there's two men married, the entire family breaks apart? Come on.. The bonds of any decent family are way stronger than that, and my family has NOT suffered from having a gay couple in the house. NO on PROP 8 YES to Obama EDIT: Found this image was fitting... ![]() It's arguable that the abolitionist and empancipation movements are an outgrowth of Christian ethics, the notion of either being an absurdity in the Greco-Roman world in which Christian ethics first originated. Although Paul and the early Patristic Fathers did not insist on an outright abolition of slavery, they regarded the insitituion as a regrettable reality showing the fallen state of man. Paul in his epistles admonished his followers against treating slaves cruely and advised that they be treated as part of the family. This was a shift, if not outright reversal of the notion of natural slavery prevalent in the ancient world. Slavery was a universal institution in the ancient world, it was Christianity which, if it did not quite abolish it, at least provided the intellectual basis for it through its insistence on the inherent dignity of all human life. Christian ethics contributed to the empancipation of women too, in the ancient world, by viewing marriage as a mutually binding commitment, encompassing the same obligations for man and women. It's known that women played a prominent role in the leadership of the early church, and were important patronesses of the movement in its infancy. The Pauline comments about the relationships between man and women must be contrasted with Roman Patria Potestas- the Roman patriarchal order. Most of our modern sentiments about enfranchisement of the poor and wretched would probably not exist had the Roman Empire not become aligned with the Christian religion in the 4th century. This alignment of course changed Christian doctrine in fundamental ways too, of course, which became partially romanized, but it's wrong for secularized thinkers to accuse Christianity of being the source modern moral problems, when all people, especially those on the left (with the exception of certain disciples of Nietzsche or Social Darwinists,) are indebted to its influence. P.S. The comic above cites mosaic law, and it would be lying to say that mosaic law has not been adopted, in some historic instances by Christianity, but the prevailing view since Aquinas has been that the judiciary function of mosaic law were temporary, as opposed to its moral function, and ceased to be binding since the new covenant with Christ. That is, mosaic law was applicable only for the pre-Christian era. Jesus, christ. o.O I'm not even going to debate that. The comic was meant to make you laugh, not spark a huge debate :D | ||
Wysp
Canada2299 Posts
| ||
BuGzlToOnl
United States5918 Posts
| ||
Mindcrime
United States6899 Posts
| ||
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
Tsagacity
United States2124 Posts
Also voted to legalize medicinal marijuana. ![]() | ||
KOFgokuon
United States14894 Posts
On November 05 2008 04:59 Carnac wrote: Show nested quote + On November 05 2008 04:58 HonestTea wrote: Man, I really wish I weren't a convicted felon. It'd be nice to vote what did you do :O yarly | ||
only_human89
United States212 Posts
| ||
HeadBangaa
United States6512 Posts
On November 04 2008 23:27 Hawk wrote: Show nested quote + On November 04 2008 22:18 HeadBangaa wrote: I'm being facetious, relax. Actually I completely agree with this guy (from some blog): On November 04 2008 17:15 Not_Computer wrote: Ah, this is such a touchy topic I don't know how to go about it without being offending to someone out there. But here's my opinion: Garriage. It's not "marriage" but it's just as special. In fact, its so special that it's not the same word as marriage! The couple are still entitled to all the nuts and bolts of marriage but adjusted appropriately so that its for the same sex. There's still that special union, still that special pact, still the same expectations of domestic abuse and divorce (though actually Garriage would probably have statistically lower of these). Now you won't have to worry about uncivilized and uneducated co-workers asking you who your "wife" is if you're married to your husband and vice versa. You won't have to hear all the religious cries about how it's crossing over into the holy matrimony of the pencil being put into the pencil sharpener and how putting the pencil tip on the eraser end is a sin. Sure it isn't what most homosexuals are after, but why do we have to change the definition for something that's existed for so many centuries and millenia. (note: not to be confused with "garage".) I thought about it, and my main problem is with the semantic change. I think it's culturally coercive. Give that type of union its own name, and voila, I'm a happy camper. Come on dude, you're really gonna vote yes over semantics?!?! =[ THINK OF THIS MAN ![]() I agree that a nuclear family is ideal, but we gotta deal with reality. Gay parents can make just as capable parents, and, in most situations, adoption agencies would give a kid to a good family, not some fucked up one. Do the right thing dude!!! I WANT TO PLAY ON THE CELTICS, NOT FAIR! Voted: Chuck Baldwin, Constitutional Party Yes on Prop 8. No on Prop 2. | ||
Savio
United States1850 Posts
| ||
Sadist
United States7233 Posts
| ||
NrG.Bamboo
United States2756 Posts
On November 05 2008 03:41 jhNz wrote: i'm german but i'd have voted obama, no doubt 'bout that. 08 barrack(s) ftw I'm really surprized to not have heard any 8rax jokes about barack 08 etc. (yet?) | ||
![]()
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On November 05 2008 10:57 Valentine wrote: Show nested quote + On November 05 2008 03:41 jhNz wrote: i'm german but i'd have voted obama, no doubt 'bout that. 08 barrack(s) ftw I'm really surprized to not have heard any 8rax jokes about barack 08 etc. (yet?) i made tons earlier this year ![]() | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games summit1g15106 tarik_tv5597 shahzam939 Day[9].tv751 JimRising ![]() monkeys_forever179 C9.Mang0153 Maynarde35 Organizations
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH209 StarCraft: Brood War• musti20045 ![]() • davetesta41 • Adnapsc2 ![]() • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP League of Legends Other Games |
LiuLi Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
RSL Revival
RSL Revival
SC Evo League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
[ Show More ] RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
The PondCast
|
|