|
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.
Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. |
Croatia9504 Posts
|
Russian Federation610 Posts
Yeah, I remember that, it's just there was so much salt on "Russian propaganda" takes in this thread, that I didn't want to barge in with my numbers (as you may have guessed, not exactly aligning with a consensus here). But since I did the post on troop figures for both sides, I would also try to estimate the losses later, since the matters are connected, as soon as I have free time.
|
On August 25 2023 07:49 Ardias wrote:Yeah, I remember that, it's just there was so much salt on "Russian propaganda" takes in this thread, that I didn't want to barge in with my numbers (as you may have guessed, not exactly aligning with a consensus here). But since I did the post on troop figures for both sides, I would also try to estimate the losses later, since the matters are connected, as soon as I have free time.
I don't feel like you need to worry. Great post as usual. Thanks...
It seems crazy, did you really mean that 1.2M soldiers are somehow involved in the operations? Or is that total potential personnel that can be activated (just like 2M is very high, but I guess they are fighting for their survival so they can mobilize more)
|
Russian Federation610 Posts
On August 25 2023 08:29 0x64 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2023 07:49 Ardias wrote:Yeah, I remember that, it's just there was so much salt on "Russian propaganda" takes in this thread, that I didn't want to barge in with my numbers (as you may have guessed, not exactly aligning with a consensus here). But since I did the post on troop figures for both sides, I would also try to estimate the losses later, since the matters are connected, as soon as I have free time. I don't feel like you need to worry. Great post as usual. Thanks... It seems crazy, did you really mean that 1.2M soldiers are somehow involved in the operations? Or is that total potential personnel that can be activated (just like 2M is very high, but I guess they are fighting for their survival so they can mobilize more) Russian Army is scheduled to be expanded from 1 million in 2022 to 1,5 million in 2026 https://www.rbc.ru/politics/17/01/2023/63c669949a794736a6c4eada I don't know how losses in war fall into the equasion. But some measures for expansion seem to had been taken already (unconfirmed info though) https://t.me/bmpd_cast/17148 Two army corps are being transformed into armies, plus another new army is being created (for now there is one new division formed within it). On marine and one airborne brigades are also being increased to divisions. So maybe some of the new contract soldiers are filling these units, though that would mean that these forces would most likely be moved into Ukraine at some point as well.
As for how many people are actually fighting atm and how my aforementioned numbers corellate with currently existing combat units as well as estimated losses - that's what I would further adress. Probably would have to make separate post adressing both sides major combat elements, to give context.
But answering your question - in short, yes, it's the number of either participating or able to go in from reserve for both sides. With one correction - this number is also including all KIA, WIA, MIA and POWs from both sides througout the war.
Edit: Also, before going to bed, some recent news: Zaluzhniy claims that AFU are on the brink of breakthrough https://www.ukr.net/news/details/politics/99381448.html Rogozin claims that AFU are amassing up to 83 combat vehicles near Orekhov https://t.me/rogozin_do/4683 There is also a recent video from Russian side, claiming tightly packed AFU vehicles on the move https://t.me/warhistoryalconafter/118300
So there is a possibility of something coming up these few days
|
Northern Ireland25332 Posts
On August 25 2023 06:13 captainwaffles wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2023 03:32 Mikau wrote: It's also uncanny how he integrates what others say to him in his own posts.
For a while he got called out for logical fallacies, so he started accusing everything somebody said to him of being a logical fallacy. Then came the point where everything Ukraine does are "war crimes" and "terrorism", or he started accusing Ukraine of "indiscriminate constant shelling of civilians, shooting of prisoners and the bombing of dams." It seems that the recent word he learned from other posters here is "projection".
I swear, it's almost like talking to Zeo is like talking to an AI, which on one end gets fed Russian propaganda and on the other end learns to phrase that propaganda with words and phrases the rest of TL (bar captainwaffles, who if anything is more batshit insane) uses against him and/or about Russia. Bro, you call people like us batshit insane, but look at the world, look at the amount of the human population that is with Russia against NATO in this conflict. Factor all of that in, and you quickly become the minority here. Remember, from our point of view, Russia is fighting for it's sovereignty against a NATO that has expanded east since the fall of the USSR, despite promises made to Russia that NATO "would not expand one inch eastward." Now, even though I've removed myself from the Western media bubble, I still don't think y'all are batshit insane, I understand it as; those who control the material means of production, control the mental means of production, as Karl Marx wrote over 150 years ago: Show nested quote + More than a century ago Karl Marx observed that those who control the material means of production also control the mental means of production. So in every epoch the ruling ideas are the ideas of the ruling class. Indeed, it seems so today. Viewpoints supported by money have no trouble gaining mass exposure and sympathetic media treatment, while those offensive to moneyed interests languish either for want of the costly sums needed to reach a vast public or because of the prohibitions exercised by media owners and management. In a word, the mass media are a class-dominated media-- bound by the parameters of ownership in a capitalist society.
(Inventing Reality, Michael Parenti) https://archive.org/details/michael-parenti-inventing-reality-the-politics-of-the-mass-media-1986-st.-martins-press_202012Now all that being said, I haven't read every post in here since my last one, so I'm posting this bit of information as "new" but the NYT and The Guardian are casting doubt on the death of Preghozin: Show nested quote +Was Prigozhin Killed in the Plane Crash? It Will Take Time to Confirm, Milley Says.
The Wagner Group has not confirmed its leader’s death, nor has the Russian government. https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/24/world/europe/us-prigozhin-plane-crash.htmlShow nested quote +
Is Yevgeny Prigozhin really dead? Not everyone is convinced Andrew Roth
Alternative theories abound, fuelled by his reappearance after being reported killed in a 2019 plane crash in Africa
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/aug/24/is-yevgeny-prigozhin-really-dead-not-everyone-is-convincedSo, like I said, could have been anything, he could still be alive, according to the mainstream media, and we also may never know, could be a Tupac in Cuba or Hitler in Argentina type thing, where it just becomes a legend/myth. Don’t insult Marx and subsequent Marxist thinkers by trying to shroud your insane takes in ideology derived from there. You post utter fucking bollocks constantly.
Being the relative underdog geopolitically does not immediately confer any kind of similar proletariat/bourgeoise dynamic on a nation state level.
Facts of the matter Russia had much of Europe happy to bend over and work with it, had a US that was happy to stand by and watch that process happen. The Cold War was long gone, the existential threat of Communism thwarted and the more prosperous and more integrated Russia became, the better.
It is literally that simple, broad brushing. Ffs
|
|
Do you have an opinión about It? To me It sounds like your standard "i have to pretend we didn't kill him while it's obvious enough we did".
|
On August 25 2023 19:55 Godwrath wrote:Do you have an opinión about It? To me It sounds like your standard "i have to pretend we didn't kill him while it's obvious enough we did".
Even more so if you read between the lines (Tho I'm not going to hold that up as some kind of smoking gun, meanings often get lost in translation after all. It's just more funny than anything else).
"He was a man with a difficult fate. And he made serious mistakes in his life"
|
On August 25 2023 20:22 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On August 25 2023 19:55 Godwrath wrote:Do you have an opinión about It? To me It sounds like your standard "i have to pretend we didn't kill him while it's obvious enough we did". Even more so if you read between the lines (Tho I'm not going to hold that up as some kind of smoking gun, meanings often get lost in translation after all. It's just more funny than anything else). "He was a man with a difficult fate. And he made serious mistakes in his life"
Yeah, if the accident would have been unwanted, the speech would be very different.
|
Finland931 Posts
Finnish police have arrested Jan Petrovski, leader of Task Force Rusich, and today they're looking to extend the arrest. No confirmation when he was arrested, police are being very quiet about it, and they're requesting that the court records are kept sealed. Ukraine has already requested his extradition.
He's suspected of terrorist actions in Eastern Ukraine in 2014 and 2015. No idea what he was doing in Finland, where there's been an arrest warrant since 2017.
|
Finland931 Posts
|
https://news.yahoo.com/commander-chief-ukrainian-armed-forces-200252698.html
Based on my own cautious optimism, I've armchaired myself to the same conclusion. Ukraine haven't gained a lot of ground in terms of meters, but the ground they've made is important, and engulfs some very strategic positions. There's a spot just south of where they've pushed the furthest in the southern region, where all 3 Russian defensive lines are almost on top of each other (which is rather uncharacteristic). If a breakthrough happens there in the next few months, we could be seeing some major ground being taken before winter.
But I guess time will tell whether Valerii Zaluzhnyi (and me) are just huffing the copium
|
United States42689 Posts
I think the focus on land is misleading, the land will come when they run out of Russians to defend it. In bw if you have more bases and a contain you don’t need to bust the nat, you just need to trade until they can’t trade anymore. Measuring the winner by how much the tank line shifts is misleading.
Russia’s most exhaustible resource patches are its Soviet inheritance of tanks, tubes, airframes, and so forth, none of which can be replaced at anything like the current rate of consumption. We’ve already seen a huge change in the way Russia uses artillery shells compared to a year ago as they ration for a much longer war. It sucks but we must remember that the German army was still on French soil when Germany was defeated in WW1.
|
I'm not an expert in media sources - how trustworthy is this one?
|
Hard to say, to be honest. They are way past their prime of investigative journalism and in recent years they had quite a few scandals were they peddled stories based on entirely fabricated evidence, or reported on things that never happened.
Unfortunately that thing is paywalled, so I cannot say what evidence they present this time. The last time their evidence was: -The boat that might have been at the scene was chartered by a Ukrainian company -The people showed Ukrainian passports, which could have been forged
And that was it. I would love to know whether it's something substantial this time or more of the same.
|
Seeing as the story hasn't been picked up by anybody else, it is clearly not enough on its own to convince editors at other papers (yet). So I'll wait and see.
|
I still fail to see the motivation for Ukraine to do this. The pipe was shut down, the EU decided to decouple from Russian gas, and Ukraine had the means to blow up pipes with Russian gas in Ukraine without raising any suspicion. Why take such a massive risk? If they were behind it and this came to light, it could be a massive blow to their NATO/EU aspirations.
On the other hand, the way the pipes were sabotaged was very convenient for Russia. Massive damage to pipes for closing of which they faced litigation claims and repairable/no damage to the pipes that were sanctioned. Immediately after the attack Russia said they can resume gas transit but the EU/Germany would have to lift the sanctions from NS2. How convenient.
|
Zurich15328 Posts
On June 07 2023 16:47 zatic wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2023 06:32 maybenexttime wrote: I still doubt Ukraine did it. They'd have to be really fucking stupid to potentially jeopardise their support from the West for practically no gain. I mean by now there should be little doubt it was Ukraine in one way or another. What is extra spicy: A so far unnamed European intel agency learned about the plans in June 2022. They notified the CIA and BND (German intel). CIA did not trust the source. BND did, enough to inform members of parliament about them. The agencies then learned that the plans had been cancelled. The bombing in September does not match the plans BND and CIA had from June. Obviously the target was the same, but doesn't match the planning from June in terms of scale and I suppose other factors. So there is still some ambiguity who exactly conducted the specific operation in September (Ukraine special ops, private actors operated by Ukraine intel, etc), but all leads point to Ukraine. It was Ukraine, i that's been clear to everyone who wants to know for months. It's just that it's not in the interest of any of Ukraine's allies to really dig into this case too deeply.
As to that particular source, the Spiegel investigative team is still highly regarded.
|
The hypothesis that some Ukrainian official(s) knew of the operation beforehand has been floating around for a long time.
There are a number of parties that would be very interested in blaming Ukrainian leadership. Direct evidence has never been published and every bit of information that comes out should be taken with a massive grain of salt.
The article from Spiegel doesn't produce any new evidence, so they still don't have anything concrete. It's highly irreponsible of such a reputable news outlet to publish what is currently a non-story and could be completely misleading. They're stirring the pot and I don't know why they'd do that except for selfish sensationalism.
|
On August 26 2023 17:25 zatic wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2023 16:47 zatic wrote:On June 07 2023 06:32 maybenexttime wrote: I still doubt Ukraine did it. They'd have to be really fucking stupid to potentially jeopardise their support from the West for practically no gain. I mean by now there should be little doubt it was Ukraine in one way or another. What is extra spicy: A so far unnamed European intel agency learned about the plans in June 2022. They notified the CIA and BND (German intel). CIA did not trust the source. BND did, enough to inform members of parliament about them. The agencies then learned that the plans had been cancelled. The bombing in September does not match the plans BND and CIA had from June. Obviously the target was the same, but doesn't match the planning from June in terms of scale and I suppose other factors. So there is still some ambiguity who exactly conducted the specific operation in September (Ukraine special ops, private actors operated by Ukraine intel, etc), but all leads point to Ukraine. It was Ukraine, i that's been clear to everyone who wants to know for months. It's just that it's not in the interest of any of Ukraine's allies to really dig into this case too deeply. As to that particular source, the Spiegel investigative team is still highly regarded. It was the Dutch MIVD that informed the CIA and BND. The bombing matched the scenario in June and after the bombing the MIVD received additional information about the bombing from a source in Ukraine. So it looks likely it was Ukraine but they're not sure yet and still investigating. Source is in Dutch so sorry for that:
https://nos.nl/artikel/2478770-vs-waarschuwde-oekraine-nord-stream-niet-te-saboteren-na-alarm-van-mivd
|
|
|
|