• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:45
CET 14:45
KST 22:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation13Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t RotterdaM "Serral is the GOAT, and it's not close" RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview
Tourneys
$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle What happened to TvZ on Retro? BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ SnOw's ASL S20 Finals Review BW General Discussion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Path of Exile Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread About SC2SEA.COM Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2389 users

Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine - Page 503

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 501 502 503
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.
mindjames
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Israel402 Posts
4 hours ago
#10041
On November 17 2025 17:58 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 17:45 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:14 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:09 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:01 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
We are mixing "could be" and "is likely" statements. Let's be clear.

I interpret RvB to be of the opinion that Israel is likely being called Nazi for being Jewish, and likely would not be called that if they were Muslim. He can correct me if I'm wrong, and you can too. I think some examples could be given there to substantiate this, if you wanna go down that road.


You're mixing a "Your logic is faulty" statement with a "Your logic is not faulty" statement. The difference is the "not" in the second sentence.

Please focus and engage with what I'm saying.
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
Why is it "more likely" that Trump and Israel are called Nazi for the same reason?

And if so, what is that reason then?


They're both far right governments engaged in far right projects. "Nazi" is a term that describes people on the far right.

That's a fair assumption. I'm not sure it makes it "more likely", especially when the accusations against Israel are often tied to its treatment of Palestinians. You must see the correlation there. People could not know the makeup of the Israeli government and call it Nazi for said treatment.


"Its treatment of Palestinians" is the main far right thing that Israel is doing. You are not making a powerful distinction. People don't go "Fuck I hate this nazi Trump, but I have to create a distinction, it's only because he has far right politics and not because of how he treats Latino immigrants". Nobody on the left has ever said this.

Let's be clear that we are talking about perceptions here.

I will try to emphasize RvB's position.

Here's a controversial topic: Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

A strong proponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the most moral that can be, given the circumstances and available alternatives.

A strong opponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the least moral, given the same.

If I am antisemitic, I will need no evidence of Israel's conduct - I will simply conclude that it is immoral and make the assumption that it is genociding the Palestinians, and/or have been since the beginning (vice versa with a person who is fanatically Zionist, of course).

RvB thinks - if I understand him correctly - that this type of occurrence is extremely prevalent.

You could say having far-right tendencies is the reason for being called Nazi, let's go with that. The perception of an entity's actions can be affected by the biases of the observer, and that in turn will determine whether it sees them as "far right" in that manner.


Yes, all of that is entirely possible. It's just much less likely than my alternative, because you're trying to explain something that is already in line with what you should expect. The most likely reason why something that makes complete sense happens is probably because it makes complete sense, as opposed to because of some underlying hidden agenda.

Let's compare this with something that doesn't make complete sense. Let's take some huge racist in the United States, some Trump guy. He wants to kick all the black and brown people from the US, including muslims. Denying them citizenship, putting them in camps, killing them, everything is fine with him. But suddenly he speaks out against the treatment of Palestinians by Israel? Well, that is inconsistent. We have a reason to wonder why he thinks that, and one of the likely candidates is antisemitism. Let's take the opposite, let's say that instead he applauds the treatment of Palestinians by Israel. Would you think that this individual is more likely to have this approving view of Israel because he loves Jewish people, or because he hates muslims? There's only one correct answer.

I want to point out again that all you're doing is creating an alternative theory, and none of this shows that my logic is faulty. If you can't show that my logic is faulty in the next post I will conclude that it wasn't.

Show nested quote +

Your assessment does not preclude RvB being correct. He need only show an anti-Jewish bias and a rejection of evidence that favors Israel, in a group or individual.


What you describe here precludes RvB from being correct, because it would then be that anti-Jewish bias that he shows that demonstrates antisemitism, and not the mere act of comparing zionism and nazism. In your own argument in defense of RvB, the claim that RvB defends is wrong.

Claim: "If Israel were acting like Nazi's and wanted to occupy all of the middle east, killed minorities on an industrial scale, etc. then the comparison would not be antisemetic. [...] The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state. If Israel were the Islamic state of Israel and Zionism the movement to create an Islamic state in Israel there'd not be the nazi comparisons."

Counter-argument: "Trump. He isn't Jewish, he doesn't act like a nazi under the set of defining actions that you've given here, and his administration, especially in the context of ICE but not exclusively, is regularly compared to nazis."

Your statement is either sufficient or insufficient to refute RvB's claim depending on how you interpret the sentence "The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state".

Do you think RvB is saying:
1. Calling Israel Nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views
Or
2. The reason the comparison is this prevalent is because of antisemitic views

So, I will amend my statement: You are either employing faulty logic, or interpreting RvB's statement differently than me. Perhaps he can clarify?
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12354 Posts
4 hours ago
#10042
On November 17 2025 18:26 mindjames wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 17:58 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:45 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:14 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:09 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:01 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
We are mixing "could be" and "is likely" statements. Let's be clear.

I interpret RvB to be of the opinion that Israel is likely being called Nazi for being Jewish, and likely would not be called that if they were Muslim. He can correct me if I'm wrong, and you can too. I think some examples could be given there to substantiate this, if you wanna go down that road.


You're mixing a "Your logic is faulty" statement with a "Your logic is not faulty" statement. The difference is the "not" in the second sentence.

Please focus and engage with what I'm saying.
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
Why is it "more likely" that Trump and Israel are called Nazi for the same reason?

And if so, what is that reason then?


They're both far right governments engaged in far right projects. "Nazi" is a term that describes people on the far right.

That's a fair assumption. I'm not sure it makes it "more likely", especially when the accusations against Israel are often tied to its treatment of Palestinians. You must see the correlation there. People could not know the makeup of the Israeli government and call it Nazi for said treatment.


"Its treatment of Palestinians" is the main far right thing that Israel is doing. You are not making a powerful distinction. People don't go "Fuck I hate this nazi Trump, but I have to create a distinction, it's only because he has far right politics and not because of how he treats Latino immigrants". Nobody on the left has ever said this.

Let's be clear that we are talking about perceptions here.

I will try to emphasize RvB's position.

Here's a controversial topic: Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

A strong proponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the most moral that can be, given the circumstances and available alternatives.

A strong opponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the least moral, given the same.

If I am antisemitic, I will need no evidence of Israel's conduct - I will simply conclude that it is immoral and make the assumption that it is genociding the Palestinians, and/or have been since the beginning (vice versa with a person who is fanatically Zionist, of course).

RvB thinks - if I understand him correctly - that this type of occurrence is extremely prevalent.

You could say having far-right tendencies is the reason for being called Nazi, let's go with that. The perception of an entity's actions can be affected by the biases of the observer, and that in turn will determine whether it sees them as "far right" in that manner.


Yes, all of that is entirely possible. It's just much less likely than my alternative, because you're trying to explain something that is already in line with what you should expect. The most likely reason why something that makes complete sense happens is probably because it makes complete sense, as opposed to because of some underlying hidden agenda.

Let's compare this with something that doesn't make complete sense. Let's take some huge racist in the United States, some Trump guy. He wants to kick all the black and brown people from the US, including muslims. Denying them citizenship, putting them in camps, killing them, everything is fine with him. But suddenly he speaks out against the treatment of Palestinians by Israel? Well, that is inconsistent. We have a reason to wonder why he thinks that, and one of the likely candidates is antisemitism. Let's take the opposite, let's say that instead he applauds the treatment of Palestinians by Israel. Would you think that this individual is more likely to have this approving view of Israel because he loves Jewish people, or because he hates muslims? There's only one correct answer.

I want to point out again that all you're doing is creating an alternative theory, and none of this shows that my logic is faulty. If you can't show that my logic is faulty in the next post I will conclude that it wasn't.


Your assessment does not preclude RvB being correct. He need only show an anti-Jewish bias and a rejection of evidence that favors Israel, in a group or individual.


What you describe here precludes RvB from being correct, because it would then be that anti-Jewish bias that he shows that demonstrates antisemitism, and not the mere act of comparing zionism and nazism. In your own argument in defense of RvB, the claim that RvB defends is wrong.

Claim: "If Israel were acting like Nazi's and wanted to occupy all of the middle east, killed minorities on an industrial scale, etc. then the comparison would not be antisemetic. [...] The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state. If Israel were the Islamic state of Israel and Zionism the movement to create an Islamic state in Israel there'd not be the nazi comparisons."

Counter-argument: "Trump. He isn't Jewish, he doesn't act like a nazi under the set of defining actions that you've given here, and his administration, especially in the context of ICE but not exclusively, is regularly compared to nazis."

Your statement is either sufficient or insufficient to refute RvB's claim depending on how you interpret the sentence "The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state".

Do you think RvB is saying:
1. Calling Israel Nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views
Or
2. The reason the comparison is this prevalent is because of antisemitic views

So, I will amend my statement: You are either employing faulty logic, or interpreting RvB's statement differently than me. Perhaps he can clarify?


I think it's 1), I think RvB is saying that calling Israel nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views.
No will to live, no wish to die
mindjames
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Israel402 Posts
4 hours ago
#10043
On November 17 2025 18:28 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 18:26 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:58 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:45 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:14 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:09 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:01 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
We are mixing "could be" and "is likely" statements. Let's be clear.

I interpret RvB to be of the opinion that Israel is likely being called Nazi for being Jewish, and likely would not be called that if they were Muslim. He can correct me if I'm wrong, and you can too. I think some examples could be given there to substantiate this, if you wanna go down that road.


You're mixing a "Your logic is faulty" statement with a "Your logic is not faulty" statement. The difference is the "not" in the second sentence.

Please focus and engage with what I'm saying.
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
Why is it "more likely" that Trump and Israel are called Nazi for the same reason?

And if so, what is that reason then?


They're both far right governments engaged in far right projects. "Nazi" is a term that describes people on the far right.

That's a fair assumption. I'm not sure it makes it "more likely", especially when the accusations against Israel are often tied to its treatment of Palestinians. You must see the correlation there. People could not know the makeup of the Israeli government and call it Nazi for said treatment.


"Its treatment of Palestinians" is the main far right thing that Israel is doing. You are not making a powerful distinction. People don't go "Fuck I hate this nazi Trump, but I have to create a distinction, it's only because he has far right politics and not because of how he treats Latino immigrants". Nobody on the left has ever said this.

Let's be clear that we are talking about perceptions here.

I will try to emphasize RvB's position.

Here's a controversial topic: Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

A strong proponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the most moral that can be, given the circumstances and available alternatives.

A strong opponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the least moral, given the same.

If I am antisemitic, I will need no evidence of Israel's conduct - I will simply conclude that it is immoral and make the assumption that it is genociding the Palestinians, and/or have been since the beginning (vice versa with a person who is fanatically Zionist, of course).

RvB thinks - if I understand him correctly - that this type of occurrence is extremely prevalent.

You could say having far-right tendencies is the reason for being called Nazi, let's go with that. The perception of an entity's actions can be affected by the biases of the observer, and that in turn will determine whether it sees them as "far right" in that manner.


Yes, all of that is entirely possible. It's just much less likely than my alternative, because you're trying to explain something that is already in line with what you should expect. The most likely reason why something that makes complete sense happens is probably because it makes complete sense, as opposed to because of some underlying hidden agenda.

Let's compare this with something that doesn't make complete sense. Let's take some huge racist in the United States, some Trump guy. He wants to kick all the black and brown people from the US, including muslims. Denying them citizenship, putting them in camps, killing them, everything is fine with him. But suddenly he speaks out against the treatment of Palestinians by Israel? Well, that is inconsistent. We have a reason to wonder why he thinks that, and one of the likely candidates is antisemitism. Let's take the opposite, let's say that instead he applauds the treatment of Palestinians by Israel. Would you think that this individual is more likely to have this approving view of Israel because he loves Jewish people, or because he hates muslims? There's only one correct answer.

I want to point out again that all you're doing is creating an alternative theory, and none of this shows that my logic is faulty. If you can't show that my logic is faulty in the next post I will conclude that it wasn't.


Your assessment does not preclude RvB being correct. He need only show an anti-Jewish bias and a rejection of evidence that favors Israel, in a group or individual.


What you describe here precludes RvB from being correct, because it would then be that anti-Jewish bias that he shows that demonstrates antisemitism, and not the mere act of comparing zionism and nazism. In your own argument in defense of RvB, the claim that RvB defends is wrong.

Claim: "If Israel were acting like Nazi's and wanted to occupy all of the middle east, killed minorities on an industrial scale, etc. then the comparison would not be antisemetic. [...] The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state. If Israel were the Islamic state of Israel and Zionism the movement to create an Islamic state in Israel there'd not be the nazi comparisons."

Counter-argument: "Trump. He isn't Jewish, he doesn't act like a nazi under the set of defining actions that you've given here, and his administration, especially in the context of ICE but not exclusively, is regularly compared to nazis."

Your statement is either sufficient or insufficient to refute RvB's claim depending on how you interpret the sentence "The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state".

Do you think RvB is saying:
1. Calling Israel Nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views
Or
2. The reason the comparison is this prevalent is because of antisemitic views

So, I will amend my statement: You are either employing faulty logic, or interpreting RvB's statement differently than me. Perhaps he can clarify?


I think it's 1), I think RvB is saying that calling Israel nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views.

Okay well, let's see if he wants to amend his statement or clarify then.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12354 Posts
4 hours ago
#10044
On November 17 2025 18:29 mindjames wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 18:28 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 18:26 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:58 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:45 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:14 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:09 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:01 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
We are mixing "could be" and "is likely" statements. Let's be clear.

I interpret RvB to be of the opinion that Israel is likely being called Nazi for being Jewish, and likely would not be called that if they were Muslim. He can correct me if I'm wrong, and you can too. I think some examples could be given there to substantiate this, if you wanna go down that road.


You're mixing a "Your logic is faulty" statement with a "Your logic is not faulty" statement. The difference is the "not" in the second sentence.

Please focus and engage with what I'm saying.
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
Why is it "more likely" that Trump and Israel are called Nazi for the same reason?

And if so, what is that reason then?


They're both far right governments engaged in far right projects. "Nazi" is a term that describes people on the far right.

That's a fair assumption. I'm not sure it makes it "more likely", especially when the accusations against Israel are often tied to its treatment of Palestinians. You must see the correlation there. People could not know the makeup of the Israeli government and call it Nazi for said treatment.


"Its treatment of Palestinians" is the main far right thing that Israel is doing. You are not making a powerful distinction. People don't go "Fuck I hate this nazi Trump, but I have to create a distinction, it's only because he has far right politics and not because of how he treats Latino immigrants". Nobody on the left has ever said this.

Let's be clear that we are talking about perceptions here.

I will try to emphasize RvB's position.

Here's a controversial topic: Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

A strong proponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the most moral that can be, given the circumstances and available alternatives.

A strong opponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the least moral, given the same.

If I am antisemitic, I will need no evidence of Israel's conduct - I will simply conclude that it is immoral and make the assumption that it is genociding the Palestinians, and/or have been since the beginning (vice versa with a person who is fanatically Zionist, of course).

RvB thinks - if I understand him correctly - that this type of occurrence is extremely prevalent.

You could say having far-right tendencies is the reason for being called Nazi, let's go with that. The perception of an entity's actions can be affected by the biases of the observer, and that in turn will determine whether it sees them as "far right" in that manner.


Yes, all of that is entirely possible. It's just much less likely than my alternative, because you're trying to explain something that is already in line with what you should expect. The most likely reason why something that makes complete sense happens is probably because it makes complete sense, as opposed to because of some underlying hidden agenda.

Let's compare this with something that doesn't make complete sense. Let's take some huge racist in the United States, some Trump guy. He wants to kick all the black and brown people from the US, including muslims. Denying them citizenship, putting them in camps, killing them, everything is fine with him. But suddenly he speaks out against the treatment of Palestinians by Israel? Well, that is inconsistent. We have a reason to wonder why he thinks that, and one of the likely candidates is antisemitism. Let's take the opposite, let's say that instead he applauds the treatment of Palestinians by Israel. Would you think that this individual is more likely to have this approving view of Israel because he loves Jewish people, or because he hates muslims? There's only one correct answer.

I want to point out again that all you're doing is creating an alternative theory, and none of this shows that my logic is faulty. If you can't show that my logic is faulty in the next post I will conclude that it wasn't.


Your assessment does not preclude RvB being correct. He need only show an anti-Jewish bias and a rejection of evidence that favors Israel, in a group or individual.


What you describe here precludes RvB from being correct, because it would then be that anti-Jewish bias that he shows that demonstrates antisemitism, and not the mere act of comparing zionism and nazism. In your own argument in defense of RvB, the claim that RvB defends is wrong.

Claim: "If Israel were acting like Nazi's and wanted to occupy all of the middle east, killed minorities on an industrial scale, etc. then the comparison would not be antisemetic. [...] The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state. If Israel were the Islamic state of Israel and Zionism the movement to create an Islamic state in Israel there'd not be the nazi comparisons."

Counter-argument: "Trump. He isn't Jewish, he doesn't act like a nazi under the set of defining actions that you've given here, and his administration, especially in the context of ICE but not exclusively, is regularly compared to nazis."

Your statement is either sufficient or insufficient to refute RvB's claim depending on how you interpret the sentence "The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state".

Do you think RvB is saying:
1. Calling Israel Nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views
Or
2. The reason the comparison is this prevalent is because of antisemitic views

So, I will amend my statement: You are either employing faulty logic, or interpreting RvB's statement differently than me. Perhaps he can clarify?


I think it's 1), I think RvB is saying that calling Israel nazi can only ever be done due to antisemitic views.

Okay well, let's see if he wants to amend his statement or clarify then.


I have an advantage over you on this, I have read the thread so I know that this is already clear.

On November 14 2025 12:59 RvB wrote:
Many of the current anti semetic tropes originated in the USSR. [...] equating Israeli policy with nazism


On November 14 2025 18:02 RvB wrote:
Even you should be able to figure out how comparing the only Jewish state, who were the main victims of the Nazi's, to the Nazi's is antisemetic.


On November 17 2025 09:27 RvB wrote:
If Israel were acting like Nazi's and wanted to occupy all of the middle east, killed minorities on an industrial scale, etc. then the comparison would not be antisemetic. They're clearly not Nazi's though. The comparison is made because they're a Jewish state.
No will to live, no wish to die
mindjames
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Israel402 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-11-17 09:50:07
3 hours ago
#10045
All of these can be interpreted as "this is the main culprit" / "this is engaging in antisemitic tropes" (whether knowingly or not). Do you think he would disagree that a person could call Israel a Nazi state if all they knew about it was that the current government was extremely right wing?

He is making a generalization, you are making it absolute. Maybe he means it that way, but I don't think so.
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12354 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-11-17 09:53:11
3 hours ago
#10046
On November 17 2025 18:47 mindjames wrote:
All of these can be interpreted as "this is the main culprit" / "this is engaging in antisemitic tropes" (whether knowingly or not). Do you think he would disagree that a person could call Israel a Nazi state if all they knew about it was that the current government was extremely right wing?


I do not know what he would say. I told him that it was silly to say that making comparisons between zionism and nazism was one of the antisemitic tropes that the left introduced, he had the opportunity to say "Yeah of course you're right it is silly, I meant something else with some other specific conditions", but he didn't, he doubled down. I agree with you that it is a silly claim.
No will to live, no wish to die
mindjames
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Israel402 Posts
3 hours ago
#10047
On November 17 2025 18:52 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 18:47 mindjames wrote:
All of these can be interpreted as "this is the main culprit" / "this is engaging in antisemitic tropes" (whether knowingly or not). Do you think he would disagree that a person could call Israel a Nazi state if all they knew about it was that the current government was extremely right wing?


I do not know what he would say. I told him that it was silly to say that making comparisons between zionism and nazism was one of the antisemitic tropes that the left introduced, he had the opportunity to say "Yeah of course you're right it is silly, I meant something else with some other specific conditions", but he didn't, he doubled down. I agree with you that it is a silly claim.

Well do you agree that the comparison is as common as it is at least partly because it involves Jews?
Nebuchad
Profile Blog Joined December 2012
Switzerland12354 Posts
3 hours ago
#10048
On November 17 2025 18:55 mindjames wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 18:52 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 18:47 mindjames wrote:
All of these can be interpreted as "this is the main culprit" / "this is engaging in antisemitic tropes" (whether knowingly or not). Do you think he would disagree that a person could call Israel a Nazi state if all they knew about it was that the current government was extremely right wing?


I do not know what he would say. I told him that it was silly to say that making comparisons between zionism and nazism was one of the antisemitic tropes that the left introduced, he had the opportunity to say "Yeah of course you're right it is silly, I meant something else with some other specific conditions", but he didn't, he doubled down. I agree with you that it is a silly claim.

Well do you agree that the comparison is as common as it is at least partly because it involves Jews?


No
No will to live, no wish to die
mindjames
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Israel402 Posts
3 hours ago
#10049
On November 17 2025 18:56 Nebuchad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 18:55 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 18:52 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 18:47 mindjames wrote:
All of these can be interpreted as "this is the main culprit" / "this is engaging in antisemitic tropes" (whether knowingly or not). Do you think he would disagree that a person could call Israel a Nazi state if all they knew about it was that the current government was extremely right wing?


I do not know what he would say. I told him that it was silly to say that making comparisons between zionism and nazism was one of the antisemitic tropes that the left introduced, he had the opportunity to say "Yeah of course you're right it is silly, I meant something else with some other specific conditions", but he didn't, he doubled down. I agree with you that it is a silly claim.

Well do you agree that the comparison is as common as it is at least partly because it involves Jews?


No

Wow, not even partly, huh?

Guess that works pretty well with your defense of stilt's incoherent ramblings.

Live your best life, king.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26047 Posts
54 minutes ago
#10050
On November 17 2025 17:45 mindjames wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 17:14 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:09 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:01 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
We are mixing "could be" and "is likely" statements. Let's be clear.

I interpret RvB to be of the opinion that Israel is likely being called Nazi for being Jewish, and likely would not be called that if they were Muslim. He can correct me if I'm wrong, and you can too. I think some examples could be given there to substantiate this, if you wanna go down that road.


You're mixing a "Your logic is faulty" statement with a "Your logic is not faulty" statement. The difference is the "not" in the second sentence.

Please focus and engage with what I'm saying.
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
Why is it "more likely" that Trump and Israel are called Nazi for the same reason?

And if so, what is that reason then?


They're both far right governments engaged in far right projects. "Nazi" is a term that describes people on the far right.

That's a fair assumption. I'm not sure it makes it "more likely", especially when the accusations against Israel are often tied to its treatment of Palestinians. You must see the correlation there. People could not know the makeup of the Israeli government and call it Nazi for said treatment.


"Its treatment of Palestinians" is the main far right thing that Israel is doing. You are not making a powerful distinction. People don't go "Fuck I hate this nazi Trump, but I have to create a distinction, it's only because he has far right politics and not because of how he treats Latino immigrants". Nobody on the left has ever said this.

Let's be clear that we are talking about perceptions here.

I will try to emphasize RvB's position.

Here's a controversial topic: Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

A strong proponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the most moral that can be, given the circumstances and available alternatives.

A strong opponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the least moral, given the same.

If I am antisemitic, I will need no evidence of Israel's conduct - I will simply conclude that it is immoral and make the assumption that it is genociding the Palestinians, and/or have been since the beginning (vice versa with a person who is fanatically Zionist, of course).

RvB thinks - if I understand him correctly - that this type of occurrence is extremely prevalent.

You could say having far-right tendencies is the reason for being called Nazi, let's go with that. The perception of an entity's actions can be affected by the biases of the observer, and that in turn will determine whether it sees them as "far right" in that manner.

Your assessment does not preclude RvB being correct. He need only show an anti-Jewish bias and a rejection of evidence that favors Israel, in a group or individual.

I will point out that people have called Israel a Nazi state through Rabin's prime ministership, through the 2005 withdrawal, etc.

You can argue it was less people (and I would agree there), but people on the far left, as well as much of the Muslim world, has been calling Israel Nazi forever. It is absolutely fair to assume that at least part of that has to do with antisemitism, even if not all.

(Fucking hell, how did I get dragged to the antisemitism discussion again? I don't even like making these arguments, it's an incredibly hard thing to assess and measure and I'm not really interested in it. I hope I clarified RvB's position at least.)

I think one needs to show a bias that is specifically anti-Jewish in motivation, which is somewhat trickier. Regular old blind spots and biases exist too after all.

I’d probably feel quite differently re the invocation of Nazism in this context if it wasn’t incredibly, incredibly common already and massively overused already.

This comes right around to what I was saying re tropes versus observations, it really does depend who’s using them and why they are used.

If the claim is that anti-Semites will draw the Nazi comparison to try to delegitimise Israel, then that is probably true, sure. But the former will influence almost anything they say on the topic.

One can’t peer into the souls of people, it’s quite the tricky task, but one can infer certain motivations to at least some degree of accuracy.

I mean person x can observe that the Jewish lobby is quite influential in the US. But I mean, it kind of is. Person y can say the same, but couch it in a worldview that Jews plot to shift the world in their favour.

Or, in a roundabout way, a lot of these tropes require the cooker to be turned on and the soup cooked by an anti-Semite to turn out as an anti-Semitic meal.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26047 Posts
46 minutes ago
#10051
On November 17 2025 16:35 Acrofales wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 15:37 KwarK wrote:
I have no interest in your question, I just read your extremely bad example and saw a learning opportunity for you.

I entered to provide you correction and upon reading my feedback you chose to actively participate in the learning process. Nobody made you. You have provided me with new examples based on the feedback I provided and after reviewing them I find your new examples are acceptable. I’ve said as much.

We’re done now, please continue with whatever you were doing before.

I can't help but read this in the voice of GLaDOS. I do hope there's cake, though. This thread needs cake.

I read every Kwark post in Harlan Ellison’s voice for AM from I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
mindjames
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Israel402 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-11-17 13:11:05
37 minutes ago
#10052
On November 17 2025 21:51 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 17:45 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:14 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:09 mindjames wrote:
On November 17 2025 17:01 Nebuchad wrote:
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
We are mixing "could be" and "is likely" statements. Let's be clear.

I interpret RvB to be of the opinion that Israel is likely being called Nazi for being Jewish, and likely would not be called that if they were Muslim. He can correct me if I'm wrong, and you can too. I think some examples could be given there to substantiate this, if you wanna go down that road.


You're mixing a "Your logic is faulty" statement with a "Your logic is not faulty" statement. The difference is the "not" in the second sentence.

Please focus and engage with what I'm saying.
On November 17 2025 16:58 mindjames wrote:
Why is it "more likely" that Trump and Israel are called Nazi for the same reason?

And if so, what is that reason then?


They're both far right governments engaged in far right projects. "Nazi" is a term that describes people on the far right.

That's a fair assumption. I'm not sure it makes it "more likely", especially when the accusations against Israel are often tied to its treatment of Palestinians. You must see the correlation there. People could not know the makeup of the Israeli government and call it Nazi for said treatment.


"Its treatment of Palestinians" is the main far right thing that Israel is doing. You are not making a powerful distinction. People don't go "Fuck I hate this nazi Trump, but I have to create a distinction, it's only because he has far right politics and not because of how he treats Latino immigrants". Nobody on the left has ever said this.

Let's be clear that we are talking about perceptions here.

I will try to emphasize RvB's position.

Here's a controversial topic: Israel's treatment of Palestinians.

A strong proponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the most moral that can be, given the circumstances and available alternatives.

A strong opponent of Israel will say that its treatment of Palestinians is the least moral, given the same.

If I am antisemitic, I will need no evidence of Israel's conduct - I will simply conclude that it is immoral and make the assumption that it is genociding the Palestinians, and/or have been since the beginning (vice versa with a person who is fanatically Zionist, of course).

RvB thinks - if I understand him correctly - that this type of occurrence is extremely prevalent.

You could say having far-right tendencies is the reason for being called Nazi, let's go with that. The perception of an entity's actions can be affected by the biases of the observer, and that in turn will determine whether it sees them as "far right" in that manner.

Your assessment does not preclude RvB being correct. He need only show an anti-Jewish bias and a rejection of evidence that favors Israel, in a group or individual.

I will point out that people have called Israel a Nazi state through Rabin's prime ministership, through the 2005 withdrawal, etc.

You can argue it was less people (and I would agree there), but people on the far left, as well as much of the Muslim world, has been calling Israel Nazi forever. It is absolutely fair to assume that at least part of that has to do with antisemitism, even if not all.

(Fucking hell, how did I get dragged to the antisemitism discussion again? I don't even like making these arguments, it's an incredibly hard thing to assess and measure and I'm not really interested in it. I hope I clarified RvB's position at least.)

I think one needs to show a bias that is specifically anti-Jewish in motivation, which is somewhat trickier. Regular old blind spots and biases exist too after all.

I’d probably feel quite differently re the invocation of Nazism in this context if it wasn’t incredibly, incredibly common already and massively overused already.

This comes right around to what I was saying re tropes versus observations, it really does depend who’s using them and why they are used.

If the claim is that anti-Semites will draw the Nazi comparison to try to delegitimise Israel, then that is probably true, sure. But the former will influence almost anything they say on the topic.

One can’t peer into the souls of people, it’s quite the tricky task, but one can infer certain motivations to at least some degree of accuracy.

I mean person x can observe that the Jewish lobby is quite influential in the US. But I mean, it kind of is. Person y can say the same, but couch it in a worldview that Jews plot to shift the world in their favour.

Or, in a roundabout way, a lot of these tropes require the cooker to be turned on and the soup cooked by an anti-Semite to turn out as an anti-Semitic meal.

Great, then you agree with me and disagree with Nebuchad, who thinks absolutely no part of the Nazi comparisons originates in antisemitism.

Well... actually, we do disagree on one thing.
On November 17 2025 21:59 WombaT wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 17 2025 16:35 Acrofales wrote:
On November 17 2025 15:37 KwarK wrote:
I have no interest in your question, I just read your extremely bad example and saw a learning opportunity for you.

I entered to provide you correction and upon reading my feedback you chose to actively participate in the learning process. Nobody made you. You have provided me with new examples based on the feedback I provided and after reviewing them I find your new examples are acceptable. I’ve said as much.

We’re done now, please continue with whatever you were doing before.

I can't help but read this in the voice of GLaDOS. I do hope there's cake, though. This thread needs cake.

I read every Kwark post in Harlan Ellison’s voice for AM from I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream

That story is awful and it offends me more than antisemitism that you like it. At least Arcofales is a man of culture.
Prev 1 501 502 503
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
12:00
#61
WardiTV895
TKL 208
Harstem173
Rex116
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Reynor 338
TKL 208
Harstem 173
Lowko138
ProTech119
Rex 116
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43528
Calm 8680
Horang2 1432
EffOrt 937
Jaedong 898
Soma 654
Stork 494
firebathero 444
Larva 378
Rush 275
[ Show more ]
Pusan 161
Zeus 145
ZerO 107
Killer 93
Mind 88
ToSsGirL 78
Sea.KH 66
yabsab 31
scan(afreeca) 30
Hm[arnc] 14
NaDa 10
ivOry 10
sas.Sziky 5
Dota 2
Gorgc2534
qojqva1526
Dendi995
XcaliburYe176
Counter-Strike
olofmeister2007
x6flipin689
pashabiceps435
allub183
markeloff65
Other Games
B2W.Neo731
Pyrionflax436
hiko422
crisheroes329
Fuzer 310
Sick188
oskar111
Hui .102
Liquid`LucifroN75
QueenE41
ZerO(Twitch)18
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream12782
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2215
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 69
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 1
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1786
• WagamamaTV117
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
3h 15m
Replay Cast
9h 15m
ChoboTeamLeague
11h 15m
WardiTV Korean Royale
22h 15m
BSL: GosuLeague
1d 7h
The PondCast
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Reynor
Maru vs SHIN
MaxPax vs TriGGeR
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
4 days
IPSL
5 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
RSL Revival
5 days
Wardi Open
6 days
IPSL
6 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-14
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.