Or maybe we could, I don't know, not support invasions and ethnic cleansings no matter who is committing them, and then nobody would have to flee -- not to mention that fleeing a place that is under a military blockade and has literally zero connections to the outside world is not actually possible.
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine - Page 159
Forum Index > General Forum |
NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. | ||
Salazarz
Korea (South)2561 Posts
Or maybe we could, I don't know, not support invasions and ethnic cleansings no matter who is committing them, and then nobody would have to flee -- not to mention that fleeing a place that is under a military blockade and has literally zero connections to the outside world is not actually possible. | ||
Acrofales
Spain17714 Posts
On December 22 2023 16:28 KwarK wrote: It’s not hard. Palestinian is to Palestine as French is to France. You don’t need to introduce thousand year old books, they think it’s their country because it’s their country. The Spaniards live in Spain. The Swedes live in Sweden. The Palestinians live in Palestine. I don’t need to assert that I intimately understand the mind of every Palestinian to make this argument. The Palestinians think that they should live in Palestine because it’s Palestine and they’re the Palestinians. It’s not because of some ancient book. By that same purely linguistic reasoning, Israeli think they should live in Israël, even though most of their grandparents aren't from Israel. And if I tomorrow proclaim I live in Acrofalia, and the Spaniards should get out, that doesn't suddenly make it okay, even if my neighbors agree that this has *always* been Acrofalia and we are Acrofalian. In fact, we're still dealing with the fallout from the last time my neighbors tried that. The problem is really that two people claim the same land is theirs. Whether it's by right of ancestry or because might makes right. | ||
Cerebrate1
265 Posts
On December 22 2023 18:26 Magic Powers wrote: "Callous" would be the right word for people who are pleading for Palestinians to flee while at the same time supporting Israel. Do you perhaps see the problem a bit better now? It seems to me that (at least on this forum) anyone who has supported evacuating Palestinian civilians from a war zone has also supported evacuating Israelis from war zones (like all the communities along the Gaza border or near the Lebanon border whose inhabitants have been displaced within Israel or to other countries.) I disagree with JimmyJRaynor that individual migration will solve this conflict, but it seems clear that such an opinion is based on prioritization of the value of life over any one side winning the conflict. | ||
ChristianS
United States3177 Posts
| ||
Magic Powers
Austria3413 Posts
On December 23 2023 01:48 ChristianS wrote: I’d think “maybe they can resettle in Canada” is a pretty obvious self-deception to avoid confronting the sheer quantity of deaths some of Israel’s preferred outcomes would necessarily entail, but that’s just me. Maybe it’s a genuine humanitarian impulse and not just an obfuscation device. For people who are ideologically possessed there is generally speaking no reality that can bring them back down to Earth and understand the flaws of their perspective. Just to name one of the many ideological preconceptions, someone who firmly believes that everything can be solved on an individual level - as Jimmy generally appears to believe - will fail to acknowledge the reality that many innocent people are dying regardless. Reality clashes with the idea and contradicts it, and yet the idea holds supreme in the mind. There's very little that can convince people of such a mindset that their idea has major flaws due to it failing to work in reality. Something must obviously be wrong with the people who are dying, because the idea can't possibly be wrong. | ||
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4308 Posts
On December 22 2023 15:33 JimmyJRaynor wrote: Immigration minister Marc Miller changing immigration rules announcing people living in Gaza will be able to apply for temporary residency in Canada. Good move. Bad move because it's helping Israels ethnic cleansing program.They want them out of Gaza and Western governments are helping them facilitate that. We pay for weapons and bombs Israel uses to accomplish the cleansing and then we pay for the resettlement and ongoing support of those made homeless by those actions as well? It's just so wrong. | ||
Acrofales
Spain17714 Posts
| ||
Acrofales
Spain17714 Posts
On December 23 2023 01:43 Cerebrate1 wrote: It seems to me that (at least on this forum) anyone who has supported evacuating Palestinian civilians from a war zone has also supported evacuating Israelis from war zones (like all the communities along the Gaza border or near the Lebanon border whose inhabitants have been displaced within Israel or to other countries.) I disagree with JimmyJRaynor that individual migration will solve this conflict, but it seems clear that such an opinion is based on prioritization of the value of life over any one side winning the conflict. While Israeli towns and kibbutzes were obviously targeted by Hamas on October 7, they don't need to fear for their homes and livelihood anymore. They may want to evacuate from that near a warzone, but they can be fairly confident that when they come back in a few weeks/months, they can restart in the same house on the same land. Palestinians don't have that certainty. In fact, if history is a guide, if they leave their home then that's it. Next time they see it, there'll be an Israeli living there, probably claiming the land was unused when they moved there, and so they didn't steal it. | ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland23136 Posts
On December 23 2023 17:04 Acrofales wrote: I think the world might be ending: I agree with Nettles. I do as well so it definitely is | ||
Ciaus237
South Africa253 Posts
Haven't seen it reported anywhere else, so salt appropriately. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Also makes no sense as to why Hezbollah cross the border a few days after Hamas attack. Seems to show that they, along with Iran, did not know of such plans to attack. Though after Gaza operations who the hell knows what Netanyahu will do. WASHINGTON—President Biden urged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to halt a pre-emptive strike against Hezbollah forces in Lebanon days after Hamas militants’ Oct. 7 assault on southern Israel, warning that such an attack could spark a wider regional war. Israel had intelligence—which the U.S. deemed unreliable—that Hezbollah attackers were preparing to cross the border as part of a multipronged attack, pushing some of Israel’s more hawkish officials to the brink, officials said. Israeli warplanes were in the air awaiting orders when Biden spoke to Netanyahu on Oct. 11 and told the Israeli prime minister to stand down and think through the consequences of such an action, according to people familiar with the call. The Israeli attack didn’t go ahead. And the conversation between Biden and other U.S. officials and Netanyahu and his war cabinet—the details of which haven’t been previously reported—set a pattern of White House efforts to guard against any expansion of the conflict that could draw in the U.S. A major focus of the Biden administration since Oct. 7 has been trying to prevent any escalation along Israel’s northern border with Lebanon, where Israeli forces trade fire almost daily with fighters from Iran-backed Shiite militant group Hezbollah and Palestinian militants. After the Hamas assault, the U.S. sent two aircraft carrier strike groups to the eastern Mediterranean, followed by a nuclear submarine, to bolster deterrence. More recently, it created a special naval task force in the Red Sea to deal with attacks from Iran-backed Houthi militants in Yemen. But diplomacy has been at the heart of Washington’s efforts. Amos Hochstein, the White House official leading the efforts to de-escalate tensions at the Israeli-Lebanese border, has ferried between Washington, Beirut and Jerusalem in an attempt to secure a diplomatic end to the fighting. France has also been heavily involved, pushing Lebanon to abide by U.N. Security Council resolution 1701, which calls for Hezbollah forces to pull out of southern Lebanon and stay at least 18 miles away from the Israel border. The U.S. role in stopping Israel from carrying out a massive attack on Hezbollah in October shows the critical role diplomacy has played in preventing the conflict from metastasizing into a larger regional war. The U.S. received its first indication of Israel’s proposed plans to pre-emptively strike the morning of Oct. 11 around 6:30 a.m. in Washington, when Israeli officials urgently notified the White House that they believed Hezbollah was planning an attack. Israel knew it couldn’t do it alone, U.S. officials said, and they asked for American support. Biden’s top intelligence, military and national security advisers—including CIA Director William Burns and Director of National Intelligence Avril Haines, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs CQ Brown—convened later that morning for a principal’s committee meeting to discuss Israel’s proposed plans and determined that U.S. intelligence didn’t correspond with Israel’s. After Biden was briefed, he got on a call with Netanyahu and his war cabinet urging Israel to stand down. Netanyahu wasn’t convinced, but members of his war cabinet, particularly Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, explained that a broader war was inevitable, and they wanted to get ahead of an attack. The U.S. pushed back, insisting that a bigger war could be averted. After 45 minutes of discussion, Netanyahu ended the call saying he would discuss the matter with his cabinet, U.S. officials said. Around the same time, northern Israel went on alert. Israeli soldiers on the northern border received urgent orders from their commanders that they should prepare to fight Hezbollah fighters paragliding and driving into the country from southern Lebanon. Israel sent out an alert for everyone in northern Israel to immediately head into bomb shelters. The warnings, which later proved to be false alarms, were among a series of incidents that fueled their fears of another attack, U.S. and Israeli officials said. It took about six hours of back-and-forth calls and meetings before Israeli officials agreed to stand down, as the U.S. insisted the intelligence didn’t suggest an imminent Hezbollah attack. After getting pushback from Biden, Netanyahu and the war cabinet decided not to go forward with the major strike, U.S. and former Israeli officials said. Officials in the Israeli prime minister’s office and at the Defense Ministry declined to comment. Pentagon press secretary Patrick Ryder said the Pentagon remains concerned about tensions along the Israeli-Lebanese border but declined to comment on any specific conversations or intelligence matters. The CIA declined to comment. The State Department didn’t respond to a request for comment. The risks of miscalculation on both sides of the border persist. Militants in Lebanon have hit Israel more than 200 times in attacks that have killed 10 people, including seven Israeli soldiers, according to data compiled by the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project. Israel has responded with nearly 1,000 strikes inside southern Lebanon that have killed more than 120 Hezbollah fighters and 10 Lebanese civilians. On Friday, Hezbollah strikes killed one Israeli soldier and seriously wounded another, prompting counterstrikes by Israel into southern Lebanon. Israel on Saturday said it struck Hezbollah that morning and overnight, striking targets linked to the group’s infrastructure. “The situation now, as everybody knows, it is tense,” Maj. Gen. Aroldo Lazaro Saenz, the Spanish officer who leads the U.N. peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, told reporters earlier this week in Beirut. Israeli leaders have repeatedly vowed to deliver even more far-reaching blows to Lebanon if Hezbollah doesn’t agree to move back from the border. “The Americans would say: ‘Let’s explore these options diplomatically’ and Israel is probably much more saying: ‘OK, diplomacy is good, but without the use of force, you are not going to get where you want to go,’” said one Israeli official. “We say: ‘Deterrence in the north and victory in the south,” the official said. “But it’s very dangerous and you could see an escalation, precisely because Hezbollah continues to act the way it does.’” There are signs of progress in the diplomatic efforts, however. Lebanon Foreign Minister Abdallah Bou Habib has told French interlocutors that his country is ready to work on a deal, according to Lebanese officials. And after more than two months of strikes that have delivered a significant blow to Hezbollah forces in Lebanon, Israeli officials also expressed optimism that the militant group would agree to withdraw its forces from the Israel-Lebanon border. “The feeling is that this is doable now,” one of those officials said. Source | ||
flashymarine
48 Posts
On December 23 2023 16:01 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Bad move because it's helping Israels ethnic cleansing program.They want them out of Gaza and Western governments are helping them facilitate that. We pay for weapons and bombs Israel uses to accomplish the cleansing and then we pay for the resettlement and ongoing support of those made homeless by those actions as well? It's just so wrong. Least successful ethnic cleansing ever? Maybe they should look to the Arab world for how it is done. Jews are the victims of ethnic cleansing, not the perpetrators. | ||
KwarK
United States41615 Posts
| ||
flashymarine
48 Posts
| ||
KwarK
United States41615 Posts
| ||
WombaT
Northern Ireland23136 Posts
On December 24 2023 12:36 flashymarine wrote: Can't argue the point so you resort to personal attacks. Classy. I mean one can argue the point, it’s just preposterous so why bother? I’m not a history expert by any means but did anything happen between 1948 and now, perhaps the establishment and solidification of a hypothetical state where Jews could emigrate to, in the vague vicinity that might account for some of the direction of travel? Or I mean if you’re posting some infographic at least give the source. Come on, Saudi Arabia, who loves all that Western money and is happy to shelve principles for it. ‘0 Jews since the Middle Ages’. Jordan? None? The UAE, none? Ridiculous. Kwark was absolutely correct to give you short shrift, if anything this wasn’t even worth engaging with whatsoever. | ||
Cerebrate1
265 Posts
Now, people might be concerned about the possibility that it will happen in the future. Like the concern that Israel might have only given 24 hours for people to evacuate North Gaza. Or the concern that they might not provide free water to Gaza. Or the concern that they might not permit aid to enter the strip. Or the concerns that they might commit genocide or ethnic cleansing on Gaza in the wars in 2008, 2012, 2014, or 2021. (None of those concerns ended up being validated btw). But if someone is concerned about what Israel might do in the future, they should at least clarify that with their language rather than making it sound like this is already something they are guilty of having done in the past. | ||
Gahlo
United States35070 Posts
On December 24 2023 13:41 Cerebrate1 wrote: Eh. We also explained at length how the term "ethnic cleansing" as defined in every other conflict it's used in does not match what Israel has been up to for the past 70 years (not that everything is sunshine and rainbows, but that doesn't give it's opponents permission to redefine terms to rile people up). If people continue to use inaccurate terminology after it has been dismissed, it shouldn't be problematic to call them out on it. Now, people might be concerned about the possibility that it will happen in the future. Like the concern that Israel might have only given 24 hours for people to evacuate North Gaza. Or the concern that they might not provide free water to Gaza. Or the concern that they might not permit aid to enter the strip. Or the concerns that they might commit genocide or ethnic cleansing on Gaza in the wars in 2008, 2012, 2014, or 2021. (None of those concerns ended up being validated btw). But if someone is concerned about what Israel might do in the future, they should at least clarify that with their language rather than making it sound like this is already something they are guilty of having done in the past. Oh boy, is this where I get to go "uhm, acktually, Palestinians are a semetic people, so Israel are the actual antisemitics" ? | ||
Cerebrate1
265 Posts
On December 24 2023 13:58 Gahlo wrote: Oh boy, is this where I get to go "uhm, acktually, Palestinians are a semetic people, so Israel are the actual antisemitics" ? Only if you are unaware of the definition of that term as well. Britannica: Anti-Semitism, hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious or racial group. Cambridge Dictionary: hate directed at Jewish people, or cruel or unfair treatment of people because they are Jewish Merriam Webster: hostility toward or discrimination against Jews as a religious, ethnic, or racial group Or perhaps you were intentionally supporting my point by providing another example of anti-Israel advocates redefining terms in an attempt to further their political goals. | ||
Cerebrate1
265 Posts
I don't think anyone here independently came up with any of these misleading terms. I think they originated in think tanks in Iran, Russia, or Egypt (depending on the era of origin of that particular blood libel). But I do think that parroting these terms that you hear from other sources is problematic if we want to have an intelligent discussion instead of just working ourselves into some kind of misguided frenzy. If you have actual facts on the ground and sources for them, great. You can educate us as many users here have. But banding about slogans that are designed to fit on a poster doesn't exactly elevate our discussion. | ||
| ||