|
Any and all updates regarding the COVID-19 will need a source provided. Please do your part in helping us to keep this thread maintainable and under control.
It is YOUR responsibility to fully read through the sources that you link, and you MUST provide a brief summary explaining what the source is about. Do not expect other people to do the work for you.
Conspiracy theories and fear mongering will absolutely not be tolerated in this thread. Expect harsh mod actions if you try to incite fear needlessly.
This is not a politics thread! You are allowed to post information regarding politics if it's related to the coronavirus, but do NOT discuss politics in here.
Added a disclaimer on page 662. Many need to post better. |
On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:18 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 14:19 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 13:35 BlackJack wrote: [quote]
Wrong again. Why would I dispute the claim that boosters make transmission less likely? I’m the one here that’s been posting studies that show boosters offer some protection for at least 3 months and then maybe a tiny bit after that. If boosters didn’t make transmission less likely the Vaccine efficacy would have been 0% across the board, don’t you agree? I have absolutely no idea what your question says, maybe you want to rephrase that. The question is why would you think I would dispute that boosters makes transmission less likely. I gave 4 links that showed boosters offered protection against Omicron infection for at least a few months and than a tiny bit after that. Protection against infection is protection against transmission. It's not complicated. If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours As I have said repeatedly in this thread, I think the vaccinated are well enough protected with their vaccine that they should not need to compel everyone around them to get the vaccine as well. is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people. Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?" You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated. I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now? Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree. No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's. Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life. Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion.
You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital?
On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:Show nested quote +On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized. I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else. I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade. Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccinesNow I don't know who to believe + Show Spoiler + People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.
From the CDC:
Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred: After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults, More often after the second dose Usually within several days after vaccination Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.
Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either. + Show Spoiler +
Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths.
|
"after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.
|
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.
hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.
Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.
That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.
|
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. Do you want to commit to myocarditis from the vaccine is the con that that compels you to say that there are cons or risks to getting the vaccine that justify an antivax stance?
|
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.
I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).
|
|
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).
It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.
|
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation). It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.
I don't think anyone is saying myocarditis doesn't happen from the vax. I think the basic logic is this:
1) Either you get covid myocarditis, or you get covid vax myocarditis
2) vax makes someone less likely to get it
Conclusion: If myocarditis is the concern, you should get vaxed
If you assume someone can never get covid and also not get vaxed, the logic falls apart though
Edit: The way I understand the situation: The immune response to the spike protein will cause myocarditis in some % of people. Just like how a fever can harm someone, the human body's response to a spike protein can harm the body.
|
On August 23 2022 06:55 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:18 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 14:19 Magic Powers wrote: [quote]
I have absolutely no idea what your question says, maybe you want to rephrase that. The question is why would you think I would dispute that boosters makes transmission less likely. I gave 4 links that showed boosters offered protection against Omicron infection for at least a few months and than a tiny bit after that. Protection against infection is protection against transmission. It's not complicated. If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours As I have said repeatedly in this thread, I think the vaccinated are well enough protected with their vaccine that they should not need to compel everyone around them to get the vaccine as well. is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people. Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?" You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated. I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now? Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree. No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's. Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life. Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion. You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital? Show nested quote +On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized. I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else. I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade. Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccinesNow I don't know who to believe + Show Spoiler + People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.
From the CDC:
Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred: After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults, More often after the second dose Usually within several days after vaccination Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.
Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either. + Show Spoiler + Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths.
If something is common in unvaxxed people when they contract Covid, and getting the vaccine makes that thing go from 'common' to 'almost doesn't happen' the conclusion isn't "vaccines cause myocarditis", it's "vaccines prevent myocarditis".
|
On August 20 2022 19:52 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 20 2022 18:59 evilfatsh1t wrote:On August 20 2022 17:59 Artisreal wrote: Mind pointing out what exactly is political and not facts getting in the way of some posters feelings ? the vaccine isnt a 100% preventative measure against covid. this much is clear and no one in this thread disputes this. + Show Spoiler +then naturally the discussion that comes after it is how much risk do people consider to be acceptable, and whether such risk should be managed at a personal or societal level, or both. this discussion doesnt have a clear answer and is likely to be influenced by your inherent political biases. for example people on the left will likely argue towards there being a higher social responsibility, mandates being a clear example of that. people on the right are more likely to argue towards higher personal responsibility, hence the arguments that people should make efforts to mitigate their own risk and let others choose to manage their risk individually.
you can throw tantrums all you like about how one viewpoint is clearly correct and the other is wrong, but its a fruitless argument. the reality of most of the heated discussions here is at its simplest form, a left vs right discussion, and you will never come to a consensus. like rkc previously pointed out, its not just a matter of fact finding and science. people have different values and were brought up in different cultures. people will have different ideas of what they consider to be an acceptable level of risk and therefore the question of how society deals with this risk will throw up many different answers.
with a topic like covid, politicised discussions in unavoidable. in fact the discussion about what should be done is highly relevant and important, however this thread has fallen into the trap that the pol threads always fall into. the higher number of left leaning users in the site slowly but surely starting to pummel the user on the opposite end, regardless of whether that perspective is valid or correct. people are allowed to be wrong, even on the left. but on tl i dont think we would ever know if people on the left were in the wrong. and for what its worth, i certainly dont identify as a right wing user and although i dont engage in much discussion, i didnt typically agree with many of the hard right users on various topics (eg gun control) in the past. i still think its a pity that they couldnt deal with the majority and either left of their own accord or got banned for their views on a site that is actually supposed to be a gaming community, not a left wing echo chamber. I don't know if that's necessarily true Sermokala on this very page posted "Even the thing he keeps asserting what the point of vaccination is, being the end of people getting covid, is still a good thing and would be true if people actually got vaccinated." A few pages back NewSunShine posted "And if everyone got the vaccine a year ago, transmissibility of the virus would have plummeted, and if not die off completely, it wouldn't have had the chance to mutate into Omicron and BA5 like it has. It would be over by now. Nobody would be dying anymore." Some people here genuinely think if it weren't for the antivaxxers we'd basically have eradicated COVID by now. To that end, their hatred or disdain for the antivaxxers could be considered quite normal. It's just a shame that these beliefs are fairly irrational and even more a shame that I'm the only one in this thread challenging them. Regarding the idea that if everyone got vaccinated the strain would die off and would be unable to mutate, I already argued against that last year as vaccination rates in much of Africa and other places like Afghanistan, some Eastern European countries etc are very low.
So it would have mutated in poorer countries with low vaccine rates anyway.Which is basically what happened with Omicron which was first detected in Botswana and South Africa in late 2021.
While many in rich developed nations are queueing up for their fifth, soon to be sixth jab many in very poor countries have not had the chance to even get their first.
|
Mohdoo and Mikau that is correct. As far as I know this is common undisputed knowledge among physicians.
|
|
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation). It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat. The truth is that its a result of covid. The truth is that there are many less cases of it with the vaccine than without it. The truth is that its already known and isn't an issue for rational free thinking individuals.
But the real truth that you refuse to answer is why you think its the answer to why people shouldn't get vaccinated.
|
On August 23 2022 14:34 Mohdoo wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation). It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat. I don't think anyone is saying myocarditis doesn't happen from the vax. + Show Spoiler +I think the basic logic is this:
1) Either you get covid myocarditis, or you get covid vax myocarditis
2) vax makes someone less likely to get it
Conclusion: If myocarditis is the concern, you should get vaxed
If you assume someone can never get covid and also not get vaxed, the logic falls apart though
Edit: The way I understand the situation: The immune response to the spike protein will cause myocarditis in some % of people. Just like how a fever can harm someone, the human body's response to a spike protein can harm the body.
Really, that’s a super interesting interpretation of “nobody had been hospitalized for myocarditis after getting the vaccine” but okay
|
|
On August 23 2022 16:51 Mikau313 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 06:55 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:18 BlackJack wrote: [quote]
The question is why would you think I would dispute that boosters makes transmission less likely. I gave 4 links that showed boosters offered protection against Omicron infection for at least a few months and than a tiny bit after that. Protection against infection is protection against transmission. It's not complicated. If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours As I have said repeatedly in this thread, I think the vaccinated are well enough protected with their vaccine that they should not need to compel everyone around them to get the vaccine as well. is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people. Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?" You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated. I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now? Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree. No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's. Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life. Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion. You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital? On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized. I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else. I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade. Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccinesNow I don't know who to believe + Show Spoiler + People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.
From the CDC:
Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred: After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults, More often after the second dose Usually within several days after vaccination Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.
Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either. + Show Spoiler + Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths. If something is common in unvaxxed people when they contract Covid, and getting the vaccine makes that thing go from 'common' to 'almost doesn't happen' the conclusion isn't "vaccines cause myocarditis", it's "vaccines prevent myocarditis".
We wouldn’t say either of those things because we have an entire language at our disposal to be precise. We actually don’t have to say things that are factually incorrect.
|
On August 24 2022 03:03 Sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation). It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat. The truth is that its a result of covid. The truth is that there are many less cases of it with the vaccine than without it. The truth is that its already known and isn't an issue for rational free thinking individuals. But the real truth that you refuse to answer is why you think its the answer to why people shouldn't get vaccinated.
Why should I keep talking to you? You’re still asking me why I think people shouldn’t get vaccinated?
Liquid’Drone: bj’s position is this
BJ: yeah that’s my position
DPB: bjs position is this
Bj: yeah that’s my position
Sermokala: no that’s not his position. He thinks people shouldn’t get vaccinated
Do you have any idea how obnoxious that is? To tell someone that is saying “this is what I believe” “no, that’s not what you believe. You actually believe this.”
Which is whatever. I’ve been dealing with that for a long time in this thread so I’m used to ignoring it by now. I’m just telling you this in case this is something you do in real life because you will lose a lot of relationships if you can’t accept what someone is telling you at face value.
|
Northern Ireland24775 Posts
For a thread of seemingly intelligent people (and me), why are we locked in a seemingly interminable cycle of ‘what BJ’s position is?’
The cosmic ballet… goes on.
|
On August 24 2022 05:17 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 23 2022 16:51 Mikau313 wrote:On August 23 2022 06:55 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote: [quote]
If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours
[quote]
is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people. Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?" You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated. I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel. That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now? Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree. No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's. Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life. Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion. You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital? On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized. I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else. I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade. Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccinesNow I don't know who to believe + Show Spoiler + People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.
From the CDC:
Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred: After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults, More often after the second dose Usually within several days after vaccination Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly. Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.
Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either. + Show Spoiler + Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths. If something is common in unvaxxed people when they contract Covid, and getting the vaccine makes that thing go from 'common' to 'almost doesn't happen' the conclusion isn't "vaccines cause myocarditis", it's "vaccines prevent myocarditis". We wouldn’t say either of those things because we have an entire language at our disposal to be precise. We actually don’t have to say things that are factually incorrect. It's worse to be slightly incorrect from a semantic point of view than to make a misleading argument which misses the whole fucking point, apparently.
|
On August 24 2022 05:28 BlackJack wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2022 03:03 Sermokala wrote:On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote: "after" =/= "because of"
I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either. hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue. Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination. That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record. I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation). It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat. The truth is that its a result of covid. The truth is that there are many less cases of it with the vaccine than without it. The truth is that its already known and isn't an issue for rational free thinking individuals. But the real truth that you refuse to answer is why you think its the answer to why people shouldn't get vaccinated. Why should I keep talking to you? You’re still asking me why I think people shouldn’t get vaccinated? Liquid’Drone: bj’s position is this BJ: yeah that’s my position DPB: bjs position is this Bj: yeah that’s my position Sermokala: no that’s not his position. He thinks people shouldn’t get vaccinated Do you have any idea how obnoxious that is? To tell someone that is saying “this is what I believe” “no, that’s not what you believe. You actually believe this.” Which is whatever. I’ve been dealing with that for a long time in this thread so I’m used to ignoring it by now. I’m just telling you this in case this is something you do in real life because you will lose a lot of relationships if you can’t accept what someone is telling you at face value. Because you repeatedly refuse to answer the basic question I keep asking you.
You keep refusing to address the most simple points about your position in a constant state of trying to achieve gotchas that get dismissed by everyone. You constantly lie and bring up things you show you know is a lie.
You keep spreading anti vax misinformation and except people to never question or respond to you. When confronted you ignore what people are saying and insist that you're somehow being attacked because you're somehow the only one that knows the truth.
You keep refusing to answer even the most basic questions that people ask you with the blind resistance of someone who is afraid to question anything that they're saying.
So I will constantly ask you the same basic question you keep refusing to answer. Why do you think people shouldn't be mandated to get the vaccine, when we have a list of other mandates about basic operations in the country that are no different from it.
|
|
|
|