• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:15
CEST 12:15
KST 19:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview25Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates7GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26Code S RO12 Results + RO8 Groups (2025 Season 2)3
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th
Tourneys
Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Cheeseadelphia 2025 - Open Bracket LAN!
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance Mutation # 473 Cold is the Void
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ I made an ASL quiz [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2 [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 1
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 24929 users

Coronavirus and You - Page 626

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 624 625 626 627 628 699 Next
Any and all updates regarding the COVID-19 will need a source provided. Please do your part in helping us to keep this thread maintainable and under control.

It is YOUR responsibility to fully read through the sources that you link, and you MUST provide a brief summary explaining what the source is about. Do not expect other people to do the work for you.

Conspiracy theories and fear mongering will absolutely not be tolerated in this thread. Expect harsh mod actions if you try to incite fear needlessly.

This is not a politics thread! You are allowed to post information regarding politics if it's related to the coronavirus, but do NOT discuss politics in here.

Added a disclaimer on page 662. Many need to post better.
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10366 Posts
August 22 2022 21:55 GMT
#12501
On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:18 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 14:19 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 13:35 BlackJack wrote:
[quote]

Wrong again. Why would I dispute the claim that boosters make transmission less likely? I’m the one here that’s been posting studies that show boosters offer some protection for at least 3 months and then maybe a tiny bit after that. If boosters didn’t make transmission less likely the Vaccine efficacy would have been 0% across the board, don’t you agree?


I have absolutely no idea what your question says, maybe you want to rephrase that.


The question is why would you think I would dispute that boosters makes transmission less likely. I gave 4 links that showed boosters offered protection against Omicron infection for at least a few months and than a tiny bit after that. Protection against infection is protection against transmission. It's not complicated.


If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours

As I have said repeatedly in this thread, I think the vaccinated are well enough protected with their vaccine that they should not need to compel everyone around them to get the vaccine as well.


is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people.


Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.


Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?"
You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated.

I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.

That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now?


Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree.


No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's.


Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you


I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life.

Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion.


You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital?

On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:
Show nested quote +
On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:
On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 05:50 BlackJack wrote:
So are you now claiming that myocarditis is a "harmless" side effect?

Per the World Health Organization

"Current evidence suggests a likely causal association between myocarditis and the mRNA vaccines"

"Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines and those most likely to be affected."

https://www.who.int/news/item/09-07-2021-gacvs-guidance-myocarditis-pericarditis-covid-19-mrna-vaccines


Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized.

I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else.
I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade.


Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.

WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines

Now I don't know who to believe

+ Show Spoiler +

People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.

From the CDC:

Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred:
After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults,
More often after the second dose
Usually within several days after vaccination
Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly.
Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.


Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either.+ Show Spoiler +


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html

There is clearly no risk from Pfizer.


On September 20 2021 07:27 BlackJack wrote:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135

"In 323 of the reports that met the CDC definition of confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis, 96% were hospitalized, but most were discharged with a resolution of symptoms."



Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths.
Magic Powers
Profile Joined April 2012
Austria3769 Posts
August 22 2022 22:06 GMT
#12502
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.
If you want to do the right thing, 80% of your job is done if you don't do the wrong thing.
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10366 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-08-22 22:24:08
August 22 2022 22:22 GMT
#12503
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13828 Posts
August 22 2022 22:53 GMT
#12504
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.

Do you want to commit to myocarditis from the vaccine is the con that that compels you to say that there are cons or risks to getting the vaccine that justify an antivax stance?
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
DarkPlasmaBall
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States44102 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-08-23 00:22:58
August 23 2022 00:20 GMT
#12505
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).
"There is nothing more satisfying than looking at a crowd of people and helping them get what I love." ~Day[9] Daily #100
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
August 23 2022 04:20 GMT
#12506
--- Nuked ---
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10366 Posts
August 23 2022 05:12 GMT
#12507
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).



It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.
Mohdoo
Profile Joined August 2007
United States15509 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-08-23 05:49:06
August 23 2022 05:34 GMT
#12508
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).



It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.


I don't think anyone is saying myocarditis doesn't happen from the vax. I think the basic logic is this:

1) Either you get covid myocarditis, or you get covid vax myocarditis

2) vax makes someone less likely to get it

Conclusion: If myocarditis is the concern, you should get vaxed

If you assume someone can never get covid and also not get vaxed, the logic falls apart though

Edit: The way I understand the situation: The immune response to the spike protein will cause myocarditis in some % of people. Just like how a fever can harm someone, the human body's response to a spike protein can harm the body.
Mikau313
Profile Joined January 2021
Netherlands230 Posts
August 23 2022 07:51 GMT
#12509
On August 23 2022 06:55 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:18 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 14:19 Magic Powers wrote:
[quote]

I have absolutely no idea what your question says, maybe you want to rephrase that.


The question is why would you think I would dispute that boosters makes transmission less likely. I gave 4 links that showed boosters offered protection against Omicron infection for at least a few months and than a tiny bit after that. Protection against infection is protection against transmission. It's not complicated.


If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours

As I have said repeatedly in this thread, I think the vaccinated are well enough protected with their vaccine that they should not need to compel everyone around them to get the vaccine as well.


is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people.


Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.


Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?"
You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated.

I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.

That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now?


Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree.


No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's.


Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you


I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life.

Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion.


You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital?

Show nested quote +
On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:
On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 05:50 BlackJack wrote:
So are you now claiming that myocarditis is a "harmless" side effect?

Per the World Health Organization

"Current evidence suggests a likely causal association between myocarditis and the mRNA vaccines"

"Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines and those most likely to be affected."

https://www.who.int/news/item/09-07-2021-gacvs-guidance-myocarditis-pericarditis-covid-19-mrna-vaccines


Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized.

I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else.
I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade.


Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.

WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines

Now I don't know who to believe

+ Show Spoiler +

People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.

From the CDC:

Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred:
After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults,
More often after the second dose
Usually within several days after vaccination
Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly.
Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.


Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either.+ Show Spoiler +


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html

There is clearly no risk from Pfizer.


Show nested quote +
On September 20 2021 07:27 BlackJack wrote:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135

"In 323 of the reports that met the CDC definition of confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis, 96% were hospitalized, but most were discharged with a resolution of symptoms."



Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths.


If something is common in unvaxxed people when they contract Covid, and getting the vaccine makes that thing go from 'common' to 'almost doesn't happen' the conclusion isn't "vaccines cause myocarditis", it's "vaccines prevent myocarditis".
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4329 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-08-23 09:35:30
August 23 2022 09:34 GMT
#12510
On August 20 2022 19:52 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 20 2022 18:59 evilfatsh1t wrote:
On August 20 2022 17:59 Artisreal wrote:
Mind pointing out what exactly is political and not facts getting in the way of some posters feelings ?

the vaccine isnt a 100% preventative measure against covid. this much is clear and no one in this thread disputes this.
+ Show Spoiler +
then naturally the discussion that comes after it is how much risk do people consider to be acceptable, and whether such risk should be managed at a personal or societal level, or both.
this discussion doesnt have a clear answer and is likely to be influenced by your inherent political biases. for example people on the left will likely argue towards there being a higher social responsibility, mandates being a clear example of that. people on the right are more likely to argue towards higher personal responsibility, hence the arguments that people should make efforts to mitigate their own risk and let others choose to manage their risk individually.

you can throw tantrums all you like about how one viewpoint is clearly correct and the other is wrong, but its a fruitless argument. the reality of most of the heated discussions here is at its simplest form, a left vs right discussion, and you will never come to a consensus. like rkc previously pointed out, its not just a matter of fact finding and science. people have different values and were brought up in different cultures. people will have different ideas of what they consider to be an acceptable level of risk and therefore the question of how society deals with this risk will throw up many different answers.

with a topic like covid, politicised discussions in unavoidable. in fact the discussion about what should be done is highly relevant and important, however this thread has fallen into the trap that the pol threads always fall into. the higher number of left leaning users in the site slowly but surely starting to pummel the user on the opposite end, regardless of whether that perspective is valid or correct. people are allowed to be wrong, even on the left. but on tl i dont think we would ever know if people on the left were in the wrong.
and for what its worth, i certainly dont identify as a right wing user and although i dont engage in much discussion, i didnt typically agree with many of the hard right users on various topics (eg gun control) in the past. i still think its a pity that they couldnt deal with the majority and either left of their own accord or got banned for their views on a site that is actually supposed to be a gaming community, not a left wing echo chamber.


I don't know if that's necessarily true

Sermokala on this very page posted

"Even the thing he keeps asserting what the point of vaccination is, being the end of people getting covid, is still a good thing and would be true if people actually got vaccinated."

A few pages back NewSunShine posted

"And if everyone got the vaccine a year ago, transmissibility of the virus would have plummeted, and if not die off completely, it wouldn't have had the chance to mutate into Omicron and BA5 like it has. It would be over by now. Nobody would be dying anymore."

Some people here genuinely think if it weren't for the antivaxxers we'd basically have eradicated COVID by now. To that end, their hatred or disdain for the antivaxxers could be considered quite normal. It's just a shame that these beliefs are fairly irrational and even more a shame that I'm the only one in this thread challenging them.

Regarding the idea that if everyone got vaccinated the strain would die off and would be unable to mutate, I already argued against that last year as vaccination rates in much of Africa and other places like Afghanistan, some Eastern European countries etc are very low.

So it would have mutated in poorer countries with low vaccine rates anyway.Which is basically what happened with Omicron which was first detected in Botswana and South Africa in late 2021.

While many in rich developed nations are queueing up for their fifth, soon to be sixth jab many in very poor countries have not had the chance to even get their first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Titusmaster6
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
United States5937 Posts
August 23 2022 11:16 GMT
#12511
Mohdoo and Mikau that is correct. As far as I know this is common undisputed knowledge among physicians.
Shorts down shorts up, BOOM, just like that.
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
August 23 2022 12:32 GMT
#12512
--- Nuked ---
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13828 Posts
August 23 2022 18:03 GMT
#12513
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).



It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.

The truth is that its a result of covid. The truth is that there are many less cases of it with the vaccine than without it. The truth is that its already known and isn't an issue for rational free thinking individuals.

But the real truth that you refuse to answer is why you think its the answer to why people shouldn't get vaccinated.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10366 Posts
August 23 2022 20:09 GMT
#12514
On August 23 2022 14:34 Mohdoo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).



It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.


I don't think anyone is saying myocarditis doesn't happen from the vax. + Show Spoiler +
I think the basic logic is this:

1) Either you get covid myocarditis, or you get covid vax myocarditis

2) vax makes someone less likely to get it

Conclusion: If myocarditis is the concern, you should get vaxed

If you assume someone can never get covid and also not get vaxed, the logic falls apart though

Edit: The way I understand the situation: The immune response to the spike protein will cause myocarditis in some % of people. Just like how a fever can harm someone, the human body's response to a spike protein can harm the body.


Really, that’s a super interesting interpretation of “nobody had been hospitalized for myocarditis after getting the vaccine” but okay
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
August 23 2022 20:16 GMT
#12515
--- Nuked ---
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10366 Posts
August 23 2022 20:17 GMT
#12516
On August 23 2022 16:51 Mikau313 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 06:55 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:18 BlackJack wrote:
[quote]

The question is why would you think I would dispute that boosters makes transmission less likely. I gave 4 links that showed boosters offered protection against Omicron infection for at least a few months and than a tiny bit after that. Protection against infection is protection against transmission. It's not complicated.


If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours

As I have said repeatedly in this thread, I think the vaccinated are well enough protected with their vaccine that they should not need to compel everyone around them to get the vaccine as well.


is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people.


Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.


Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?"
You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated.

I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.

That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now?


Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree.


No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's.


Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you


I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life.

Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion.


You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital?

On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:
On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 05:50 BlackJack wrote:
So are you now claiming that myocarditis is a "harmless" side effect?

Per the World Health Organization

"Current evidence suggests a likely causal association between myocarditis and the mRNA vaccines"

"Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines and those most likely to be affected."

https://www.who.int/news/item/09-07-2021-gacvs-guidance-myocarditis-pericarditis-covid-19-mrna-vaccines


Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized.

I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else.
I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade.


Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.

WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines

Now I don't know who to believe

+ Show Spoiler +

People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.

From the CDC:

Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred:
After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults,
More often after the second dose
Usually within several days after vaccination
Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly.
Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.


Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either.+ Show Spoiler +


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html

There is clearly no risk from Pfizer.


On September 20 2021 07:27 BlackJack wrote:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135

"In 323 of the reports that met the CDC definition of confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis, 96% were hospitalized, but most were discharged with a resolution of symptoms."



Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths.


If something is common in unvaxxed people when they contract Covid, and getting the vaccine makes that thing go from 'common' to 'almost doesn't happen' the conclusion isn't "vaccines cause myocarditis", it's "vaccines prevent myocarditis".


We wouldn’t say either of those things because we have an entire language at our disposal to be precise. We actually don’t have to say things that are factually incorrect.
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10366 Posts
August 23 2022 20:28 GMT
#12517
On August 24 2022 03:03 Sermokala wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).



It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.

The truth is that its a result of covid. The truth is that there are many less cases of it with the vaccine than without it. The truth is that its already known and isn't an issue for rational free thinking individuals.

But the real truth that you refuse to answer is why you think its the answer to why people shouldn't get vaccinated.


Why should I keep talking to you? You’re still asking me why I think people shouldn’t get vaccinated?

Liquid’Drone: bj’s position is this

BJ: yeah that’s my position

DPB: bjs position is this

Bj: yeah that’s my position

Sermokala: no that’s not his position. He thinks people shouldn’t get vaccinated

Do you have any idea how obnoxious that is? To tell someone that is saying “this is what I believe” “no, that’s not what you believe. You actually believe this.”

Which is whatever. I’ve been dealing with that for a long time in this thread so I’m used to ignoring it by now. I’m just telling you this in case this is something you do in real life because you will lose a lot of relationships if you can’t accept what someone is telling you at face value.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland24775 Posts
August 23 2022 21:36 GMT
#12518
For a thread of seemingly intelligent people (and me), why are we locked in a seemingly interminable cycle of ‘what BJ’s position is?’

The cosmic ballet… goes on.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
August 24 2022 00:16 GMT
#12519
On August 24 2022 05:17 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 23 2022 16:51 Mikau313 wrote:
On August 23 2022 06:55 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 06:34 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 23 2022 05:09 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 22:00 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:56 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 21:12 Magic Powers wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:41 BlackJack wrote:
On August 22 2022 20:36 Magic Powers wrote:
[quote]

If you agree that boosters make transmission less likely, then this opinion of yours

[quote]

is irrelevant. According to the scientific facts, people would be rightfully concerned having to live and work side by side with unvaccinated people.


Sure they can be concerned all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.


Just like evil you're also misrepresenting the argument. They're rightfully concerned, not concerned. Unvaccinated people are basically saying "more of you may get infected by me, but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make". Your argument is akin to saying "I don't wash myself with soap, so what? At least I'm not injecting anything into your body. What, am I hurting your feelings by being needlessly unsanitary?"
You're only willing to acknowledge the rights of the unvaccinated but not the rights of the vaccinated.

I could use your dishonest reframing against you. Sure the unvaccinated can be concerned about side effects from vaccines all they want. I can't dictate how concerned they feel.

That is totally not dismissive and dishonest at all, or is it now?


Didn’t you say that “I’ve never argued that vaccinated people should be banned from the workplace” like a page ago? So…? Do you think they should be then? Because if not you seem to be taking a lot of issue with something you agree with me on lol. If you do then that’s fine. We’ll agree to disagree. Or disagree to disagree.


No they should not be banned. My point of view is that radical points of view need to get out of the debate. That is yours and JimmiC's.


Well then you’re just completely ignoring the rights of the vaccinated to be able to not have to work around the unvaccinated. I think there’s no room in the debate for antivaxxers like you


I don't care about covid policy since I have no impact on it, as long as I can live a normal life.

Here in this thread I'm trying to mitigate the damage you're doing by spreading misinformation like the one about myocarditis and the one about protection against infection. My goal is to let people know that they benefit from more frequent boosters, and you've been deliberately spreading information that leads them away from that conclusion.


You really want to talk about myocarditis again? Are you referencing the time you claimed that "nobody" had been admitted to the hospital for myocarditis after vaccination and I had to correct you by stating that according to the CDC 96% of people diagnosed with vaccine induced myocarditis were admitted to the hospital?

On September 19 2021 21:22 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 20:57 BlackJack wrote:
On September 19 2021 06:23 Magic Powers wrote:
On September 19 2021 05:50 BlackJack wrote:
So are you now claiming that myocarditis is a "harmless" side effect?

Per the World Health Organization

"Current evidence suggests a likely causal association between myocarditis and the mRNA vaccines"

"Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines and those most likely to be affected."

https://www.who.int/news/item/09-07-2021-gacvs-guidance-myocarditis-pericarditis-covid-19-mrna-vaccines


Myocarditis is a plausible but unproven side effect of the Pfizer vaccine, and it can be easily and safely treated. No one has died from it and no one has been hospitalized.

I'm gonna say this very openly right now that it's become obvious to me that you're approaching this situation personally, not fact oriented. You're putting words into my mouth and interpreting the things I actually say in the worst light possible. You're not interested in what's true and what's false. This whole thing is therefore clearly about you and nothing else.
I'll say it one last time, if you try to engage with me again in this manner I will write a complaint to the moderators, because you've been causing significant disruptions in this thread with your very personal cruisade.


Magic Powers: Vaccination (especially Pfizer) contains no risk other than a sore arm for a few days and in few cases maybe a day of (harmless) side effects.

WHO: Clinicians should be aware of the risk of myocarditis and pericarditis with mRNA vaccines

Now I don't know who to believe

+ Show Spoiler +

People are fallible, objective reality is not. You should never trust any source, you should always check multiple independent sources.

From the CDC:

Cases of myocarditis reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)external icon have occurred:
After (not because of) mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna), especially in male adolescents and young adults,
More often after the second dose
Usually within several days after vaccination
Most patients with myocarditis or pericarditis who received care responded well to medicine and rest and felt better quickly.
Patients can usually return to their normal daily activities after their symptoms improve. Those who have been diagnosed with myocarditis should consult with their cardiologist (heart doctor) about return to exercise or sports. More information will be shared as it becomes available.


Furthermore, no hospitalizations or deaths have occured as a result of myocarditis after vaccination. No chronic cases either.+ Show Spoiler +


https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/myocarditis.html

There is clearly no risk from Pfizer.


On September 20 2021 07:27 BlackJack wrote:
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056135

"In 323 of the reports that met the CDC definition of confirmed myocarditis/pericarditis, 96% were hospitalized, but most were discharged with a resolution of symptoms."



Sorry if it's considered misinformation to correct your untruths.


If something is common in unvaxxed people when they contract Covid, and getting the vaccine makes that thing go from 'common' to 'almost doesn't happen' the conclusion isn't "vaccines cause myocarditis", it's "vaccines prevent myocarditis".


We wouldn’t say either of those things because we have an entire language at our disposal to be precise. We actually don’t have to say things that are factually incorrect.

It's worse to be slightly incorrect from a semantic point of view than to make a misleading argument which misses the whole fucking point, apparently.
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
Sermokala
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States13828 Posts
August 24 2022 01:03 GMT
#12520
On August 24 2022 05:28 BlackJack wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 24 2022 03:03 Sermokala wrote:
On August 23 2022 14:12 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 09:20 DarkPlasmaBall wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:22 BlackJack wrote:
On August 23 2022 07:06 Magic Powers wrote:
"after" =/= "because of"

I'm done with your lies, and I'm reinstating my policy. Not posting anything here over the next week or two either.


hahah "after" is an even more broad term than "because of" which makes your claim even more untrue.

Pretty sure that literally everyone that was admitted "because of" vaccine-induced myocarditis contracted the myocarditis "after" vaccination.

That was a very poor attempt at trying to use semantics to obfuscate that for a full year you've been the one spreading misinformation that vaccines have "zero risks" and that nobody has been hospitalized for myocarditis after vaccination and for a full year I've been the one correcting the record.


I'm not taking any sides here, but a point of clarification: he wasn't switching from "because of" to simply "after". He said "as a result of", aka "because of", aka "causation", and I'm pretty sure he was saying that your source merely pointed out that myocarditis happened sometime after the vaccine (correlation?), but that there's insufficient evidence for that example to meet the burden of "because of" / "as a result of" / "causation". I think that was his issue with the source you responded with (only correlation, not causation).



It’s still blatant misinformation. The CDC recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. The WHO recognizes vaccine induced myocarditis is real. It’s just blatantly false to say that it’s not a real thing or that nobody has been hospitalized for it. It’s a shame that I’m literally the only one in this thread that will call out this untruth. Maybe if there was a couple other posters that had some loyalty to the truth I wouldn’t have to take all the heat.

The truth is that its a result of covid. The truth is that there are many less cases of it with the vaccine than without it. The truth is that its already known and isn't an issue for rational free thinking individuals.

But the real truth that you refuse to answer is why you think its the answer to why people shouldn't get vaccinated.


Why should I keep talking to you? You’re still asking me why I think people shouldn’t get vaccinated?

Liquid’Drone: bj’s position is this

BJ: yeah that’s my position

DPB: bjs position is this

Bj: yeah that’s my position

Sermokala: no that’s not his position. He thinks people shouldn’t get vaccinated

Do you have any idea how obnoxious that is? To tell someone that is saying “this is what I believe” “no, that’s not what you believe. You actually believe this.”

Which is whatever. I’ve been dealing with that for a long time in this thread so I’m used to ignoring it by now. I’m just telling you this in case this is something you do in real life because you will lose a lot of relationships if you can’t accept what someone is telling you at face value.

Because you repeatedly refuse to answer the basic question I keep asking you.

You keep refusing to address the most simple points about your position in a constant state of trying to achieve gotchas that get dismissed by everyone. You constantly lie and bring up things you show you know is a lie.

You keep spreading anti vax misinformation and except people to never question or respond to you. When confronted you ignore what people are saying and insist that you're somehow being attacked because you're somehow the only one that knows the truth.

You keep refusing to answer even the most basic questions that people ask you with the blind resistance of someone who is afraid to question anything that they're saying.

So I will constantly ask you the same basic question you keep refusing to answer. Why do you think people shouldn't be mandated to get the vaccine, when we have a list of other mandates about basic operations in the country that are no different from it.
A wise man will say that he knows nothing. We're gona party like its 2752 Hail Dark Brandon
Prev 1 624 625 626 627 628 699 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Bellum Gens Elite
10:00
Stara Zagora 2025 Day 4
Reynor vs ShoWTimELIVE!
Serral vs Lambo
Clem vs Zoun
TaKeTV 179
IndyStarCraft 77
3DClanTV 62
Rex0
ComeBackTV 0
Bellum Gens Elite0
LiquipediaDiscussion
CranKy Ducklings
10:00
Master Swan Open #92
CranKy Ducklings32
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
IndyStarCraft 77
Hui .68
EnDerr 25
Rex 0
Bellum Gens Elite0
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 17339
Sea 3494
Bisu 1316
Jaedong 902
Hyuk 601
BeSt 245
EffOrt 184
Zeus 177
PianO 123
sorry 97
[ Show more ]
Mind 89
Hyun 81
ZerO 33
Last 28
Sacsri 17
GoRush 15
Noble 7
ajuk12(nOOB) 5
Yoon 4
Dota 2
XcaliburYe681
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1291
byalli155
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor206
Other Games
singsing1543
Mew2King177
XaKoH 133
DeMusliM42
Lowko30
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream5998
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 22
lovetv 7
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• LUISG 50
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
SC Evo League
1h 45m
Fire Grow Cup
4h 45m
CSO Contender
6h 45m
BSL: ProLeague
7h 45m
StRyKeR vs MadiNho
Cross vs UltrA
TT1 vs JDConan
Bonyth vs Sziky
Replay Cast
13h 45m
SOOP Global
16h 45m
Creator vs Rogue
Cure vs Classic
SOOP
22h 45m
Classic vs GuMiho
Sparkling Tuna Cup
23h 45m
AllThingsProtoss
1d
Fire Grow Cup
1d 4h
[ Show More ]
BSL: ProLeague
1d 7h
HBO vs Doodle
spx vs Tech
DragOn vs Hawk
Dewalt vs TerrOr
Replay Cast
1d 13h
Replay Cast
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL Code S
4 days
herO vs TBD
Classic vs TBD
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
GSL Code S
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
6 days
Korean StarCraft League
6 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 1
DreamHack Dallas 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
2025 GSL S2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.