• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:20
CEST 06:20
KST 13:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror4[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)73Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2317
StarCraft 2
General
StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Back to SC2 after 14 years - Protoss CTRL groups? October World Ranking: herO stays #1, ByuN returns
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SC2 INu's Battles#21 [ 3-Days tournament ]
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble
Brood War
General
20-year-old Valorant player starting StarCraft Sagi.gg Launcher Released Fantasy returning? BSL Season 23 Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Semifinal A [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 9100 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5512

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 5510 5511 5512 5513 5514 5995 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland27460 Posts
February 20 2026 18:49 GMT
#110221
On February 21 2026 03:35 Falling wrote:
Your Warren Buffet quote doesn't seem to align with your go all in on sales tax idea?
Like, at all???

Looks like Warren just wants to fix the current progressive tax systems so people in the ultra rich categories actually pay what it says on paper? As well as creating a new tax bracket with a much higher percentage than taxing at 17%. Which sounds imminently reasonable.

It's 'prolly' useful to have a few different sources of revenue so you have a few different levers to pull to raise revenue without being regressive on the poor or stifling growth. 'Prolly' that's the reason no country has tried a mono-tax policy?

I mean, I’m not especially well versed in the nitty-gritty of taxation policy, but aren’t blanket consumption taxes disproportionately punitive to the poor? If one wants to make some arbitrary luxury goods tax then that shifts the burden to richer folks, but surely it’s never going to offset a removal of income tax.

I mean it is a Jimmy proposal and, least to my eyes quite arbitrary and untethered from economic reality. If Jimmy thinks it’s frivolous it’s useless and should be taxed out the wazoo, regardless of whether x activity is actually beneficial in a socioeconomic sense
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
TL+ Member
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States44355 Posts
February 20 2026 19:00 GMT
#110222
On February 21 2026 02:55 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Consumption based taxes are an effective way to tax the rich.

Except they're absolutely not.

The problem is the runaway train of compounding growth where the income exceeds the capability of people to spend. It's all the capital growth that is never getting spent which turns into more capital which turns into more capital growth. The excess that generates even more excess.

You're proposing to deal with that by refusing to touch the excess.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22638 Posts
February 20 2026 19:01 GMT
#110223
On February 21 2026 02:55 JimmyJRaynor wrote:
Consumption based taxes are an effective way to tax the rich. This is prolly why they are never brought up as a viable option.

Tariffs are "barely ok" as a consumption based tax. The better way: a straightforward national sales tax similar to Canada's GST. I'd crank it up to a % high enough until it completely replaces income tax. Then, I'd end income tax. You exempt rent, groceries, and medical care from this sales tax. This is the best way to tax the rich who love to spend money on total bullshit. You can always double the tax % for things like video games, $250,000 sports cars, ZEGNA Black Zai skiis, sugar filled carbonated drinks, cigarettes etc etc....

Warren Buffett 2011: "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich". This is from an NY Times Op-Ed by Buffett in 2011.
+ Show Spoiler +
OUR leaders have asked for “shared sacrifice.” But when they did the asking, they spared me. I checked with my mega-rich friends to learn what pain they were expecting. They, too, were left untouched.
While the poor and middle class fight for us in Afghanistan, and while most Americans struggle to make ends meet, we mega-rich continue to get our extraordinary tax breaks.
Last year my federal tax bill — the income tax I paid, as well as payroll taxes paid by me and on my behalf — was $6,938,744. That sounds like a lot of money. But what I paid was only 17.4 percent of my taxable income — and that’s actually a lower percentage than was paid by any of the other 20 people in our office. Their tax burdens ranged from 33 percent to 41 percent and averaged 36 percent.
If you make money with money, as some of my super-rich friends do, your percentage may be a bit lower than mine. But if you earn money from a job, your percentage will surely exceed mine — most likely by a lot.
To understand why, you need to examine the sources of government revenue. Last year about 80 percent of these revenues came from personal income taxes and payroll taxes. The mega-rich pay income taxes at a rate of 15 percent on most of their earnings but pay practically nothing in payroll taxes.
Back in the 1980s and 1990s, tax rates for the rich were far higher, and my percentage rate was in the middle of the pack. According to a theory I sometimes hear, I should have thrown a fit and refused to invest because of the elevated tax rates on capital gains and dividends. I didn’t refuse, nor did others. [...] People invest to make money, and potential taxes have never scared them off.
Since 1992, the I.R.S. has compiled data from the returns of the 400 Americans reporting the largest income. In 1992, the top 400 had aggregate taxable income of $16.9 billion and paid federal taxes of 29.2 percent on that sum. In 2008, the aggregate income of the highest 400 had soared to $90.9 billion — a staggering $227.4 million on average — but the rate paid had fallen to 21.5 percent.
Twelve members of Congress will soon take on the crucial job of rearranging our country’s finances. [...] I would leave rates for 99.7 percent of taxpayers unchanged [...] But for those making more than $1 million — there were 236,883 such households in 2009 — I would raise rates immediately on taxable income in excess of $1 million, including, of course, dividends and capital gains. And for those who make $10 million or more — there were 8,274 in 2009 — I would suggest an additional increase in rate.
My friends and I have been coddled long enough by a billionaire-friendly Congress. It’s time for our government to get serious about shared sacrifice.


Any how, thank God the US Supreme Court made the proper decision today.
Isn't 'tax 101' that a consumption tax is regressive because poor people spend a larger % of their income on consumption then rich people?

You always pretend like your smart but then you say the most stupid shit.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18869 Posts
February 20 2026 19:06 GMT
#110224
We should incentivize the rich to hoard their wealth even more than they already do, what could go wrong. Also poor people should have luxuries put even further out of their reach. I am very smart.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11607 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 20:39:41
February 20 2026 19:11 GMT
#110225
that is why the Warren Buffett item is in a separate paragraph.

You might want a transition sentence then because the way that reads is paragraph one is your claim, paragraph two is the support to your claim. But, sure.

make your case.

More or less just did. If the current US tax regime is as Warren Buffet lays out, I would support his proposed changes for the reasons he lays out. I would reject getting rid of income tax in favour of a super sales tax as I doubt it would raise sufficient revenue, and if it's a high flat sales tax, it would be a regressive tax. (A greater portion of a low income goes to basic cost of living purchases that a sales tax would hit. Whereas a progressive income tax can ease the tax burden on the first $50,000 you make with an adjustable basic personal amount to carve out more space for people barely making ends meet.) A balance of progressive income tax combined with sales tax, property tax etc allows revenue raised without putting undue burden on those at the bottom end.
ModeratorWake me up when Trump's term is finished. Slava Ukraini.
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
22415 Posts
February 20 2026 19:17 GMT
#110226
On February 21 2026 04:06 farvacola wrote:
We should incentivize the rich to hoard their wealth even more than they already do, what could go wrong. Also poor people should have luxuries put even further out of their reach. I am very smart.


One thing that effectively caps the mega richs wealth is confining it to be spent only in their countries.

Or charging them monstrous premiums when they are abroad.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18869 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 19:22:45
February 20 2026 19:21 GMT
#110227
On February 21 2026 04:17 Vivax wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2026 04:06 farvacola wrote:
We should incentivize the rich to hoard their wealth even more than they already do, what could go wrong. Also poor people should have luxuries put even further out of their reach. I am very smart.


One thing that effectively caps the mega richs wealth is confining it to be spent only in their countries.

Or charging them monstrous premiums when they are abroad.

Fair point, and the US tax regime uses a number of tools that look a lot like that, namely Report of Foreign Bank Account disclosure requirements and the transfer pricing approach to locating the domesticity of income earned by international companies (among others). More to that end could certainly be done and there are lots of holes in what already exists that could be closed up. Ain’t gonna happen anytime soon sadly.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States3273 Posts
February 20 2026 19:24 GMT
#110228
On February 21 2026 03:07 FlaShFTW wrote:
Kavanaugh's dissent is so pitiful, and while I know he's a rat, I'd really expect more from a SC justice... basically said "well, we don't know how to resolve the issue if we rule this is illegal! What do we do with refunds, we haven't thought of that!"

Yeah Justice Kavanuagh, I guess if the illegal item is too hard to fix, we shouldn't rule it illegal. Fucking joke.


Pam Bondi was saying approximately the same thing. "If we prosecute all the Epstein clients our whole system will collapse! What's a little child diddling compared to the DOW being over 50,000?"
"don't try to pull a LightSpectra-Trumper"
Billyboy
Profile Joined September 2024
2470 Posts
February 20 2026 19:25 GMT
#110229
That’s the problem with electing the Epstein class, they are not looking to tax themselves.

This is also why congress and senators get so rich in the states. Not going to make sensible rules when they are making out like bandits.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18869 Posts
February 20 2026 19:25 GMT
#110230
Kav bro wrote something very similar in his dissent in Purdue, he’s a broken record when it comes to shrugging in the face of difficult to unwind illegal shit
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
22415 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 19:41:02
February 20 2026 19:39 GMT
#110231
On February 21 2026 04:21 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2026 04:17 Vivax wrote:
On February 21 2026 04:06 farvacola wrote:
We should incentivize the rich to hoard their wealth even more than they already do, what could go wrong. Also poor people should have luxuries put even further out of their reach. I am very smart.


One thing that effectively caps the mega richs wealth is confining it to be spent only in their countries.

Or charging them monstrous premiums when they are abroad.

Fair point, and the US tax regime uses a number of tools that look a lot like that, namely Report of Foreign Bank Account disclosure requirements and the transfer pricing approach to locating the domesticity of income earned by international companies (among others). More to that end could certainly be done and there are lots of holes in what already exists that could be closed up. Ain’t gonna happen anytime soon sadly.


Yeah imagine how bad it‘d be if they spent their money in their own country instead of using it to assault others through their nonsense machines.

Or rather. If they were forced to spend.
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States3273 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 19:43:54
February 20 2026 19:41 GMT
#110232
Taxing the wealthy is a solved problem. Capital gains (only realized is necessary if we ban taking out loans on the basis of unrealized gains, but taxing unrealized gains isn't impossible either) and non-first-home property worth over $1m in increasing brackets until it's 99.9% on amounts over $20m or something along those lines. That takes zero dollars from the working class, has zero risk of capital flight (which has been wildly over-stated even on income taxes), doesn't reward firing employees for stock buybacks, and it's exceedingly difficult to hide stocks and property from the IRS.

It's not a math problem, it's a political problem sprouting from an education problem. Politicians just don't want to do that because swing voters don't realize how bad wealth inequality has gotten and all the cool stuff we could have if the Epstein class had tax rates like they did in the 1950s.
"don't try to pull a LightSpectra-Trumper"
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18869 Posts
February 20 2026 19:55 GMT
#110233
On February 21 2026 04:41 LightSpectra wrote:
Taxing the wealthy is a solved problem. Capital gains (only realized is necessary if we ban taking out loans on the basis of unrealized gains, but taxing unrealized gains isn't impossible either) and non-first-home property worth over $1m in increasing brackets until it's 99.9% on amounts over $20m or something along those lines. That takes zero dollars from the working class, has zero risk of capital flight (which has been wildly over-stated even on income taxes), doesn't reward firing employees for stock buybacks, and it's exceedingly difficult to hide stocks and property from the IRS.

It's not a math problem, it's a political problem sprouting from an education problem. Politicians just don't want to do that because swing voters don't realize how bad wealth inequality has gotten and all the cool stuff we could have if the Epstein class had tax rates like they did in the 1950s.

Only quibble I have with this is that it is actually fairly easy to hide property like stocks and real estate under current US tax laws, especially when it comes to use of vehicles like partnerships and trusts (REITs being a prime example). Beneficial ownership rules that requires those entities to report who their owners are started to take off a few years ago and made things somewhat easier, but they’ve mostly been rendered a dead letter and didn’t solve the more fundamental moral hazards created by easy, effectively limitless pass through structures.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24374 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 20:00:35
February 20 2026 19:59 GMT
#110234
On February 21 2026 04:55 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2026 04:41 LightSpectra wrote:
Taxing the wealthy is a solved problem. Capital gains (only realized is necessary if we ban taking out loans on the basis of unrealized gains, but taxing unrealized gains isn't impossible either) and non-first-home property worth over $1m in increasing brackets until it's 99.9% on amounts over $20m or something along those lines. That takes zero dollars from the working class, has zero risk of capital flight (which has been wildly over-stated even on income taxes), doesn't reward firing employees for stock buybacks, and it's exceedingly difficult to hide stocks and property from the IRS.

It's not a math problem, it's a political problem sprouting from an education problem. Politicians just don't want to do that because swing voters don't realize how bad wealth inequality has gotten and all the cool stuff we could have if the Epstein class had tax rates like they did in the 1950s.

Only quibble I have with this is that it is actually fairly easy to hide property like stocks and real estate under current US tax laws, especially when it comes to use of vehicles like partnerships and trusts (REITs being a prime example). Beneficial ownership rules that requires those entities to report who their owners are started to take off a few years ago and made things somewhat easier, but they’ve mostly been rendered a dead letter and didn’t solve the more fundamental moral hazards created by easy, effectively limitless pass through structures.


And just like that, the Hamster Wheel returns.

1. There's a problem [wealth distribution in this case]
2. [bipartisan] Politicians won't fix it
3. Need to replace the politicians with ones that will
4. Can't replace the politicians because of how the system works
5. Need to fix the system
6. [bipartisan] Politicians won't fix it (because it benefits them)
7. Repeat ad nauseam.

Math, political, education, whatever the problems, figuring out a way off the wheel is a necessary step to addressing them.

Anyone got any ideas for getting off the Hamster Wheel everyone finds themselves on at the end of discussing something like this? Or will we just go back to 1. shortly?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
LightSpectra
Profile Blog Joined October 2011
United States3273 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 20:07:11
February 20 2026 20:05 GMT
#110235
On February 21 2026 04:55 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 21 2026 04:41 LightSpectra wrote:
Taxing the wealthy is a solved problem. Capital gains (only realized is necessary if we ban taking out loans on the basis of unrealized gains, but taxing unrealized gains isn't impossible either) and non-first-home property worth over $1m in increasing brackets until it's 99.9% on amounts over $20m or something along those lines. That takes zero dollars from the working class, has zero risk of capital flight (which has been wildly over-stated even on income taxes), doesn't reward firing employees for stock buybacks, and it's exceedingly difficult to hide stocks and property from the IRS.

It's not a math problem, it's a political problem sprouting from an education problem. Politicians just don't want to do that because swing voters don't realize how bad wealth inequality has gotten and all the cool stuff we could have if the Epstein class had tax rates like they did in the 1950s.

Only quibble I have with this is that it is actually fairly easy to hide property like stocks and real estate under current US tax laws, especially when it comes to use of vehicles like partnerships and trusts (REITs being a prime example). Beneficial ownership rules that requires those entities to report who their owners are started to take off a few years ago and made things somewhat easier, but they’ve mostly been rendered a dead letter and didn’t solve the more fundamental moral hazards created by easy, effectively limitless pass through structures.


I'm not saying tax evasion is impossible, but you're talking figurative pennies compared to the literal trillions in unrealized capital gains that the tech industry is sitting on, and they can't hide that. The main loophole they use (to my knowledge) is they take out bank loans using their stock portfolio as collateral. That can easily be banned.
"don't try to pull a LightSpectra-Trumper"
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
22415 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 20:20:15
February 20 2026 20:17 GMT
#110236
If the president knows to be in a compromised position and unwell, the best he can do for his nation is resign.

That would actually earn him respect. Even if all the things he covered up won‘t surface. But there‘s a bit of hope someone else will do that.

His family would probably thank him for that. Immediately or in the long run.
Falling
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Canada11607 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 20:39:14
February 20 2026 20:25 GMT
#110237
5. Need to fix the system

I think the closest to finding the first step to fix the system is what Newsom is doing with redistricting.
You have a national problem that can only be solved at the state level across every state. You aren't going to remove state control over how elections are run (well, Trump is floating that idea but for nefarious reasons).

So you are stuck in the prisoner's dilemma where no-one wants to be the one to reform how redistricting works in their state.

The only solution to the prisoner's dilemma is to play nice first. And then if it is not reciprocated, absolutely smack them down. And then make a new offer and smack again if an open offer is taken advantage of.

Redistricting in favour of Democrats in California is a warning shot across the bow though unfortunately making the bad system worse. But a few more follow ups might be necessary to put the fear of God into Republican states. There is then a slim chance for a sit down in the equivalent of the First Minister meeting to negotiate some sort of accord/ armistice to commit to reform whereby redistricting is done through an independent body (by state- never going to get one independent body for all in the US) with an agreed upon representation formula.

It will also never happen.
It won't happen under Trump because the man has only thoughts for accruing power and none for how to reform the system to make it better in the long run- just better for him personally. So he would only be a hindrance to chairing/ mediating the Governors' meeting.

And even without Trump, I just don't see everyone putting down their swords at this point. But however slim, I think playing hardball with the threat to make redistricting worse across all Democrat run states, if Republican states don't back down is the only way forward.

I guess, either that or bite the bullet and try and amend the constitution so that a federal independent agency (the equivalent of Elections Canada) operates federal elections. We might bring peace to the Middle East before then though.

But it is still Newsom redistricting to force a compromise in Congress and Senate to get an independent Elections USA.
ModeratorWake me up when Trump's term is finished. Slava Ukraini.
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
22415 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-20 22:18:36
February 20 2026 21:47 GMT
#110238
The British are probably smart enough to understand that an attack for Iran blocks the energy supply route Trump has left to block, which is why they don‘t allow the use of their bases after Europe committed to supporting Ukraine.

By now, nobody sane in the world wants to depend on the US for basic needs unless absolutely necessary.

Because it becomes increasingly clear that the Russians have compromised him in some way, along with some of his trusted billionaires.

It‘s like the election was an intelligence test for the whole population which it failed and now he‘s going to give them the result..

Around here mostly we don‘t care except for keeping American manufactured monstrosities at bay. But they‘re growing very hard to ignore.

And Drumpf doesn‘t have the balls to resign and confess. Too much power in the hands of a madman.

If I were to be US president I wouldn‘t have Cohen as attorney just telling me to deny all allegations.

If he doesn‘t resign, someone will do it for him. But he probably believes these are the end days and if they aren‘t, he‘ll make it so.
Vivax
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
22415 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-21 01:03:52
February 20 2026 23:29 GMT
#110239
In any case, let me know when Trumps testicals are back in stock for a brief gander.

My bastard current country knows more about them than they let on.

Hotel owners and their associates are more powerful than you‘d believe…

Or some big bastards who flaunt themselves as pediatrician around these parts.
Vindicare605
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States16126 Posts
Last Edited: 2026-02-21 01:04:22
February 21 2026 01:04 GMT
#110240
I love how the deficit and the debt only matter to Republicans when it's convenient. They'll pass a gigantic tax cut on the rich and for corporations but when they do that, there's no problem with the deficit. They'll balloon federal spending on defense and homeland security, and then there's no problem with the deficit.

But when it ever inconveniences their bullshit policies, that's when they whine about the debt and the deficit.

If they actually were serious about cutting the deficit I could respect it and we could have some serious hard discussions. But they're not. They want to pass tax cuts and cut spending without cutting defense spending. You are NEVER going to get anywhere with deficit reduction in any meaningful way that way. If the estimate of 175 billion dollars raised is true, that's not even 10 percent of the deficit for one single year. Think of all of the problems for every day Americans those tarrifs cause, that's not even 10 percent of 1 year of our deficit.

It's inefficient policy even when it works, and it doesn't because it was blatantly illegal from the beginning.
aka: KTVindicare the Geeky Bartender
Prev 1 5510 5511 5512 5513 5514 5995 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Replay Cast
08:00
QMC Community Tournament 1
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RuFF_SC2 177
StarCraft: Brood War
GuemChi 1471
NotJumperer 95
910 85
Bale 36
ajuk12(nOOB) 19
Noble 6
Britney 0
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm174
febbydoto16
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox399
Mew2King48
Other Games
summit1g7868
Coldzera 724
JimRising 637
C9.Mang0332
WinterStarcraft317
PiGStarcraft276
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1013
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream25
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Letter149
• practicex 6
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota231
League of Legends
• Lourlo845
• Rush744
• Stunt148
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
5h 40m
Soma vs Soulkey
INu's Battles
6h 40m
SHIN vs Cure
ByuN vs Zoun
PiGosaur Cup
19h 40m
Patches Events
1d 11h
The PondCast
2 days
INu's Battles
2 days
Percival vs TBD
TBD vs herO
OSC
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
OSC
3 days
BSL: Ladder Tournament
4 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Patches Events
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
HCC Season 3
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.