On October 23 2025 12:23 Razyda wrote:Show nested quote +On October 23 2025 11:09 KwarK wrote:On October 23 2025 11:01 Razyda wrote:On October 23 2025 10:52 KwarK wrote:
Trump is, legally speaking, a rapist.
Was he ever convicted of rape?
Yes. The court found that he sexually penetrated a woman’s vagina without her consent. The name for that is rape. Your counter argument, that he didn’t use his penis to penetrate her, doesn’t matter. Your counter argument that it was a civil proceeding rather than a criminal one doesn’t matter. It doesn’t change what the court found he did. Trump is, legally speaking, a rapist.
For what it’s worth he also stole money from children’s cancer charities. He’s just an all round piece of shit.
I also don't see how you got from being upset about the lawfare being used against Trump to learning that he actually did the things he was found to have done to
I don't give a damn.
Well, I do see how you got there, you know what I think about you, but yeah, it's not good.
Quite literally he was never found guilty of rape. Your "legally speaking" statement is provably false, unless you are able to provide criminal case where Trump was found guilty of rape??? You are going full MP route now where you decided to find indefensible hill to die on.
" Your counter argument, that he didn’t use his penis to penetrate her, doesn’t matter." - WTF?? this was not my counter argument, my counter argument was that trial was lacking in evidence?
"Trump is, legally speaking, a rapist." - he is literally not, unless you are able to provide the case where he is charged with rape and found guilty.
"For what it’s worth he also stole money from children’s cancer charities. He’s just an all round piece of shit." - no argument here.
"I also don't see how you got from being upset about the lawfare being used against Trump to learning that he actually did the things he was found to have done to
Well, I do see how you got there, you know what I think about you, but yeah, it's not good."
Kwark you sort of melting. I literally just explained how I dont think he should be found guilty in this particular case. I think that it is worth mentioning that you never challanged single issue I had with the trial, but merely my conclusion?
"I do see how you got there, you know what I think about you, but yeah, it's not good" - I do and it makes me happy, it literally makes my life easier. You are doing the very thing you shat on MP for, choosing indefensible hill to die on. Trump was never convicted of rape, hence you cant say he is "legally speaking" a rapist. Worlld doesnt work this way. I must say I find your arguments wanting.