US Politics Mega-thread - Page 5219
Forum Index > General Forum |
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting! NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets. Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source. If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread | ||
decafchicken
United States20025 Posts
| ||
oBlade
United States5660 Posts
On September 12 2025 14:14 decafchicken wrote: His team put out a tweet then he insulted Walz instead of calling him vs instituting a nation wide mourning and flying his body home on fucking air force 2 lol If Trump lowered the flags, people would complain he didn't give them the medal of freedom. If he gave them the medal of freedom, people would complain why he didn't give them a gold funeral. If he gave them a gold funeral, they would complain he didn't start a task force. If he started a task force against right wing terrorism, they would complain he didn't magically vacuum all the guns in the country. The truth is Kirk is far more widely known than the victims in Minnesota. This does not make one murder better or worse than the other, and it has no implication that any of them were better or worse human beings. But it's connected to why it's more noteworthy. There was no nationwide campaign of dehumanization targeting the victims leading up to the assassination, they weren't known at all. Nobody was calling or rooting for them to be killed, encouraging the Michael Myers mask guy who acted alone, nobody was going on TV and filling social media with bullshit riling up the uninformed against them. Nor did anyone support or celebrate their deaths (except the most antisocial few among our societies which criminal justice reform advocates refuse to simply imprison). Everyone was on the same page. Don't kill politicians. In Kirk's case, all of those things have happened. Whoever shot Kirk did it to silence him. That has to be specifically, immediately, and ruthlessly opposed by the keepers of civilization. Too many people straddle a line, like Walz himself, when the genius rumor of Trump's passing came out a few weeks ago, Walz said like I know it's hard when you think there's news (of Trump's death) but there isn't, but don't worry one day there will be news. This is somebody who ran against Trump publicly explaining he wants Trump to die. Then a tragedy happens and it's oops we condemn violence. | ||
Vivax
22023 Posts
On September 12 2025 15:41 ETisME wrote: said it before and will say it again, there's a significantly disproportional coverage on far right over far left on mass media. EU, UK, Australia are sinking into anti encryption, ID check on social media. this is only the beginning, worst of all there's hardly any protests against them. There's a lot hating on 4chan or X, but majority of them are keyboard warriors. imo reddit is simply worst of the bunch. the insane power hungry politically biased super Mods, the upvote system, and the reach to ordinary folks. Never liked politics much, but as a whole we are just skydiving on the freedom scale. The ID check and anti encryption is fine imo. For the reason that internet moguls from overseas can manipulate information to their hearts content while other governments need costly access to the information they provide. With crypto they can fund people to work for them, also in shady areas. It could be a counter to the trend that the user needs to accept maximum transparency while the corporation enjoys maximum secrecy. | ||
MJG
United Kingdom1191 Posts
On September 12 2025 15:57 oBlade wrote: If Trump lowered the flags, people would complain he didn't give them the medal of freedom. If he gave them the medal of freedom, people would complain why he didn't give them a gold funeral. If he gave them a gold funeral, they would complain he didn't start a task force. If he started a task force against right wing terrorism, they would complain he didn't magically vacuum all the guns in the country. The correct thing to do would've been to condemn political violence and attempt to ease tensions. Trump and company poured gasoline on the fire instead. Like KwarK has said much more eloquently: Trump and his ilk opened Pandora's box despite all warnings that it was a bad idea. They don't get to complain about the contents. | ||
Magic Powers
Austria4294 Posts
On September 12 2025 10:38 Razyda wrote: See free speech actually should be free. If you think otherwise you are just misguided. Why would you be against it? What happened to Kirk is very result of believing that he shouldn't be allowed to say what he was saying. Mind I dont think anyone should be banned for expressing their opinion on this murder. I am actually glad that given opportunity to show their true colours, people will do just that. You see I used to like you. I did considered your ideas idiotic, but overall it seemed like they were coming from the good place. Now I see there never was a good place. As for everyone else cheering for this murder: line which shouldn't have been crossed was crossed, enjoy and bear the consequences. Might be worth to remember that right wing people actually went to capitol on January 6, didnt limit themselves to posting mean posts on internet. Bruh, you never liked me. You may've liked my political views because they weren't so disaligned with yours at the time. Or at least you thought. I will still defend free speech. The way it's done in my country is that you can say literally anything that's not a call to violence or a death threat or something like that.You're even allowed to question the number of Jews killed in the Holocaust. What you're not allowed to do is question the Holocaust without evidence. In America you don't need a shred of evidence. Our way is better, and America's way is worse. This is simply a matter of fact. So I will not defend absolute free speech. I've outgrown that phase years ago. | ||
Doublemint
Austria8565 Posts
Fast-moving manhunts often are chaotic, but the search for the person who killed conservative activist Charlie Kirk has been particularly plagued by slow, confusing and contradictory disclosures from public officials. The roller coaster of information began about 25 minutes after the shooting, when Utah Valley University sent an alert to students stating there was a “suspect in custody.” Roughly an hour and a half later, the school confirmed the person in custody had been released. Later in the afternoon, FBI Director Kash Patel on social media raised hopes with a message that said a second person, whom he called a “subject” in the shooting, was in custody. It appeared Utah Department of Public Safety commissioner Beau Mason wasn’t aware of Patel’s announcement when he told reporters the suspect was still at large. Later Wednesday night Patel backtracked, saying the second individual had been released after questioning. Both men who had been questioned were the subject of rampant speculation on social media, and officials acknowledged Thursday morning that the men had faced a wave of threats and harassment. “We ask the public to be patient with the investigative process. These individuals were not suspects, they were people of interest,” Mason said. Others said the missteps added to the fear and uncertainty over what officials described as a political assassination that took place in broad daylight, as thousands of people had gathered to watch Kirk speak. “Clear language and accurate updates protect both public safety and the integrity of the investigation, even as the facts are still evolving,” said Jason Pack, a retired FBI agent who served as a bureau spokesman. Authorities said Thursday they had good video footage of a person they believed was the gunman, but they declined to immediately release it to the public, with Mason saying they were confident in their ability to identify the person through “some technologies.” “If we are unsuccessful, we will reach out to you as the media and we will push that publicly to help us identify them,” Mason said. Hours later, the FBI released two grainy photos of someone it described as a person of interest and announced a $100,000 reward in exchange for information leading to the shooter’s identity. The swirl of information also included the sharing among law enforcement agencies of an internal bulletin that said investigators found ammunition engraved with expressions of “transgender and antifascist ideology” inside the rifle that authorities believe was used in the fatal shooting. But some officials close to the investigation later Thursday urged caution, saying the probe was in its early stages, investigators were still analyzing the evidence and the bulletin may not accurately reflect the messages on the ammunition. A spokesman for the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which circulated the bulletin internally among law-enforcement officials, didn’t immediately respond to requests for comment. In public, officials did confirm that they had recovered a high-powered bolt action rifle near the shooting scene, as well as imprints of a forearm, a palm and a shoe. They said Kirk’s killer appears to be of college age, allowing the person to blend in with students on campus. so apparently the "transgender ideology ammo" thing could not be substantiated and they are slowly trying pivot away from it...? this is also why people have a hard time trusting usually decent papers. sensationalism and easy eyeballs/clicks for what? you yourself have eggs on your face and trust is a hard currency you devalue by succumbing to speed instead of accuracy... but I guess people will have forgotten all about the mistake at this point tomorrow and the "rumour" of the "trans ideology ammo" will miraculously be stuck in people's heads forever. especially as other outlets and the whole goddamn internet ran with a "preliminary law enforcement report" basically drilling it into people's heads. also not a good look for Patel's FBI, messaging like amateurs and sowing even more confusion. Current and former U.S. officials called Patel's announcement counterproductive. “At the outset of an investigation, much of the initial intelligence is typically wrong or slightly off. That's why what he did yesterday has never been done by any FBI director before him, or any division leadership before," said retired FBI agent Dan Brunner. "The investigators need to sort through all the initial intelligence before putting out factual evidence ... FBI does not run investigations on social media.” | ||
KT_Elwood
Germany991 Posts
https://apnews.com/article/dowd-msnbc-kirk-comments-e08f349022c9d69171cd575664141075 If you are an american, you are only allowed to praise the Martyr - not say that he was one of the strongest voices in preaching hate and divisiveness. Warnings also have supposedly been sent ot immigrants and out in the world, that Immigration will profile aliens for "mocking" Charlie Kirk publicly, and deny entry to the country or visa. https://www.axios.com/2025/09/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-immigrants-state-department | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44559 Posts
| ||
Gorsameth
Netherlands21772 Posts
No? Only going after democrats? yeah figured... | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44559 Posts
On September 12 2025 19:43 KT_Elwood wrote: Warnings also have supposedly been sent ot immigrants and out in the world, that Immigration will profile aliens for "mocking" Charlie Kirk publicly, and deny entry to the country or visa. https://www.axios.com/2025/09/11/charlie-kirk-shooting-immigrants-state-department Now that looks like the government is trying to infringe on someone's 1st Amendment right to freedom of speech, especially when "The State Department on Thursday indicated it would review the legal status of immigrants "praising, rationalizing, or making light" of conservative activist Charlie Kirk's fatal shooting." | ||
Sadist
United States7254 Posts
| ||
Jankisa
Croatia747 Posts
The outrage now is basically the same playbook from the Sidney Sweeney "controversy", but turned up to 11, a whole lot of conservatives pretending like "the left" is represented by the most extreme, 100 follower accounts on twitter while ignoring that when the tables were their turned public representatives were posting memes. Even worse, anyone who is not praising this right wing demagogue is "not being respectful" and they will use this to justify all sorts of violence in the future. | ||
KT_Elwood
Germany991 Posts
On September 12 2025 19:47 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: I recently heard the following take on Charlie Kurk's assassination: "I don't support what happened to Charlie, but Charlie would have supported what happened to Charlie". I think that's a fair point. That's a fireable offense if you are an MSNBC talking head. And Dowd had even said less than that. He just described Kirk's "Performances" honestly - not trying to assume what Kirk would have said to his own killing. MAGA-Nation on the internet is actting as if all the billions of transgender liberals are dancing naked in the streets presenting their rainbow dyed armpits with blackpower fists in the air to celebrate the death of Charlie Kirk. International media is trying to construct an "inb4 civil war" atmosphere.. for clicks and eyeballs on their pages. FOX NEWS maybe has replaced it's news-ticker with a row of sandbags - because you never know! | ||
LightSpectra
United States1685 Posts
Twitter is a prime example. Musk said he bought it because free speech is a cornerstone of civilization, unbanned a bunch of actual self-identified Neo-Nazis, then censored the word "cis". | ||
JimmyJRaynor
Canada16755 Posts
It starts at 20 minutes and 20 seconds. @22:18 "Israel was on the verge of civil war...Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead...". Dead bang on the money. It is inevitable that talking like this got him deader than Kennedy. If he didn't get killed September 10th he was on his way to getting killed. When you have the reach and influence Kirk had ... You can't talk like this. It'll be interesting to see if Candace Owens steers away from criticizing Israel after Kirk's death. Rest In Peace Charlie Kirk. | ||
MJG
United Kingdom1191 Posts
US representative Nancy Mace says she will introduce a resolution to Congress to authorise Charlie Kirk to "lie in honour" in the Capitol Rotunda - a grand circular room in the US Capitol. "He inspired millions, led countless souls to Christ, and never wavered in defense of the First Amendment. Such a legacy makes him uniquely worthy of this distinction," the lawmaker writes on X. To lie in state in the Rotunda means people will be able to visit Kirk's casket to pay their respects, for a period of time determined by the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the president. I'd assume this was a joke if the person suggesting it wasn't so unhinged. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44559 Posts
On September 12 2025 20:55 MJG wrote: From the BBC live feed: I'd assume this was a joke if the person suggesting it wasn't so unhinged. Lying honorably after his death? I guess that makes sense, since he'd been lying dishonorably all his life. | ||
LightSpectra
United States1685 Posts
| ||
MJG
United Kingdom1191 Posts
On September 12 2025 20:57 LightSpectra wrote: Damn that's crazy. Where are the Epstein files? There is no list, but the Democrats are definitely on that list, which doesn't exist. | ||
DarkPlasmaBall
United States44559 Posts
| ||
| ||