• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:01
CEST 18:01
KST 01:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection6Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO8 Preview5[ASL21] Finals Preview: Two Legacies21Code S Season 2 (2026) - RO12 Preview2
Community News
[BSL22] Non-Korean Championship from 13 to 28 June2Weekly Cups (May 25-31): Clem doubles, 2v2 circuit heads toward finale0StarCraft II 5.0.16 PTR Patch Notes may 26th151Weekly Cups (May 18-24): MaxPax wins doubles0Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League6
StarCraft 2
General
TL Poll: How do you feel about the 5.0.16 PTR balance changes? Oliveira Would Have Returned If EWC Continued TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview What kind of tool would you be interested in?
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 2 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule ! Crank Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 529 Opportunities Unleashed Mutation # 528 Infection Detected Welcome to the External Content forum
Brood War
General
25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 BW General Discussion BW animated web series: seeking contributors FlaSh's ASL S21 Finals Review BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
[BSL22] Grand Finals - Sunday 21:00 CEST [ASL21] Grand Finals [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Why doesn't anyone use restoration? Muta micro map competition [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction
Other Games
General Games
PC Games Sales Thread Nintendo Switch Thread ZeroSpace Megathread Summer Games Done Quick 2026! The Perfect Game
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Trading/Investing Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books [TV/BOOK] *SPOILERS* Game of Thrones Discussion Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Facing Challenges in Mobile App Development
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
I'm an arrogant trash talke…
FlaShFTW
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
Esportsmanship: How to NOT B…
TrAiDoS
Why RTS gamers make better f…
gosubay
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6295 users

US Politics Mega-thread - Page 1328

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 5776 Next
Now that we have a new thread, in order to ensure that this thread continues to meet TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we will be enforcing the rules in the OP more strictly. Be sure to give them a complete and thorough read before posting!

NOTE: When providing a source, please provide a very brief summary on what it's about and what purpose it adds to the discussion. The supporting statement should clearly explain why the subject is relevant and needs to be discussed. Please follow this rule especially for tweets.

Your supporting statement should always come BEFORE you provide the source.


If you have any questions, comments, concern, or feedback regarding the USPMT, then please use this thread: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/website-feedback/510156-us-politics-thread
Gorsameth
Profile Joined April 2010
Netherlands22415 Posts
April 15 2019 21:31 GMT
#26541
On April 16 2019 02:48 Plansix wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 02:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On April 16 2019 02:30 Plansix wrote:
Agreed, the report won’t prompt impeachment the way the Nixon tapes did. It will just be more fuel on the fire for 2020. The only thing that would change the impeachment discussion is something like the President being caught on tape telling border patrol to commit a crime and he would pardon them. Something that is impossible to spin or ignore. Absent that, it will just be the Republicans keeping their heads down and hoping there is no crisis in the next 2 years.


You really think so? I don't see a political upside for either side in pursuing impeachment at this point regardless of what comes out? I don't think anyone has even so much as speculated who those 16+ Republican senators would be to actually remove him. I caution Democrats on thinking it's fuel too, it may be, just for the wrong fire.

The impeachment of Nixon seemed impossible and turned around in like 7 days. When it is not longer possible to deny that the President is conspiring to commit criminal acts to further his agenda or protect himself, it changes the political calculation.

Right now there is deniability of some form. They can blame the Democrats, the deep state, the globalist and so on. A tape of Trump overtly and clearly telling someone to break the law, as an example, and receive a pardon would remove final defense. That is what the Nixon tapes did. It removed any ability to deny that Nixon was involved with a crime and the cover up of said crime.

That being said, you might be right and the Republicans in the Senate are completely feckless and would just ignore all of it. But they don’t have as firm of a hold on the Senate as they going into the mid-terms, so there might be enough of them that are worried about losing their seat.
I think you have to much faith in Republicans, that undenying crimes would even move the needle on this.
This is not the same party that threw out Nixon.
It ignores such insignificant forces as time, entropy, and death
Kyadytim
Profile Joined March 2009
United States886 Posts
April 15 2019 22:36 GMT
#26542
On April 16 2019 06:31 Gorsameth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 02:48 Plansix wrote:
On April 16 2019 02:36 GreenHorizons wrote:
On April 16 2019 02:30 Plansix wrote:
Agreed, the report won’t prompt impeachment the way the Nixon tapes did. It will just be more fuel on the fire for 2020. The only thing that would change the impeachment discussion is something like the President being caught on tape telling border patrol to commit a crime and he would pardon them. Something that is impossible to spin or ignore. Absent that, it will just be the Republicans keeping their heads down and hoping there is no crisis in the next 2 years.


You really think so? I don't see a political upside for either side in pursuing impeachment at this point regardless of what comes out? I don't think anyone has even so much as speculated who those 16+ Republican senators would be to actually remove him. I caution Democrats on thinking it's fuel too, it may be, just for the wrong fire.

The impeachment of Nixon seemed impossible and turned around in like 7 days. When it is not longer possible to deny that the President is conspiring to commit criminal acts to further his agenda or protect himself, it changes the political calculation.

Right now there is deniability of some form. They can blame the Democrats, the deep state, the globalist and so on. A tape of Trump overtly and clearly telling someone to break the law, as an example, and receive a pardon would remove final defense. That is what the Nixon tapes did. It removed any ability to deny that Nixon was involved with a crime and the cover up of said crime.

That being said, you might be right and the Republicans in the Senate are completely feckless and would just ignore all of it. But they don’t have as firm of a hold on the Senate as they going into the mid-terms, so there might be enough of them that are worried about losing their seat.
I think you have to much faith in Republicans, that undenying crimes would even move the needle on this.
This is not the same party that threw out Nixon.

Agreed. We could get video of some of Trump's private meetings with Putin that show Trump literally selling out the US and congressional Republicans (aided by Fox News) would find some way to downplay it. Or just outright call it fake and carry on as thought nothing had happened.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26972 Posts
April 15 2019 22:38 GMT
#26543
Is that really a Republican specific thing these days?
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24018 Posts
April 15 2019 22:48 GMT
#26544
On April 16 2019 07:38 Wombat_NI wrote:
Is that really a Republican specific thing these days?


Not from where I sit. Though I would say Democrats do more downplaying than outright denial compared to Republicans.
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26972 Posts
April 15 2019 23:01 GMT
#26545
On April 16 2019 07:48 GreenHorizons wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 07:38 Wombat_NI wrote:
Is that really a Republican specific thing these days?


Not from where I sit. Though I would say Democrats do more downplaying than outright denial compared to Republicans.

They’re not averse to outright denial, although downplaying and deflection have been the more recent MO I suppose.

The response of Dems in office and the base to the auld Wikileaks stuff getting out there being a case in point.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24018 Posts
April 15 2019 23:55 GMT
#26546
On April 16 2019 08:01 Wombat_NI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 07:48 GreenHorizons wrote:
On April 16 2019 07:38 Wombat_NI wrote:
Is that really a Republican specific thing these days?


Not from where I sit. Though I would say Democrats do more downplaying than outright denial compared to Republicans.

They’re not averse to outright denial, although downplaying and deflection have been the more recent MO I suppose.

The response of Dems in office and the base to the auld Wikileaks stuff getting out there being a case in point.


Fair point. The more I think about it the more I can remember.

I don't know where Fox News found this audience in PA but wow, Sanders had them going with his closing statement from the Town Hall.

"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland26972 Posts
April 16 2019 00:12 GMT
#26547
Bernie’s 100% right on basically all those things.

It’s not just a top level politics thing either, partisanship of the kind we see today is toxic at all stratas of life.

I didn’t use to lose friends over political differences, it’s happened to me now and it’s never been something I’ve instigated.

It benefits almost nobody for things to be this fractious
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 16 2019 00:27 GMT
#26548
On April 16 2019 09:12 Wombat_NI wrote:
Bernie’s 100% right on basically all those things.

It’s not just a top level politics thing either, partisanship of the kind we see today is toxic at all stratas of life.

I didn’t use to lose friends over political differences, it’s happened to me now and it’s never been something I’ve instigated.

It benefits almost nobody for things to be this fractious


It could be(and is increasingly becoming) which is why, whether win or lose, Sanders is achieving what he set out to do 3 years ago. Change the narrative; can you imagine in past elections of any Democratic candidate proposing universal education, and healthcare? No. It would be insane. Now imagine if Democrats jumped on introducing said Healthcare, and Education changes. It would force their opponents to defend and come out and support private healthcare companies, one of the most hated groups in this country.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
GreenHorizons
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States24018 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-04-16 00:33:32
April 16 2019 00:30 GMT
#26549
On April 16 2019 09:27 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 09:12 Wombat_NI wrote:
Bernie’s 100% right on basically all those things.

It’s not just a top level politics thing either, partisanship of the kind we see today is toxic at all stratas of life.

I didn’t use to lose friends over political differences, it’s happened to me now and it’s never been something I’ve instigated.

It benefits almost nobody for things to be this fractious


It could be(and is increasingly becoming) which is why, whether win or lose, Sanders is achieving what he set out to do 3 years ago. Change the narrative; can you imagine in past elections of any Democratic candidate proposing universal education, and healthcare? No. It would be insane. Now imagine if Democrats jumped on introducing said Healthcare, and Education changes. It would force their opponents to defend and come out and support private healthcare companies, one of the most hated groups in this country.


As bad as Trump is the political future certainly seems like it's got a lot more potential than if Hillary had won (and Bernie not run). Like what would she be running on in 2020 I wonder? Certainly not Bernie's platform or the iterations we've seen from the rest of the field.. Republicans would be running someone a lot less noticeably absurd than Trump too.

It would be a more centrist platform than 2016 probably right?
"People like to look at history and think 'If that was me back then, I would have...' We're living through history, and the truth is, whatever you are doing now is probably what you would have done then" "Scratch a Liberal..."
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-04-16 01:02:42
April 16 2019 01:00 GMT
#26550
On April 16 2019 09:12 Wombat_NI wrote:
Bernie’s 100% right on basically all those things.

It’s not just a top level politics thing either, partisanship of the kind we see today is toxic at all stratas of life.

I didn’t use to lose friends over political differences, it’s happened to me now and it’s never been something I’ve instigated.

It benefits almost nobody for things to be this fractious

Well while democrats and republicans agree for the most part on quite a few broad stroke subjects, it's in the details that they fight over and stallout. Which i'm sure sanders knows all too well.

Democrats want reform and investment in programs and agencies
Republicans want divestment, privatization and contractors to programs and agencies

Both will ending up spending more.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
April 16 2019 01:10 GMT
#26551
On April 16 2019 10:00 semantics wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 09:12 Wombat_NI wrote:
Bernie’s 100% right on basically all those things.

It’s not just a top level politics thing either, partisanship of the kind we see today is toxic at all stratas of life.

I didn’t use to lose friends over political differences, it’s happened to me now and it’s never been something I’ve instigated.

It benefits almost nobody for things to be this fractious

Well while democrats and republicans agree for the most part on quite a few broad stroke subjects, it's in the details that they fight over and stallout. Which i'm sure sanders knows all too well.

Democrats want reform and investment in programs and agencies
Republicans want divestment, privatization and contractors to programs and agencies

Both will ending up spending more.


Or more than likely more of the same, both parties feed from the same troth of big banks, defense, pharmaceutical etc. Clinton in an effort to seem more electable move the party to the right nearly 30 years ago. It hasn't been the same since.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
April 16 2019 01:25 GMT
#26552
--- Nuked ---
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4993 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-04-16 01:54:27
April 16 2019 01:49 GMT
#26553
In some ways, Trump was a very centrist candidate. Fiscally liberal, culturally conservative is, by self-identification, the single largest group on that famous square diagram.

****

And since today is tax day, here's an update in the tax law. Surprise! The media was lying. 65% got a cut (or more, depending on who you ask), 6% got a raise in taxes, the rest were *about* the same.

In particular I like the title of the piece, there's a lot going on there.



Face It: You (Probably) Got a Tax Cut

If you’re an American taxpayer, you probably got a tax cut last year. And there’s a good chance you don’t believe it.

Ever since President Trump signed the Republican-sponsored tax bill in December 2017, independent analyses have consistently found that a large majority of Americans would owe less because of the law. Preliminary data based on tax filings has shown the same.

Yet as the first tax filing season under the new law wraps up on Monday, taxpayers are skeptical. A survey conducted in early April for The New York Times by the online research platform SurveyMonkey found that just 40 percent of Americans believed they had received a tax cut under the law. Just 20 percent were certain they had done so. That’s consistent with previous polls finding that most Americans felt they hadn’t gotten a tax cut, and that a large minority thought their taxes had risen — though not even one in 10 households actually got a tax increase.

To a large degree, the gap between perception and reality on the tax cuts appears to flow from a sustained — and misleading — effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand it as a broad middle-class tax increase.

That effort began in the fall of 2017, when Republicans prepared to introduce legislation that models by the independent Tax Policy Center predicted could raise taxes on nearly a third of middle-class taxpayers. It continued through Mr. Trump’s signing of the law, even though the group’s models showed that the revised bill would raise taxes on relatively few in the middle class in the 2018 tax year.

After the law went into effect, Democrats played down those estimates and instead highlighted projections that most Americans’ taxes are set to increase in 2026, after the individual tax cuts in the law are scheduled to expire.

The messaging stuck. In December 2017, polling for The Times by SurveyMonkey showed that nearly two-thirds of Americans — and three-quarters of Democrats — did not believe they would get a tax cut from the new law. In this month’s poll, three-quarters of Democrats again said they did not think they got a tax cut from the law, and the overall share of Americans who said they had benefited rose only slightly from the 2017 expectations.

In convincing people that they would not benefit, “the Democrats did a very good job,” said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. “They were able to put that into the public perception, and the reality has been unable to break that perception.”

Tax Cuts by the Numbers

Experts are divided on whether the tax law was a good idea. But there is little disagreement on this core point: Most people got a tax cut.

The Tax Policy Center estimates that 65 percent of people paid less under the law and that just 6 percent paid more. (The rest saw little change to their taxes.)

Other analyses reached similar conclusions. The Joint Committee on Taxation — Congress’s nonpartisan team of tax analysts — found that every income group would see a tax cut on average. So did the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank that was sharply critical of the law. In fact, that group went even further: In a December 2017 analysis, it found that every income group in every state would pay less on average under the law in 2019.

So far, tax season seems to be playing out more or less as the experts predicted. H&R Block, the tax-preparation giant, said last week that two-thirds of returning customers had paid less tax this year than last (excluding people who owed no tax in either year). Taxes were down, on average, in every state.

“The vast majority of people did get a tax cut,” said Nathan Rigney, an analyst at H&R Block’s Tax Institute. That’s been clear all along, he added, “just now we have real data to back that up.”


This is about half the article, and you should click it because it has 2 graphs that kind of make the point. It also talks about SALT.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-tax-cut.html
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
April 16 2019 01:53 GMT
#26554
--- Nuked ---
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4993 Posts
April 16 2019 01:56 GMT
#26555
On April 16 2019 10:53 JimmiC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 10:49 Introvert wrote:
In some ways, Trump was a very centrist candidate. Fiscally liberal, culturally conservative is, by self-identification, the single largest group on that famous square diagram.

****

And since today is tax day, here's an update in the tax law. Surprise! The media was lying. 80% got a cut, 6% got a raise in taxes, the rest were *about* the same.

In particular I like the title of the piece, there's a lot going on there.



Face It: You (Probably) Got a Tax Cut

If you’re an American taxpayer, you probably got a tax cut last year. And there’s a good chance you don’t believe it.

Ever since President Trump signed the Republican-sponsored tax bill in December 2017, independent analyses have consistently found that a large majority of Americans would owe less because of the law. Preliminary data based on tax filings has shown the same.

Yet as the first tax filing season under the new law wraps up on Monday, taxpayers are skeptical. A survey conducted in early April for The New York Times by the online research platform SurveyMonkey found that just 40 percent of Americans believed they had received a tax cut under the law. Just 20 percent were certain they had done so. That’s consistent with previous polls finding that most Americans felt they hadn’t gotten a tax cut, and that a large minority thought their taxes had risen — though not even one in 10 households actually got a tax increase.

To a large degree, the gap between perception and reality on the tax cuts appears to flow from a sustained — and misleading — effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand it as a broad middle-class tax increase.

That effort began in the fall of 2017, when Republicans prepared to introduce legislation that models by the independent Tax Policy Center predicted could raise taxes on nearly a third of middle-class taxpayers. It continued through Mr. Trump’s signing of the law, even though the group’s models showed that the revised bill would raise taxes on relatively few in the middle class in the 2018 tax year.

After the law went into effect, Democrats played down those estimates and instead highlighted projections that most Americans’ taxes are set to increase in 2026, after the individual tax cuts in the law are scheduled to expire.

The messaging stuck. In December 2017, polling for The Times by SurveyMonkey showed that nearly two-thirds of Americans — and three-quarters of Democrats — did not believe they would get a tax cut from the new law. In this month’s poll, three-quarters of Democrats again said they did not think they got a tax cut from the law, and the overall share of Americans who said they had benefited rose only slightly from the 2017 expectations.

In convincing people that they would not benefit, “the Democrats did a very good job,” said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. “They were able to put that into the public perception, and the reality has been unable to break that perception.”

Tax Cuts by the Numbers

Experts are divided on whether the tax law was a good idea. But there is little disagreement on this core point: Most people got a tax cut.

The Tax Policy Center estimates that 65 percent of people paid less under the law and that just 6 percent paid more. (The rest saw little change to their taxes.)

Other analyses reached similar conclusions. The Joint Committee on Taxation — Congress’s nonpartisan team of tax analysts — found that every income group would see a tax cut on average. So did the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank that was sharply critical of the law. In fact, that group went even further: In a December 2017 analysis, it found that every income group in every state would pay less on average under the law in 2019.

So far, tax season seems to be playing out more or less as the experts predicted. H&R Block, the tax-preparation giant, said last week that two-thirds of returning customers had paid less tax this year than last (excluding people who owed no tax in either year). Taxes were down, on average, in every state.

“The vast majority of people did get a tax cut,” said Nathan Rigney, an analyst at H&R Block’s Tax Institute. That’s been clear all along, he added, “just now we have real data to back that up.”


This is about half the article, and you should click it because it has graphs.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-tax-cut.html


It is hard to put Trump on the spectrum because he basically says everything and because of his constant lying it is hard to know what his position is. But to me the main policies that stuck out from the election were wall and tax cuts. Both which are decidedly right. And considering the next one I think of is getting rid of Obama care it is more right. What of his fiscal policies or promises strikes you as left?


Trump didn't campaign on tax cuts. He campaigned on the wall, yes. But every time he was asked about doing things conservatives want done, like fixing entitlements, he said he wouldn't touch them. He didn't run on reducing the deficit, although he made noises about how he was going to save the government so much money. But he didn't campaign on tax cuts or on lowering government spending.
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Plansix
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
United States60190 Posts
April 16 2019 02:06 GMT
#26556
And yet he signed that tax bill, has spent his entire term gutting government agencies and packing the court with conservatives. Its like called a centrist Democrat after nationalizing the oil industry to pay for healthcare and education.
I have the Honor to be your Obedient Servant, P.6
TL+ Member
semantics
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
10040 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-04-16 04:07:32
April 16 2019 02:08 GMT
#26557
On April 16 2019 10:56 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 10:53 JimmiC wrote:
On April 16 2019 10:49 Introvert wrote:
In some ways, Trump was a very centrist candidate. Fiscally liberal, culturally conservative is, by self-identification, the single largest group on that famous square diagram.

****

And since today is tax day, here's an update in the tax law. Surprise! The media was lying. 80% got a cut, 6% got a raise in taxes, the rest were *about* the same.

In particular I like the title of the piece, there's a lot going on there.



Face It: You (Probably) Got a Tax Cut

If you’re an American taxpayer, you probably got a tax cut last year. And there’s a good chance you don’t believe it.

Ever since President Trump signed the Republican-sponsored tax bill in December 2017, independent analyses have consistently found that a large majority of Americans would owe less because of the law. Preliminary data based on tax filings has shown the same.

Yet as the first tax filing season under the new law wraps up on Monday, taxpayers are skeptical. A survey conducted in early April for The New York Times by the online research platform SurveyMonkey found that just 40 percent of Americans believed they had received a tax cut under the law. Just 20 percent were certain they had done so. That’s consistent with previous polls finding that most Americans felt they hadn’t gotten a tax cut, and that a large minority thought their taxes had risen — though not even one in 10 households actually got a tax increase.

To a large degree, the gap between perception and reality on the tax cuts appears to flow from a sustained — and misleading — effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand it as a broad middle-class tax increase.

That effort began in the fall of 2017, when Republicans prepared to introduce legislation that models by the independent Tax Policy Center predicted could raise taxes on nearly a third of middle-class taxpayers. It continued through Mr. Trump’s signing of the law, even though the group’s models showed that the revised bill would raise taxes on relatively few in the middle class in the 2018 tax year.

After the law went into effect, Democrats played down those estimates and instead highlighted projections that most Americans’ taxes are set to increase in 2026, after the individual tax cuts in the law are scheduled to expire.

The messaging stuck. In December 2017, polling for The Times by SurveyMonkey showed that nearly two-thirds of Americans — and three-quarters of Democrats — did not believe they would get a tax cut from the new law. In this month’s poll, three-quarters of Democrats again said they did not think they got a tax cut from the law, and the overall share of Americans who said they had benefited rose only slightly from the 2017 expectations.

In convincing people that they would not benefit, “the Democrats did a very good job,” said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. “They were able to put that into the public perception, and the reality has been unable to break that perception.”

Tax Cuts by the Numbers

Experts are divided on whether the tax law was a good idea. But there is little disagreement on this core point: Most people got a tax cut.

The Tax Policy Center estimates that 65 percent of people paid less under the law and that just 6 percent paid more. (The rest saw little change to their taxes.)

Other analyses reached similar conclusions. The Joint Committee on Taxation — Congress’s nonpartisan team of tax analysts — found that every income group would see a tax cut on average. So did the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank that was sharply critical of the law. In fact, that group went even further: In a December 2017 analysis, it found that every income group in every state would pay less on average under the law in 2019.

So far, tax season seems to be playing out more or less as the experts predicted. H&R Block, the tax-preparation giant, said last week that two-thirds of returning customers had paid less tax this year than last (excluding people who owed no tax in either year). Taxes were down, on average, in every state.

“The vast majority of people did get a tax cut,” said Nathan Rigney, an analyst at H&R Block’s Tax Institute. That’s been clear all along, he added, “just now we have real data to back that up.”


This is about half the article, and you should click it because it has graphs.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-tax-cut.html


It is hard to put Trump on the spectrum because he basically says everything and because of his constant lying it is hard to know what his position is. But to me the main policies that stuck out from the election were wall and tax cuts. Both which are decidedly right. And considering the next one I think of is getting rid of Obama care it is more right. What of his fiscal policies or promises strikes you as left?


Trump didn't campaign on tax cuts. He campaigned on the wall, yes. But every time he was asked about doing things conservatives want done, like fixing entitlements, he said he wouldn't touch them. He didn't run on reducing the deficit, although he made noises about how he was going to save the government so much money. But he didn't campaign on tax cuts or on lowering government spending.

His campaign-proposal talked tax cuts quite a bit and in quite an aggressive manner in terms of overhaul
https://www.taxpolicycenter.org/publications/analysis-donald-trumps-tax-plan/full
JimmiC
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
Canada22817 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-04-16 02:11:20
April 16 2019 02:10 GMT
#26558
--- Nuked ---
Dan HH
Profile Joined July 2012
Romania9215 Posts
April 16 2019 02:12 GMT
#26559
On April 16 2019 10:56 Introvert wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 16 2019 10:53 JimmiC wrote:
On April 16 2019 10:49 Introvert wrote:
In some ways, Trump was a very centrist candidate. Fiscally liberal, culturally conservative is, by self-identification, the single largest group on that famous square diagram.

****

And since today is tax day, here's an update in the tax law. Surprise! The media was lying. 80% got a cut, 6% got a raise in taxes, the rest were *about* the same.

In particular I like the title of the piece, there's a lot going on there.



Face It: You (Probably) Got a Tax Cut

If you’re an American taxpayer, you probably got a tax cut last year. And there’s a good chance you don’t believe it.

Ever since President Trump signed the Republican-sponsored tax bill in December 2017, independent analyses have consistently found that a large majority of Americans would owe less because of the law. Preliminary data based on tax filings has shown the same.

Yet as the first tax filing season under the new law wraps up on Monday, taxpayers are skeptical. A survey conducted in early April for The New York Times by the online research platform SurveyMonkey found that just 40 percent of Americans believed they had received a tax cut under the law. Just 20 percent were certain they had done so. That’s consistent with previous polls finding that most Americans felt they hadn’t gotten a tax cut, and that a large minority thought their taxes had risen — though not even one in 10 households actually got a tax increase.

To a large degree, the gap between perception and reality on the tax cuts appears to flow from a sustained — and misleading — effort by liberal opponents of the law to brand it as a broad middle-class tax increase.

That effort began in the fall of 2017, when Republicans prepared to introduce legislation that models by the independent Tax Policy Center predicted could raise taxes on nearly a third of middle-class taxpayers. It continued through Mr. Trump’s signing of the law, even though the group’s models showed that the revised bill would raise taxes on relatively few in the middle class in the 2018 tax year.

After the law went into effect, Democrats played down those estimates and instead highlighted projections that most Americans’ taxes are set to increase in 2026, after the individual tax cuts in the law are scheduled to expire.

The messaging stuck. In December 2017, polling for The Times by SurveyMonkey showed that nearly two-thirds of Americans — and three-quarters of Democrats — did not believe they would get a tax cut from the new law. In this month’s poll, three-quarters of Democrats again said they did not think they got a tax cut from the law, and the overall share of Americans who said they had benefited rose only slightly from the 2017 expectations.

In convincing people that they would not benefit, “the Democrats did a very good job,” said Howard Gleckman, a senior fellow at the Tax Policy Center. “They were able to put that into the public perception, and the reality has been unable to break that perception.”

Tax Cuts by the Numbers

Experts are divided on whether the tax law was a good idea. But there is little disagreement on this core point: Most people got a tax cut.

The Tax Policy Center estimates that 65 percent of people paid less under the law and that just 6 percent paid more. (The rest saw little change to their taxes.)

Other analyses reached similar conclusions. The Joint Committee on Taxation — Congress’s nonpartisan team of tax analysts — found that every income group would see a tax cut on average. So did the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, a left-leaning think tank that was sharply critical of the law. In fact, that group went even further: In a December 2017 analysis, it found that every income group in every state would pay less on average under the law in 2019.

So far, tax season seems to be playing out more or less as the experts predicted. H&R Block, the tax-preparation giant, said last week that two-thirds of returning customers had paid less tax this year than last (excluding people who owed no tax in either year). Taxes were down, on average, in every state.

“The vast majority of people did get a tax cut,” said Nathan Rigney, an analyst at H&R Block’s Tax Institute. That’s been clear all along, he added, “just now we have real data to back that up.”


This is about half the article, and you should click it because it has graphs.

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/14/business/economy/income-tax-cut.html


It is hard to put Trump on the spectrum because he basically says everything and because of his constant lying it is hard to know what his position is. But to me the main policies that stuck out from the election were wall and tax cuts. Both which are decidedly right. And considering the next one I think of is getting rid of Obama care it is more right. What of his fiscal policies or promises strikes you as left?


Trump didn't campaign on tax cuts. He campaigned on the wall, yes. But every time he was asked about doing things conservatives want done, like fixing entitlements, he said he wouldn't touch them. He didn't run on reducing the deficit, although he made noises about how he was going to save the government so much money. But he didn't campaign on tax cuts or on lowering government spending.


It's been less than three years, mate. Let's not rewrite reality so soon.


https://web.archive.org/web/20160929155208/https://www.donaldjtrump.com/policies/tax-plan/



DONALD J. TRUMP’S VISION

Reduce taxes across-the-board, especially for working and middle-income Americans.

[...]

The Trump Plan will lower the business tax rate from 35 percent to 15 percent, and eliminate the corporate alternative minimum tax. This rate is available to all businesses, both small and large, that that want to retain the profits within the business.

[...]
Introvert
Profile Joined April 2011
United States4993 Posts
Last Edited: 2019-04-16 03:03:50
April 16 2019 02:19 GMT
#26560
pointing to his website doesn't tell us much. it really doesn't matter, espeically for Trump. The overlap between what he says and his people say is often quite large. More than once he said his own taxes should be higher. One of his most consistent things was no changes to medicare or social security. Trump didn't go to rallies and spend 20 minutes riffing on tax cuts every time. Moreover, let's say you don't believe me about tax cuts. it'd be great to see evidence he ran as a fiscal conservative which is most directly related to what I posted above.

As for what "left" things he wanted... at various times he spoke well of other countries' healthcare systems and promised that "everyone" would have "great" insurance, and endorsed more government involvement in this area.

User was warned for this post
"But, as the conservative understands it, modification of the rules should always reflect, and never impose, a change in the activities and beliefs of those who are subject to them, and should never on any occasion be so great as to destroy the ensemble."
Prev 1 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 5776 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Maestros of the Game
15:00
Playoffs
Classic vs LamboLIVE!
Clem vs Maru
RotterdaM1612
IntoTheiNu 1084
ComeBackTV 999
TaKeTV 514
Rex186
IndyStarCraft 182
Ryung 172
BRAT_OK 82
3DClanTV 75
EnkiAlexander 70
CosmosSc2 59
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 1612
Rex 186
IndyStarCraft 182
Ryung 172
BRAT_OK 82
CosmosSc2 59
Codebar 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 5429
Sea 2434
Shuttle 1231
Mini 990
ggaemo 810
actioN 545
Hyuk 326
Soulkey 243
Snow 181
Rush 116
[ Show more ]
Hyun 102
Sharp 83
Noble 70
Free 49
Barracks 38
firebathero 35
JYJ 35
sSak 33
Movie 31
Sacsri 24
Rock 24
Killer 23
soO 19
Terrorterran 18
GoRush 17
NaDa 15
IntoTheRainbow 15
JulyZerg 9
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Dota 2
qojqva2511
Dendi1435
syndereN376
Counter-Strike
fl0m1124
kRYSTAL_58
x6flipin9
Other Games
gofns43380
tarik_tv12315
singsing1818
Liquid`RaSZi1410
FrodaN815
B2W.Neo753
Beastyqt569
hiko568
byalli435
ceh9302
ArmadaUGS260
crisheroes171
Liquid`VortiX126
Hui .96
KnowMe91
QueenE81
Trikslyr38
SHIN 11
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV290
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 11
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis3135
• Jankos1992
• TFBlade1016
Other Games
• WagamamaTV439
• Shiphtur71
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 59m
The PondCast
17h 59m
Maestros of the Game
22h 59m
Serral vs Rogue
herO vs SHIN
OSC
1d 6h
Replay Cast
1d 7h
Maestros of the Game
1d 21h
Replay Cast
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
[ Show More ]
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
3 days
OSC
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 22
2026 GSL S2
Heroes Pulsing #1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
CSCL: Masked Kings S4
YSL S3
Acropolis #4 - GSB
SCTL 2026 Spring
WardiTV Spring 2026
Maestros of the Game 2
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Murky Cup 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026

Upcoming

BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
HSC XXIX
Douyu Cup 2026
Heroes Pulsing #3
Heroes Pulsing #2
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.