we call it 장기 (Jang-gi)
chess vs chinese chess - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
XDawn
Canada4040 Posts
we call it 장기 (Jang-gi) | ||
|
WhatisProtoss
Korea (South)2325 Posts
On October 29 2006 17:28 baal wrote: the only bad thing about Chineese chess is when the King gets greedy declares communism and all the pawns die. What a lame joke... | ||
|
ky[Z]
China1730 Posts
On October 29 2006 17:35 haduken wrote: only old people play this in China. lol....plz stop generalizing and pretending you know everything. I play chinese chess and a lot of my chinese friends play it too. | ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
When I went to China for missions this summer, I played and CRUSHED the kids at Chinese Chess. Where I went to high school, all my friends were Chinese and I learned Chinese Chess. I was about a 1700 ELO regular Chess player (yeah I was a freaking nerd but don't imagnie fat asian kid with glasses, imagine 6' 200 pound hockey player with intelligence ;D). From someone who knows how to play both games decently, I have to say International Chess (Western Chess if you will) is by FAR more complicated then Chinese Chess. There is FAR less strategy involved in Chinese Chess. It's just attack and whoever attacks better wins. Chess you have aspects of pawn formation, defense, counting which squares are owned, dark square vs light square weaknesses, potential sacrifices, and the list goes on and on. I picked up Chinese Chess way too quickly for it to be complicated. None of my Chinese friends can beat me. I used to play religiously on FICS with this program called Thief but since college started last year I gave more priority to StarCraft =D. Though whenever I take a crap I bring out some old Chess books. ㅋㅋㅋ | ||
|
Cambium
United States16368 Posts
| ||
|
overuoveruoveru
143 Posts
| ||
|
Kacas
Brazil3143 Posts
even the opinions differ. but there's a 1700 player. i think he knows what he talks =/ | ||
|
aseq
Netherlands3991 Posts
| ||
|
Myrmidon
United States9452 Posts
| ||
|
jkillashark
United States5262 Posts
He got schooled and he asked me to join his club. I said no. I guess I generalize it a lot when I say Chess players > Chinese Chess players but Chess players have a far better thought process when making a move because the game has just far too many complications than to just attack with two or three pieces. In Chess, one move can threaten SO many things. Chess also can be played through a variety of styles. A very wild attacking and sacrifical style of chess was played by Mikhail Tal. A very defensive and preventative choking style of play was exhibited by Tigran Petrosian. A very strategically complicated style of play was shown by Emanuel Lasker. A lot of times I like to think of StarCraft as the Chess of video games. As in, it's freaking perfect. | ||
|
haduken
Australia8267 Posts
| ||
|
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
| ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
| ||
|
0x64
Finland4600 Posts
| ||
|
ssj100
Afghanistan320 Posts
| ||
|
Holbein
38 Posts
![]() | ||
|
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On October 29 2006 17:31 haduken wrote: international cheese is way way way more complex. Chinese chess is pretty easy so long u follow the required openings. Eh, no? The gametree complexit of chinese chess is higher than regular chess, followed by janggi, shogi and lastly by the infinitely more complex Go (weiqi, baduk). http://www.csie.ndhu.edu.tw/~sjyen/Papers/2004CCC.pdf (actually janggi wasn't in the list, hm). | ||
|
ssj100
Afghanistan320 Posts
And to be honest, International Chess is the most balanced board game of all time. Why do you think people are making a living from just playing it, computer chess programs have been developing for decades (and people are buying them). It's just like Starcraft - there are many other computer games more complex than this (like Civ 4?) but Starcraft is much more popular as it is simple enough, but complex enough to be fun and enjoyable on all levels (noob to pro). | ||
|
One Page Memory
Bulgaria2145 Posts
| ||
|
IIICodeIIIIIII
China1101 Posts
With that out of the way, i'd say that the differences between chinese chess and international chess is that chinese chess tends to be more tactical in nature whereas international chess has a lot more to do with maneuvering and strategies. This is because international chess has so many more pawns that tie up the game, and literally, up to half of the squares are occupied by pieces. In chinese chess, the squares are occupied by less pieces, and most of the offensive units can more around much more easily so there's more tactics involved with relatively speaking, less focus on positional variations (relative to chess). I play chess. i love when i go back to china and school all the old people who are playing chinese chess. it's too bad that people don't play it as much as they used too. in the good old days, if you're on a train, there will be people playing chess and a group watching. Now, i was on a train several times and didn't see one chess game. curse the new generation! | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://files.myopera.com/shemok/albums/20945/new.jpg)