• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:00
CEST 10:00
KST 17:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview4[ASL21] Ro4 Preview: On Course12Code S Season 1 - RO8 Preview7[ASL21] Ro8 Preview Pt2: Progenitors8Code S Season 1 - RO12 Group A: Rogue, Percival, Solar, Zoun13
Community News
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results2Weekly Cups (May 4-10): Clem, MaxPax, herO win1Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !11Weekly Cups (April 27-May 4): Clem takes triple0RSL Revival: Season 5 - Qualifiers and Main Event12
StarCraft 2
General
Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO4 & Finals Preview Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO8 Results Code S Season 1 (2026) - RO12 Results Team Liquid Map Contest #22 - The Finalists MaNa leaves Team Liquid
Tourneys
GSL Code S Season 1 (2026) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week 89 2026 GSL Season 2 Qualifiers Maestros of The Game 2 announcement and schedule !
Strategy
Custom Maps
[D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3 [A] Nemrods 1/4 players
External Content
Mutation # 525 Wheel of Misfortune The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 524 Death and Taxes Mutation # 523 Firewall
Brood War
General
Pros React to: TvT Masterclass in FlaSh vs Light vespene.gg — BW replays in browser BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion ASL21 General Discussion
Tourneys
[BSL22] RO8 Bracket Stage + Another TieBreaker [ASL21] Semifinals B [ASL21] Ro8 Day 4 Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 2
Strategy
Muta micro map competition Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Hydra ZvZ: An Introduction Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Starcraft Tabletop Miniature Game
Dota 2
The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas TL Mafia Community Thread Five o'clock TL Mafia
Community
General
YouTube Thread US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
streaming software Strange computer issues (software) [G] How to Block Livestream Ads
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
How EEG Data Can Predict Gam…
TrAiDoS
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1679 users

UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 91

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 89 90 91 92 93 646 Next
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note.

Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion.
Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon.

All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting.

https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4926 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-18 11:16:32
June 18 2016 10:52 GMT
#1801
It's funny that the Eurosceptics and Nationalists are complaining about the ineffectiveness and the lack of democracy in the EU, when the petty individual interests of the member states and their governments, i.e. eurosceptic and nationalist tendencies, are the major reasons for the current sorry state of affairs.

I hope Britain leaves. It won't solve any of the nation's true problems, but at least the people can no longer make Brussels the scapegoat for anything and everything, and it might trigger some desperately needed changes both in the EU and in the UK.
Maenander
Profile Joined November 2002
Germany4926 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-18 11:00:36
June 18 2016 11:00 GMT
#1802
sorry double post
RvB
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Netherlands6274 Posts
June 18 2016 11:16 GMT
#1803
On June 18 2016 05:52 Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2016 05:24 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 18 2016 05:20 Shield wrote:
On June 18 2016 05:17 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 18 2016 05:08 Shield wrote:
On June 18 2016 04:52 jello_biafra wrote:
I was heavily in favour of staying in the EU until very recently but the more I find out the more I change my mind, I assumed the parliament worked like a normal parliament and that there was some degree of democracy. Turns out the EU cripples democracy and self-determination. It doesn't matter what you believe. If you're a communist, capitalist, monarchist, whatever, any changes you want to make can be nullified by the EU. Basically, unless your ideals align perfectly with what they want, and you're confident that their interests will never diverge from your own, you have no reason to vote remain. It's a rare case of a truly bipartisan issue, and it's telling that support for leave has been so high despite the entire establishment pushing against it.

For years I've just kind of gone along with the story that Farage was some fringe lunatic but it turns out he might actually have been right all along.

Also I'm all for European countries working together and having a common market, I'm even in favour of countries like Britain and Germany giving money to develop countries like Poland but it turns out the way it's been done is really inefficient and a lot of the money is just wasted on bureaucracy. The more I learn the more it seems like Germany is the only country that's really benefited from the whole project.



Yes, and your PM and MPs are elected by EU. Also, EU threatens to eat your children. Don't you feel you overstretch your arguments here? You make it sound like your parliament has no power at all.

Germany isn't some evil genius. In fact, it's a more disciplined country than the UK even though I live in the UK. Just because you can't make it work doesn't mean others can't. Learn something from Germany.

Learn what? How to create a currency union that enriches your country to the cost of Spain, Italy, Greece, Portugal?

How to engineer a refugee crisis?


You're very uneducated, aren't you? Who intervened in the Middle East to cause refugee crisis? Hint: Germany wasn't the major player. It was your friend Tony Blair and George Bush.

Yes, Tony Blair caused the Syrian civil war...

Merkel was the one that openly invited everyone to come to Europe, the majority of the migrants aren't Syrian and many aren't even refugees


Yes, Merkel made a mistake. I think she made it because Germany may feel guilty because of fascism, and they want redemption by inviting refugees. Still, such a large amount of refugees was a mistake. Having refugees is the symptom though. I don't mean to sound mean when I say that. You have to think of the reason why there are refugees at all. It's because the west (mainly USA) made a terrible mistake to promote democracy in the Middle East and overthrow their leaders. Democracy is great, but it doesn't work in the Middle East as you can see now.

While what Merkel did was pretty dumb it wasnt what caused the refugees to flood in. Let's not forget thst her welcoming everyone was a response to all the refugees already coming in.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 18 2016 12:41 GMT
#1804
On June 18 2016 07:28 Shield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2016 07:19 KwarK wrote:
On June 18 2016 07:14 Shield wrote:
On June 18 2016 07:03 KwarK wrote:
On June 18 2016 06:56 Shield wrote:
This video reminds me of that one:

You may say it affects Western Europe in general, including the UK. What's your view on it?

That is the stupidest youtube video I've ever watched. It's literally trying to beg the question

"so, given that Israel has a wall and oppresses Palestinians, who are the real racists, Hitler or the Jews?"

No, still Hitler. Always Hitler.


I think anti-racist Hitler could be replaced by anyone from far left. Israel in video could be any country from Western Europe. That's how I understand it at least.

How I understand it is that an unchanged Hitler wakes up in 2016 and wants to destroy the Jews. He then decides that the real racists in 2016 are the liberals who are seeking the destruction of races through mixed breeding, integration and tolerance. Then, whenever they question his policies to destroy the Jews he goes "I'm just being tolerant and liberal, you're not a racist are you? Because if you disagree with me you must be a racist".

Like I said, one of the stupidest videos I've ever seen.


Isn't this how it is in Europe at the moment though? Open borders, white British people are minority in London, etc. If you take a figurative view of that video, you may see it's similar. I'm not saying the video is exclusively for the UK though. I think it's not about Israel at all. I believe it's about monolithic societies in Europe in general.

I live in London and British people being a minority in London isn't even remotely true. Sure, there are areas of high concentration of Jewish and Indian and Pakistani populations, but those immigrant populations (some of which have been there for over 100 years) have nothing to do with the EU. Not that it matters since UK isn't part of the Schengen Zone. The vast majority of immigrants coming into UK are from outside the EU.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4416 Posts
June 18 2016 13:22 GMT
#1805
Well technically they are a minority now, white british in London is 49%.
Heaps of Eastern Europeans doing the lower paid hospitality work.
I was there last year.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
maartendq
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Belgium3115 Posts
June 18 2016 14:36 GMT
#1806
On June 18 2016 19:52 Maenander wrote:
It's funny that the Eurosceptics and Nationalists are complaining about the ineffectiveness and the lack of democracy in the EU, when the petty individual interests of the member states and their governments, i.e. eurosceptic and nationalist tendencies, are the major reasons for the current sorry state of affairs.

I hope Britain leaves. It won't solve any of the nation's true problems, but at least the people can no longer make Brussels the scapegoat for anything and everything, and it might trigger some desperately needed changes both in the EU and in the UK.

I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour, will blame after it turns out that not being part of the EU did not change their problems one single bit. On the contrary, Brexit will probably make matters worse for them because some businesses are bound to leave for other shores.

Then there's Scotland who will demand to have another independence referendum because they are largely pro-EU.
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
June 18 2016 16:06 GMT
#1807
On June 18 2016 23:36 maartendq wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 18 2016 19:52 Maenander wrote:
It's funny that the Eurosceptics and Nationalists are complaining about the ineffectiveness and the lack of democracy in the EU, when the petty individual interests of the member states and their governments, i.e. eurosceptic and nationalist tendencies, are the major reasons for the current sorry state of affairs.

I hope Britain leaves. It won't solve any of the nation's true problems, but at least the people can no longer make Brussels the scapegoat for anything and everything, and it might trigger some desperately needed changes both in the EU and in the UK.

I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour, will blame after it turns out that not being part of the EU did not change their problems one single bit. On the contrary, Brexit will probably make matters worse for them because some businesses are bound to leave for other shores.

Then there's Scotland who will demand to have another independence referendum because they are largely pro-EU.


To the mainland Europeans in this thread: please take what you read in your newspapers with a pinch of salt. The main advocates for Brexit are the working class themselves, i.e. the people disenfranchised by the EU. If Brexit happens, it will essentially have been a revolution. You might believe that the EU is doing something noble when it gives businesses grants to move their production/services to eastern Europe; something like Robin Hood, maybe. The reality is that it is a major driving force for inequality within the UK, as the amount of low-skilled employment available is driven down and the amount of low-skill labour available rises rapidly with unchecked immigration. This results in lower wages, higher house prices and, as a result, it drives down living standards for the poor, resulting in greater inequality. The irony is that the EU is exacerbating the capitalistic nature of the UK economy. Last year was also the first time in a decade that wealth inequality has gone up, in no small part because immigration is driving house prices through the roof. 330,000 net migration last year to the UK, and England is already the most densely populated country in Europe.

Even Deutsche Bank predicts that UK stocks are going to outperform those in Europe, in the case of Brexit, because the pound being competitive will result in more exports - and more exports means more jobs for the working class.

As for Scotland - they are not nearly as different from the rest of the UK on this issue as their politicians like to make out. Politicians in general have shown how horrendously disconnected they are from voters. As for independence, Scotland has absolutely no hope of separating from the UK since oil prices collapsed, and if they had voted to leave the chances are that they would be in recession by now.

Regardless: I predict we're going to vote to remain. It will not be the result of any positive feeling toward the EU, but rather of fear and coercion. When you have to convince members to stay with coercion, you ought to understand that your institution is toxic. But no, the EU will take it as endorsement and continue to plough onward in pursuit of that holy grail, the European superstate.

It won't end well.
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4416 Posts
June 18 2016 20:37 GMT
#1808
I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour

This makes absolutely no sense, it is the other way around.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 18 2016 22:08 GMT
#1809
On June 18 2016 22:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Well technically they are a minority now, white british in London is 49%.
Heaps of Eastern Europeans doing the lower paid hospitality work.
I was there last year.
Presuming that figure is true, how would that be a minority? Unless you lump everybody who isn't white British into some sort of homogeneous group of their own? More importantly, even if they were, what does it matter as those who aren't white British adopt British culture and cultural norms? Personally I'll expend my energy on the vast amounts of native British who have negative cultural values. In any case the vast majority of non- white British will most assuredly be from India or Bangladesh, neither of which are in the EU. Lastly what does it matter to you how many White British faces you can see in London? I have lived in London all my life. It doesn't bother me one jot.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
June 18 2016 22:12 GMT
#1810
On June 19 2016 05:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
Show nested quote +
I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour

This makes absolutely no sense, it is the other way around.

He suspect he is refering to those who are dependent on low skilled labour jobs.
BurningSera
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
Ireland19621 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-18 23:35:57
June 18 2016 23:32 GMT
#1811
On June 17 2016 04:07 warding wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2016 03:40 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:34 Ghostcom wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:16 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 17 2016 01:40 Ghostcom wrote:
On June 17 2016 01:03 Madkipz wrote:


Arguments for leaving the EU.

You can revive the british fishing industry.

You can not pay the EU membership fees, and EU imposed taxes (VAT taxes), and support your own agriculture rather than the failing EU agriculture.

You can avoid joining in the failing EU economy with low growth and high youth employment.

You'll still have trade with the EU, but at your own therms.

Yes the market will have a downturn, but the remain side is lying to you when they are calling it a disaster.


The only way UK is going to trade with EU is if they get an agreement similar to Norway, which

1) Is highly unlikely. The deal is almost certainly going to be pretty terrible for the UK as the EU will want to emphasize that leaving is not beneficial and after all the UK needs access to the EU-market more than the other way around.
2) Means they have to live up to EU-regulations with zero influence over the policies implemented.

EDIT:
On June 17 2016 00:37 Maenander wrote:
A rise of hooliganism, assassination attempts, right-wing terrorism. This is what all the fear-mongering in Europe has brought us to. It seems like rational discourse is a thing of the past.


Let's not pretend that left-wingers are innocent in this.

The UK is Germany's biggest export market, it's definitely in their interest to come to an agreement, getting a Norway style deal is pretty much the worst case scenario and it's basically the same as what we have now.

Edit: ok it's not the worst case scenario but it's the most likely worst case scenario


It's not basically the same as what you have now. It's the same regulations as you have now without any of the influence you currently hold. It's a pretty damn bad scenario, and it is much more likely you get a worse deal as EU is largely tired of the Swiss/Norwegian deals.

Difference is that those regulations would now only apply to businesses dealing directly with EU countries instead of to all businesses, and it's not like we have much influence over said regulations at the moment anyway

If the UK decides to create its own regulations akin to the EU directives then it's basically imposing an added cost of compliance for UK businesses, making it costlier to export. It'll also be a cost on EU businesses exporting to the UK, and that will surely be reflected on higher prices. Not to mention the cost of drawing up your own regulation. For that reason it'll make the most economic sense for the UK to continue to follow the EU directives.


People need to talk more about regulations rather than the rubbish flying around (i mean on the media here). Since i am involved in the regulatory field, i don't even want to start to think about how much it will cost if we left EU.

The simplest example i just told my housemate is that, imagine X product that you use daily that we imported from certain EU country, and regulation says ok you cant raise the price of X product for more than 0.001-0.005% per year. If we left EU that regulation will not apply to us and then troubles happen, prices raise price drop, competitions come and go, small medium companies will get crushed so hard (they will not be able to see that coming at all), and ultimately common folks (like me) will get affected big time. And the rich? they would have prepared better and even if they had 0 backup plan, everything will be fine for them anyway - at worst, one less holiday beach house this year. And whats the worst thing, we have literally 0 export that any other countries want.

In the past decade you hear people blame everything on immigrants. We don't want to work at McDonald's, we blame foreigners who are willing to take those jobs as 'they come here to take our jobs' (and usually comes with 'and our women', and i won't go into that). so if we actually leave EU (it won't), i would like to see how would people react when £ crash like mad, and maybe then they will stfu about blaming foreigners etc. I am saying this because this is a country where when people see a black man drives a Mercedes they will bat an eye on, up north will be fine with this, but try south england (bar london) you see this so evidently. British need to see that the problems lie deep down in the system but stop blaming foreigners/EU, changes are needed to improve alot of issues in this country - not saying that EU has no issues or influence to this mess, EU will definitely need some changes (to work better with UK and every other countries) after the referendum.

So the bottomline is, i never care about politics, as a common folk who works in the field where money comes from regulations themselves, no changes will affect my job/income anyway - except war and this goddamn UK leaving EU change. I mean, if you are poor/average, you have no reason to vote leave, because we will not suddenly get a pay raise 'oh because we left EU so we have more money to pay you :D), and if changes will hit us hard (and it will) and no matter what you say about 'oh it is just a temporary pain' i will not want to see all the goddamn prices raise in the next few years; if you are rich (i mean truly rich, like at least half a mil income per annual), i just dont see how/why would you want to vote no, same thing you will need to spend more here and there but that probably doesn't come out from your own pocket, and that money will probably be equal to hiring someone for 1 year, 1 job less, vote leave or stay literally mean 'meh' to the rich.
is 2017, stop being lame, fuck's sakes. 'Can't wait for the rise of the cakes and humanity's last stand tbqh.'
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
June 19 2016 01:01 GMT
#1812
lol at people who reflexively defended that guy as having nothing to do with brexit
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
bardtown
Profile Joined June 2011
England2313 Posts
June 19 2016 03:17 GMT
#1813
On June 19 2016 08:32 BurningSera wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 17 2016 04:07 warding wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:40 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:34 Ghostcom wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:16 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 17 2016 01:40 Ghostcom wrote:
On June 17 2016 01:03 Madkipz wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW0LEtW_6sI

Arguments for leaving the EU.

You can revive the british fishing industry.

You can not pay the EU membership fees, and EU imposed taxes (VAT taxes), and support your own agriculture rather than the failing EU agriculture.

You can avoid joining in the failing EU economy with low growth and high youth employment.

You'll still have trade with the EU, but at your own therms.

Yes the market will have a downturn, but the remain side is lying to you when they are calling it a disaster.


The only way UK is going to trade with EU is if they get an agreement similar to Norway, which

1) Is highly unlikely. The deal is almost certainly going to be pretty terrible for the UK as the EU will want to emphasize that leaving is not beneficial and after all the UK needs access to the EU-market more than the other way around.
2) Means they have to live up to EU-regulations with zero influence over the policies implemented.

EDIT:
On June 17 2016 00:37 Maenander wrote:
A rise of hooliganism, assassination attempts, right-wing terrorism. This is what all the fear-mongering in Europe has brought us to. It seems like rational discourse is a thing of the past.


Let's not pretend that left-wingers are innocent in this.

The UK is Germany's biggest export market, it's definitely in their interest to come to an agreement, getting a Norway style deal is pretty much the worst case scenario and it's basically the same as what we have now.

Edit: ok it's not the worst case scenario but it's the most likely worst case scenario


It's not basically the same as what you have now. It's the same regulations as you have now without any of the influence you currently hold. It's a pretty damn bad scenario, and it is much more likely you get a worse deal as EU is largely tired of the Swiss/Norwegian deals.

Difference is that those regulations would now only apply to businesses dealing directly with EU countries instead of to all businesses, and it's not like we have much influence over said regulations at the moment anyway

If the UK decides to create its own regulations akin to the EU directives then it's basically imposing an added cost of compliance for UK businesses, making it costlier to export. It'll also be a cost on EU businesses exporting to the UK, and that will surely be reflected on higher prices. Not to mention the cost of drawing up your own regulation. For that reason it'll make the most economic sense for the UK to continue to follow the EU directives.


People need to talk more about regulations rather than the rubbish flying around (i mean on the media here). Since i am involved in the regulatory field, i don't even want to start to think about how much it will cost if we left EU.

The simplest example i just told my housemate is that, imagine X product that you use daily that we imported from certain EU country, and regulation says ok you cant raise the price of X product for more than 0.001-0.005% per year. If we left EU that regulation will not apply to us and then troubles happen, prices raise price drop, competitions come and go, small medium companies will get crushed so hard (they will not be able to see that coming at all), and ultimately common folks (like me) will get affected big time. And the rich? they would have prepared better and even if they had 0 backup plan, everything will be fine for them anyway - at worst, one less holiday beach house this year. And whats the worst thing, we have literally 0 export that any other countries want.

In the past decade you hear people blame everything on immigrants. We don't want to work at McDonald's, we blame foreigners who are willing to take those jobs as 'they come here to take our jobs' (and usually comes with 'and our women', and i won't go into that). so if we actually leave EU (it won't), i would like to see how would people react when £ crash like mad, and maybe then they will stfu about blaming foreigners etc. I am saying this because this is a country where when people see a black man drives a Mercedes they will bat an eye on, up north will be fine with this, but try south england (bar london) you see this so evidently. British need to see that the problems lie deep down in the system but stop blaming foreigners/EU, changes are needed to improve alot of issues in this country - not saying that EU has no issues or influence to this mess, EU will definitely need some changes (to work better with UK and every other countries) after the referendum.

So the bottomline is, i never care about politics, as a common folk who works in the field where money comes from regulations themselves, no changes will affect my job/income anyway - except war and this goddamn UK leaving EU change. I mean, if you are poor/average, you have no reason to vote leave, because we will not suddenly get a pay raise 'oh because we left EU so we have more money to pay you :D), and if changes will hit us hard (and it will) and no matter what you say about 'oh it is just a temporary pain' i will not want to see all the goddamn prices raise in the next few years; if you are rich (i mean truly rich, like at least half a mil income per annual), i just dont see how/why would you want to vote no, same thing you will need to spend more here and there but that probably doesn't come out from your own pocket, and that money will probably be equal to hiring someone for 1 year, 1 job less, vote leave or stay literally mean 'meh' to the rich.


There are many thousands of reasons to leave.

You should not look to your own job as justification, either way. It's not a vote about your job. It's a vote about the EU; about the corrupt system that is eroding democracy in Europe.

EU constitution: French people vote NO. Dutch people vote NO. What does the EU do? It renames it to the Lisbon Treaty and doesn't give them another vote. The Irish vote NO to the Lisbon Treaty. So the EU makes them take the vote again, because the reality is that the EU will not let one nation stand in its way. Of course, if referendums had been held in other counties - especially the UK - they would have had to admit that it was not just Ireland who didn't want the Lisbon Treaty, but many other nations.

Everything the EU does relies on the people having no say.

In the words of Juncker, the head of the EU commission: there can be no democratic choice against the European treaties.

Let's take a look at what else this pillar of western democracy has said:

--When it becomes serious, you have to lie.

--If it's a Yes, we will say 'on we go', and if it's a No we will say 'we continue’

--We decide on something, leave it lying around, and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don't understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back.

--Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?

--In the very long run, we will need a European army. Because we have to be credible when it comes to foreign policy

--A common European army would convey a clear message to Russia that we are serious about defending our European values.


This is what you're voting for. Not your job. Not some notion of European fraternity. You're voting for a collection of unelected crackpots to continue playing at being big powerful politicians at the expense of the European peoples.
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
12088 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-19 06:51:54
June 19 2016 06:50 GMT
#1814
On June 19 2016 12:17 bardtown wrote:
Show nested quote +
--When it becomes serious, you have to lie.

--If it's a Yes, we will say 'on we go', and if it's a No we will say 'we continue’

--We decide on something, leave it lying around, and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don't understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back.

--Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?

--In the very long run, we will need a European army. Because we have to be credible when it comes to foreign policy

--A common European army would convey a clear message to Russia that we are serious about defending our European values.


This is what you're voting for. Not your job. Not some notion of European fraternity. You're voting for a collection of unelected crackpots to continue playing at being big powerful politicians at the expense of the European peoples.


I don't agree with the statements that you have to lie to get things working.

That we will need an EU army is self evident to me since all nations aren't part of NATO. If all EU nations were part of it then we would have no need since we would have a huge voting block in a larger army that would be tied into the defensive clause.

That we are dissolving the nations and making them into more of regions is one of the good things the EU is doing, not one of the bad things. I personally want a global government and the EU starting and slowly walking towards that seems fine to me. None of the current stuff seems like huge blunders, more like minor stumbles on the journey there.

(I am not a huge proponent of democracy but there isn't a better alternative and the current EU works well enough as a government body for me.)
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4416 Posts
June 19 2016 07:02 GMT
#1815
Lets be clear here on the reason he is calling for an EU army to "Stand up to Russia"...
Why the sabre rattling? Because the economy is incredibly shaky.Economic troubles severely threaten the EU's power which is why they are starting to accelerate these plans.

As for the migrant issue and Merkel welcoming them in the reason is obvious.To reduce the culture and national identity of the Independent nations that make up the EU, making it easier to create an EU superstate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
KwarK
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
United States43989 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-19 07:10:20
June 19 2016 07:07 GMT
#1816
Er, Russia invaded part of the Ukraine contrary to their specific agreements following the fall of the Soviet Union with borders guaranteed by the western nations. Sabre rattling against Russia makes sense in that context. It's not just "hey, look, an enemy, let's distract ourselves". Russia is actually being expansionist and the EU bloc is their rival in that.
ModeratorThe angels have the phone box
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4416 Posts
June 19 2016 07:52 GMT
#1817
On June 19 2016 16:07 KwarK wrote:
Er, Russia invaded part of the Ukraine contrary to their specific agreements following the fall of the Soviet Union with borders guaranteed by the western nations. Sabre rattling against Russia makes sense in that context. It's not just "hey, look, an enemy, let's distract ourselves". Russia is actually being expansionist and the EU bloc is their rival in that.

NATO has already established missile defenses and bases in Europe and is stronger than any EU army would be since it includes the co-operation of the United States.NATO is already sabre ratting Russia.The only reason to create an EU army is to move further towards the EU superstate.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
iPlaY.NettleS
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Australia4416 Posts
June 19 2016 07:54 GMT
#1818
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7PvoI6gvQs
WhiteDog
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
France8650 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-19 08:12:17
June 19 2016 08:08 GMT
#1819
On June 19 2016 16:54 iPlaY.NettleS wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0gHLfMXb0Yg

The core of discussion, discussed by common people. Thank you dumbuselesseconomists, you're fired.

There is everything in there : the question of soreignty, the possibility of an heterogeneous effect of the european union (with most of the negative on low income workers), the desire to be part of something bigger (i.e. the opposition between the empire and the kingdom), the fact that most problem won't be instantly solved by getting out (national politics is a thing too).
"every time WhiteDog overuses the word "seriously" in a comment I can make an observation on his fragile emotional state." MoltkeWarding
maartendq
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
Belgium3115 Posts
Last Edited: 2016-06-19 08:23:30
June 19 2016 08:09 GMT
#1820
On June 19 2016 12:17 bardtown wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 19 2016 08:32 BurningSera wrote:
On June 17 2016 04:07 warding wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:40 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:34 Ghostcom wrote:
On June 17 2016 03:16 jello_biafra wrote:
On June 17 2016 01:40 Ghostcom wrote:
On June 17 2016 01:03 Madkipz wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JW0LEtW_6sI

Arguments for leaving the EU.

You can revive the british fishing industry.

You can not pay the EU membership fees, and EU imposed taxes (VAT taxes), and support your own agriculture rather than the failing EU agriculture.

You can avoid joining in the failing EU economy with low growth and high youth employment.

You'll still have trade with the EU, but at your own therms.

Yes the market will have a downturn, but the remain side is lying to you when they are calling it a disaster.


The only way UK is going to trade with EU is if they get an agreement similar to Norway, which

1) Is highly unlikely. The deal is almost certainly going to be pretty terrible for the UK as the EU will want to emphasize that leaving is not beneficial and after all the UK needs access to the EU-market more than the other way around.
2) Means they have to live up to EU-regulations with zero influence over the policies implemented.

EDIT:
On June 17 2016 00:37 Maenander wrote:
A rise of hooliganism, assassination attempts, right-wing terrorism. This is what all the fear-mongering in Europe has brought us to. It seems like rational discourse is a thing of the past.


Let's not pretend that left-wingers are innocent in this.

The UK is Germany's biggest export market, it's definitely in their interest to come to an agreement, getting a Norway style deal is pretty much the worst case scenario and it's basically the same as what we have now.

Edit: ok it's not the worst case scenario but it's the most likely worst case scenario


It's not basically the same as what you have now. It's the same regulations as you have now without any of the influence you currently hold. It's a pretty damn bad scenario, and it is much more likely you get a worse deal as EU is largely tired of the Swiss/Norwegian deals.

Difference is that those regulations would now only apply to businesses dealing directly with EU countries instead of to all businesses, and it's not like we have much influence over said regulations at the moment anyway

If the UK decides to create its own regulations akin to the EU directives then it's basically imposing an added cost of compliance for UK businesses, making it costlier to export. It'll also be a cost on EU businesses exporting to the UK, and that will surely be reflected on higher prices. Not to mention the cost of drawing up your own regulation. For that reason it'll make the most economic sense for the UK to continue to follow the EU directives.


People need to talk more about regulations rather than the rubbish flying around (i mean on the media here). Since i am involved in the regulatory field, i don't even want to start to think about how much it will cost if we left EU.

The simplest example i just told my housemate is that, imagine X product that you use daily that we imported from certain EU country, and regulation says ok you cant raise the price of X product for more than 0.001-0.005% per year. If we left EU that regulation will not apply to us and then troubles happen, prices raise price drop, competitions come and go, small medium companies will get crushed so hard (they will not be able to see that coming at all), and ultimately common folks (like me) will get affected big time. And the rich? they would have prepared better and even if they had 0 backup plan, everything will be fine for them anyway - at worst, one less holiday beach house this year. And whats the worst thing, we have literally 0 export that any other countries want.

In the past decade you hear people blame everything on immigrants. We don't want to work at McDonald's, we blame foreigners who are willing to take those jobs as 'they come here to take our jobs' (and usually comes with 'and our women', and i won't go into that). so if we actually leave EU (it won't), i would like to see how would people react when £ crash like mad, and maybe then they will stfu about blaming foreigners etc. I am saying this because this is a country where when people see a black man drives a Mercedes they will bat an eye on, up north will be fine with this, but try south england (bar london) you see this so evidently. British need to see that the problems lie deep down in the system but stop blaming foreigners/EU, changes are needed to improve alot of issues in this country - not saying that EU has no issues or influence to this mess, EU will definitely need some changes (to work better with UK and every other countries) after the referendum.

So the bottomline is, i never care about politics, as a common folk who works in the field where money comes from regulations themselves, no changes will affect my job/income anyway - except war and this goddamn UK leaving EU change. I mean, if you are poor/average, you have no reason to vote leave, because we will not suddenly get a pay raise 'oh because we left EU so we have more money to pay you :D), and if changes will hit us hard (and it will) and no matter what you say about 'oh it is just a temporary pain' i will not want to see all the goddamn prices raise in the next few years; if you are rich (i mean truly rich, like at least half a mil income per annual), i just dont see how/why would you want to vote no, same thing you will need to spend more here and there but that probably doesn't come out from your own pocket, and that money will probably be equal to hiring someone for 1 year, 1 job less, vote leave or stay literally mean 'meh' to the rich.


There are many thousands of reasons to leave.

You should not look to your own job as justification, either way. It's not a vote about your job. It's a vote about the EU; about the corrupt system that is eroding democracy in Europe.

EU constitution: French people vote NO. Dutch people vote NO. What does the EU do? It renames it to the Lisbon Treaty and doesn't give them another vote. The Irish vote NO to the Lisbon Treaty. So the EU makes them take the vote again, because the reality is that the EU will not let one nation stand in its way. Of course, if referendums had been held in other counties - especially the UK - they would have had to admit that it was not just Ireland who didn't want the Lisbon Treaty, but many other nations.

Everything the EU does relies on the people having no say.

In the words of Juncker, the head of the EU commission: there can be no democratic choice against the European treaties.

Let's take a look at what else this pillar of western democracy has said:

Show nested quote +
--When it becomes serious, you have to lie.

--If it's a Yes, we will say 'on we go', and if it's a No we will say 'we continue’

--We decide on something, leave it lying around, and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don't understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back.

--Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?

--In the very long run, we will need a European army. Because we have to be credible when it comes to foreign policy

--A common European army would convey a clear message to Russia that we are serious about defending our European values.


This is what you're voting for. Not your job. Not some notion of European fraternity. You're voting for a collection of unelected crackpots to continue playing at being big powerful politicians at the expense of the European peoples.


The only reason Great Britain wants out is because they have finally realised that their biggest historical project, preventing France and Germany from becoming the most powerful bloc on the continent, has failed. Despite having lost two world wars, Germany is now the most powerful European country. When Germany and France put both their shoulders under something, it usually gets through the EU parliament without much trouble. In the eastern bloc Poland and Hungary are also increasingly spreading their influence. Despite going through recessions, neither Portugal, Spain or Greece have any intention of leaving the EU.

Another thing that the UK has trouble accepting is that in a European Parliament consisting of democratically elected (!) MPs from over two dozens of different European nations they can no longer easily and unilaterally push through their own interests at the cost of everyone else's. This may of course lead to the illusion that leaving the EU will enable it to wield its former influence again, but the truth is that the UK is no longer an empire or world power, but an island nation that is increasingly divided from within: Scotland threatens do have another referendum on independence if the Leave camp wins, low-skilled workers increasingly experience difficulties in finding stable, secure jobs which heavily affects former industrial cities such as Manchester while people working in London's financial sector rake in millions.

So for now the UK can still blame the EU for all its woes (even though the harm is largely self-inflicted). I'm still curious who will be the scapegoat when it turns out that leaving the EU did not solve any of the problems at all (because it won't).

As for that youtube video: leaving the EU will do nought for low-skilled workers because low-skilled labour in the West is just too expensive compared to East Asia (or Africa in about a decade or so). Newsflash: there is a reason why every economy in West Europe has slowly been evolving towards service economies instead of 1960s style manufacturing economies. I would also like to point out that the only reason that the EU didn't impose tariffs on Chinese steel was because of the UK government being against it. As that nice lady towards the end of the video pointed out: the UK is just about the only country with zero hour contracts. Blame your own politicians for the state your country is in, and stop voting for demagogues such as Farage or Cameron.
Prev 1 89 90 91 92 93 646 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 195
Rex 30
StarCraft: Brood War
Mind 334
Killer 148
scan(afreeca) 122
Bale 31
Hm[arnc] 26
JulyZerg 22
Backho 21
Noble 16
yabsab 10
Dota 2
NeuroSwarm154
XaKoH 113
League of Legends
JimRising 635
Other Games
summit1g10573
WinterStarcraft510
monkeys_forever308
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL7196
Other Games
gamesdonequick821
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 187
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH170
• CranKy Ducklings SOOP24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• LUISG 0
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1346
• Jankos462
Upcoming Events
GSL
1m
Cure vs herO
SHIN vs Maru
GSL EN (SOOP)0
IPSL
8h 1m
Bonyth vs Napoleon
G5 vs JDConan
BSL
11h 1m
OyAji vs JDConan
DragOn vs TBD
Replay Cast
1d 1h
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 16h
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
4 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
WardiTV Spring Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs SHIN
Rogue vs Bunny
BSL
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Escore Tournament S2: W7
WardiTV TLMC #16
Nations Cup 2026

Ongoing

BSL Season 22
ASL Season 21
IPSL Spring 2026
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 2
Acropolis #4
KK 2v2 League Season 1
BSL 22 Non-Korean Championship
SCTL 2026 Spring
RSL Revival: Season 5
2026 GSL S1
Heroes Pulsing #1
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2

Upcoming

YSL S3
Escore Tournament S2: W8
CSLAN 4
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Maestros of the Game 2
WardiTV Spring 2026
2026 GSL S2
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.