I hope Britain leaves. It won't solve any of the nation's true problems, but at least the people can no longer make Brussels the scapegoat for anything and everything, and it might trigger some desperately needed changes both in the EU and in the UK.
UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 91
| Forum Index > General Forum |
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note. Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon. All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting. https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk | ||
|
Maenander
Germany4926 Posts
I hope Britain leaves. It won't solve any of the nation's true problems, but at least the people can no longer make Brussels the scapegoat for anything and everything, and it might trigger some desperately needed changes both in the EU and in the UK. | ||
|
Maenander
Germany4926 Posts
| ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6262 Posts
On June 18 2016 05:52 Shield wrote: Yes, Merkel made a mistake. I think she made it because Germany may feel guilty because of fascism, and they want redemption by inviting refugees. Still, such a large amount of refugees was a mistake. Having refugees is the symptom though. I don't mean to sound mean when I say that. You have to think of the reason why there are refugees at all. It's because the west (mainly USA) made a terrible mistake to promote democracy in the Middle East and overthrow their leaders. Democracy is great, but it doesn't work in the Middle East as you can see now. While what Merkel did was pretty dumb it wasnt what caused the refugees to flood in. Let's not forget thst her welcoming everyone was a response to all the refugees already coming in. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On June 18 2016 07:28 Shield wrote: Isn't this how it is in Europe at the moment though? Open borders, white British people are minority in London, etc. If you take a figurative view of that video, you may see it's similar. I'm not saying the video is exclusively for the UK though. I think it's not about Israel at all. I believe it's about monolithic societies in Europe in general. I live in London and British people being a minority in London isn't even remotely true. Sure, there are areas of high concentration of Jewish and Indian and Pakistani populations, but those immigrant populations (some of which have been there for over 100 years) have nothing to do with the EU. Not that it matters since UK isn't part of the Schengen Zone. The vast majority of immigrants coming into UK are from outside the EU. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4381 Posts
Heaps of Eastern Europeans doing the lower paid hospitality work. I was there last year. | ||
|
maartendq
Belgium3115 Posts
On June 18 2016 19:52 Maenander wrote: It's funny that the Eurosceptics and Nationalists are complaining about the ineffectiveness and the lack of democracy in the EU, when the petty individual interests of the member states and their governments, i.e. eurosceptic and nationalist tendencies, are the major reasons for the current sorry state of affairs. I hope Britain leaves. It won't solve any of the nation's true problems, but at least the people can no longer make Brussels the scapegoat for anything and everything, and it might trigger some desperately needed changes both in the EU and in the UK. I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour, will blame after it turns out that not being part of the EU did not change their problems one single bit. On the contrary, Brexit will probably make matters worse for them because some businesses are bound to leave for other shores. Then there's Scotland who will demand to have another independence referendum because they are largely pro-EU. | ||
|
bardtown
England2313 Posts
On June 18 2016 23:36 maartendq wrote: I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour, will blame after it turns out that not being part of the EU did not change their problems one single bit. On the contrary, Brexit will probably make matters worse for them because some businesses are bound to leave for other shores. Then there's Scotland who will demand to have another independence referendum because they are largely pro-EU. To the mainland Europeans in this thread: please take what you read in your newspapers with a pinch of salt. The main advocates for Brexit are the working class themselves, i.e. the people disenfranchised by the EU. If Brexit happens, it will essentially have been a revolution. You might believe that the EU is doing something noble when it gives businesses grants to move their production/services to eastern Europe; something like Robin Hood, maybe. The reality is that it is a major driving force for inequality within the UK, as the amount of low-skilled employment available is driven down and the amount of low-skill labour available rises rapidly with unchecked immigration. This results in lower wages, higher house prices and, as a result, it drives down living standards for the poor, resulting in greater inequality. The irony is that the EU is exacerbating the capitalistic nature of the UK economy. Last year was also the first time in a decade that wealth inequality has gone up, in no small part because immigration is driving house prices through the roof. 330,000 net migration last year to the UK, and England is already the most densely populated country in Europe. Even Deutsche Bank predicts that UK stocks are going to outperform those in Europe, in the case of Brexit, because the pound being competitive will result in more exports - and more exports means more jobs for the working class. As for Scotland - they are not nearly as different from the rest of the UK on this issue as their politicians like to make out. Politicians in general have shown how horrendously disconnected they are from voters. As for independence, Scotland has absolutely no hope of separating from the UK since oil prices collapsed, and if they had voted to leave the chances are that they would be in recession by now. Regardless: I predict we're going to vote to remain. It will not be the result of any positive feeling toward the EU, but rather of fear and coercion. When you have to convince members to stay with coercion, you ought to understand that your institution is toxic. But no, the EU will take it as endorsement and continue to plough onward in pursuit of that holy grail, the European superstate. It won't end well. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4381 Posts
I'm actually curious who the main advocates of a Brexit, i.e. those dependent on low-skilled labour This makes absolutely no sense, it is the other way around. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On June 18 2016 22:22 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: Presuming that figure is true, how would that be a minority? Unless you lump everybody who isn't white British into some sort of homogeneous group of their own? More importantly, even if they were, what does it matter as those who aren't white British adopt British culture and cultural norms? Personally I'll expend my energy on the vast amounts of native British who have negative cultural values. In any case the vast majority of non- white British will most assuredly be from India or Bangladesh, neither of which are in the EU. Lastly what does it matter to you how many White British faces you can see in London? I have lived in London all my life. It doesn't bother me one jot.Well technically they are a minority now, white british in London is 49%. Heaps of Eastern Europeans doing the lower paid hospitality work. I was there last year. | ||
|
Dangermousecatdog
United Kingdom7084 Posts
On June 19 2016 05:37 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: This makes absolutely no sense, it is the other way around. He suspect he is refering to those who are dependent on low skilled labour jobs. | ||
|
BurningSera
Ireland19621 Posts
On June 17 2016 04:07 warding wrote: If the UK decides to create its own regulations akin to the EU directives then it's basically imposing an added cost of compliance for UK businesses, making it costlier to export. It'll also be a cost on EU businesses exporting to the UK, and that will surely be reflected on higher prices. Not to mention the cost of drawing up your own regulation. For that reason it'll make the most economic sense for the UK to continue to follow the EU directives. People need to talk more about regulations rather than the rubbish flying around (i mean on the media here). Since i am involved in the regulatory field, i don't even want to start to think about how much it will cost if we left EU. The simplest example i just told my housemate is that, imagine X product that you use daily that we imported from certain EU country, and regulation says ok you cant raise the price of X product for more than 0.001-0.005% per year. If we left EU that regulation will not apply to us and then troubles happen, prices raise price drop, competitions come and go, small medium companies will get crushed so hard (they will not be able to see that coming at all), and ultimately common folks (like me) will get affected big time. And the rich? they would have prepared better and even if they had 0 backup plan, everything will be fine for them anyway - at worst, one less holiday beach house this year. And whats the worst thing, we have literally 0 export that any other countries want. In the past decade you hear people blame everything on immigrants. We don't want to work at McDonald's, we blame foreigners who are willing to take those jobs as 'they come here to take our jobs' (and usually comes with 'and our women', and i won't go into that). so if we actually leave EU (it won't), i would like to see how would people react when £ crash like mad, and maybe then they will stfu about blaming foreigners etc. I am saying this because this is a country where when people see a black man drives a Mercedes they will bat an eye on, up north will be fine with this, but try south england (bar london) you see this so evidently. British need to see that the problems lie deep down in the system but stop blaming foreigners/EU, changes are needed to improve alot of issues in this country - not saying that EU has no issues or influence to this mess, EU will definitely need some changes (to work better with UK and every other countries) after the referendum. So the bottomline is, i never care about politics, as a common folk who works in the field where money comes from regulations themselves, no changes will affect my job/income anyway - except war and this goddamn UK leaving EU change. I mean, if you are poor/average, you have no reason to vote leave, because we will not suddenly get a pay raise 'oh because we left EU so we have more money to pay you :D), and if changes will hit us hard (and it will) and no matter what you say about 'oh it is just a temporary pain' i will not want to see all the goddamn prices raise in the next few years; if you are rich (i mean truly rich, like at least half a mil income per annual), i just dont see how/why would you want to vote no, same thing you will need to spend more here and there but that probably doesn't come out from your own pocket, and that money will probably be equal to hiring someone for 1 year, 1 job less, vote leave or stay literally mean 'meh' to the rich. | ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
bardtown
England2313 Posts
On June 19 2016 08:32 BurningSera wrote: People need to talk more about regulations rather than the rubbish flying around (i mean on the media here). Since i am involved in the regulatory field, i don't even want to start to think about how much it will cost if we left EU. The simplest example i just told my housemate is that, imagine X product that you use daily that we imported from certain EU country, and regulation says ok you cant raise the price of X product for more than 0.001-0.005% per year. If we left EU that regulation will not apply to us and then troubles happen, prices raise price drop, competitions come and go, small medium companies will get crushed so hard (they will not be able to see that coming at all), and ultimately common folks (like me) will get affected big time. And the rich? they would have prepared better and even if they had 0 backup plan, everything will be fine for them anyway - at worst, one less holiday beach house this year. And whats the worst thing, we have literally 0 export that any other countries want. In the past decade you hear people blame everything on immigrants. We don't want to work at McDonald's, we blame foreigners who are willing to take those jobs as 'they come here to take our jobs' (and usually comes with 'and our women', and i won't go into that). so if we actually leave EU (it won't), i would like to see how would people react when £ crash like mad, and maybe then they will stfu about blaming foreigners etc. I am saying this because this is a country where when people see a black man drives a Mercedes they will bat an eye on, up north will be fine with this, but try south england (bar london) you see this so evidently. British need to see that the problems lie deep down in the system but stop blaming foreigners/EU, changes are needed to improve alot of issues in this country - not saying that EU has no issues or influence to this mess, EU will definitely need some changes (to work better with UK and every other countries) after the referendum. So the bottomline is, i never care about politics, as a common folk who works in the field where money comes from regulations themselves, no changes will affect my job/income anyway - except war and this goddamn UK leaving EU change. I mean, if you are poor/average, you have no reason to vote leave, because we will not suddenly get a pay raise 'oh because we left EU so we have more money to pay you :D), and if changes will hit us hard (and it will) and no matter what you say about 'oh it is just a temporary pain' i will not want to see all the goddamn prices raise in the next few years; if you are rich (i mean truly rich, like at least half a mil income per annual), i just dont see how/why would you want to vote no, same thing you will need to spend more here and there but that probably doesn't come out from your own pocket, and that money will probably be equal to hiring someone for 1 year, 1 job less, vote leave or stay literally mean 'meh' to the rich. There are many thousands of reasons to leave. You should not look to your own job as justification, either way. It's not a vote about your job. It's a vote about the EU; about the corrupt system that is eroding democracy in Europe. EU constitution: French people vote NO. Dutch people vote NO. What does the EU do? It renames it to the Lisbon Treaty and doesn't give them another vote. The Irish vote NO to the Lisbon Treaty. So the EU makes them take the vote again, because the reality is that the EU will not let one nation stand in its way. Of course, if referendums had been held in other counties - especially the UK - they would have had to admit that it was not just Ireland who didn't want the Lisbon Treaty, but many other nations. Everything the EU does relies on the people having no say. In the words of Juncker, the head of the EU commission: there can be no democratic choice against the European treaties. Let's take a look at what else this pillar of western democracy has said: --When it becomes serious, you have to lie. --If it's a Yes, we will say 'on we go', and if it's a No we will say 'we continue’ --We decide on something, leave it lying around, and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don't understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back. --Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact? --In the very long run, we will need a European army. Because we have to be credible when it comes to foreign policy --A common European army would convey a clear message to Russia that we are serious about defending our European values. This is what you're voting for. Not your job. Not some notion of European fraternity. You're voting for a collection of unelected crackpots to continue playing at being big powerful politicians at the expense of the European peoples. | ||
|
Yurie
12011 Posts
On June 19 2016 12:17 bardtown wrote: This is what you're voting for. Not your job. Not some notion of European fraternity. You're voting for a collection of unelected crackpots to continue playing at being big powerful politicians at the expense of the European peoples. I don't agree with the statements that you have to lie to get things working. That we will need an EU army is self evident to me since all nations aren't part of NATO. If all EU nations were part of it then we would have no need since we would have a huge voting block in a larger army that would be tied into the defensive clause. That we are dissolving the nations and making them into more of regions is one of the good things the EU is doing, not one of the bad things. I personally want a global government and the EU starting and slowly walking towards that seems fine to me. None of the current stuff seems like huge blunders, more like minor stumbles on the journey there. (I am not a huge proponent of democracy but there isn't a better alternative and the current EU works well enough as a government body for me.) | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4381 Posts
Why the sabre rattling? Because the economy is incredibly shaky.Economic troubles severely threaten the EU's power which is why they are starting to accelerate these plans. As for the migrant issue and Merkel welcoming them in the reason is obvious.To reduce the culture and national identity of the Independent nations that make up the EU, making it easier to create an EU superstate. | ||
|
KwarK
United States43538 Posts
| ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4381 Posts
On June 19 2016 16:07 KwarK wrote: Er, Russia invaded part of the Ukraine contrary to their specific agreements following the fall of the Soviet Union with borders guaranteed by the western nations. Sabre rattling against Russia makes sense in that context. It's not just "hey, look, an enemy, let's distract ourselves". Russia is actually being expansionist and the EU bloc is their rival in that. NATO has already established missile defenses and bases in Europe and is stronger than any EU army would be since it includes the co-operation of the United States.NATO is already sabre ratting Russia.The only reason to create an EU army is to move further towards the EU superstate. | ||
|
iPlaY.NettleS
Australia4381 Posts
| ||
|
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On June 19 2016 16:54 iPlaY.NettleS wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=0gHLfMXb0Yg The core of discussion, discussed by common people. Thank you dumbuselesseconomists, you're fired. There is everything in there : the question of soreignty, the possibility of an heterogeneous effect of the european union (with most of the negative on low income workers), the desire to be part of something bigger (i.e. the opposition between the empire and the kingdom), the fact that most problem won't be instantly solved by getting out (national politics is a thing too). | ||
|
maartendq
Belgium3115 Posts
On June 19 2016 12:17 bardtown wrote: There are many thousands of reasons to leave. You should not look to your own job as justification, either way. It's not a vote about your job. It's a vote about the EU; about the corrupt system that is eroding democracy in Europe. EU constitution: French people vote NO. Dutch people vote NO. What does the EU do? It renames it to the Lisbon Treaty and doesn't give them another vote. The Irish vote NO to the Lisbon Treaty. So the EU makes them take the vote again, because the reality is that the EU will not let one nation stand in its way. Of course, if referendums had been held in other counties - especially the UK - they would have had to admit that it was not just Ireland who didn't want the Lisbon Treaty, but many other nations. Everything the EU does relies on the people having no say. In the words of Juncker, the head of the EU commission: there can be no democratic choice against the European treaties. Let's take a look at what else this pillar of western democracy has said: This is what you're voting for. Not your job. Not some notion of European fraternity. You're voting for a collection of unelected crackpots to continue playing at being big powerful politicians at the expense of the European peoples. The only reason Great Britain wants out is because they have finally realised that their biggest historical project, preventing France and Germany from becoming the most powerful bloc on the continent, has failed. Despite having lost two world wars, Germany is now the most powerful European country. When Germany and France put both their shoulders under something, it usually gets through the EU parliament without much trouble. In the eastern bloc Poland and Hungary are also increasingly spreading their influence. Despite going through recessions, neither Portugal, Spain or Greece have any intention of leaving the EU. Another thing that the UK has trouble accepting is that in a European Parliament consisting of democratically elected (!) MPs from over two dozens of different European nations they can no longer easily and unilaterally push through their own interests at the cost of everyone else's. This may of course lead to the illusion that leaving the EU will enable it to wield its former influence again, but the truth is that the UK is no longer an empire or world power, but an island nation that is increasingly divided from within: Scotland threatens do have another referendum on independence if the Leave camp wins, low-skilled workers increasingly experience difficulties in finding stable, secure jobs which heavily affects former industrial cities such as Manchester while people working in London's financial sector rake in millions. So for now the UK can still blame the EU for all its woes (even though the harm is largely self-inflicted). I'm still curious who will be the scapegoat when it turns out that leaving the EU did not solve any of the problems at all (because it won't). As for that youtube video: leaving the EU will do nought for low-skilled workers because low-skilled labour in the West is just too expensive compared to East Asia (or Africa in about a decade or so). Newsflash: there is a reason why every economy in West Europe has slowly been evolving towards service economies instead of 1960s style manufacturing economies. I would also like to point out that the only reason that the EU didn't impose tariffs on Chinese steel was because of the UK government being against it. As that nice lady towards the end of the video pointed out: the UK is just about the only country with zero hour contracts. Blame your own politicians for the state your country is in, and stop voting for demagogues such as Farage or Cameron. | ||
| ||