EPTOn July 01 2016 05:14 kollin wrote:
Guillotine them all and start again if you ask me
Guillotine them all and start again if you ask me
the entire country, I tell you! Guillotine them all, and start again from scratch.
UK Politics Mega-thread - Page 185
| Forum Index > General Forum |
In order to ensure that this thread meets TL standards and follows the proper guidelines, we ask that everyone please adhere to this mod note. Posts containing only Tweets or articles adds nothing to the discussions. Therefore, when providing a source, explain why you feel it is relevant and what purpose it adds to the discussion. Also take note that unsubstantiated tweets/posts meant only to rekindle old arguments will be actioned upon. All in all, please continue to enjoy posting in TL General and partake in discussions as much as you want! But please be respectful when posting or replying to someone. There is a clear difference between constructive criticism/discussion and just plain being rude and insulting. https://www.registertovote.service.gov.uk | ||
|
mahrgell
Germany3943 Posts
the entire country, I tell you! Guillotine them all, and start again from scratch. | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:16 mahrgell wrote: the entire country, I tell you! Guillotine them all, and start again from scratch. I don't know if you are joking, but that's how communists came in some countries. They claimed everyone was corrupt, then they founded "people's party", etc. The rest is known to everyone. | ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On July 01 2016 04:54 Shield wrote: Really? 1. Campaigning for Brexit despite his prime minister. 2. His Brexit campaign wins, which is bad for UK's economy. 3. He backtracks, then he says that you shouldn't rush to leave. 4. He decides not to run for prime minister and conservative's leader. You are either stupid or a leave voter. Or, maybe both. Let me correct you a bit. 1. Bullshit, his prime minister was OK with it. 2. Bullshit, why should it be bad for UK's economy? 3. So what? 4. So what? Who knows who actually made the decision ... | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14128 Posts
| ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:21 Sermokala wrote: The closing off of or restriction on a nations ability to trade with its neighbors is never good for an economy. The only argument you can make for brexit is that the loss in economic value is worth the increase in national sovereignty. Are you an oracle? So far, nobody said, the nation will not be able to trade with its neighbors ... | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:21 Sermokala wrote: The closing off of or restriction on a nations ability to trade with its neighbors is never good for an economy. The only argument you can make for brexit is that the loss in economic value is worth the increase in national sovereignty. its not about closing itself off its about opening it to the world. | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22373 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:11 Shield wrote: No, treason is to risk your country's economy just to become the next PM. Just like what Boris Johnson was trying to do. Don't just tell half of the story. There is nothing wrong in having different views. What's wrong is when you do it for political gains, don't really believe in what you preach (Brexit in Johnson's case), while making your country less than stable. Are you forgetting there was a democratic vote attached to this? The leave campaign is not come military coup, it is a simple democratic decision. Lying while campaigning is not a criminal offense (sadly). All the lies were debunked long before the referendum. 'Voters are dumb' is not treason. | ||
KadaverBB
Germany25658 Posts
| ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:48 KadaverBB wrote: Guys please stop reporting each other. You're all being super aggressive and I don't feel like banning most of you. We already have one terrible politics thread, we don't need a second one. LOL. What is it reporting each other? :-) Are some people in this thread seriously writing somewhere to some mods that somebody else does not agree with their stupid ideas? :-))) LOOOOL!!! btw. - how do you do it? Write personal message to Kadaver BB??? :-) | ||
|
Gorsameth
Netherlands22373 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:52 Diabolique wrote: LOL. What is it reporting each other? :-) Are some people in this thread seriously writing somewhere to some mods that somebody else does not agree with their stupid ideas? :-))) LOOOOL!!! btw. - how do you do it? Write personal message to Kadaver BB??? :-) Ehm, you just use the report button that comes with every post? | ||
|
Reaps
United Kingdom1280 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:52 Diabolique wrote: LOL. What is it reporting each other? :-) Are some people in this thread seriously writing somewhere to some mods that somebody else does not agree with their stupid ideas? :-))) LOOOOL!!! btw. - how do you do it? Write personal message to Kadaver BB??? :-) Na, there is a report button, you only get it after being registered for a year though. | ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:57 Gorsameth wrote: Ehm, you just use the report button that comes with every post? Aaaah, I see, thanks. I thought somebody writing personal message to KadaverAA: "Dear mod! I am stupid, but someone just called me to be what I am. Ban him please!" | ||
|
Zaros
United Kingdom3692 Posts
| ||
|
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On July 01 2016 05:21 Sermokala wrote: The closing off of or restriction on a nations ability to trade with its neighbors is never good for an economy. The only argument you can make for brexit is that the loss in economic value is worth the increase in national sovereignty. There are time when a trading restriction is beneficial. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States14128 Posts
On July 01 2016 06:16 WhiteDog wrote: There are time when a trading restriction is beneficial. How is that? The UK for hundreds of years has benefited from opening new markets and lowering barriers for it to trade. | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
| ||
|
Diabolique
Czech Republic5118 Posts
On July 01 2016 07:25 Shield wrote: Will the sterling now stabilise until the election of new PM? No. Why did nobody mention the great name of today's events BOREXIT? :-) | ||
|
Banaora
Germany234 Posts
The University of Liverpool Law School Professor Michael Dougan has spent his career studying EU law as it relates to the UK. | ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
| ||
|
bardtown
England2313 Posts
On July 01 2016 13:45 Banaora wrote: I thought + Show Spoiler + https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0dosmKwrAbI The University of Liverpool Law School Professor Michael Dougan has spent his career studying EU law as it relates to the UK. He's a funny man, because he claims to be unbiased but then spends his entire time picking apart straw men. We know, for example, that the UK can veto Turkey's membership of the EU - but it categorically would not do so given that it was the UK govt that most eagerly pushed for Turkey's membership in the first place, because they were so keen to expand the market. He says that it is a common lie that the EU commission adopts legislation. I would challenge him to give me one single example where this has been claimed to be the case. The EU commission proposes legislation and dictates policy making direction. These are powers the parliament does not have. We know, as well, that the UK could have, in theory, vetoed treaties leading to further integration. I say in theory, because in practice they have failed to do so. The British public would never have voted in favour of the Lisbon treaty. The Irish rejected it... until they were made to take another vote. The French and Dutch also rejected it, in its earlier form as the EU constitution, through referenda, so they renamed it and didn't give the French/Dutch public another say. The national govts of Europe are absolutely complicit in what has been happening with the EU, so this result is a message to them just as much as it is a message to the EU itself. It is time to start standing up for your people. | ||
| ||
