• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:51
CEST 16:51
KST 23:51
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End6Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7
Community News
GSTL Returns in 2026!43Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-2212Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-611
StarCraft 2
General
GSTL Returns in 2026! Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) SC4ALL: II Talent Announcement! Protoss AoE skill expression Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) WardiTV Mondays 2026 KungFu Cup Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Announcement
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome Mutation # 538 Media Blackout Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory
Brood War
General
Rush's Odyssey Controversy [ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End BW General Discussion StarCraft 64 is coming to Philly at SC4ALL II Best Games Kespa era
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL22] Ro24 Group A CSLAN 4 is Coming! ASL Season 22 LIVESTREAM with English Commentary
Strategy
Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend? Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Letting Off Steam Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread Series you have seen recently...
Sports
MLB/Baseball 2023 Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Chinese Gen Z: Between Dream…
TrAiDoS
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10494 users

Obama backs gay marriage - Page 11

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 19 Next All
pbjsandwich
Profile Joined August 2010
United States443 Posts
March 01 2013 22:36 GMT
#201
As someone who grew up buddihst I think it has a lot less "preachiness" to it.

No offense with that post but Buddhism is about karma and a good middle road life that is accepting and thoughtful about your after life.

It's way less invasive than most of the other religions and you don't have buddhists on street corners yelling "GOD HATES FAGS"

or even in politics trying to limit the rights of homosexual because of their scripture.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18866 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-01 22:37:29
March 01 2013 22:36 GMT
#202
On March 02 2013 07:20 m4inbrain wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 07:04 Joedaddy wrote:
...focus with a skeptical perspective on the parts that suit their agenda.


A 1000x this. There is so much hatred and bigotry towards religion. Hatred and bigotry are the manifestation of ignorance on a subject that some have no desire to understand because its simply more convenient to ignore the truth while generalizing all religions and religious people.


You know that this works also the other way around, right?

Do me a favor, explain to me reasonable, why so many people hate on islam and christians (you see, its not hatred or bigotry towards religion in general, but towards these two religions) - and near to none (i NEVER saw someone doing it) towards for example buddhists?

Do you have any experience with nations in which Buddhism is a major religion?
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
[]Phase[]
Profile Joined September 2010
Belgium927 Posts
March 01 2013 22:37 GMT
#203
The last thing we should do is listen to some fictional book or its followers when we are trying to get equal rights for everybody. Good thing Obama is pushing this now, who knows how long it would take if you get another few of those religious cooks in the future.
[Agony]x90
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States853 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-01 22:47:53
March 01 2013 22:39 GMT
#204
What tso and dAPhREAk said. Also check this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persecution_of_Buddhists

If it exists, theres probably been persecution against it.

As for those justifying negative behavior towards religion, bigotry is bigotry. In my opinion, people aren't jerks because of their religion, creed, sexuality, beliefs, etc. They're jerks because they're jerks and people from all sorts of associations, groups, and backgrounds can behave with civility or with irrational rage. The fact that they believe that they can fully justify is why bigotry even exists.



Also for a challenge for those bashing Christianity. Here's something you may wanna try out for the hell of it. Don't even consider Christianity at all. Pretend that no religion was the reason for restrictions on homosexuality. Now consider what other factors may have contributed to these restrictions. Could it have been economic? Perhaps prior to modern technology, the only way for the majority of the population to survive was through the traditional family unit and a high reproduction rate. Perhaps it was other social factors, such as misogyny, which I argue is not purely a Christian fault, as many societies and religions developed as such. Perhaps the need for the female/male dynamic was seen as infallible.

Certainly these don't hold true today, but what you should consider is that these factors may go hand and hand with Christianity that one was not necessarily the cause of the other.
JF dodger since 2009
Pimpmuckl
Profile Joined March 2011
Germany528 Posts
March 01 2013 22:59 GMT
#205
After reading page 9 & 10 i really really want to go to the States to check out if those "Christians" are indeed as funny as they seem. I was raised christian and i can't believe the same "christians" spread hate although they should spread the love. I don't get it, maybe in Germany the protestant Church is just more "nice"?

Now as far as the news goes, i'm glad. Finally a big hint into the worlds direction to show some support to our friends who want to live their life with another person they love. Gay or not, don't see the matter.
twitter.com/pimpmuckl
pbjsandwich
Profile Joined August 2010
United States443 Posts
March 01 2013 23:03 GMT
#206
On March 02 2013 07:59 Pimpmuckl wrote:
After reading page 9 & 10 i really really want to go to the States to check out if those "Christians" are indeed as funny as they seem. I was raised christian and i can't believe the same "christians" spread hate although they should spread the love. I don't get it, maybe in Germany the protestant Church is just more "nice"?

Now as far as the news goes, i'm glad. Finally a big hint into the worlds direction to show some support to our friends who want to live their life with another person they love. Gay or not, don't see the matter.

It really is the influence of politics
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 01 2013 23:05 GMT
#207
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
cz
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States3249 Posts
March 01 2013 23:06 GMT
#208
Is anyone even arguing that religious views justify a ban on same sex marriage here? Looks like 11 pages of circlejerking from e-atheists.
McBengt
Profile Joined May 2011
Sweden1684 Posts
March 01 2013 23:07 GMT
#209
On March 02 2013 07:19 Tachion wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 07:12 danl9rm wrote:
On March 01 2013 14:29 aTnClouD wrote:
Huge bigot religious drama shitfest inc


Let me try to interpret this.

It's not alright when religious people believe that homosexual partners should not be able to marry because they believe it is wrong and therefore voice their opinion.

It is alright when people believe that homosexual partners should be able to marry because they believe it is okay and therefore voice their opinion.

Is that a fair assessment?
Correct me where I'm wrong.

I'm not trying to be rude, this is just what it seems like to me and so figure I'm missing something.

Why do you think you're missing something? Seems pretty bang on to me. At least when it's in regards to making law and not simply a matter of personal preference.


Having a dissenting opinion is fine. Having a dissenting opinion not based on facts, science, empirical and demonstrable evidence, not so much. Claiming that the moon is made of cheese is an opinion. Would you take it seriously?

Also, what on earth inspired some people to think marriage has any roots in religion? It existed as a concept long before any of the monotheistic religions that dominate the world today came into being. It is basically institutionalized prostitution, usually in the form of a father granting exclusive access to his daughter's vagina in exchange for money/land/goods. It's a business agreement, nothing more. It's about as romantic and sacred as the stuff you get between your toes after wearing flip-flops on a really warm day.

For the record, I fully support gay marriage, and fully oppose marriage as a concept. If that made any sense.
"My twelve year old will out-reason Bill Maher when it comes to understanding, you know, what, uh, how to logic work" - Rick Santorum
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18866 Posts
March 01 2013 23:10 GMT
#210
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
March 01 2013 23:11 GMT
#211
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
tso
Profile Joined April 2010
United States132 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-01 23:40:13
March 01 2013 23:21 GMT
#212
On March 02 2013 08:11 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.


i always get "why are you so closed minded?" when expressing how i don't believe the earth is 6000 years old

they really are that blind
...
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18866 Posts
March 01 2013 23:23 GMT
#213
On March 02 2013 08:11 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.

Come on, I know you see the problems inherent to such a cursory brand of logic. A great number of those who see the utility in lambasting something as expansive as "religion" are simply unable or unwilling to recognize just how much differentiation exists amongst the "religious". Furthermore, the notion that anyone ought to outwardly justify their religious inclinations in order to satisfy some stilted public perspective makes little sense to me, particularly when that public perspective is so obviously flawed.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-01 23:33:48
March 01 2013 23:31 GMT
#214
On March 02 2013 08:23 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:11 oneofthem wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.

Come on, I know you see the problems inherent to such a cursory brand of logic. A great number of those who see the utility in lambasting something as expansive as "religion" are simply unable or unwilling to recognize just how much differentiation exists amongst the "religious". Furthermore, the notion that anyone ought to outwardly justify their religious inclinations in order to satisfy some stilted public perspective makes little sense to me, particularly when that public perspective is so obviously flawed.

yea well, religion can be ok, but as a broader social phenomenon it is notable for the powerful hereditary effects. it's one of the pillars of passing on traditions, and that includes traditional prejudices.

of course, one can be religious and reject any and all of the doctrines held by the rest of the religious group. but, even that guy should recognize the above mentioned blind heredity of tradition in religious society.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Roe
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Canada6002 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-01 23:32:45
March 01 2013 23:32 GMT
#215
On March 02 2013 08:21 tso wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:11 oneofthem wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.


i always get "why are you so closed minded?" when expressing how i don't believe the earth is not 6000 years old

they really are that blind


I'm sorry if I'm mistaken, but did you just say you believe the earth is 6000 years old? Or that you don't? (double negative)
jinorazi
Profile Joined October 2004
Korea (South)4948 Posts
March 01 2013 23:37 GMT
#216
lol earth 6,000 years old. idiots i call them. its actually 10,000 years old.
age: 84 | location: california | sex: 잘함
tso
Profile Joined April 2010
United States132 Posts
March 01 2013 23:40 GMT
#217
On March 02 2013 08:32 Roe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:21 tso wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:11 oneofthem wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.


i always get "why are you so closed minded?" when expressing how i don't believe the earth is not 6000 years old

they really are that blind


I'm sorry if I'm mistaken, but did you just say you believe the earth is 6000 years old? Or that you don't? (double negative)


lol fixed. an unfortunate negative there
...
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18866 Posts
March 01 2013 23:48 GMT
#218
On March 02 2013 08:31 oneofthem wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 02 2013 08:23 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:11 oneofthem wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:10 farvacola wrote:
On March 02 2013 08:05 oneofthem wrote:
using religion as a rationale for prejudice has the hidden implication that your religion bounds you to a certain moral view. this binding is what's really at stake.

why can't you think for yourself, the general refrain.

Well then the answering verse would be "we can and we do."

doesn't look like it from the outside.

Come on, I know you see the problems inherent to such a cursory brand of logic. A great number of those who see the utility in lambasting something as expansive as "religion" are simply unable or unwilling to recognize just how much differentiation exists amongst the "religious". Furthermore, the notion that anyone ought to outwardly justify their religious inclinations in order to satisfy some stilted public perspective makes little sense to me, particularly when that public perspective is so obviously flawed.

yea well, religion can be ok, but as a broader social phenomenon it is notable for the powerful hereditary effects. it's one of the pillars of passing on traditions, and that includes traditional prejudices.

of course, one can be religious and reject any and all of the doctrines held by the rest of the religious group. but, even that guy should recognize the above mentioned blind heredity of tradition in religious society.

That sounds far more reasonable, and believe me when I tell you that there do exist entire congregations of "Christians" who consider it their spiritual duty to indict tradition and challenge "the moral establishment" as much as they can. Many atheists and agnostics would be surprised to know just how many religious folk are actually "on their side", if only they'd drop the surface level hyperbolic judgements.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
CeriseCherries
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
6170 Posts
March 01 2013 23:48 GMT
#219
1. its about time, democratic presidents always have this giant problem of growing their balls on the bottom of their feet so they pussyfoot around every issue ~.~ seriously

2. it doesnt make you morally superior for believing in creationism or evolution. the same fundamental reason that you or anyone believes evolution is the same reason that someone believes creationsim: someone told you, probably starting at a young age that it was so. for all we know tomorrow the fuckign Xel Naga will land and tell us that evolution is bullshit and they made everyone. well haha for you morally superior prick.

3. if you take the second most important law (love thy neighbor, after love the lord your god which we shall ignore because that is a non-secular one), then there is no reason to ban gay marriage. if the term marriage was not used in over 1100 places in legislation that defines everything from the tax code to the most inane of topics, then whatever. but if in keeping your beliefs hurts someone else, that is fundamentally wrong. It matters little whether someone hates gays or loves gays or doesnt care, so far as it not affect someone

4. hate the players, not the game
Remember, no matter where you go, there you are.
tso
Profile Joined April 2010
United States132 Posts
March 01 2013 23:54 GMT
#220
On March 02 2013 08:48 CeriseCherries wrote:
the same fundamental reason that you or anyone believes evolution is the same reason that someone believes creationsim: someone told you, probably starting at a young age that it was so. for all we know tomorrow the fuckign Xel Naga will land and tell us that evolution is bullshit and they made everyone. well haha for you morally superior prick.


evidence > holy book
...
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 9m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RushiSC 21
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 8184
Shuttle 2203
Mini 980
BeSt 799
EffOrt 629
Soulkey 506
Soma 386
Stork 321
ggaemo 256
Larva 220
[ Show more ]
Mong 178
Snow 130
Hyun 75
Mind 67
sSak 58
Sexy 41
Bale 30
sorry 28
Terrorterran 19
zelot 15
Noble 9
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Dota 2
Gorgc9183
qojqva2490
Dendi2123
BananaSlamJamma347
Counter-Strike
edward220
markeloff119
x6flipin13
Other Games
singsing1902
hiko827
B2W.Neo653
Liquid`RaSZi609
Lowko448
crisheroes319
TKL 241
Liquid`VortiX218
Hui .186
RotterdaM110
Livibee89
QueenE67
ArmadaUGS63
Mew2King50
Trikslyr6
Beastyqt4
Organizations
StarCraft 2
WardiTV1130
IntoTheiNu 973
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 12
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
• mYiSmile10
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV852
League of Legends
• Jankos1527
• TFBlade899
Upcoming Events
The Patches Monday
1h 9m
Afreeca Starleague
19h 9m
Sharp vs Shinee
Action vs Shine
GSL
20h 9m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 9h
Replay Cast
1d 18h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 19h
BeSt vs Paralyze
Jaedong vs Speed
Kung Fu Cup
1d 20h
Replay Cast
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
KCM Race Survival
2 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
PiG Sty Festival
3 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
PiG Sty Festival
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSLAN 4
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
RSL Revival: Season 6
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
META DYMY #4
Esports World Cup 2026
Esports World Cup 2026: LCQ
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026

Upcoming

CSL Season 22: Qualifier 1
Escore Tournament S3: W8
CSL Season 22: Qualifier 2
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.