|
On February 24 2013 23:45 Korinai wrote:Show nested quote +But, if you listen in on any kind of male conversation about women, they predominantly rate women on their looks. Then personality / ability to stand the person bla bla bla comes 2nd. My physical attraction to a person is based off their personality. I would date a 5 or a 6 with an amazing personality far more than I would date a 9 or 10 with a shitty personality.
Most guys would. All that 9/10 shit only has one purpose: shallow inter-male conversations, like with guys you don't know very well, are greatly simplified and give a common ground for conversation and bragging.
When looking for a relationship, most guys I know would prefer an interesting '5' (God that's so pathetic) over an annoying, boring '9'.
|
"But is superficiality a bad thing? I don't think so, it's simply biological."
If you go down that route you could also say killing people you don't like isn't bad because its biological.
If we really lived like nature intended there would be nothing but chaos.
|
People are just attracted to pretty things. Women like pretty material and men like pretty women. It's really just evolution.
|
On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans.
Evolution happens by both natural and sexual selection. They exist fully among humans, in fact they cannot be eliminated from a species until that species becomes extinct. We can only change the rules by which natural selection occurs.
On February 24 2013 23:26 Twinkle Toes wrote:
Of course not, you can do better than that, here let me help you explain your thoughts by answering these questions:
Instead of explaining my thoughts to me, which I already fully understand, why don't you try to explain your thoughts? Because those are a complete fucking mystery.
On February 25 2013 00:43 Vandrad wrote:
"But is superficiality a bad thing? I don't think so, it's simply biological."
If you go down that route you could also say killing people you don't like isn't bad because its biological.
If we really lived like nature intended there would be nothing but chaos.
Nature doesn't "intend" anything.
|
On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans.
Just wow.
In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists?
Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ?
l o l .
|
The men with monney are not complaining.
So i dont think its that bad.
|
On February 25 2013 00:06 Djzapz wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 23:59 Eufouria wrote:On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh what? No it hasn't, what evidence do you have that evolution has stopped? Sure the game has changed a little bit, medicine has advanced the human lifespan drastically and weak traits that would be weeded out by natural selection are now cureable, treatable or no longer such a huge obstacle, but of course evolution still happens. More attractive people will on average have more children so these attractive traits will be passed on, and some genes are going to become less common in the next 100 years, while others become more common, that is evolution. Many people seem to believe that evolution has stopped for us because there are some people who would have died had they been born in the past and now they're allowed to survive. To say that it stopped is ridiculous and I don't know why anybody would believe that outright, but it's true that modern medicine kind of manipulates natural selection. So we survive when we should have died, we're fertile when we would have been sterile, etc. By no means does that "stop" evolution, obviously. Like you said, there are still traits which are favored and whatnot. So I too am interested to know what would make people think that evolution stopped. Hopefully we won't be subjected to the good ole argument that "have you ever seen a fish give birth to a dog". =P
The bigger the population, the more mutations, in that sense we are evolving maybe even faster. However evolution often implies that these mutations spread eventually to the whole population sample through selection. If you remove natural selection, those mutations are just there but do not increase in frequency.
I m not convinced that a "5" will have less children than a "9".
If someone says he likes blondes, is it from the genes that appeared in a population when being blonde was an indication of superior health, or belonging to wealthier family? so that the gene telling you to like blondes conferred you an advantage in life over people who only liked brunettes?
People who invoke evolution are just mindlessly following a fad. One day they will explain males strategy is to put their dick in as many females as possible to pass on their gene. Another day they will say males care about the fine details of said female. In fact, they just make up a maybe plausible scenario and have really no idea.
They usually can't describe a gene that would "code" for whatever character they talk about. And if there is a correlation between some genes and that character, the path is very long from that DNA sequence to the actual brain electrical signals.
But apparently it is fancy to say "it's biology" now, as a token of belonging to the enlighten rather than the bible freaks.
|
On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l .
Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand.
l o l.
User was warned for this post
|
This is very simple. Men look down on women's superficiality. Women look down on men's superficiality. That's it in a nutshell.
So the question becomes: Why does the OP and so many posters identify with the female perspective?
1) Because they are female.
2) Because they are males who have been feminized by modern society.
|
On February 25 2013 00:43 Vandrad wrote:
"But is superficiality a bad thing? I don't think so, it's simply biological."
If you go down that route you could also say killing people you don't like isn't bad because its biological.
If we really lived like nature intended there would be nothing but chaos.
I don't know if that really works, I mean nature evolved us with a brain, and the brain has (almost always) some universal moral values. So we are basically following what nature "intended" (we're not the same as animals).
Natures "intention" is therefore pretty much synonymous with the brain's intention, as it is the result of evolution. Of course we're anthropomorphizing nature, but I understand what you mean. If we followed the rules of nature might be a better description.
And also, sure our brains can affect certain change in how we behave, but we also have certain natural impulses that really can't be changed, probably because they are ingrained in our genes somehow as a result of millions of years of evolution. Basically the nature vs nurture debate. I'm sure you understand that but just wanted to point it out since its relevant
|
On February 25 2013 02:33 Feartheguru wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l . Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand. l o l.
Ugly and stupid individuals have been able to pass on their genes in every species since life started, just not always as successfully. Stop talking when you clearly don't understand what you're talking about.
|
On February 25 2013 02:33 Feartheguru wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l . Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand. l o l.
Oh wow. You truly are an idiot.
|
Russian Federation748 Posts
Most guys would.
But they don't.
|
I want to be with a woman that will make me happy.
Is she rich? That will probably make me happy.
Is she super hot? That will probably make me happy.
How are any of these things superficial? You act as if people will date a super bitch because they have both of these things. Some people are just into super bitches. There are people I wouldn't date in 1 billion years, but they still manage to get dates (Somehow).
There is someone for everyone.
|
On February 25 2013 03:01 Recognizable wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2013 02:33 Feartheguru wrote:On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l . Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand. l o l. Oh wow. You truly are an idiot.
He isn't an idiot. Pretty much any retarded person (literally, not even figuratively) can procreate now when previously they would die much younger or never get the chance to begin with.
Natural selection has disappeared off the face of the planet in first world countries due to modern medicine and the lack of a need to actually develop special skills (especially physically) to survive.
Evolution is Humans is absolutely gone until the next major apocolypse or subspecies we let live ( like that would ever happen) emerges.
Or until someone gets the ability to start procreating with animals.
|
Russian Federation4447 Posts
On February 25 2013 04:02 Figgy wrote:
He isn't an idiot. Pretty much any retarded person (literally, not even figuratively) can procreate now when previously they would die much younger or never get the chance to begin with.
Natural selection has disappeared off the face of the planet in first world countries due to modern medicine and the lack of a need to actually develop special skills (especially physically) to survive.
Evolution is Humans is absolutely gone until the next major apocolypse or subspecies we let live ( like that would ever happen) emerges.
Or until someone gets the ability to start procreating with animals.
Sick but true....
Exceptional children can still be born from 2 below average intellect parents, but its not the norm.
|
On February 25 2013 04:02 Figgy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2013 03:01 Recognizable wrote:On February 25 2013 02:33 Feartheguru wrote:On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l . Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand. l o l. Oh wow. You truly are an idiot. He isn't an idiot. Pretty much any retarded person (literally, not even figuratively) can procreate now when previously they would die much younger or never get the chance to begin with. Natural selection has disappeared off the face of the planet in first world countries due to modern medicine and the lack of a need to actually develop special skills (especially physically) to survive. Evolution is Humans is absolutely gone until the next major apocolypse or subspecies we let live ( like that would ever happen) emerges. Or until someone gets the ability to start procreating with animals.
Let me explain this in detail. Modern society keeps alive those who would've died quickly in the past, such as the retarded or severely disfigured. But those people reproduce less often on average than those who bear desirable traits such as attractiveness, personality, social status, and wealth. In the ancient past, wealth and status revolved mostly around hunting, but now acquiring wealth and status requires a different skill set, which drives evolution towards increasing those traits in the population. Modern society is our new environment, and the rules of the game have changed. Far fewer people die, but evolution is still definitely happening in terms of sexual selection. Now, the environment favors hard-working but uncreative, cooperative, and socially adept people (coincidentally, women average higher scores than men on all of these traits). This is obviously a simplification, but the point should be clear.
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On February 25 2013 00:16 kafkaesque wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 23:45 Korinai wrote:But, if you listen in on any kind of male conversation about women, they predominantly rate women on their looks. Then personality / ability to stand the person bla bla bla comes 2nd. My physical attraction to a person is based off their personality. I would date a 5 or a 6 with an amazing personality far more than I would date a 9 or 10 with a shitty personality. Most guys would. All that 9/10 shit only has one purpose: shallow inter-male conversations, like with guys you don't know very well, are greatly simplified and give a common ground for conversation and bragging. When looking for a relationship, most guys I know would prefer an interesting '5' (God that's so pathetic) over an annoying, boring '9'.
All I gotta say is that if someone is profoundly physically unattractive, I'm not gonna be super interested in dating her. I don't know where the various numbers fall on that scale but it's the truth. Same about being super dumb. At the very least you gotta be moderately physically attractive and moderately intelligent or I'm not gonna be interested. And on that point, I also get it if chicks don't have like hella lady-boners for me if I'm not the best-looking, most charming, or richest dude. People are allowed to have tastes.
If for example, I was a person entirely interested in looks rather than personality, that would be a legitimate set of tastes because it would be the set of tastes I hold. I'm sure I'd have a good argument defending why I personally would be reasonable to hold said tastes. and if a hot chick only gets lady-boners for dudes with tons of money cause she wants to have like 7 babies and send them all to college, that's her prerogative. I know that I sure can't afford to send 7 kids to college so yeah
|
On February 25 2013 04:02 Figgy wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2013 03:01 Recognizable wrote:On February 25 2013 02:33 Feartheguru wrote:On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:On February 22 2013 03:50 Tien wrote:
[...]
Women attracted to men with money because their lifestyle / children will be taken cared of. Is this a bad thing? No. It's just personal preference.
this makes sense.
Men attracted to beautiful women because they will have attractive offspring. Is this a bad thing? Nope, personal preference.
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here. Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l . Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand. l o l. Oh wow. You truly are an idiot. He isn't an idiot. Pretty much any retarded person (literally, not even figuratively) can procreate now when previously they would die much younger or never get the chance to begin with. Natural selection has disappeared off the face of the planet in first world countries due to modern medicine and the lack of a need to actually develop special skills (especially physically) to survive. Evolution is Humans is absolutely gone until the next major apocolypse or subspecies we let live ( like that would ever happen) emerges. Or until someone gets the ability to start procreating with animals.
Sorry to pick your post out but lots of people are saying this and it's completely false.
Evolution is not "gone" in humans - it is just favouring different characteristics than it did in the past, particularly in developed countries.
There are still genes that will be more successful in modern society than others. You are right strength/survivability is less important but then that means that factors such as sexual attractiveness, fertility and promiscuity become more important. That is evolution in action, just acting on a new set of environmental constraints.
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
On February 25 2013 04:23 Klive5ive wrote:Show nested quote +On February 25 2013 04:02 Figgy wrote:On February 25 2013 03:01 Recognizable wrote:On February 25 2013 02:33 Feartheguru wrote:On February 25 2013 01:10 JieXian wrote:On February 24 2013 23:24 Feartheguru wrote:On February 24 2013 23:16 gedatsu wrote:On February 24 2013 23:09 Twinkle Toes wrote:On February 24 2013 19:01 sunprince wrote:On February 24 2013 17:46 Navane wrote:
[quote]
this makes sense.
[quote]
that is a circular argument. Men likes x in women so x will be given to the next generation and future men will like the next generation because it has x. X can be anything genetic here.
Correct. The real reason that men are attracted to beautiful women is because beauty implies youh, health, and fertility, all of which increase the likelihood of passing on their genes. No, just too many wrongs on this BS. Let me be a bit more honest and adult here with my reply, so if there are any kids/minors reading this, stay back. We ask why are men or why am I attracted to pretty women? Lets be honest, attracted here means FUCKING her. And if I may be even more honest, it means fucking her in the most animal and primal of ways, doggy, chained, titfuck, facial, cream pie, biting her lips, sucking her strawberry tongue, pink nipples, beating her pussy up til she cant walk for a week, etc etc.. You get what I mean, unless you are in grade school and think of attraction as holding hands and smelling her hair. Genes, fertility, and all those evolutionary bullcrap are secondary and almost unintended side-effects. What? That's really all I can say to that. On February 24 2013 22:35 llIH wrote:
Remember that evolution has more or less stopped by now. The conditions are not as they where before. Uh, no. Evolution carries on in full force. Conditions have never stayed the same. No. It doesn't.... evolution happens by natural selection which to a large extent no longer exists among humans. Just wow. In a thread talking about beautiful women and rich men being more popular and more attractive to the opposite sex you say that natural selection no longer exists? Weaker, sick and handicapped people don't die out as fast but how could you possible be this blind ? l o l . Because unlike in caveman times, ugly and stupid people such as yourself are also able to pass on their genes (unfortunately), not sure why that's hard to understand. l o l. Oh wow. You truly are an idiot. He isn't an idiot. Pretty much any retarded person (literally, not even figuratively) can procreate now when previously they would die much younger or never get the chance to begin with. Natural selection has disappeared off the face of the planet in first world countries due to modern medicine and the lack of a need to actually develop special skills (especially physically) to survive. Evolution is Humans is absolutely gone until the next major apocolypse or subspecies we let live ( like that would ever happen) emerges. Or until someone gets the ability to start procreating with animals. Sorry to pick your post out but lots of people are saying this and it's completely false. Evolution is not "gone" in humans - it is just favouring different characteristics than it did in the past, particularly in developed countries. There are still genes that will be more successful in modern society than others. You are right strength/survivability is less important but then that means that factors such as sexual attractiveness, fertility and promiscuity become more important. That is evolution in action, just acting on a new set of environmental constraints.
that and being part of a religion that is like "hey dudes have like 900 babies, no contraception plz" this is very clever imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
