• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 09:49
CET 15:49
KST 23:49
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket8Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge1[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA12
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t GM / Master map hacker and general hacking and cheating thread
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle soO on: FanTaSy's Potential Return to StarCraft [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta How to stay on top of macro? PvZ map balance Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile [Game] Osu! Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games? Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI About SC2SEA.COM
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Evangelium — Chapt…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2231 users

President Obama Re-Elected - Page 873

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 871 872 873 874 875 1504 Next
Hey guys! We'll be closing this thread shortly, but we will make an American politics megathread where we can continue the discussions in here.

The new thread can be found here: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=383301
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
October 17 2012 18:55 GMT
#17441
If Obama meant to call the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism in the Rose Garden, he wouldn't have waffled on the issue for weeks thereafter. It's as simple as that. Y'all are being duped.
kmillz
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1548 Posts
October 17 2012 18:56 GMT
#17442
On October 18 2012 03:55 xDaunt wrote:
If Obama meant to call the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism in the Rose Garden, he wouldn't have waffled on the issue for weeks thereafter. It's as simple as that. Y'all are being duped.


Exactly.
farvacola
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States18839 Posts
October 17 2012 18:56 GMT
#17443
On October 18 2012 03:44 kmillz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 03:34 Souma wrote:
On October 18 2012 03:29 Innovation wrote:
Something seems off about your guys' argument.

Romney didn't predict anything. He blatantly mistook a message given by the Benghazi consulate as the words of Obama and tried to score political points with it and ultimately failed.

Or are we discussing something else?



What's worse. Pointing out your opponents failures for political gain during a presidential campaign season or trying to cover up a terrorist attack and a failure of policy that cost Americans their lives for political gain during a presidential campaign season?

The Obama administration either is flat out incompetent in their policy and their response to this tragedy or it's been blatantly lying to the American people to avoid political fall-out. There are no other options between these two scenarios. Either way its appropriate for Romney to question during a political season or any season for that matter.

Everyone should be concerned by his administrations response and by it's failed policies.


I don't care what's worse. I'm pointing out a fact.


No, that is your opinion, I disagree with it too. I think Obama camp took a big hit from the Bengazi scandal, so saying "score political points with it and ultimately failed" is certainly NOT a fact.

Considering the little game of reading comprehension failure you've just played out for the thread, I'm inclined to consider your assessment of the "facts" rather suspect. But, by all means, continue on with the partisan hackery turned language arts magic. It behooves the campaign you champion.
"when the Dead Kennedys found out they had skinhead fans, they literally wrote a song titled 'Nazi Punks Fuck Off'"
cLAN.Anax
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States2847 Posts
October 17 2012 18:56 GMT
#17444
On October 18 2012 03:51 Stratos_speAr wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 03:48 cLAN.Anax wrote:
On October 18 2012 03:41 Deathmanbob wrote:
On October 18 2012 03:36 kmillz wrote:

That stupid CNN moderator lied when she said:

“He did in fact say it was an act of terror"

Since when is it HER job to be fact-checker first of all? Second of all, if she is going to be picking sides, she may as well have her facts straight at least.

Remarks by the President on the Deaths of U.S. Embassy Staff in Libya

Rose Garden

10:43 A.M. EDT

THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Every day, all across the world, American diplomats and civilians work tirelessly to advance the interests and values of our nation. Often, they are away from their families. Sometimes, they brave great danger.

Yesterday, four of these extraordinary Americans were killed in an attack on our diplomatic post in Benghazi. Among those killed was our Ambassador, Chris Stevens, as well as Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith. We are still notifying the families of the others who were killed. And today, the American people stand united in holding the families of the four Americans in our thoughts and in our prayers.

The United States condemns in the strongest terms this outrageous and shocking attack. We're working with the government of Libya to secure our diplomats. I've also directed my administration to increase our security at diplomatic posts around the world. And make no mistake, we will work with the Libyan government to bring to justice the killers who attacked our people.

Since our founding, the United States has been a nation that respects all faiths. We reject all efforts to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. But there is absolutely no justification to this type of senseless violence. None. The world must stand together to unequivocally reject these brutal acts.

Already, many Libyans have joined us in doing so, and this attack will not break the bonds between the United States and Libya. Libyan security personnel fought back against the attackers alongside Americans. Libyans helped some of our diplomats find safety, and they carried Ambassador Stevens’s body to the hospital, where we tragically learned that he had died.

It's especially tragic that Chris Stevens died in Benghazi because it is a city that he helped to save. At the height of the Libyan revolution, Chris led our diplomatic post in Benghazi. With characteristic skill, courage, and resolve, he built partnerships with Libyan revolutionaries, and helped them as they planned to build a new Libya. When the Qaddafi regime came to an end, Chris was there to serve as our ambassador to the new Libya, and he worked tirelessly to support this young democracy, and I think both Secretary Clinton and I relied deeply on his knowledge of the situation on the ground there. He was a role model to all who worked with him and to the young diplomats who aspire to walk in his footsteps.

Along with his colleagues, Chris died in a country that is still striving to emerge from the recent experience of war. Today, the loss of these four Americans is fresh, but our memories of them linger on. I have no doubt that their legacy will live on through the work that they did far from our shores and in the hearts of those who love them back home.

Of course, yesterday was already a painful day for our nation as we marked the solemn memory of the 9/11 attacks. We mourned with the families who were lost on that day. I visited the graves of troops who made the ultimate sacrifice in Iraq and Afghanistan at the hallowed grounds of Arlington Cemetery, and had the opportunity to say thank you and visit some of our wounded warriors at Walter Reed. And then last night, we learned the news of this attack in Benghazi.

As Americans, let us never, ever forget that our freedom is only sustained because there are people who are willing to fight for it, to stand up for it, and in some cases, lay down their lives for it. Our country is only as strong as the character of our people and the service of those both civilian and military who represent us around the globe.

No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for. Today we mourn four more Americans who represent the very best of the United States of America. We will not waver in our commitment to see that justice is done for this terrible act. And make no mistake, justice will be done.

But we also know that the lives these Americans led stand in stark contrast to those of their attackers. These four Americans stood up for freedom and human dignity. They should give every American great pride in the country that they served, and the hope that our flag represents to people around the globe who also yearn to live in freedom and with dignity.

We grieve with their families, but let us carry on their memory, and let us continue their work of seeking a stronger America and a better world for all of our children.

Thank you. May God bless the memory of those we lost and may God bless the United States of America.

END
10:48 A.M. EDT


http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/12/remarks-president-deaths-us-embassy-staff-libya

No where do I see him calling it an act of terror.


No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation


reading is a good skill, or so i've been told



Sketchy. I could see one saying that this attack is inferred as an "act of terror," and yet Obama did not outright refer to the attack in the context of this. + Show Spoiler [Personal opinion] +
Still, I myself am inclined to believe Obama meant the Ambassador Stevens incident.


It's part of speaking eloquently. Anyone that tries to argue that he wasn't referring to both 9/11 and this attack as an act of terror is either delusional or doesn't have a complete grasp of the English language.


His "eloquence" must be improving. I'm surprised he didn't begin that statement with, "Let me make it (absolutely) clear," lol.
┬─┬___(ツ)_/¯ 彡┻━┻ I am the 4%. "I cant believe i saw ANAL backwards before i saw the word LAN." - Capped
Kimaker
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States2131 Posts
October 17 2012 18:57 GMT
#17445
On October 18 2012 03:33 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 03:24 Kimaker wrote:
Romney wins first debate: Romney is a liar.

Obama wins second debate: Obama is a cheater

Gotta love that American partisanship xD

Looking around the landscape today, I'm not so sure that Obama scored anything more than a technical victory last night. Take a look at these post-debate polls:

CBS News:
Show nested quote +
Moments following the debate at Hofstra University in Hempstead, N.Y., 37 percent of voters polled said the president won, 30 percent awarded the victory to Romney, and 33 percent called it a tie. After some particularly animated exchanges between the two candidates, 55 percent of voters said Mr. Obama gave direct answers, but 49 percent also said that about Romney.

As for who would do a better job of handling the economy, the president made some headway on closing that gap. Before the debate, 71 percent said they believed Romney would, while only 27 percent said they thought Obama would; after the debate, 34 percent said the president would better handle the economy, with 65 percent saying Romney would.

Obama would also be more likely to help the middle class, according to 56 percent of voters after the debate, compared with 43 percent who said that about Romney.


CNN:
Show nested quote +
The major post debate polls are showing most debate watchers think President Obama was
the winner — and a typical finding comes in the CNN post-debate poll of registered voters who actually watched the debate.
They were 33 percent Democratic and 33 percent Republican — which means it’s weighted a bit to include about 8 percent more Republicans than the voting population as a whole.

Bottom line: by 46-39 percent, the CNN.com poll respondents called Obama the winner. But asked who did the debate make you more likely to vote for, the respondents were tied between Romney and Obama, 25-25 percent.

Still, Romney won in other key areas:
*On who would better handle the economy: 58 percent Romney; 40 percent Obama.
*On who would better handle health care: 49 percent Romney; 46 percent Obama
*On taxes: 51 percent Romney; 44 percent Obama
*On who is a stronger leader: 49 percent Romney; 46 percent Obama
*On who is more likeable: 47 percent Obama: 41 percent Romney
*On who cares more about your life: 44 percent Obama; 40 percent Romney
*On who answered more directly: 45 percent Romney; 43 percent Obama


If those are in fact the numbers, particularly on handling the economy, Obama is dead meat.


Oh, I by no means think he's in the clear. Far from it, El Presidente is in trouble and short of Romney having a meltdown and having a racist tirade I don't think that will change any time soon.

I was simply commenting on the ridiculous partisanship when the debates are viewed in their own little bubble. Crazy stuff.
Entusman #54 (-_-) ||"Gold is for the Mistress-Silver for the Maid-Copper for the craftsman cunning in his trade. "Good!" said the Baron, sitting in his hall, But Iron — Cold Iron — is master of them all|| "Optimism is Cowardice."- Oswald Spengler
kmillz
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1548 Posts
October 17 2012 18:58 GMT
#17446
On October 18 2012 03:56 farvacola wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 03:44 kmillz wrote:
On October 18 2012 03:34 Souma wrote:
On October 18 2012 03:29 Innovation wrote:
Something seems off about your guys' argument.

Romney didn't predict anything. He blatantly mistook a message given by the Benghazi consulate as the words of Obama and tried to score political points with it and ultimately failed.

Or are we discussing something else?



What's worse. Pointing out your opponents failures for political gain during a presidential campaign season or trying to cover up a terrorist attack and a failure of policy that cost Americans their lives for political gain during a presidential campaign season?

The Obama administration either is flat out incompetent in their policy and their response to this tragedy or it's been blatantly lying to the American people to avoid political fall-out. There are no other options between these two scenarios. Either way its appropriate for Romney to question during a political season or any season for that matter.

Everyone should be concerned by his administrations response and by it's failed policies.


I don't care what's worse. I'm pointing out a fact.


No, that is your opinion, I disagree with it too. I think Obama camp took a big hit from the Bengazi scandal, so saying "score political points with it and ultimately failed" is certainly NOT a fact.

Considering the little game of reading comprehension failure you've just played out for the thread, I'm inclined to consider your assessment of the "facts" rather suspect. But, by all means, continue on with the partisan hackery turned language arts magic. It behooves the campaign you champion.


I think the reading comprehension failure is on your part, read the next 2 weeks of what Obama camp has to say about the anti-Islamic video and how it resulted in the attack.
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
October 17 2012 19:03 GMT
#17447
well shit, i didn't realize you need to boldly declare terrorist attack with a pending investigation. el mejor presidente romney would certainly have condemned the muslims without any.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-10-17 19:09:26
October 17 2012 19:07 GMT
#17448
On October 18 2012 04:03 oneofthem wrote:
well shit, i didn't realize you need to boldly declare terrorist attack with a pending investigation. el mejor presidente romney would certainly have condemned the muslims without any.

The problem is that the administration didn't just say that they were "investigating." Multiple officials, including Obama, Secretary Clinton, and the UN ambassador, all blamed that stupid video.

EDIT: In fact, I believe it was the UN ambassador who even said that "there was no evidence of terrorism."
Innovation
Profile Joined February 2010
United States284 Posts
October 17 2012 19:11 GMT
#17449
Quotes about what happened from state department officials

"The ambassador walked guests out at 8:30 p.m. or so." This is the night of the attack on 9/11. "There was nobody on the street." This is about the possible protests before the attack. "There was nobody on the street" according to this call with two senior State Department officials. Then at 9:30 p.m. they saw on the security cameras at the consulate that there were armed men invading the compound. Again, no protest, no spontaneous protest. There were armed men invading the compound. Quote, "Everything is calm at 8:30 p.m., nothing unusual. There had been nothing unusual during the day outside all day. And then the attack."


This was known by the State department within 24 hours yet everyone in the Obama administration continued to call it the result of a "spontaneous demonstration resulting from an offensive YouTube video" for 14 days. It has irrefutably been shown that it was not the video that caused this attack and that there was intelligence early on to prove it and that the administration either simply was totally and completely incompetent because it couldn't get the story right for two weeks despite the information being available or it was trying to cover up the administrations failed policies and failure to protect its ambassador.
About ChoyafOu "if he wants games decided by random chance he could just play the way he always does" Idra
oneofthem
Profile Blog Joined November 2005
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
October 17 2012 19:12 GMT
#17450
we'll have to know the internal communications and analysis reports on this stuff. the video did cause a big impact and they may have fallen into a causal trap with it being the closest, significant event.

there's no question that there was an intelligence gap that allowed this attack to go down. you could argue they were a bit slow to get to the bottom of things. but there is hardly any ground for declaring it a cover-up as opposed to a case of incompetence.
We have fed the heart on fantasies, the heart's grown brutal from the fare, more substance in our enmities than in our love
Lmui
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada6215 Posts
October 17 2012 19:14 GMT
#17451
I honestly don't see how it's not clear that the speech and specifically the lines referring to terror do not refer to the two incidents together.

I think that the debate hurt Romney though as far as further lowering his chances with women voters. I'm not sure that it will change much considering how poorly he was perceived by women beforehand but his ignorance of the challenges that women around the USA face in finding jobs, pay equality and women's rights in general.
ticklishmusic
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
United States15977 Posts
October 17 2012 19:15 GMT
#17452
someone's mad their boy romney fumbled the benghazi point yesterday.
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
armada[sb]
Profile Joined August 2011
United States432 Posts
October 17 2012 19:17 GMT
#17453
I think it shows how little that Romney can attack Obamas record that this is the only point that you all continue to harp on. Grasping at straws. If you cared so much about lying you wouldn't be voting for Romney.
#Hitpoint @ GameSurge (IDLE=BAN)
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
October 17 2012 19:20 GMT
#17454
On October 18 2012 04:17 armada[sb] wrote:
I think it shows how little that Romney can attack Obamas record that this is the only point that you all continue to harp on. Grasping at straws. If you cared so much about lying you wouldn't be voting for Romney.

Are you joking? Romney absolutely shat on Obama's horrible record last night.
cLAN.Anax
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States2847 Posts
October 17 2012 19:21 GMT
#17455
On October 18 2012 04:17 armada[sb] wrote:
I think it shows how little that Romney can attack Obamas record that this is the only point that you all continue to harp on. Grasping at straws. If you cared so much about lying you wouldn't be voting for Romney.


Perhaps Romney can't attack Obama's record because, even though he's had four years as Pres., he doesn't have a record to attack?...
┬─┬___(ツ)_/¯ 彡┻━┻ I am the 4%. "I cant believe i saw ANAL backwards before i saw the word LAN." - Capped
Innovation
Profile Joined February 2010
United States284 Posts
October 17 2012 19:23 GMT
#17456
someone's mad their boy romney fumbled the benghazi point yesterday.


Romney could have been better in his response but it becomes difficult to respond when the moderator is interrupting him to defend Obama which is not her role as a moderator. There were plenty of chances for her to do the same with outright lies that the president said during the debate but she never "fact checked" Obama the way that she tried to shut down Romney last night. It certainly points to her leanings.

Whether Romney could have done a better job in the debate with that question or not has nothing to do with the facts of what the Obama administration has done with the Benghazi attack. Is the only thing you can say when presented with facts is a troll "U MAD?" response?
About ChoyafOu "if he wants games decided by random chance he could just play the way he always does" Idra
xDaunt
Profile Joined March 2010
United States17988 Posts
October 17 2012 19:28 GMT
#17457
On October 18 2012 04:23 Innovation wrote:
Show nested quote +
someone's mad their boy romney fumbled the benghazi point yesterday.


Romney could have been better in his response but it becomes difficult to respond when the moderator is interrupting him to defend Obama which is not her role as a moderator. There were plenty of chances for her to do the same with outright lies that the president said during the debate but she never "fact checked" Obama the way that she tried to shut down Romney last night. It certainly points to her leanings.

Whether Romney could have done a better job in the debate with that question or not has nothing to do with the facts of what the Obama administration has done with the Benghazi attack. Is the only thing you can say when presented with facts is a troll "U MAD?" response?

All last night did was delay the inevitable. The Libya issue will come up again Monday, and Romney will get it right then. It's too easy of an issue to screw up twice on. Last night's debate isn't going to matter.
cLAN.Anax
Profile Blog Joined July 2012
United States2847 Posts
October 17 2012 19:30 GMT
#17458
On October 18 2012 04:23 Innovation wrote:
Show nested quote +
someone's mad their boy romney fumbled the benghazi point yesterday.


Romney could have been better in his response but it becomes difficult to respond when the moderator is interrupting him to defend Obama which is not her role as a moderator. There were plenty of chances for her to do the same with outright lies that the president said during the debate but she never "fact checked" Obama the way that she tried to shut down Romney last night. It certainly points to her leanings.


I only caught the tail end of the debate, but I didn't think the moderator was all that bad or biased, 'least the part that I watched. Could have been a better moderator quality-wise (better speaker perhaps), but still pretty fair to both candidates in my opinion.
┬─┬___(ツ)_/¯ 彡┻━┻ I am the 4%. "I cant believe i saw ANAL backwards before i saw the word LAN." - Capped
HellRoxYa
Profile Joined September 2010
Sweden1614 Posts
October 17 2012 19:36 GMT
#17459
On October 18 2012 04:28 xDaunt wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 18 2012 04:23 Innovation wrote:
someone's mad their boy romney fumbled the benghazi point yesterday.


Romney could have been better in his response but it becomes difficult to respond when the moderator is interrupting him to defend Obama which is not her role as a moderator. There were plenty of chances for her to do the same with outright lies that the president said during the debate but she never "fact checked" Obama the way that she tried to shut down Romney last night. It certainly points to her leanings.

Whether Romney could have done a better job in the debate with that question or not has nothing to do with the facts of what the Obama administration has done with the Benghazi attack. Is the only thing you can say when presented with facts is a troll "U MAD?" response?

All last night did was delay the inevitable. The Libya issue will come up again Monday, and Romney will get it right then. It's too easy of an issue to screw up twice on. Last night's debate isn't going to matter.


We'll see. If it's the same Obama that came out in the last debate then Romney wont be gaining much, and perhaps even be losing when he shouldn't.
urashimakt
Profile Joined October 2009
United States1591 Posts
October 17 2012 19:37 GMT
#17460
On October 18 2012 04:23 Innovation wrote:
Show nested quote +
someone's mad their boy romney fumbled the benghazi point yesterday.


Romney could have been better in his response but it becomes difficult to respond when the moderator is interrupting him to defend Obama which is not her role as a moderator. There were plenty of chances for her to do the same with outright lies that the president said during the debate but she never "fact checked" Obama the way that she tried to shut down Romney last night. It certainly points to her leanings.

Whether Romney could have done a better job in the debate with that question or not has nothing to do with the facts of what the Obama administration has done with the Benghazi attack. Is the only thing you can say when presented with facts is a troll "U MAD?" response?

Crowley didn't defend Obama. Obama defended Obama. He said Romney was wrong and prompted a fact check. Here's the exact transcript:


OBAMA: The day after the attack, governor, I stood in the Rose Garden and I told the American people in the world that we are going to find out exactly what happened. That this was an act of terror and I also said that we’re going to hunt down those who committed this crime.

ROMNEY: I — I think interesting the president just said something which — which is that on the day after the attack he went into the Rose Garden and said that this was an act of terror.

OBAMA: That’s what I said.

ROMNEY: You said in the Rose Garden the day after the attack, it was an act of terror.

It was not a spontaneous demonstration, is that what you’re saying?

OBAMA: Please proceed governor.

ROMNEY: I want to make sure we get that for the record because it took the president 14 days before he called the attack in Benghazi an act of terror.

OBAMA: Get the transcript.

CROWLEY: It — it — it — he did in fact, sir. So let me — let me call it an act of terror…

OBAMA: Can you say that a little louder, Candy?

CROWLEY: He — he did call it an act of terror. It did as well take — it did as well take two weeks or so for the whole idea there being a riot out there about this tape to come out. You are correct about that.


And a link to the video excerpt can be found here. If you think the moderator shouldn't be allowed to end the dispute of a fact check when prompted, you may be a tad bit biased here.
Who dat ninja?
Prev 1 871 872 873 874 875 1504 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
OSC
13:00
King of the Hill #231
SteadfastSC137
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko467
RotterdaM 252
SteadfastSC 137
LamboSC2 114
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 48400
Calm 4887
Rain 3221
Sea 1987
firebathero 672
Mini 622
EffOrt 421
Snow 301
BeSt 281
PianO 241
[ Show more ]
Soma 201
Rush 157
JYJ134
Light 130
Backho 93
hero 78
Hyun 62
yabsab 56
soO 40
Movie 36
Terrorterran 32
ToSsGirL 31
Aegong 24
scan(afreeca) 16
Shine 13
HiyA 13
ivOry 6
Dota 2
Gorgc4769
singsing2307
qojqva2231
Dendi660
XcaliburYe128
League of Legends
KnowMe23
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1988
allub294
oskar83
markeloff70
Heroes of the Storm
Trikslyr19
Other Games
B2W.Neo1321
hiko562
crisheroes476
ArmadaUGS110
Mew2King93
nookyyy 28
QueenE13
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream14758
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• IndyKCrew
StarCraft: Brood War
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2591
• WagamamaTV290
League of Legends
• Nemesis3022
• Jankos1928
• TFBlade890
• Stunt576
• HappyZerGling186
Upcoming Events
BSL: GosuLeague
6h 11m
RSL Revival
16h 41m
Zoun vs Classic
SHIN vs TriGGeR
herO vs Reynor
Maru vs MaxPax
WardiTV Korean Royale
21h 11m
Replay Cast
1d 8h
RSL Revival
1d 16h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 21h
IPSL
2 days
Julia vs Artosis
JDConan vs DragOn
BSL 21
2 days
TerrOr vs Aeternum
HBO vs Kyrie
RSL Revival
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
[ Show More ]
IPSL
3 days
StRyKeR vs OldBoy
Sziky vs Tarson
BSL 21
3 days
StRyKeR vs Artosis
OyAji vs KameZerg
Replay Cast
3 days
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-16
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.