|
You can't seriously argue for the death penalty in cases were there remains ueven the slgihtest ncertainity. Putting an innocent person on death penalty is murder.
Now i'm against the death penalty in general but if your absolutely, 100% sure, i see how you can argue for it... If there is doubt you just can't whiteout making yourself look bad, really, really bad.
|
On September 22 2011 23:47 LEGIONzomg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:24 dakalro wrote:On September 22 2011 20:51 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 20:46 Cheerio wrote: I think death penalty should be for doing something outrageous and where mistakes can be totally ruled out. Killing a cop under shady circumstances doesnt qualify. Shady doesn't mean innocent. Apparently he had shot someone else and Ballistics matched up with the other bullet from the cop. IF all you read was this article posted by the OP then I can see why it'd be shady... No, apparently the cops mixed up the bullets from the two shootings and placed them in the same evidence bag. And later declared they "fixed" that. There was no gun either for the cop shooting. The simple fact he kept saying he was innocent of the crime right as he was about to be murdered casts a very large doubt. People that kill once for stupid reasons don't deserve death. The psychopaths, sure, the ones that get angry or stupid can be rehabilitated (and don't tell me everyone that kills is a psychopath). Killing for any other reason then Self Defense is a STUPID Reason...Killing is against the Law you do realize this right? Killing for a stupid Reason is AGAINST THE LAW. Was the guy doing it in self defense? No? It's Illegal. Plenty of studies show that one who gets "Rehabilitated" goes back into the world and recommits the crime whatever it may be. When you're working with numbers you go with the MAJORITY not the OMG BUT SOME PEOPLE DONT?! that's not how anything works in the world.. The fact of the matter is once convicted in 19 years if you cant come up with a credible reason why you are innocent then you 1) either did it or 2) Life hates you. All of you that claim this to be because he's black make me Lul at your credibility. Wanna stop Racism? Stop claiming everything to be Racist. Easy as that. Until you people stop claim racism every time you turn around it will never change. Don't be hypocritical and claim racism because the persons black when you're claiming EVERYONE else to be racist and judging us because we're another Race. You're all Ignorant and that annoys me.
..So you proved our point? That killing is wrong no matter what? The world should push towards being able to adequately rehabilitate murderers or punish them in a way that does not cause more deaths.
|
On September 22 2011 23:09 Doppelganger wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 22:48 IrOnKaL wrote: I feel that most people that are crazy enough to murder a fellow citizen will only end up doing it again if / when they get out of prison. And I think that it should be irrelevant what you feel about it. Furthermore, almost every person can be pushed to the brink by the circumstances and can turn into a murderer. You have nothing to base your feeling upon. There are serial killers and some killers/rapists that are bat shit crazy beyond help. That does however not mean that everyone is beyond help. Anyway in either case: a life long prison sentence should do the trick.
Whether you like it or not I'm not paying for someone convicted of murderer to get a free ride through life. If you're willing to pay my portion of the taxes then I'll vote your way but that's only if you're ok with explaining your point of view to murder victims relatives.
|
I think capital punishment is terrible and barbaric, and then there's the risk of killing an innocent man on top of that. Makes me very sad to see the american state killing it's own people, behaving like countries such as China, North Korea and Iran. USA is really lagging behind the rest of the western world in this regard IMO. I'm very happy EU has made abolition of death penalty a neccesity in order to join.
|
I'm generally fine with the death penalty but there were too many doubts brought up in this specific case for me to agree with it.
There should have been a re-trial or at the very least reduced to a life sentence.
|
On September 22 2011 23:50 LEGIONzomg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:09 Doppelganger wrote:On September 22 2011 22:48 IrOnKaL wrote: I feel that most people that are crazy enough to murder a fellow citizen will only end up doing it again if / when they get out of prison. And I think that it should be irrelevant what you feel about it. Furthermore, almost every person can be pushed to the brink by the circumstances and can turn into a murderer. You have nothing to base your feeling upon. There are serial killers and some killers/rapists that are bat shit crazy beyond help. That does however not mean that everyone is beyond help. Anyway in either case: a life long prison sentence should do the trick. Whether you like it or not I'm not paying for someone convicted of murderer to get a free ride through life. If you're willing to pay my portion of the taxes then I'll vote your way but that's only if you're ok with explaining your point of view to murder victims relatives.
And you explain the same to the relatives of the unjustly convicted murderer that just got killed by your justice system...
|
On September 22 2011 23:50 Odal wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:47 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 23:24 dakalro wrote:On September 22 2011 20:51 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 20:46 Cheerio wrote: I think death penalty should be for doing something outrageous and where mistakes can be totally ruled out. Killing a cop under shady circumstances doesnt qualify. Shady doesn't mean innocent. Apparently he had shot someone else and Ballistics matched up with the other bullet from the cop. IF all you read was this article posted by the OP then I can see why it'd be shady... No, apparently the cops mixed up the bullets from the two shootings and placed them in the same evidence bag. And later declared they "fixed" that. There was no gun either for the cop shooting. The simple fact he kept saying he was innocent of the crime right as he was about to be murdered casts a very large doubt. People that kill once for stupid reasons don't deserve death. The psychopaths, sure, the ones that get angry or stupid can be rehabilitated (and don't tell me everyone that kills is a psychopath). Killing for any other reason then Self Defense is a STUPID Reason...Killing is against the Law you do realize this right? Killing for a stupid Reason is AGAINST THE LAW. Was the guy doing it in self defense? No? It's Illegal. Plenty of studies show that one who gets "Rehabilitated" goes back into the world and recommits the crime whatever it may be. When you're working with numbers you go with the MAJORITY not the OMG BUT SOME PEOPLE DONT?! that's not how anything works in the world.. The fact of the matter is once convicted in 19 years if you cant come up with a credible reason why you are innocent then you 1) either did it or 2) Life hates you. All of you that claim this to be because he's black make me Lul at your credibility. Wanna stop Racism? Stop claiming everything to be Racist. Easy as that. Until you people stop claim racism every time you turn around it will never change. Don't be hypocritical and claim racism because the persons black when you're claiming EVERYONE else to be racist and judging us because we're another Race. You're all Ignorant and that annoys me. ..So you proved our point? That killing is wrong no matter what? The world should push towards being able to adequately rehabilitate murderers or punish them in a way that does not cause more deaths. He never said that killing is wrong no matter what. His point was that on an individual level, its wrong to kill another human being for any other reason than self defense.
Rehabilitation treats committing crime like its some sort of mental disorder that can be fixed, and afterwards the criminal can go live a "normal" life. Some criminals have mental disorders which act as factors, but if you believe in free will, do you not see a problem with this ideal?
|
there are no guilty men in prison rehabilitation is a myth
|
On September 22 2011 23:50 Odal wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:47 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 23:24 dakalro wrote:On September 22 2011 20:51 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 20:46 Cheerio wrote: I think death penalty should be for doing something outrageous and where mistakes can be totally ruled out. Killing a cop under shady circumstances doesnt qualify. Shady doesn't mean innocent. Apparently he had shot someone else and Ballistics matched up with the other bullet from the cop. IF all you read was this article posted by the OP then I can see why it'd be shady... No, apparently the cops mixed up the bullets from the two shootings and placed them in the same evidence bag. And later declared they "fixed" that. There was no gun either for the cop shooting. The simple fact he kept saying he was innocent of the crime right as he was about to be murdered casts a very large doubt. People that kill once for stupid reasons don't deserve death. The psychopaths, sure, the ones that get angry or stupid can be rehabilitated (and don't tell me everyone that kills is a psychopath). Killing for any other reason then Self Defense is a STUPID Reason...Killing is against the Law you do realize this right? Killing for a stupid Reason is AGAINST THE LAW. Was the guy doing it in self defense? No? It's Illegal. Plenty of studies show that one who gets "Rehabilitated" goes back into the world and recommits the crime whatever it may be. When you're working with numbers you go with the MAJORITY not the OMG BUT SOME PEOPLE DONT?! that's not how anything works in the world.. The fact of the matter is once convicted in 19 years if you cant come up with a credible reason why you are innocent then you 1) either did it or 2) Life hates you. All of you that claim this to be because he's black make me Lul at your credibility. Wanna stop Racism? Stop claiming everything to be Racist. Easy as that. Until you people stop claim racism every time you turn around it will never change. Don't be hypocritical and claim racism because the persons black when you're claiming EVERYONE else to be racist and judging us because we're another Race. You're all Ignorant and that annoys me. ..So you proved our point? That killing is wrong no matter what? The world should push towards being able to adequately rehabilitate murderers or punish them in a way that does not cause more deaths.
No your point is not proven... You're apparently reading what you want but that's cool I can't help that. A Murderer should be killed for MANY Reasons. This is stuff you will not understand until you either know someone that was murdered close to you or you realize the Statistics of the topic. You do realize to keep a Murderer in Prison for a Life Sentence in some states is $130 a day per Life inmate. So you understand this I'll spell it out.. That's a $16.25 per hour 9-5 Job. That's double Minimum Wage+. Lets say the person convicted is 50 yrs old and lives to 85. That's $1,660,750 for that ONE person to live it out. In the states of $130 per day the Lethal Injection is $8,866 per Person. The Lethal Injection is supposed to be the MOST Humane form of Capital Punishment. So if you wanna go on Humane or Inhumane would you rather get a Lethal Injection or sit in a Cell for 35 Yrs and hope you don't get Raped/Murdered. I'd choose Injection.
I'd rather Kill one Person that Killed Two then Risk the chances(btw that show adequate evidence on rehabilitated Convicts end up COMMITTING the SAME Crime Over again) of them getting out and Killing Several more. Makes sense to me. I don't see how you think otherwise.
|
Capital punishment is a midevil form of punishment which doesn't belong in the western world in 2011.
|
On September 22 2011 23:47 LEGIONzomg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:24 dakalro wrote:On September 22 2011 20:51 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 20:46 Cheerio wrote: I think death penalty should be for doing something outrageous and where mistakes can be totally ruled out. Killing a cop under shady circumstances doesnt qualify. Shady doesn't mean innocent. Apparently he had shot someone else and Ballistics matched up with the other bullet from the cop. IF all you read was this article posted by the OP then I can see why it'd be shady... No, apparently the cops mixed up the bullets from the two shootings and placed them in the same evidence bag. And later declared they "fixed" that. There was no gun either for the cop shooting. The simple fact he kept saying he was innocent of the crime right as he was about to be murdered casts a very large doubt. People that kill once for stupid reasons don't deserve death. The psychopaths, sure, the ones that get angry or stupid can be rehabilitated (and don't tell me everyone that kills is a psychopath). Killing for any other reason then Self Defense is a STUPID Reason... Killing is against the Law you do realize this right? Killing for a stupid Reason is AGAINST THE LAW. Was the guy doing it in self defense? No? It's Illegal. Plenty of studies show that one who gets "Rehabilitated" goes back into the world and recommits the crime whatever it may be. When you're working with numbers you go with the MAJORITY not the OMG BUT SOME PEOPLE DONT?! that's not how anything works in the world.. The fact of the matter is once convicted in 19 years if you cant come up with a credible reason why you are innocent then you 1) either did it or 2) Life hates you. All of you that claim this to be because he's black make me Lul at your credibility. Wanna stop Racism? Stop claiming everything to be Racist. Easy as that. Until you people stop claim racism every time you turn around it will never change. Don't be hypocritical and claim racism because the persons black when you're claiming EVERYONE else to be racist and judging us because we're another Race. You're all Ignorant and that annoys me.
I like how you base your entire ideology on this issue on a faulty fact. Look at Norway, most liberal view on jailtime and is the most focused on rehabilitating in the world and guess what, they also have the lowest rates of crime and rates of people re-entering old habits after being released.
|
You give me proof he killed a cop, I'll give you a dead man in return.
That's how the system works, like it or not.
|
On September 22 2011 23:53 Velr wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:50 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 23:09 Doppelganger wrote:On September 22 2011 22:48 IrOnKaL wrote: I feel that most people that are crazy enough to murder a fellow citizen will only end up doing it again if / when they get out of prison. And I think that it should be irrelevant what you feel about it. Furthermore, almost every person can be pushed to the brink by the circumstances and can turn into a murderer. You have nothing to base your feeling upon. There are serial killers and some killers/rapists that are bat shit crazy beyond help. That does however not mean that everyone is beyond help. Anyway in either case: a life long prison sentence should do the trick. Whether you like it or not I'm not paying for someone convicted of murderer to get a free ride through life. If you're willing to pay my portion of the taxes then I'll vote your way but that's only if you're ok with explaining your point of view to murder victims relatives. And you explain the same to the relatives of the unjustly convicted murderer that just got killed by your justice system...
Maybe we should kill everyone in the world? This would be the cheapest, there would be no costs! Never again would there be any costs! I swear, I can't take people seriously who use the argument of "cost efficency" when the topic is human life.
|
On September 22 2011 23:53 Velr wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:50 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 23:09 Doppelganger wrote:On September 22 2011 22:48 IrOnKaL wrote: I feel that most people that are crazy enough to murder a fellow citizen will only end up doing it again if / when they get out of prison. And I think that it should be irrelevant what you feel about it. Furthermore, almost every person can be pushed to the brink by the circumstances and can turn into a murderer. You have nothing to base your feeling upon. There are serial killers and some killers/rapists that are bat shit crazy beyond help. That does however not mean that everyone is beyond help. Anyway in either case: a life long prison sentence should do the trick. Whether you like it or not I'm not paying for someone convicted of murderer to get a free ride through life. If you're willing to pay my portion of the taxes then I'll vote your way but that's only if you're ok with explaining your point of view to murder victims relatives. And you explain the same to the relatives of the unjustly convicted murderer that just got killed by your justice system...
I would rather Later find out that we made a mistake and explain that then have to explain "Oh hey remember that guy that murdered your Daughter? We let him go and now he's murdered your Son.. Our Bad."
|
Disgusting and disgraceful. Nothing more to say about the topic.
|
I'd like to point out once again, that its unfair to harp on the death penalty simply because in rare cases, innocent men and women get punished by the judical system. This is something that needs to be blamed on the courts, the law enforcement, and others involved in prosecution.
Anyone with common sense can tell you that the death penalty (or really any punishment for that matter) should absolutely not be carried out unless it is beyond all reasonable doubt. There are issues where this doesnt happen, but for fucks sake look at all the times the system actually works and things play out this way.
What ever happened to Casey Anthony? Remember her? It wasn't beyond all reasonable doubt (And there was a fuckton of circumstantial evidence), and she got off. The system isn't a complete shitshow, it works most of the time but there are flaws just like in everything else in life.
|
On September 23 2011 00:02 BlackFlag wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:53 Velr wrote:On September 22 2011 23:50 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 23:09 Doppelganger wrote:On September 22 2011 22:48 IrOnKaL wrote: I feel that most people that are crazy enough to murder a fellow citizen will only end up doing it again if / when they get out of prison. And I think that it should be irrelevant what you feel about it. Furthermore, almost every person can be pushed to the brink by the circumstances and can turn into a murderer. You have nothing to base your feeling upon. There are serial killers and some killers/rapists that are bat shit crazy beyond help. That does however not mean that everyone is beyond help. Anyway in either case: a life long prison sentence should do the trick. Whether you like it or not I'm not paying for someone convicted of murderer to get a free ride through life. If you're willing to pay my portion of the taxes then I'll vote your way but that's only if you're ok with explaining your point of view to murder victims relatives. And you explain the same to the relatives of the unjustly convicted murderer that just got killed by your justice system... Maybe we should kill everyone in the world? This would be the cheapest, there would be no costs! Never again would there be any costs! I swear, I can't take people seriously who use the argument of "cost efficency" when the topic is human life.
Believe it or not but a lot of things are ran by Cost Efficiency. Hence why we have Currencies and not "IOU's". If you can't stand people that argue cost efficiency then move to the Woodlands?
|
On September 23 2011 00:04 JamesJohansen wrote: I'd like to point out once again, that its unfair to harp on the death penalty simply because in rare cases, innocent men and women get punished by the judical system. This is something that needs to be blamed on the courts, the law enforcement, and others involved in prosecution.
Anyone with common sense can tell you that the death penalty (or really any punishment for that matter) should absolutely not be carried out unless it is beyond all reasonable doubt. There are issues where this doesnt happen, but for fucks sake look at all the times the system actually works and things play out this way.
What ever happened to Casey Anthony? Remember her? It wasn't beyond all reasonable doubt (And there was a fuckton of circumstantial evidence), and she got off. The system isn't a complete shitshow, it works most of the time but there are flaws just like in everything else in life.
You can't explain this to people. People don't understand that NO system is 100% Flawless. It's hard to see that when apparently we're all Perfect human beings. You can explain it over and over but everyone always has that "but but if it's a 9/10 and not a 10/10 its flawed BOOO for that 1 time"
|
On September 23 2011 00:02 LEGIONzomg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 22 2011 23:53 Velr wrote:On September 22 2011 23:50 LEGIONzomg wrote:On September 22 2011 23:09 Doppelganger wrote:On September 22 2011 22:48 IrOnKaL wrote: I feel that most people that are crazy enough to murder a fellow citizen will only end up doing it again if / when they get out of prison. And I think that it should be irrelevant what you feel about it. Furthermore, almost every person can be pushed to the brink by the circumstances and can turn into a murderer. You have nothing to base your feeling upon. There are serial killers and some killers/rapists that are bat shit crazy beyond help. That does however not mean that everyone is beyond help. Anyway in either case: a life long prison sentence should do the trick. Whether you like it or not I'm not paying for someone convicted of murderer to get a free ride through life. If you're willing to pay my portion of the taxes then I'll vote your way but that's only if you're ok with explaining your point of view to murder victims relatives. And you explain the same to the relatives of the unjustly convicted murderer that just got killed by your justice system... I would rather Later find out that we made a mistake and explain that then have to explain "Oh hey remember that guy that murdered your Daughter? We let him go and now he's murdered your Son.. Our Bad."
So you'd rather the blood be on your hands than another person's? That may sound commendable in some strange way, but it's certainly not what I'd prefer. Besides, what are the circumstances of "we let him go?" There are these things called life sentences. If a jury "let's him go," and he was guilty, that has more to do with incompetent police work, lack of evidence, or good old dishonest lawyers working the system, etc.
It's also rather known that prison sucks. I'd hardly call it a free ride. It's simply humane not to starve people, murderers or not.
If you haven't heard of Ron Williamson or read John Grisham's The Innocent Man, I highly suggest it. That particular book is non fiction and tells the story of a real person who was wrongly convicted of murder and his life was ruined after he was sent to death row. It also shows the horrors of solitary confinement. A picture of the man when he was 47 looked like he was 80 and invalid. I always thought that was a dramatization of books like A Tale of Two Cities, but it's actually possible. The book has the pictures.
|
On September 23 2011 00:08 LEGIONzomg wrote:Show nested quote +On September 23 2011 00:04 JamesJohansen wrote: I'd like to point out once again, that its unfair to harp on the death penalty simply because in rare cases, innocent men and women get punished by the judical system. This is something that needs to be blamed on the courts, the law enforcement, and others involved in prosecution.
Anyone with common sense can tell you that the death penalty (or really any punishment for that matter) should absolutely not be carried out unless it is beyond all reasonable doubt. There are issues where this doesnt happen, but for fucks sake look at all the times the system actually works and things play out this way.
What ever happened to Casey Anthony? Remember her? It wasn't beyond all reasonable doubt (And there was a fuckton of circumstantial evidence), and she got off. The system isn't a complete shitshow, it works most of the time but there are flaws just like in everything else in life. You can't explain this to people. People don't understand that NO system is 100% Flawless. It's hard to see that when apparently we're all Perfect human beings. You can explain it over and over but everyone always has that "but but if it's a 9/10 and not a 10/10 its flawed BOOO for that 1 time" But we can still try and strive for perfection, which is the opposite of what you´re doing. Once again, look at Norway.
|
|
|
|