On September 24 2011 06:30 Hinanawi wrote:
I'm liberal as hell, but the 'factoid' that 7/12 witnesses recanted is nonsense - they recanted on minor, unimportant details, just so the defense could say they 'recanted', and then shoved them away so they couldn't be interviewed again.
He was guilty as fuck by all indications. I'll save my tears for someone else.
I'm liberal as hell, but the 'factoid' that 7/12 witnesses recanted is nonsense - they recanted on minor, unimportant details, just so the defense could say they 'recanted', and then shoved them away so they couldn't be interviewed again.
He was guilty as fuck by all indications. I'll save my tears for someone else.
Eye witness testimony is notoriously unreliable. Do you not find it troubling that there was no shred of physical evidence found linking him to the crime?
Maybe he was guilty, maybe he wasn't. What I find troubling is that he was convicted, sentenced to death, and executed on VERY spare evidence.