-the band MIMS' song This is Why I'm Hot
Dumb Song Lyrics - Page 18
Forum Index > General Forum |
crown77
United States157 Posts
-the band MIMS' song This is Why I'm Hot | ||
oDieN[Siege]
United States2904 Posts
| ||
Le BucheRON
Canada619 Posts
| ||
Truedot
444 Posts
On September 06 2011 08:31 MozzarellaL wrote: Try this one out for size: or this: man you just don't know art and good music. you want some garbage, try this: | ||
CheeseMeNot
80 Posts
On September 09 2011 23:00 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Actually it's the case that you're supposed to see the lightning before you hear the thunder, because light travels faster than sound. And there's some sort of colloquial formula (I don't know how accurate it is) where you count the seconds after you see the lightning, until you hear the thunder, and it's supposed to correlate to how far away the central part of the storm is. So I agree; the lyrics are backwards. Way to not read a word I wrote. No one was talking about a single lightning strike. I think everyone knows light travels faster than sound... Also, it's 3 seconds per km. | ||
hipsterHobbit
United States218 Posts
While the lyrics are stupid the song is pure genius. | ||
Supamang
United States2298 Posts
On September 10 2011 03:30 lorkac wrote: Disliking a song =/= bad song lyrics Lyrics following a writing trope specific to a genre you don't like =/= bad song lyrics You not understanding why a lyric is good =/= bad song lyrics Lyrics not following a convention you follow =/= bad song lyrics This thread is full of fail "Bad" is completely subjective, you cant make other people see the same way you do. Ironically, by making this post youre completely guilty of exactly what you are blaming these people for, that is not considering other points of view. | ||
shawster
Canada2485 Posts
On September 10 2011 03:43 Le BucheRON wrote: Really, any rap song fits the bill here. We get it. You're a dangerous criminal with a lot of money and women. Can you shut up now? lol okay i guess all sc players are nerds and all sports stars are retarded jocks as well | ||
cHaNg-sTa
United States1058 Posts
On September 09 2011 06:01 mustache wrote: i wouldnt say it's *deep*, since to me *deep* usually means it has a meaning that you cant explain and only other *deep* individuals can understand. however the lyrics to fireflies do have a meaning, the singer adam young is singing about his insomnia. + Show Spoiler + "Adam Young told the story behind the song to AntiMusic: "It was 2AM and I was sitting on the floor in my parent's basement with a MicroKorg on my lap. I built this synthy legato, 'ping' sound routed through a lowpass filter and ran it through a bunch of guitar pedals. I come up with a little cascading part that wound up as the intro and verses of a song called 'Fireflies.' I have insomnia and I've always had a tough time falling asleep for as long as I can remember. I wanted to sing about my inability to sleep in a whimsical way that portrayed the condition as lighthearted and almost more of a 'blessing' than a curse. It's ironic that when sleep and I cannot bring ourselves to meet is often when inspiration strikes hardest. I'd just been on vacation to Iowa the week before I wrote the song and was amazed at how many fireflies came out at dusk. I didn't really have to think about making a connection between insomnia and lighting bugs, it just sort of happened and the song basically wrote itself. It was a lot of fun."" So.. he has insomnia and a bunch of fireflies appears and writes a song about it.. That equals "deep"? How is this any different from all the artists writing lyrics while they're high. The lyrics came out pretty damn dumb if you ask anyone. It may have a "deep" meaning to him, but it's really just a bunch of gibberish in the end. The music is pretty catchy, I'll give it that. | ||
lorkac
United States2297 Posts
On September 10 2011 14:13 Supamang wrote: "Bad" is completely subjective, you cant make other people see the same way you do. Ironically, by making this post youre completely guilty of exactly what you are blaming these people for, that is not considering other points of view. It has nothing to do with points of view. When you're talking about determining qualitative values to objects, anecdotal evidence proves nothing. It's possible to prove that something is sub-par when it is compared to either a specific standard or a proxy of said standard. At that point, the "goodness" and "badness" is determined not by subjective opinion but is instead a scale of how close one object is similar to another. | ||
lorkac
United States2297 Posts
On September 10 2011 14:18 cHaNg-sTa wrote: So.. he has insomnia and a bunch of fireflies appears and writes a song about it.. That equals "deep"? How is this any different from all the artists writing lyrics while they're high. The lyrics came out pretty damn dumb if you ask anyone. It may have a "deep" meaning to him, but it's really just a bunch of gibberish in the end. The music is pretty catchy, I'll give it that. It's the abstraction of normally coherent objects in order to describe an incoherent experience. It is inherently inconsistent and inherently fragmented to performatively reflect the subject it is discussing. It's both a description and a recreation of a subjective experience--that's what makes it supposedly "deep." Personally I think the wonderful thing about the lyrics is not the content of the words but the phonetic experience one has in the both the rhythm and the rhyme scheme of the song. But that's just me. | ||
Truedot
444 Posts
On September 10 2011 14:47 lorkac wrote: It's the abstraction of normally coherent objects in order to describe an incoherent experience. It is inherently inconsistent and inherently fragmented to performatively reflect the subject it is discussing. It's both a description and a recreation of a subjective experience--that's what makes it supposedly "deep." Personally I think the wonderful thing about the lyrics is not the content of the words but the phonetic experience one has in the both the rhythm and the rhyme scheme of the song. But that's just me. so in other words, some people consider the lyrics bad because they are true to life, instead of being neat and orderly like preprogrammed essay. | ||
Supamang
United States2298 Posts
On September 10 2011 14:43 lorkac wrote: It has nothing to do with points of view. When you're talking about determining qualitative values to objects, anecdotal evidence proves nothing. It's possible to prove that something is sub-par when it is compared to either a specific standard or a proxy of said standard. At that point, the "goodness" and "badness" is determined not by subjective opinion but is instead a scale of how close one object is similar to another. Uhhh, you should clarify that because it sounds like youre saying music should be manufactured to be as similar to each other as possible within each genre. Last time I checked, music, as with any art form, is about being the opposite of manufactured. Its about expressing yourself in your own way, not by some preset standard. Unless, of course, youre talking about mainstream music. Then I would agree with you about having specific and measurable standards for music genres. Of course in that case it would be easier to measure which songs are "good" by using record sales as a standard. | ||
Twoinches
United States131 Posts
BUT THIS To school for cool....fuck you pink. you were doing so good. and then this giant blemish. | ||
hoganftw
United States32 Posts
| ||
Twoinches
United States131 Posts
On September 10 2011 21:26 hoganftw wrote: I do not get the concept of Yellow Submarines or I am Walrus. Or any Beatles song. the concept is Lsd and lots of it. great songs though. | ||
Capped
United Kingdom7236 Posts
On September 10 2011 03:43 Le BucheRON wrote: Really, any rap song fits the bill here. We get it. You're a dangerous criminal with a lot of money and women. Can you shut up now? Agreed. Only exempt rapper is eminem IMO. Guy sings about shit thats meaningful, as opposed to all the other retarded rap shit thats out there. Oh, and he sings actual words. Not half/quater words really fast so no-one understands shit, but thats more london eh, i dunno what the official "term" was for it, but its like underground crap. | ||
DisneylandSC
Netherlands435 Posts
![]() On September 10 2011 21:42 Capped wrote: Agreed. Only exempt rapper is eminem IMO. Guy sings about shit thats meaningful, as opposed to all the other retarded rap shit thats out there. Oh, and he sings actual words. Not half/quater words really fast so no-one understands shit, but thats more london eh, i dunno what the official "term" was for it, but its like underground crap. | ||
Mallidon
Scotland557 Posts
On September 06 2011 08:31 MozzarellaL wrote: Try this one out for size: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFcfbUq2Jjg or this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Bs5LFlbVn8 Aww I actually thought these were so bad, they were almost good :o | ||
bobwhiz
United States725 Posts
I personally think the lyrics to John Lennon's "Imagine" are pretty poorly written on a philosophical level. The tune is awesome, and the delivery of the message is great, but the message itself is self-defeating, cliche and a tad bit self-righteous too. I also think U2 has some tooth-grindingly bad lyrics. However, whenever you touch the Beatles or U2 it's like you've insulted the great white gods whose wrath must be appeased and people jump all over you. Seriously. Try criticizing U2 in public, for anything, especially for being an "okay rock band with only one or two songs I like"... and people will pull out the shotguns. ALSO!!- "It kills me not to know this but I've already forgotten what the color of her eyes were" grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr | ||
| ||