• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:08
CEST 11:08
KST 18:08
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
[G] Progamer Settings i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 638 users

Warren Buffett - "Stop Coddling the Super-Rich" - Page 14

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 66 Next
Kukaracha
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
France1954 Posts
August 17 2011 00:45 GMT
#261
It amazes me how the elite brainwashes the commoner into defending its interests and not his own.

And when did the US not have an income tax? Because if it's before 1914, the US was just that country to the west that worried a little Europe, but just a little.
Le long pour l'un pour l'autre est court (le mot-à-mot du mot "amour").
Hypertension
Profile Joined April 2011
United States802 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-17 01:00:53
August 17 2011 00:45 GMT
#262
On August 17 2011 08:49 IntoTheheart wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 08:46 Hypertension wrote:
This debate is a little silly. Anyone can say that the rich should pay more taxes. The real question is how to make them.

+ Show Spoiler +
By the way, if Warren Buffet was really going to give his money to charity or to the government, he would have done it already. What is the point of waiting until he is dead. The only reward is fame, and better for him to get that now. He knows his family will contest the will and win.



Could you please enlighten me as to how his family can contest the will and win? I'm Canadian so I don't know anything about how that sort of thing works in America.


It happens almost every time someone rich dies in the US. People hire lawyers and go to court to say they deserve more money. The most famous recent example I can think of was when Anna Nicole Smith's husband died, his sons beat the will and she didn't get his money.

+ Show Spoiler +
from wikipedia "After Anna’s death, the New York Times reported that the case over the Marshall fortune "is likely to continue in the name of Ms. Smith’s infant daughter."[26] The current situation is that Anna Nicole Smith's estate will not inherit any of her late husband's estate.[27] Following the decision by the Appeals Court for the Ninth Circuit, lawyers for the estate of Anna Nicole Smith requested the appeal be heard before the entire 9th circuit. However on May 6, 2010 the appeal was denied.[28] On September 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court again agreed to hear the case.[29]

On June 23, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling against the estate of Anna Nicole Smith, deciding that a bankruptcy court ruling giving her estate a sum of 475 million was decided incorrectly. A California bankruptcy court awarded Smith part of the estate, but the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal said that a bankruptcy court could not make a decision on an issue outside of bankruptcy law. The U.S. Supreme Court agreed with the ruling of the 9th circuit court of appeals"
Buy boots first. Boots good item.
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
August 17 2011 00:46 GMT
#263
Lol @ commentators saying he's right or wrong without actually providing evidence. Typical brain-deads.
sunprince
Profile Joined January 2011
United States2258 Posts
August 17 2011 00:46 GMT
#264
On August 17 2011 09:19 0neder wrote:
Warren Buffet says what he thinks will protect his interests. It's in his interests to be friendly with the current administration.


He's been saying the same things for decades, including when Republicans were in power.

On August 17 2011 09:19 0neder wrote:
Does he really believe the USA should have a AAAA rating? Of course not! He just doesn't want to lose his fortune so he says something like that to calm investors down.


How is this in any way relevant to the discussion at hand?

On August 17 2011 09:19 0neder wrote:
Having a tax policy based on envy is not mature or healthy. Having to 'only' pay 30% taxes is not 'coddling.'


The whole point of his argument is that the wealthy don't pay close to that much.

On August 17 2011 09:19 0neder wrote:
Increased taxes on rich people discourage the very kind of giving that people like Warren Buffett and Bill Gates are doing. If anything, they themselves are the greatest example of why we don't need to take more money from the insanely wealthy - because America is already the most generous nation on earth, and we don't need to force our bazzilionaires to give back - they do it of their own free will and choice, instead of having the government compel them to virture!


Warren Buffet and Bill Gates are outliers in terms of charitable giving among the rich. Their giving was not in any way affected by the tax rates over the years, and you'll find that the same is true for rich people who don't give. Whether those of extreme means give or not is a question of whether they are generously-minded or not, not what the tax rate is.
rhs408
Profile Joined January 2011
United States904 Posts
August 17 2011 00:46 GMT
#265
On August 17 2011 09:40 Dragom wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 09:34 hacpee wrote:
On August 17 2011 09:19 Leporello wrote:
A little graph that I think is enlightening. Look at 1982. Reagan drastically cut income taxes across the board (with a little extra for the higher brackets), and concurrently, we see massive deficits and the start of our debt trend.

Did spending double during the Reagan years, or did taxes get cut in half from 70% to 30%? Because that's when our debt trend really started - the national debt more than doubled during Reagan's years in office. If Republicans could answer that question truthfully while looking at a graph like this, well, they wouldn't be Republicans.

Spending didn't lead to us borrowing trillions of dollars. We've had social security and social programs before 1950, when this graph starts. The only real spending inflation has been in our military. What did happen besides spending increases was massive, massive trends of tax cuts with no alternative revenue sources. Government gets less revenue, can't balance the budget, and we're forced to borrow.

[image loading]

Also, we see in 1992-1994 the debt growth declines for a few years. Did we cut spending on social programs during those years? Not really. We mostly simply raised taxes on the most solvent people in our country, who easily afforded it.


And if you looked even further to when we had no income tax, we were perfectly fine.


Please state where you got this data from.


It isn't even relevent where the data came from - when there was no income tax, it was a completely different world, so it doesn't have any bearing on what we are talking about today.

Hacpee, r u a tea party man? You remind me of Michelle Bachmann, with a twist of Mitt Romney.
rhs408
Profile Joined January 2011
United States904 Posts
August 17 2011 00:47 GMT
#266
On August 17 2011 09:45 Kukaracha wrote:
It amazes me how the elite brainwashes the commoner into defending its interests and not his own.

No kidding, huh?
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-17 00:52:21
August 17 2011 00:48 GMT
#267
On August 17 2011 06:46 Kaitlin wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't debate what tax rates should be, but what is the appropriate level of government spending relative to GDP, then generate tax revenues for that amount. As it is now, tax increases merely result in more government spending, requiring additional tax income, and so forth. Let's figure out what and acceptable size of government is, and stick to that.


Oh shut up. Spending cuts and tax increases are both on the plate, and are both equally important here. There is no being cutesy here and dicking around with regard to tax hikes in a certain area. It either happens, or it doesn't - and it needs to happen. "As it stands now tax increases cause increase in government spending" - horse shit. Don't bother showing me all the cute biased "evidence" that points to this moronic conclusion. I can absorb that all day over at Fox News. I don't need somebody to parrot in out.
skiptomylou1231
Profile Joined January 2011
United States63 Posts
August 17 2011 00:49 GMT
#268
On August 17 2011 07:00 Kaitlin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 06:53 BuddhaMonk wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:48 Kaitlin wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:43 xXFireandIceXx wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:41 Megatronn wrote:
If he's so concerned why doesn't he just give his money away to some poor families? o.o


Oh my god. He's donating his money already. And he's donating 99% of his wealth when he dies. He's talking about what he thinks would benefit the US as a nation. Stop acting like he's some selfish man, cuz he's not.


According to his statements that the rich should pay more taxes to the government, the fact that he's donating 99% of his wealth to charity when he dies is hypocritical. By donating to charities that HE favors, he denies the government about 60% of his wealth that would have been paid in estate taxes had he not made that selfish decision himself and left it to the government's better judgment.


So your argument is that he's selfish because he's giving away 99% of his wealth?

LOL


We're talking about what happens when he dies. I don't know what religion you are, but short of re-incarnation, 100% of everyone's wealth is "given away" when they die. He is preventing the government from getting it's cut of 60% even though his comments call for the rich to pay more. He is being quite hypocritical by demonstrating the exact opposite, that he wants to control how his money is spent, instead of the government.


You must be trolling. I'm sure the government does not mind that he's donating billions of dollars to charity..
[N3O]r3d33m3r
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Germany673 Posts
August 17 2011 00:53 GMT
#269
On August 17 2011 07:04 BuddhaMonk wrote:
It's funny how those attacking Buffet for "cheating" the government out of estate taxes are blatantly ignoring the actual point that the richest in the U.S. actually pay the least amount in taxes as a percentage of their wealth.

Ignore the message, attack the messenger.


what did you expect? there are no real arguments against what Buffet says, so they have to attack anything they can, even though it makes no sense.
gj Buffet!!!
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
August 17 2011 00:54 GMT
#270
On August 17 2011 09:48 FallDownMarigold wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 06:46 Kaitlin wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't debate what tax rates should be, but what is the appropriate level of government spending relative to GDP, then generate tax revenues for that amount. As it is now, tax increases merely result in more government spending, requiring additional tax income, and so forth. Let's figure out what and acceptable size of government is, and stick to that.


Oh shut up. Spending cuts and tax increases are both on the plate, and are both equally important here. There is no being cutesy here and dicking around with regard to tax hikes in a certain area. It either happens, or it doesn't - and it needs to happen. "As it stands now tax increases cause increase in government spending" - horse shit. Don't bother showing me all the cute biased "evidence" that points to this moronic conclusion. I can absorb that all day over at Fox News. I don't need somebody to parrot in out.


So you've shown that you like to employ a harsh tone and some ad hominem here and there.. Do you have any content to what you're saying rather than bare assertions?
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-17 00:58:06
August 17 2011 00:55 GMT
#271
On August 17 2011 09:54 arbitrageur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 09:48 FallDownMarigold wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:46 Kaitlin wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't debate what tax rates should be, but what is the appropriate level of government spending relative to GDP, then generate tax revenues for that amount. As it is now, tax increases merely result in more government spending, requiring additional tax income, and so forth. Let's figure out what and acceptable size of government is, and stick to that.


Oh shut up. Spending cuts and tax increases are both on the plate, and are both equally important here. There is no being cutesy here and dicking around with regard to tax hikes in a certain area. It either happens, or it doesn't - and it needs to happen. "As it stands now tax increases cause increase in government spending" - horse shit. Don't bother showing me all the cute biased "evidence" that points to this moronic conclusion. I can absorb that all day over at Fox News. I don't need somebody to parrot in out.


So you've shown that you like to employ a harsh tone and some ad hominem here and there.. Do you have any content to what you're saying rather than bare assertions?


Nope. It's a tired, fruitless debate. Been there. Done that. At this point I have no patience for this shit. Nor does the majority of the country. You know perfectly well what the two sides of the issue are, and where reality lies - and whose interests stand in the way of certain truths and necessities. Time will tell.

PS Look up "ad hominem". You might be interested to know that it involves personally attacking somebody - something I did not do. Harsh tone? You're goddamn right. Personal attack? Get out.
arbitrageur
Profile Joined December 2010
Australia1202 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-17 00:59:31
August 17 2011 00:59 GMT
#272
On August 17 2011 09:55 FallDownMarigold wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 09:54 arbitrageur wrote:
On August 17 2011 09:48 FallDownMarigold wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:46 Kaitlin wrote:
Maybe we shouldn't debate what tax rates should be, but what is the appropriate level of government spending relative to GDP, then generate tax revenues for that amount. As it is now, tax increases merely result in more government spending, requiring additional tax income, and so forth. Let's figure out what and acceptable size of government is, and stick to that.


Oh shut up. Spending cuts and tax increases are both on the plate, and are both equally important here. There is no being cutesy here and dicking around with regard to tax hikes in a certain area. It either happens, or it doesn't - and it needs to happen. "As it stands now tax increases cause increase in government spending" - horse shit. Don't bother showing me all the cute biased "evidence" that points to this moronic conclusion. I can absorb that all day over at Fox News. I don't need somebody to parrot in out.


So you've shown that you like to employ a harsh tone and some ad hominem here and there.. Do you have any content to what you're saying rather than bare assertions?


Nope. It's a tired, fruitless debate. Been there. Done that. At this point I have no patience for this shit. Nor does the majority of the country. You know perfectly well what the two sides of the issue is, and where reality lies - and whose interests stand in the way of certain truths. Time will tell.

PS Look up "ad hominem". You might be interested to know that it involves personally attacking somebody - something I did not do. Harsh tone? You're goddamn right. Personal attack? Get out.


You're right, I mistook your dickhead tone in every sentence for personal attack. You're probably just another guy who thinks he knows what he can't know given the information available to him.
ChoboCop
Profile Joined July 2004
United States954 Posts
August 17 2011 00:59 GMT
#273
Thank god Warren Buffet is speaking the truth about class disparities in today's society and how we can remedy inequity...

Bottom line is that you don't make money by working hard... you make money by having money. And the more money you have the more profit you make.

Noone who works for a living meets John McCain's standard for 'rich.' (>5million).
Critical thinking is the intellectually disciplined process of actively and skillfully conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating information gathered.
TheAuditor
Profile Joined February 2011
United States136 Posts
August 17 2011 01:01 GMT
#274
On August 17 2011 06:44 Megatronn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 06:43 TurpinOS wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:41 Megatronn wrote:
If he's so concerned why doesn't he just give his money away to some poor families? o.o


That is a totally different issue, what does ''having money'' have to do with pointing out failures of a complete system.

He's basically saying the rich should be taxed, the debt will go down and jobs will be made, right? If he cares so much why doesn't he give his money away to people that he thinks need/deserve it?

because he doesn't think they deserve it. No one deserves free money. Mr. Buffet has earned every cent of his money. He's not going to give it away, it's his.

What he is saying is that he doesn't agree with what the government is doing. Just because he doesn't agree to it doesn't mean he's not going to follow what they do. No sane person will ever give their money to the government because they don't agree with tax law.
Retry17
Profile Joined August 2011
30 Posts
August 17 2011 01:02 GMT
#275
You guys do realize that while Warren Buffets income tax seems rather low, you aren't factoring the multiple corporations that he owns also pay income tax. So in reality the amount of tax he pays is actually quit high.

domovoi
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1478 Posts
August 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#276
Someone explain to me why we should take Buffett's word as gospel. His analysis of the tax situation is piss-poor (anecdotes and post hoc ergo proptor hoc galore), and I happen to agree with him that taxes for the rich should increase. This is called an appeal to authority. Maybe the fact that we put him on a pedestal for being an extremely wealthy person is a symptom of the overall problem?

Way to think independently TL'ers.
FallDownMarigold
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States3710 Posts
August 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#277
On August 17 2011 09:59 arbitrageur wrote:
You're right, I mistook your dickhead tone in every sentence for personal attack.

Forgiven.

On August 17 2011 09:59 arbitrageur wrote:
You're probably just another guy who thinks he knows what he can't know given the information available to him.

"I'm probably a guy that thinks I don't know what I can't know."
-Sure. Probably.
Mortality
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States4790 Posts
August 17 2011 01:03 GMT
#278
Warren should talk... considering the way he has used his influence to make more money he is a part of the problem. Don't think for one second that this man is a saint. I doubt anybody with a billion dollar checkbook would even qualify as "average" on the moral scale.
Even though this Proleague bullshit has been completely bogus, I really, really, really do not see how Khan can lose this. I swear I will kill myself if they do. - nesix before KHAN lost to eNature
BlackJack
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
United States10446 Posts
August 17 2011 01:04 GMT
#279
On August 17 2011 09:49 skiptomylou1231 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 07:00 Kaitlin wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:53 BuddhaMonk wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:48 Kaitlin wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:43 xXFireandIceXx wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:41 Megatronn wrote:
If he's so concerned why doesn't he just give his money away to some poor families? o.o


Oh my god. He's donating his money already. And he's donating 99% of his wealth when he dies. He's talking about what he thinks would benefit the US as a nation. Stop acting like he's some selfish man, cuz he's not.


According to his statements that the rich should pay more taxes to the government, the fact that he's donating 99% of his wealth to charity when he dies is hypocritical. By donating to charities that HE favors, he denies the government about 60% of his wealth that would have been paid in estate taxes had he not made that selfish decision himself and left it to the government's better judgment.


So your argument is that he's selfish because he's giving away 99% of his wealth?

LOL


We're talking about what happens when he dies. I don't know what religion you are, but short of re-incarnation, 100% of everyone's wealth is "given away" when they die. He is preventing the government from getting it's cut of 60% even though his comments call for the rich to pay more. He is being quite hypocritical by demonstrating the exact opposite, that he wants to control how his money is spent, instead of the government.


You must be trolling. I'm sure the government does not mind that he's donating billions of dollars to charity..


Are you being sarcastic? Why would the government not care about missing a $30 billion pay day while it has a massive budget deficit?
domovoi
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1478 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-08-17 01:06:43
August 17 2011 01:05 GMT
#280
On August 17 2011 10:01 TheAuditor wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 17 2011 06:44 Megatronn wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:43 TurpinOS wrote:
On August 17 2011 06:41 Megatronn wrote:
If he's so concerned why doesn't he just give his money away to some poor families? o.o


That is a totally different issue, what does ''having money'' have to do with pointing out failures of a complete system.

He's basically saying the rich should be taxed, the debt will go down and jobs will be made, right? If he cares so much why doesn't he give his money away to people that he thinks need/deserve it?

because he doesn't think they deserve it. No one deserves free money. Mr. Buffet has earned every cent of his money. He's not going to give it away, it's his.

What he is saying is that he doesn't agree with what the government is doing. Just because he doesn't agree to it doesn't mean he's not going to follow what they do. No sane person will ever give their money to the government because they don't agree with tax law.

Some of these people do have a point. If Warren Buffett is concerned about the fiscal health of the United States, why doesn't he voluntarily pay more taxes? Why does he instead donate the vast majority of his wealth, making much of his income tax-exempt? At some level, Warren Buffett believes his money is better spent in his hands than in the hands of the government, and that's the same talking point that the right uses. Talk is cheap.
Prev 1 12 13 14 15 16 66 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 52m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JimRising 487
trigger 41
StarCraft: Brood War
Shuttle 1238
firebathero 677
Stork 361
Larva 319
actioN 272
TY 252
Zeus 210
ToSsGirL 115
PianO 90
Soma 89
[ Show more ]
Nal_rA 50
Noble 42
sSak 41
sorry 41
JulyZerg 36
Sharp 33
Yoon 32
EffOrt 31
Mini 28
Rush 25
Sacsri 23
hero 20
Barracks 15
IntoTheRainbow 7
ivOry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc1552
XcaliburYe448
XaKoH 404
Fuzer 252
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1214
Other Games
tarik_tv11011
shahzam1026
ceh9481
Happy355
crisheroes197
monkeys_forever176
Pyrionflax97
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick33798
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH396
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2178
League of Legends
• HappyZerGling118
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
52m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
6h 52m
WardiTV European League
6h 52m
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
14h 52m
RSL Revival
1d
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 14h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.