• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 03:23
CET 09:23
KST 17:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview8RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2
Community News
BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion6Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets4$21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7)16Weekly Cups (Dec 29-Jan 4): Protoss rolls, 2v2 returns7[BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 105
StarCraft 2
General
Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview Weekly Cups (Jan 5-11): Clem wins big offline, Trigger upsets When will we find out if there are more tournament SC2 Spotted on the EWC 2026 list?
Tourneys
SC2 All-Star Invitational: Jan 17-18 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SC2 AI Tournament 2026 $21,000 Rongyi Cup Season 3 announced (Jan 22-Feb 7) OSC Season 13 World Championship
Strategy
Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report Mutation # 508 Violent Night Mutation # 507 Well Trained Mutation # 506 Warp Zone
Brood War
General
Video Footage from 2005: The Birth of G2 in Spain [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] Non-Korean Championship - Starts Jan 10 Small VOD Thread 2.0 Azhi's Colosseum - Season 2
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Simple Questions, Simple Answers Game Theory for Starcraft Current Meta
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread Mechabellum
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Physical Exercise (HIIT) Bef…
TrAiDoS
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1650 users

Rossi's energy catalyzer - Page 28

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 26 27 28 29 30 51 Next
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 01:59:58
January 14 2012 01:49 GMT
#541
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....
Never GG MKP | IdrA
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:19:43
January 14 2012 02:17 GMT
#542
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:21:38
January 14 2012 02:20 GMT
#543
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.
Never GG MKP | IdrA
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:26:32
January 14 2012 02:25 GMT
#544
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?
caradoc
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada3022 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:31:36
January 14 2012 02:30 GMT
#545
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?



Exactly, although I've gone out and said I think its a scam and that these claims are almost certainly untrue, even if I turn out to be wrong, it doesn't change the fact that on the basis of everything available, calling it a scam, or at the very least refusing to accept the claims is the correct conclusion at this point.

The alternative, assuming the claims are probably true, is a type of logic which, if replicated everywhere, would basically mean the end of the scientific method.

At an emotional level, sure, I'd love to be wrong, but rationality overwhelmingly suggests that I am not.
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea...
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
January 14 2012 02:32 GMT
#546
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.
Never GG MKP | IdrA
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
January 14 2012 02:34 GMT
#547
On January 14 2012 11:32 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.


There's no reason to deny it works? How can you even be this gullable?
ThaZenith
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada3116 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:51:20
January 14 2012 02:47 GMT
#548
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.

That's the point that everyone aggressively denying this are missing. People aren't 'believing', they're just positively skeptical. We know there's no absolute proof, but it could be true, which is awesome.

And then you have all the negatively skeptical people. If there isn't 100% proof, then FUCK THAT and fuck anyone who could imagine such a thing could ever possibly be true. "I better tell everyone they're dumb just so they know I'm thinking that!" (yes, this could be hyperbole, calm down naysayers)

People need to learn to chill a bit, it's a possibly important new tech and it's interesting to follow. Nothing more...
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 03:02:26
January 14 2012 03:01 GMT
#549
On January 14 2012 11:34 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:32 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.


There's no reason to deny it works? How can you even be this gullable?


You just said this? You are contradicting your statements.


Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.


Never GG MKP | IdrA
eXigent.
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Canada2419 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 03:10:30
January 14 2012 03:07 GMT
#550
On January 14 2012 12:01 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:34 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:32 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.


There's no reason to deny it works? How can you even be this gullable?


You just said this? You are contradicting your statements.


Show nested quote +
Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.




I think you might be a bit confused at the wording. He stated that in the form of a question. He is saying how can you be soo gullible to state there is no reason to deny that it works.
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
January 14 2012 03:51 GMT
#551
I love this thread.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
Tippereth
Profile Joined December 2009
United States252 Posts
January 14 2012 03:55 GMT
#552
On January 14 2012 11:47 ThaZenith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.

That's the point that everyone aggressively denying this are missing. People aren't 'believing', they're just positively skeptical. We know there's no absolute proof, but it could be true, which is awesome.

And then you have all the negatively skeptical people. If there isn't 100% proof, then FUCK THAT and fuck anyone who could imagine such a thing could ever possibly be true. "I better tell everyone they're dumb just so they know I'm thinking that!" (yes, this could be hyperbole, calm down naysayers)

People need to learn to chill a bit, it's a possibly important new tech and it's interesting to follow. Nothing more...

So your point has boiled down to tone-trolling. Glad we cleared that up.
woody60707
Profile Joined November 2010
United States1863 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 04:04:52
January 14 2012 03:58 GMT
#553
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 04:27:08
January 14 2012 04:24 GMT
#554
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.

Especially considering the powers that may want to stop him from completing his device and making it available to the public if it does indeed do what he says it does.

Look at it this way do you believe the powers that control the energy sections propaganda or do you believe someone who may have possibly revolutionized the way we can gather energy.

I think we should be a little skeptical of course but it seems everyone wants to bury his work because it doesn't match with how science believes the physical world can work.

But theories are mean't to be broken.
Never GG MKP | IdrA
stokes17
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1411 Posts
January 14 2012 04:30 GMT
#555
is there still no peer review? or non black box demonstration?

I don't see how anyone with even a cursory grasp of the scientific method can be anything but skeptical at this point. Like obviously I hope it works, but I have no reason to believe it does work. Until there is full discourse of the process, there is no way to prove that cold fusion is the only possibility.

lets get this guys patents locked up so he can show his hand already.....
Body_Shield
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada3368 Posts
January 14 2012 04:31 GMT
#556
On January 14 2012 13:24 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.

I think that's the problem, people want to see who is right and who is wrong now, so they don't get scammed. And of course everyone is being very critical of this, if it does what it is claimed to do, it will revolutionize power; it is a very large thing to live up to.
So, five-card stud, nothing wild... and the sky's the limit
RifleCow
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada637 Posts
January 14 2012 04:38 GMT
#557
On January 14 2012 13:24 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.

Especially considering the powers that may want to stop him from completing his device and making it available to the public if it does indeed do what he says it does.

Look at it this way do you believe the powers that control the energy sections propaganda or do you believe someone who may have possibly revolutionized the way we can gather energy.

I think we should be a little skeptical of course but it seems everyone wants to bury his work because it doesn't match with how science believes the physical world can work.

But theories are mean't to be broken.


While you are free to believe in whatever you want, it is up to the person making outlandish claims to show the evidence that backs up said claims; evidence which is validated and repeatable. Until then, there is no reason to believe in anybody's claims of infinite energy, homeopathy, crystal healing, chakra balancing, or any other crackpot theory.
hohoho
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
January 14 2012 04:40 GMT
#558
Sorry guys, looks like he was beat to the punch http://www.hojomotor.com/
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
caradoc
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada3022 Posts
January 14 2012 04:49 GMT
#559
On January 14 2012 13:40 Plexa wrote:
Sorry guys, looks like he was beat to the punch http://www.hojomotor.com/


you're crazy to release that publicly.....
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea...
NicolBolas
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1388 Posts
January 14 2012 04:54 GMT
#560
On January 14 2012 13:24 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.


The difference between us is this: I won't be wrong for being skeptical of his invention. If it doesn't work, you will be wrong for believing in it when it didn't.

Skepticism isn't saying "it doesn't work." Skepticism is saying, "he hasn't proven that it works." Which is true; at this point in time, he has not proven that it does. If tomorrow he does, then the statement will still be true.

If it doesn't work however, you will have always been wrong, because your belief is that it did work when it in fact did not.

See the difference?

Especially considering the powers that may want to stop him from completing his device and making it available to the public if it does indeed do what he says it does.

Look at it this way do you believe the powers that control the energy sections propaganda or do you believe someone who may have possibly revolutionized the way we can gather energy.


This is pure conspiracy theory garbage. "The powers" are trying to stop him. Ooohhh! Fear "the powers!" Fear them!

Your mad ramblings about "the powers" do not change the fact that the man has produced virtually no independently verifiable evidence for what he claims to have done. Conspiracy theory crap doesn't change that simple fact: there is no evidence of his machine working.

Yes, I can accept that if he found a way to produce cheap energy, he would play things close to the vest. Not so much to avoid "the powers" as simply to make sure that he gets paid for cornering the global energy market and taking over Alpha Cent- the world. If it were me, I might do something similar.

But if I did, I would also be completely understanding and patient with the fact that people on the outside have no reason to accept what I've done with the virtually no independently verifiable evidence I've provided thus far. I would expect skepticism at every turn, because that's what I choose to do by keeping things hidden.

I think we should be a little skeptical of course but it seems everyone wants to bury his work because it doesn't match with how science believes the physical world can work.

But theories are mean't to be broken.


Theories are made to explain things. If facts are revealed that are contradictory to those theories, then new theories must replace or augment the old ones to explain all of the relevant facts.

You don't "break" theories because of what some guy claims. You only "break" them because of what some guy can prove with actual independently verifiable facts. Thus far, there are no independently verifiable facts on his side.
So you know, cats are interesting. They are kind of like girls. If they come up and talk to you, it's great. But if you try to talk to them, it doesn't always go so well. - Shigeru Miyamoto
Prev 1 26 27 28 29 30 51 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 37m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft539
SortOf 127
NeuroSwarm 116
Livibee 96
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 1474
Larva 268
Zeus 265
Hm[arnc] 109
Aegong 93
Shuttle 79
ajuk12(nOOB) 45
Sharp 30
Bale 11
ivOry 4
[ Show more ]
JulyZerg 4
League of Legends
JimRising 647
C9.Mang0512
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss354
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King92
Other Games
summit1g10212
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2010
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH66
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Laughngamez YouTube
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 2
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo1826
• Stunt311
• HappyZerGling143
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
37m
Wardi Open
3h 37m
Monday Night Weeklies
8h 37m
PiGosaur Monday
16h 37m
OSC
1d 2h
The PondCast
2 days
OSC
2 days
Big Brain Bouts
4 days
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
5 days
BSL 21
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

IPSL Winter 2025-26
SC2 All-Star Inv. 2025
NA Kuram Kup

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
OSC Championship Season 13
Underdog Cup #3
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W5
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.