• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:57
CEST 18:57
KST 01:57
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8
Community News
SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup4StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)66Weekly Cups (Sept 21-27): herO and ByuN double2Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple3BSL Season 2315
StarCraft 2
General
October World Ranking: herO stays #1, ByuN returns SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Awesome/Confusing SC2 BM
Tourneys
Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament 2026 GSTL Grand Finals Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) SC2 INu's Battles#21 [ 3-Days tournament ]
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts Mutation # 544 Double Trouble Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses
Brood War
General
RepMastered™: replay sharing and analyzer site BSL Season 23 Klaucher discontinued / in-game color settings BW General Discussion Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 4 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro8 Day 3 [ASL22] Ro8 Day 2
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Escaping Into Video Games: G…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 8345 users

Rossi's energy catalyzer - Page 28

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 26 27 28 29 30 51 Next
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 01:59:58
January 14 2012 01:49 GMT
#541
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....
Never GG MKP | IdrA
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:19:43
January 14 2012 02:17 GMT
#542
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:21:38
January 14 2012 02:20 GMT
#543
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.
Never GG MKP | IdrA
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:26:32
January 14 2012 02:25 GMT
#544
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?
caradoc
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada3022 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:31:36
January 14 2012 02:30 GMT
#545
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?



Exactly, although I've gone out and said I think its a scam and that these claims are almost certainly untrue, even if I turn out to be wrong, it doesn't change the fact that on the basis of everything available, calling it a scam, or at the very least refusing to accept the claims is the correct conclusion at this point.

The alternative, assuming the claims are probably true, is a type of logic which, if replicated everywhere, would basically mean the end of the scientific method.

At an emotional level, sure, I'd love to be wrong, but rationality overwhelmingly suggests that I am not.
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea...
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
January 14 2012 02:32 GMT
#546
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.
Never GG MKP | IdrA
karpo
Profile Joined October 2010
Sweden1998 Posts
January 14 2012 02:34 GMT
#547
On January 14 2012 11:32 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.


There's no reason to deny it works? How can you even be this gullable?
ThaZenith
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Canada3116 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 02:51:20
January 14 2012 02:47 GMT
#548
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.

That's the point that everyone aggressively denying this are missing. People aren't 'believing', they're just positively skeptical. We know there's no absolute proof, but it could be true, which is awesome.

And then you have all the negatively skeptical people. If there isn't 100% proof, then FUCK THAT and fuck anyone who could imagine such a thing could ever possibly be true. "I better tell everyone they're dumb just so they know I'm thinking that!" (yes, this could be hyperbole, calm down naysayers)

People need to learn to chill a bit, it's a possibly important new tech and it's interesting to follow. Nothing more...
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 03:02:26
January 14 2012 03:01 GMT
#549
On January 14 2012 11:34 karpo wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:32 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.


There's no reason to deny it works? How can you even be this gullable?


You just said this? You are contradicting your statements.


Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.


Never GG MKP | IdrA
eXigent.
Profile Blog Joined February 2007
Canada2419 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 03:10:30
January 14 2012 03:07 GMT
#550
On January 14 2012 12:01 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:34 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:32 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:25 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:20 XRaDiiX wrote:
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.



One has to protect his patents.

Even NASA is trying to get in on his technology. Apparently he has already sold several units as well.

What's there not to believe. We will see in a few months whether this turns out or not. If it turns out to disappear and never be heard of again you can bet Big-Oil has assassinated or paid them off.


Man you don't know anything about science, do you? Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.

There's reason to believe this is a revolutionary idea WHEN and IF it's released and the experiments can be reproduced by others, until then i'll just keep being sceptical. You sure seem to have a knack for conspiracies. So if this doesn't pan out it's "big oil" that killed it? Might not just be that it doesn't really work?


I never said i was science buff but it appears NASA is interested in utilizing the same technology or researching it.

That doesn't appear to be a coincidence considering Rossi's recent Customers and sales of his energy catalyzer.

We will see in the end what happens but there's no reason to deny it works the man is just protecting his patents it's that simple.


There's no reason to deny it works? How can you even be this gullable?


You just said this? You are contradicting your statements.


Show nested quote +
Being sceptical of large claims should always be the default. There's no hands on proof of this working, NASA has done research on other technology that didn't pan out before, and there's been endless amounts of similar situations where people buy unfinished products that later turn out to not work as intended.




I think you might be a bit confused at the wording. He stated that in the form of a question. He is saying how can you be soo gullible to state there is no reason to deny that it works.
Integra
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
Sweden5626 Posts
January 14 2012 03:51 GMT
#551
I love this thread.
"Dark Pleasure" | | I survived the Locust war of May 3, 2014
Tippereth
Profile Joined December 2009
United States252 Posts
January 14 2012 03:55 GMT
#552
On January 14 2012 11:47 ThaZenith wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 11:17 karpo wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]

I believe it may be genuine.

IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....



Even now there's lots of speculation, no peer reviewed material, and no independent observers. The doubtful would be in the right EVEN IF this turns out to work because there's no reason to believe it until it's shown in full light without all these special circumstances.

Rather be sceptic to everything that's unproven and full of rumors and be proven wrong than believing stuff even though there's no real evidence.

That's the point that everyone aggressively denying this are missing. People aren't 'believing', they're just positively skeptical. We know there's no absolute proof, but it could be true, which is awesome.

And then you have all the negatively skeptical people. If there isn't 100% proof, then FUCK THAT and fuck anyone who could imagine such a thing could ever possibly be true. "I better tell everyone they're dumb just so they know I'm thinking that!" (yes, this could be hyperbole, calm down naysayers)

People need to learn to chill a bit, it's a possibly important new tech and it's interesting to follow. Nothing more...

So your point has boiled down to tone-trolling. Glad we cleared that up.
woody60707
Profile Joined November 2010
United States1863 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 04:04:52
January 14 2012 03:58 GMT
#553
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.
XRaDiiX
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Canada1730 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-01-14 04:27:08
January 14 2012 04:24 GMT
#554
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.

Especially considering the powers that may want to stop him from completing his device and making it available to the public if it does indeed do what he says it does.

Look at it this way do you believe the powers that control the energy sections propaganda or do you believe someone who may have possibly revolutionized the way we can gather energy.

I think we should be a little skeptical of course but it seems everyone wants to bury his work because it doesn't match with how science believes the physical world can work.

But theories are mean't to be broken.
Never GG MKP | IdrA
stokes17
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1411 Posts
January 14 2012 04:30 GMT
#555
is there still no peer review? or non black box demonstration?

I don't see how anyone with even a cursory grasp of the scientific method can be anything but skeptical at this point. Like obviously I hope it works, but I have no reason to believe it does work. Until there is full discourse of the process, there is no way to prove that cold fusion is the only possibility.

lets get this guys patents locked up so he can show his hand already.....
Body_Shield
Profile Blog Joined February 2011
Canada3373 Posts
January 14 2012 04:31 GMT
#556
On January 14 2012 13:24 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.

I think that's the problem, people want to see who is right and who is wrong now, so they don't get scammed. And of course everyone is being very critical of this, if it does what it is claimed to do, it will revolutionize power; it is a very large thing to live up to.
So, five-card stud, nothing wild... and the sky's the limit
RifleCow
Profile Joined February 2008
Canada637 Posts
January 14 2012 04:38 GMT
#557
On January 14 2012 13:24 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.

Especially considering the powers that may want to stop him from completing his device and making it available to the public if it does indeed do what he says it does.

Look at it this way do you believe the powers that control the energy sections propaganda or do you believe someone who may have possibly revolutionized the way we can gather energy.

I think we should be a little skeptical of course but it seems everyone wants to bury his work because it doesn't match with how science believes the physical world can work.

But theories are mean't to be broken.


While you are free to believe in whatever you want, it is up to the person making outlandish claims to show the evidence that backs up said claims; evidence which is validated and repeatable. Until then, there is no reason to believe in anybody's claims of infinite energy, homeopathy, crystal healing, chakra balancing, or any other crackpot theory.
hohoho
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
January 14 2012 04:40 GMT
#558
Sorry guys, looks like he was beat to the punch http://www.hojomotor.com/
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
caradoc
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Canada3022 Posts
January 14 2012 04:49 GMT
#559
On January 14 2012 13:40 Plexa wrote:
Sorry guys, looks like he was beat to the punch http://www.hojomotor.com/


you're crazy to release that publicly.....
Salvation a la mode and a cup of tea...
NicolBolas
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1388 Posts
January 14 2012 04:54 GMT
#560
On January 14 2012 13:24 XRaDiiX wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 14 2012 12:58 woody60707 wrote:
On January 14 2012 10:49 XRaDiiX wrote:
I found something interesting. On Wikipedia.

On October 28, 2011, a 1 MW plant based on the Energy Catalyzer was reported to have been tested by engineer Domenico Fioravanti for an undisclosed customer.[58] According to Fioravanti, the plant released 2,635 kWh during five and a half hours of self sustained mode, an average power of 479 kilowatts – just under half the promised power of one megawatt. The customer reportedly acquired the plant after the test. Independent observers were not allowed to watch the measurements or make their own, and the plant remained connected to a power supply during the test allegedly to supply power to the fans and the water pumps.[59][60][61] Rossi claims to have orders from customers in the US and Europe for thirteen more 1 MW units in addition to the undisclosed customer from the October 28 test. He offers these for sale for $2 million.[62] The Italian popular science magazine Focus reports that 12 additional units are to the same, undisclosed customer, and quoted Rossi: "We are building a 13 MW thermal plant, made of 13 plant such as the one you saw on October 28th: but it's a military research and I can't reveal any further detail, not the name, nor the place, nor the nationality of the customer".[63]...

I believe it may be genuine. ...+ Show Spoiler +


IMO could be big Oil trying to stop them. Or trying to steal the patents reason being why NASA is scrambling to work with LERN and possibly co-operate with Rossi.

Looks like There has already been a few buyers at the price of 2 million each of preliminary devices.

It also makes sense why he's trying to get it patented and stopping anyone from stealing his patents.

He's just being careful so that nobody steals the rights to his technology.


Dennis M. Bushnell, Chief Scientist at NASA Langley Research Center, described LENR as a "promising" technology and praised the work of Rossi and Focardi.[7] Bushnell also said that they were starting an experiment to test the Widom-Larson theory[8], in which a Heavy electron combines with a proton, through the Weak Nuclear Force (and thus avoiding the Coulomb barrier), creating a neutrino and a neutron. The neutron can then enter a nearby nucleus, causing additional nuclear reactions. On Oct 6, 2011 the US Patent Office published an application by NASA Langley scientist Joseph Zawodny[9] for a patent "Method For Producing Heavy Electrons"[10], which quotes the Widom-Larsen theory [11] and includes "by reference in its entirety" Larsen's Patent No. 7,893,414.

With Neutron+Nickel = Copper



On November 23, 2011, in the Massachusetts Statehouse, Andrea Rossi met with the minority leader of the Massachusetts Senate Bruce Tarr and representatives from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Northeastern University, and the University of Massachusetts, to explore the prospects for developing and manufacturing the device in Massachusetts, USA. According to Robert Tamarin, the Dean of Science at UML, the representatives were mostly skeptical and only examined the possibilities of manufacturing within Massachusetts in case the technology turns out to work.[65][25]
On December 2011 Rossi stated that he had passed ten thousand pre-orders for a consumer version of the Energy Catalyzer and that he was already aiming for mass-scale production of it and electricity generation with it.[66]


Video of NASA trying to steal/use/patent the same technology Rossi's E-Cat is using.

http://technologygateway.nasa.gov/media/CC/lenr/lenr.html


It' feels good to show all the doubters of this technology that this seems to be materializing and may actually be the real deal.

Hopefully Big Oil doesn't stop them....


I'm sorry sir, but how can you read that and say "I believe it may be genuine" When you go to a magic show, do you really believe he really pulled a rabbit from a hat? No need for an Independent check of the hat, the rabbit was in there the whole time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_spin-off NASA doesn't steal, they would with the private sector to commercialized there inventions.


A cute analogy but we will see who is wrong and right in the end and there's nothing wrong with believing what he has may be genuine.


The difference between us is this: I won't be wrong for being skeptical of his invention. If it doesn't work, you will be wrong for believing in it when it didn't.

Skepticism isn't saying "it doesn't work." Skepticism is saying, "he hasn't proven that it works." Which is true; at this point in time, he has not proven that it does. If tomorrow he does, then the statement will still be true.

If it doesn't work however, you will have always been wrong, because your belief is that it did work when it in fact did not.

See the difference?

Especially considering the powers that may want to stop him from completing his device and making it available to the public if it does indeed do what he says it does.

Look at it this way do you believe the powers that control the energy sections propaganda or do you believe someone who may have possibly revolutionized the way we can gather energy.


This is pure conspiracy theory garbage. "The powers" are trying to stop him. Ooohhh! Fear "the powers!" Fear them!

Your mad ramblings about "the powers" do not change the fact that the man has produced virtually no independently verifiable evidence for what he claims to have done. Conspiracy theory crap doesn't change that simple fact: there is no evidence of his machine working.

Yes, I can accept that if he found a way to produce cheap energy, he would play things close to the vest. Not so much to avoid "the powers" as simply to make sure that he gets paid for cornering the global energy market and taking over Alpha Cent- the world. If it were me, I might do something similar.

But if I did, I would also be completely understanding and patient with the fact that people on the outside have no reason to accept what I've done with the virtually no independently verifiable evidence I've provided thus far. I would expect skepticism at every turn, because that's what I choose to do by keeping things hidden.

I think we should be a little skeptical of course but it seems everyone wants to bury his work because it doesn't match with how science believes the physical world can work.

But theories are mean't to be broken.


Theories are made to explain things. If facts are revealed that are contradictory to those theories, then new theories must replace or augment the old ones to explain all of the relevant facts.

You don't "break" theories because of what some guy claims. You only "break" them because of what some guy can prove with actual independently verifiable facts. Thus far, there are no independently verifiable facts on his side.
So you know, cats are interesting. They are kind of like girls. If they come up and talk to you, it's great. But if you try to talk to them, it doesn't always go so well. - Shigeru Miyamoto
Prev 1 26 27 28 29 30 51 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
01:00
ScienceCraft Qualifier
IndyStarCraft 176
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 555
IndyStarCraft 176
BRAT_OK 48
MindelVK 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 25986
Shuttle 1129
Hyuk 578
Mini 429
firebathero 193
hero 96
Sexy 91
ggaemo 62
Killer 52
Liquid`Ret 47
[ Show more ]
Hyun 47
Mong 46
Trap 43
PianO 29
ToSsGirL 24
zelot 17
Rock 15
Bale 11
ajuk12(nOOB) 7
Sacsri 7
Dota 2
Gorgc10253
qojqva1682
Dendi948
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor1376
crisheroes1264
Liquid`Hasu702
Other Games
FrodaN1978
fl0m1469
Beastyqt732
Mlord492
Grubby321
Hui .251
Livibee171
Liquid`VortiX163
ArmadaUGS158
KnowMe131
Mew2King57
Trikslyr35
ToD29
CosmosSc2 14
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick118
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream45
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 46
• mYiSmile131
• Adnapsc2 16
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki14
• Michael_bg 13
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 8120
Other Games
• Shiphtur283
• WagamamaTV200
Upcoming Events
AI Arena Tournament
3m
Laughngamez YouTube
BSL: Ladder Tournament
2h 3m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
17h 3m
INu's Battles
19h 3m
herO vs Classic
Percival vs Rogue
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
22h 3m
MilkiCow vs TBD
Clem vs TBD
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 2h
BSL Open Qualifier
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 7h
Afreeca Starleague
1d 17h
Rush vs Light
WardiTV Weekly
1d 18h
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 23h
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Soma vs Soulkey
INu's Battles
2 days
SHIN vs Cure
ByuN vs Zoun
PiGosaur Cup
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
INu's Battles
4 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-10-02
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Calamity Invitational

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Copium Cup
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Custodian Cup
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.