|
Keep your off topic discussions out of this thread and show some damn respect! |
On July 25 2011 03:24 Wolf wrote: Has it been confirmed that this Anders person is actually behind all of this?
Depends on what you mean by 'all of this' but if you mean the bomb and the shooting then yes. It hasn't been confirmed that he acted alone but nothing really hints of companions at this point.
|
"Helsingin yliopiston rikosoikeuden professorin Dan Fränden mukaan eristyksen kriteeri on kuitenkin nimenomaan vangin oletettu vaarallisuus vapautumishetkellä, eivät aiemmat rikokset sinänsä. "
According to a Helsinki university criminal law professor, the criteria for keeping the criminal locked in for longer than 21 years is precisely their presumed threat to society at the moment of release, and has nothing to do with their past crimes
|
I preferred this thread when people wanted him to receive death penalty to be honest.
When I read these posts, all I realise is that he's succeeded, you're all debating around his ideas, he's got you all thinking.
You may feel more intelligent than the whole situation, but trust me, from what I've read, you're just all sheep and he's herded you up real nice into his own little war.
Just lock this thread, forget the guy, don't let him be anything more than an anecdote, delete him from all texts books, from all news papers, there is nothing to be learnt through this event.
He's just a madman, and he should be locked up and forgotten for the rest of times like all the others.
You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so.
Please, realise this, and stop posting.
User was warned for this post
|
On July 25 2011 03:35 Nqsty wrote: I preferred this thread when people wanted him to receive death penalty to be honest.
When I read these posts, all I realise is that he's succeeded, you're all debating around his ideas, he's got you all thinking.
You may feel more intelligent than the whole situation, but trust me, from what I've read, you're just all sheep and he's herded you up real nice into his own little war.
Just lock this thread, forget the guy, don't let him be anything more than an anecdote, delete him from all texts books, from all news papers, there is nothing to be learnt through this event.
He's just a madman, and he should be locked up and forgotten for the rest of times like all the others.
You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so.
Please, realise this, and stop posting.
Just because you want to bury your head in the sand, doesn't mean everyone should.
|
You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right.
|
The point is: People who sympathize with his actions and/or idealogies (and you can bet your ass there will be some) will talk about this. If the people who don't agree shut up - the other side wins.
Been like that for any topic similar to this.
|
On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:Show nested quote +You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right.
Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable.
|
On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:Show nested quote +You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. and to clarify. This guy is a simple copycat. Nothing he has done or said is new. He hasn't really said or written anything that hasn't already been known for years among right extremists.
|
The various people who edit and run the news should be ashamed; a lunatic goes on a killing spree to get oxygen to his mental ideas. So the correct response is obviously to plaster his name and face everywhere, constantly reference his agenda, tell people about the fucking manifesto he posted on the internet before murdering 100 people, even fucking preview the fact that he's said he will explain his reasons tomorrow?! You fucking halfwits, why not just let him give a speech on live television? The twisted fuck has a list of demands and they are all being fucking ticked. What happens next time some fucking mentalist wants to get their message heard, and is willing to kill to get it? No news outlet should have mentioned his name. 'Man believed to be motivated by a desire to propagate extreme right wing views' would have done just fine. But no. As the BBC said, his face is now the most infamous in the world.
|
On July 25 2011 03:43 Nqsty wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable. And again. "His ideas" you are talking about aren't his ideas, They have been well known for a very long time. The guy just re hashed allot of bullshit information claimed by right extremists long ago to be the truth, then he simply went out and killed allot of people. That's all there is to it really.
|
On July 25 2011 03:45 Integra wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. and to clarify. This guy is a simple copycat. Nothing he has done or said is new. He hasn't really said or written anything that hasn't already been known for years among right extremists. 1 man killing 70+ children in Norway is pretty new. Doesn't matter what his political views are, killing 70 kids means you just aren't right in the head, obviously.
|
On July 25 2011 03:43 Nqsty wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable. Well, the day that we aren't allowed to discuss ideas is the day that we aren't free anymore. Just because some madman had a 'slightly' more extreme version of some ideas doesn't mean more moderate ideas are just as bad and a taboo to discuss about.
This is, after all, directly connected to the shooting as it was the motivation for the act.
|
On July 25 2011 03:48 Integra wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:43 Nqsty wrote:On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable. And again. "His ideas" you are talking about aren't his ideas, They have been well known for a very long time. The guy just re hashed allot of bullshit information claimed by right extremists long ago to be the truth, then he simply went out and killed allot of people. That's all there is to it really.
Are you hoping to discredit the factual islamization of Europe by labeling as racist anyone pointing it out ?
I leaved for 3 years in a predominantly Muslims area in the suburbs of Strasbourg, I didn't feel like I was in France anymore. No I would never take a shotgun and kill either socialists or muslims to exprimate my anger, but the actions of this lunatic wouldn't prevent me to stand against massive immigration (immigration concerning few thousands of people each year is fine, but when it concerns several hundreds of thousands of people it's all fucked up) and multiculturalism.
|
On July 25 2011 03:53 TeWy wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:48 Integra wrote:On July 25 2011 03:43 Nqsty wrote:On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable. And again. "His ideas" you are talking about aren't his ideas, They have been well known for a very long time. The guy just re hashed allot of bullshit information claimed by right extremists long ago to be the truth, then he simply went out and killed allot of people. That's all there is to it really. Are you hoping to discredit the factual islamization of Europe by labeling as racist anyone pointing it out ? I leaved for 3 years in a predominantly Muslims area in the suburbs of Strasbourg, I didn't feel like I was in France anymore. No I would never take a shotgun and kill either socialists or muslims to exprimate my anger, but the actions of this lunatic wouldn't prevent me to stand against massive immigration (immigration concerning few thousands of people each year is fine, but when it concerns several hundreds of thousands of people it's all fucked up) and multiculturalism.
I'm going to state what allot of other people already stated: Don't use this tragedy as an excuse to spread bullshit. There is no proof anywhere of your claim. Even if it was true you still hold the belief that muslims or jews are evil and the root of the problem. This has no actual proof either. You are just using hatred as an excuse to blaim a group of people for a set of problems. There are forums for people like you that you can go to.
|
On July 25 2011 03:48 Megatronn wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:45 Integra wrote:On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. and to clarify. This guy is a simple copycat. Nothing he has done or said is new. He hasn't really said or written anything that hasn't already been known for years among right extremists. 1 man killing 70+ children in Norway is pretty new. Doesn't matter what his political views are, killing 70 kids means you just aren't right in the head, obviously. ya, I mean the guy is freaking psycho. No question about that.
|
i'm very impressed with the way Stoltenberg is handling this
|
I'm sorry to say that, but 21 years aint enough for this crazy man
|
On July 25 2011 02:45 Derez wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 02:24 vetinari wrote:On July 25 2011 02:17 Derez wrote:On July 25 2011 00:36 vetinari wrote:On July 25 2011 00:25 WhiteDog wrote:On July 25 2011 00:18 vetinari wrote:On July 24 2011 23:04 Ardhimas wrote:On July 24 2011 22:20 Psychobabas wrote:On July 24 2011 22:13 Dystisis wrote:On July 24 2011 21:37 roflpie wrote: Yes, he had some valid points, but not the best way to get his message through. It's true muslims are a problem in Europe. Multiculturalism is just asking for trouble, it's a matter of time something worse breaks out. Social democracy and liberalism will be the death of Europe, unless people harden up a bit.
I am not supporting Breivik's actions, killing dumb children is a very wrong approach to bringing light to this problem. You are a despicable person. The people killed at the camp were not children, they were mostly teenagers from the age of 16-22. And they knew a lot more about politics and humanity than you do. Muslims are not a problem in Europe, people killing each other when they should stand together is. "let's all live peacefully together and not think of the consequences". There are no consequences to multiculturalism, unless maniacs like you and the perpetrator of this terrorist attack (and others) actually gets their way. Societies like Norway have been multicultural for thousands of years. During the crusades, Muslims traveled alongside Christians back to Europe, which is from whom many of our old military, building, and medical techniques were taught. No consequences? What a bold statement. And in my opinion, wrong. Can you tell us any bad consequences as a result of multiculturalism, and not the intolerance of people? Yes, the eventual consequence of multiculturalism is the death of the culture that allowed multiculturalism in the first place. 1) Multiculturalism is only possible in free, democratic, peaceful societies. 2) In a democratic society, the culture with an absolute majority makes the rules. 3) Cultures exist that do not see multiculturalism as a good. 4) These cultures are generally patriarchal. 5) Patriarchal cultures have higher birthrates 6) Egalitarian/matriarchal cultures have low birthrates. 7) Therefore, the culture in 3 will eventually gain an absolute majority in terms of voter count. 8) The culture in 3 will be able to make the rules, due to 2 and 7 9) One of these rules will be the assimilition of all minority cultures into culture in 3, which includes culture in 1. 10) The dominant culture in 1 will no longer exist. 11) That was the culture which created a free, peaceful, democratic society. 12) There is a chance that the new dominant culture does not allow for a free, peaceful, democratic society. QED. Sorry but no. What you said is wrong because some you are assuming that everyone in the immigrant community is refuse to assimilate any value coming from the country they are living in, which is absolutly false. The main problem of multiculturalism is that it strenghten the communities, and because of that, people tend to assimilate themselves as "french canadian", "indian", "turk" despite all living in the same country (here canada for exemple) and having nothing to do with true "indians" or "turks" who actuallylive in Indiaand turkie. What makes you think I assume that? Thats a fucking stupid assumption to make, because its false. I have my own parents as proof of that... Night[6], I would appreciate if you could actually show me to be incorrect, instead of spouting a one liner. tyvm The demographic 'theory' (whole eurabia bullshit) you are referring to is actually completely untrue. Birthrates among immigrants adjust themselves to the mean within 2 generations, and at the moment birthrates for muslim minorities are below the national average, and even below the magic 2.1 that's needed to maintain the size of their population. Enjoy: http://dougsaunders.net/2008/09/eurabia-debunking-steyn-bawer-melanie-phillips-geert-wilders/ Odd, given that your own source states that TFR among muslim women in france is higher than non-muslim women in france. That said, your source is more biased than fox news. The description of the catholic church as a terrorist organisation gives that away. So if birthrates if France stay consistent like they are at the moment there will be a muslim majority by the year 2300 or something. Well done picking the single deviant case and ignoring every other one. Also, I couldn't give a shit how the author of the article presents it. His sources are scientific, which is more that can be said for the pseudo-science employed by the defenders of this eurabia madness, and there's no need to be nice to people that spread blatant lies in order to spread fears about islam. There is no such thing as a 'cultural war', except for the one that extremists on both sides are creating for their own purposes. People like Wilders (and equivalents in other countries) are doing the exact same thing they accuse muslims of doing: Maintaining their interpretation of 'identity' at the cost of everyone else's. I'm a white, 'native', atheist dutchman, yet my sense of identity has nothing to do with what the far-right is trying to make it out to be. For me, there is no such thing as a 'dutchman', a 'norwegian', you name it. The beauty of the system we live in is that you can take up any identity you want without the state dictating it, and being dutch or european is only a very small part of that for me. That said, I don't want to respond to any of this again. Doing it earlier was a mistake already, and I should have just ignored you. This is not the place for it.
First off thanks for the link. I've been struggling with the topic a bit and sad to say the only "information" I came across in a limited search (I don't like to listen to others' opinions, rather get the facts and make my own) was the typical "muslims are taking over" stuff data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44632/446320620b2797481b98f0248bf47d03f83e2600" alt=""
Secondly, I agree with with what you say of identity. I still struggle to understand why the west still needs to group people and for their identity to be some "label"; whether this is religion, race, culture, geneder ethnicity or nationality (etc.).
My wish is that one day we will live in a society where people are treated as individuals: you are who you are and that is all that matters. There is no such thing as "you are a Norwegian (example) so you are this _____".
The way I see it is that things like culture, religion and nationality are nothing without PEOPLE. We are dealing with individuals and of course all individuals are different; no blanket term will EVER be 100% true, so why do so many people still try?
In my perfect world, people are judged based on what they can do: their ability. One person will get a job, treatment, friendship, money based on what they do, their personality and their individual.
We are all people. People brought up in different ways and in different circumstances, but this does NOT mean ANYONE is automatically x, y and z because of some superficial aspect of their upbringing.
|
On July 25 2011 03:59 Integra wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:53 TeWy wrote:On July 25 2011 03:48 Integra wrote:On July 25 2011 03:43 Nqsty wrote:On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable. And again. "His ideas" you are talking about aren't his ideas, They have been well known for a very long time. The guy just re hashed allot of bullshit information claimed by right extremists long ago to be the truth, then he simply went out and killed allot of people. That's all there is to it really. Are you hoping to discredit the factual islamization of Europe by labeling as racist anyone pointing it out ? I leaved for 3 years in a predominantly Muslims area in the suburbs of Strasbourg, I didn't feel like I was in France anymore. No I would never take a shotgun and kill either socialists or muslims to exprimate my anger, but the actions of this lunatic wouldn't prevent me to stand against massive immigration (immigration concerning few thousands of people each year is fine, but when it concerns several hundreds of thousands of people it's all fucked up) and multiculturalism. I'm going to state what allot of other people already stated: Don't use this tragedy as an excuse to spread bullshit. There is no proof anywhere of your claim. Even if it was true you still hold the belief that muslims or jews are evil and the root of the problem. This has no actual proof either. You are just using hatred as an excuse to blaim a group of people for a set of problems. There are forums for people like you that you can go to.
I do not believe Islam is the great Satan nor that this thing was set up by the Zionists or other conspirationnal bullshits. Stop demonizing anyone not sharing your views.
|
On July 25 2011 03:59 Integra wrote:Show nested quote +On July 25 2011 03:53 TeWy wrote:On July 25 2011 03:48 Integra wrote:On July 25 2011 03:43 Nqsty wrote:On July 25 2011 03:40 Thorakh wrote:You can write 70 pages about how awful the mass murdering was, but certainly not 70 pages about whether he was right or wrong to do so. You've obviously missunderstood the discussion as no one has the viewpoint that what he did was right. Didn't express myself correctly, was talking about his ideas, which some people seem to be delighted to point out that to some extent they are acceptable. And again. "His ideas" you are talking about aren't his ideas, They have been well known for a very long time. The guy just re hashed allot of bullshit information claimed by right extremists long ago to be the truth, then he simply went out and killed allot of people. That's all there is to it really. Are you hoping to discredit the factual islamization of Europe by labeling as racist anyone pointing it out ? I leaved for 3 years in a predominantly Muslims area in the suburbs of Strasbourg, I didn't feel like I was in France anymore. No I would never take a shotgun and kill either socialists or muslims to exprimate my anger, but the actions of this lunatic wouldn't prevent me to stand against massive immigration (immigration concerning few thousands of people each year is fine, but when it concerns several hundreds of thousands of people it's all fucked up) and multiculturalism. I'm going to state what allot of other people already stated: Don't use this tragedy as an excuse to spread bullshit. There is no proof anywhere of your claim. Even if it was true you still hold the belief that muslims or jews are evil and the root of the problem. This has no actual proof either. You are just using hatred as an excuse to blaim a group of people for a set of problems. There are forums for people like you that you can go to.
That's a very narrow-minded thing to say. I don't think Tewy said that muslims or jews are the root of evil. He simply stated that he was against multiculturalism and immigration of muslims to France (if i'm correct). This is a completely valid opinion to have, Europe really does immigrate a high amount of muslims.
When someone states that they would like to reduce the amount of immigrants to their country, it doesn't automatically mean that they think all muslims are evil, and it certainly doesn't mean that these people would like to execute 80+ young people... So stop saying that they are spreading Breiviks propaganda, he was way more extreme in his opinion than most people.
I'd like to finish off by saying that I don't agree with Tewy, I just think this is a subject worth discussing, since it's indeed relevant and not something you should try to hide from or refuse to discuss.
|
|
|
|