[Old] The massacre in Norway - Page 108
Forum Index > General Forum |
Keep your off topic discussions out of this thread and show some damn respect! | ||
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
| ||
DenSkumle
Norway108 Posts
http://www.vg.no/nyheter/innenriks/oslobomben/slik-skjedde-angrepene.php + Show Spoiler + 1. Here a car bomb went off at the goverment plaza friday 22. july at 15.26 Two minutes earlier a person dressed as a police offiser was observed in the vicinity of a van. 2. It takes about 35 minutes to drive from Olso to Utøya with a car. 3. Behring Breivik parked a silver gray van near the ferry crossing. 4. Anders Behring Breivik got transported in a boat to the pier in Utøya. He was dressed in police uniform, bullet proof vest og he was armed. He showed police identification and told the AUFs security guards on the mainland that he was sent out to check the security measures. 5. According to whitnesses Breivik started shooting 30 seconds after he arrived to the island. He then came walking towards the kiosk that lies just a stone's throw away and continued firing. 6. Hundreds of youngsters had come together i the main house to get briefed on the situation in Oslo. They heard several shots. Breivik was closing in on the main entrance, dressed in a police uniform, trying to lure the youngsters closer by saying "I would like to gather you all here, come here" Those who approached him got shot. 7. Breivikk shot with a automated wapon and a pistol. He walked around the whole island and continued to shoot those who tried to swim ashore to the mainland and those who tried hiding in their tents. He shoot into the rooms of the main building. There was a trail of dead people following him over the whole island, mostly at the main building, the café, the shoreline and the tenting place. 8. At 18:27 the police arrests the perpetrator. He willingly layed down his weapons and surrendered when he got invoked by the police. | ||
HowitZer
United States1610 Posts
On July 25 2011 12:57 BasedSwag wrote: ... Google most likely uses the date in the blog index/the page itself (which can obviously be modified easily). If you check the cache, ( http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:p1v7qnudxzkJ:www.bhrnm.org/business-news/bomb-rips-through-norways-capital http://www.bhrnm.org/business-news/bomb-rips-through-norways-capital&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&source=www.google.co.uk ) it was first cached on July 23rd, if it was created 3 days earlier then it would have been cached earlier. Yeah I think you're right. I did an experiment and checked the cache date on a different blog post for July 21st and it was July 21st. If the cache date was say July 23rd then it could be the caching happening a few days later. I did more experiments and the cache date is not always on the same day as the page was created. Delayed by three days cache date example: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:fVxY6O58wZIJ:www.bhrnm.org/business-news/fsb-targeted-vat-cuts-needed-to-restore-growth http://www.bhrnm.org/business-news/fsb-targeted-vat-cuts-needed-to-restore-growth&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com Delayed by four days cache date example: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:P_pBMEz1CRUJ:www.bhrnm.org/business-news/small-talk-strategic-minerals-puts-tax-concerns-aside-in-queensland http://www.bhrnm.org/business-news/small-talk-strategic-minerals-puts-tax-concerns-aside-in-queensland&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&source=www.google.com "Google most likely uses the date in the blog index/the page itself (which can obviously be modified easily)." This isn't the case from experiments I've done. Sometimes google has a date when the page has no occurrences of said date - even in the html source. | ||
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
I really wonder, did the press read the manifest? "The three primary tasks expected from your defence attorney 1. Willingness to facilitate you logistically The candidate must be willing to order the components that make out the Justiciar Knight uniform for you and he/she must then compensate a tailor to assemble it. This task will take him several hours so he should be prepared to invest that time. He must understand that wearing our uniform during trial is an essential aspect of furthering our cause and he must be willing to facilitate you." I'm wondering if they'll make it public. That'd be exactly what he wants, obviously. I'm not sure if the court would like to have it closed as it's such a significant crime. There's speculation about the safety of the suspect as if the trial is public the people might want to attack the suspect and such. I'm actually really curious about today. Will he appear in an uniform like that and what will he say? Will he seriously hold a propaganda speech about his ideals and attempt to convince everyone that what he's doing is for the greater good? Does anyone know at what time the trial is scheduled to be? | ||
Gnax
Sweden490 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:25 Shikyo wrote: The Finnish news says that the suspect wants to show up into the court wearing his uniform, but that they don't know what kind of a uniform he'd be wearing. I really wonder, did the press read the manifest? "The three primary tasks expected from your defence attorney 1. Willingness to facilitate you logistically The candidate must be willing to order the components that make out the Justiciar Knight uniform for you and he/she must then compensate a tailor to assemble it. This task will take him several hours so he should be prepared to invest that time. He must understand that wearing our uniform during trial is an essential aspect of furthering our cause and he must be willing to facilitate you." I'm wondering if they'll make it public. That'd be exactly what he wants, obviously. I'm not sure if the court would like to have it closed as it's such a significant crime. There's speculation about the safety of the suspect as if the trial is public the people might want to attack the suspect and such. I'm actually really curious about today. Will he appear in an uniform like that and what will he say? Will he seriously hold a propaganda speech about his ideals and attempt to convince everyone that what he's doing is for the greater good? Does anyone know at what time the trial is scheduled to be? I definitely think he will hold a propaganda speech, what else would he do? he already confessed to everything and according to his manifesto, the trial is a big part of his plan to send out his message. I think I read that the trial will be today. | ||
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:34 Gnax wrote: I definitely think he will hold a propaganda speech, what else would he do? he already confessed to everything and according to his manifesto, the trial is a big part of his plan to send out his message. I think I read that the trial will be today. I know it's scheduled to be today, but I'm curious about the exact time. | ||
Gnax
Sweden490 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:36 Shikyo wrote: I know it's scheduled to be today, but I'm curious about the exact time. 13:00 CEST according to aftonbladet.se | ||
Ksi
357 Posts
On July 25 2011 12:10 Romantic wrote: Have you ever seen demographic maps of US cities? Pretty much puts a fork in the idea people don't voluntarily segregate themselves. Oh I'm not going to pretend that the U.S. is some sort of racial utopia. At the very least after one or two generations, the descendants of immigrants here typically are able to interact with the rest of society as a whole and generally respect/adhere to the core principles of their country of birth. Their worldview also tends to differ greatly from the past generations and is more or less congruent with other citizens who have been there for generations. Obviously there are exceptions, but I'd confidently say this is the case most of the time at least here in America. | ||
Slakter
Sweden1947 Posts
| ||
Slakter
Sweden1947 Posts
On July 25 2011 13:47 Ksi wrote: Oh I'm not going to pretend that the U.S. is some sort of racial utopia. At the very least after (usually just one) generation, the descendants of immigrants here typically are able to interact with the rest of society as a whole and generally respect/adhere to the core principles of their country of birth. Their worldview also tends to differ greatly from the past generations and is more or less congruent with other citizens who have been there for generations. Obviously there are exceptions, but I'd confidently say this is the case most of the time at least here in America. People seem to think that "accepting the new countries values" is always a good thing, we need new people who come from the outside to come in and question our way of living, if their way of living is better then how are we supposed to know unless anyone informs us? I´m not saying that Saudi Arabia is amazing, I think it´s horrible and I think that Norway for instance is one of the best countries in the world, I´m just saying that accepting the system should not be a part of being a member of society. If that was the case me, a 100% purebred swede with blond hair, blue eyes and the whole schwabang, should not be considered a swede. Which I am. | ||
ShaLLoW[baY]
Canada12499 Posts
| ||
Gamegene
United States8308 Posts
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2084895,00.html What tipped the scales for you? What particular things pushed you to plan the attack? For me personally it was our government's involvement (engagement) with/in the attack on Serbia (NATO bombing in 1999) several years ago. It was completely unacceptable the way the U.S. and Western European regimes bombed our Serbian brothers. There have been many other cases that have strengthened my resolve. Among them, my government's cowardly handling of the Muhammed cartoons, and their decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to an Islamic terrorist (Arafat). There have been dozens of other questions. My government and our media capitulated to Islam years ago, after the Rushdie incident. Since then it has snowballed. Thousands of Muslims stream in each year through the asylum, institutions, or family connections in Norway. ... What motivates you? How have you managed to stay focused and motivated for more than 8 years? Is it bitterness and hatred against the so-called "cultural Marxist/the multiculturalism wonderful elites," or maybe towards Islam? No, not at all. If they (the cultural Marxists) against all odds, gave up on multiculturalism tomorrow, if they stopped all Muslim immigration and started the deportation of all Muslims, I would forgive them for their past crimes. If they refuse to surrender until 2020, there will be no turning back. We will eventually wipe out every single one of them. I do not hate Muslims at all. I acknowledge that there are magnificent Muslim individuals in Europe. In fact, I have had several Muslim friends over the years, some who I still respect. This does not mean that I will accept an Islamic presence in Europe. Muslim individuals who are not assimilated 100% by 2020, will be deported as soon as we manage to seize power. Although I admit that I am sick of the current development, I would say I'm driven by my love for Europe, European culture and Europeans. This does not mean I'm against diversity. But valuing diversity does not mean you support the genocide of your own culture and people. I have to give the smallest of credit for answering the immediate questions surrounding him, but holy fuck the man is insane. The kind of insane where he's not crazy, only extremely extremely rooted to a misguided cause, to the point where he is insane. | ||
Moa
United States790 Posts
On July 25 2011 14:22 Gamegene wrote: Jesus Christ, the guy who did it did an interview... with himself! http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2084895,00.html I have to give the smallest of credit for answering the immediate questions surrounding him, but holy fuck the man is insane. The kind of insane where he's not crazy, only extremely extremely rooted to a misguided cause, to the point where he is insane. Belief that his methods can possibly produce the results he seeks shows insanity (vernacular use, not clinical). I can see how someone is capable of believing in his cause to keep European culture pure (though you'd think he would look back to the 40s and see what that kind of thinking amounted to and caused) but to think that killing innocent people could bring his vision to fruition is pure madness. | ||
Gnax
Sweden490 Posts
On July 25 2011 14:19 ShaLLoW[baY] wrote: I'm not particularly religious, but I hope that there is a hell so that this fucker can burn in it. There is a hell, it's called the earth. | ||
Djzapz
Canada10681 Posts
On July 25 2011 14:22 Gamegene wrote: Jesus Christ, the guy who did it did an interview... with himself! http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2084895,00.html I have to give the smallest of credit for answering the immediate questions surrounding him, but holy fuck the man is insane. The kind of insane where he's not crazy, only extremely extremely rooted to a misguided cause, to the point where he is insane. It's surprising. I guess he managed to convince himself that his ridiculous rationalizations hold up. | ||
CowMoo
United States45 Posts
"FAUSTUS. How comes it then that thou art out of hell? MEPHIST. Why, this is hell, nor am I out of it Think'st thou that I who saw the face of God, And tasted the eternal joys of Heaven, Am not tormented with ten thousand hells, In being deprived of everlasting bliss?" The hard part for me is that the greatest people often endure the most suffering because they seem to have the highest ideals heaven. | ||
Eurekastreet
1308 Posts
On July 25 2011 07:45 ThePhan2m wrote: I want to share some thoughts a friend of mine shared in his blog about Anders Behring Breivik being a fundamental Christian. Especially to the Americans, where the media seem to misunderstand this. I thought it was up to your God to recognize his people. Do you confirm he delegated the responsibility to your friend ? | ||
Bleak
Turkey3059 Posts
Do you want to people just wipe out their memory of where they're born and what they like to do, and completely become a new person? As much as I don't like any kind of tradition, (as it denies change and reform) without them you would feel lost in a new society. I don't think what is wrong with people trying to keep their culture alive when they're living in a new country. If they can also at least take part in that country's cultural activities and get used to it, learn its language, then why should they be assimilated? That is a really negative word. | ||
Eurekastreet
1308 Posts
On July 25 2011 15:25 Bleak wrote: Is it just me, or the word "assimilation" some people are using here, should be "integration" ? Do you want to people just wipe out their memory of where they're born and what they like to do, and completely become a new person? As much as I don't like any kind of tradition, (as it denies change and reform) without them you would feel lost in a new society. I don't think what is wrong with people trying to keep their culture alive when they're living in a new country. If they can also at least take part in that country's cultural activities and get used to it, learn its language, then why should they be assimilated? That is a really negative word. But unfortunately it's a word (and a discussion about using the word instead of integration) that's used quite often these days by the politics (at least in France) since assimilation is part of their (theoretical) agenda. According to many of them, integration didn't work - people don't want to live together anymore, which would be part of the reason for their civil unrest the past few years - so they put the accent more and more on assimilation. There is nothing wrong with people wanting to keep their culture when in a new country, but there's nothing wrong either for a group to ask of someone to leave their tradition at the door if that person wants to join the group - if that's how the group feels that's the way it should be, it's gotta be a democratic discussion. | ||
Ghazwan
Netherlands444 Posts
He argued that there were three solutions: integration, assimilation or isolation. Both parties (muslims and the Europeans) want integration but differ on their perception of the term. What Muslims consider as integration is deemed as isolation by the Europeans and what Europeans consider as integration is assimilation for Muslims. Following his argument, I guess this difference is mostly based on the difference between Islam and Christianity. Islam tends to have a much bigger claim on one's daily life than Christianity, for instance, fasting one month of the year, headscarf, mosques with call to prayers five times a day, halal food, no alcohol, no interest rate, etc. Whereas Christianity's public display is limited to churches in the scenery, a sermon on a holiday (sundays), and some crosses around the necks. So, when a Muslim arrives at a Christian country and is expected to limit his/her religion's social display to the level of Christianity's, s/he considers what is expected as assimilation. And his/her unwillingness to adopt as expected is deemed as isolation by the host culture. Anyways, some food for thought. | ||
| ||