|
Once again TL proves there's no productive way to discuss religion over the internet...was to be expected I guess.
One can only hope religion will end up like smoking, less and less common until it eventually dies out. Maybe then we can have a real debate about how religion was so bad all along.
I hope the kid gets all the support he can get, good to see people taking interest in situations like this.
|
On May 27 2011 18:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: Question to US people:
So, its illegal for the school to lead prayers etc right? What about the students, are they also not allowed to lead one?
What Im saying is, could the school circumvent the legality by putting a student in charge of leading the prayer or is it more of a 'no praying in school' thing?
Technically they aren't allowed to form some kind of prayer group on school property as that would be a school sponsored club (this may differ area to area, but that was how my high school was.)
I believe you can individually pray however you wish, but not sure.
|
On May 27 2011 18:21 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:16 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:15 Pandemona wrote: Think we should all agree to disagree to agree the disagrees!
In other words, BOTH partys are wrong, BOTH should have gone about the way they handled it differently, and it needs to be forgotten, forgiven whatever!
The one thing well all know, anyone can apologise and everyone can accept it and move on! What? The kid did nothing wrong. He went about it the wrong way! So many different ways he should of gone about it! It would be like someone standing up to stop christmas because he or she does not beleive in it! If you dont beleive in christmas you don't have to take part. If he didnt beleive in god then he doesnt pray, so he should of just not prayed and moved on, was his last few weeks of school! And the christians who are using him as a tool to inflict hatred into there religion should stop, step back and just ignore him for it, there is no law which means you have to communicate with someone, if you don't like something or someone you don't do it, you do not commit hate crimes cause of it. BOTH partys are wrong and both should forgive and forget. Like the bible says, like the court room says! Nope, what the school was doing was illegal and unconstitutional, he did nothing wrong, and they should not be forgiven for treating him like that. Just bolding and capitalizing the word both doesn't make it any more true.
|
On May 27 2011 18:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: Question to US people:
So, its illegal for the school to lead prayers etc right? What about the students, are they also not allowed to lead one?
What Im saying is, could the school circumvent the legality by putting a student in charge of leading the prayer or is it more of a 'no praying in school' thing?
schools can't sanction any religious ceremonies or observances. students are allowed to pray or worship on their own, though. but i think putting a student in charge of doing it would still make the school itself responsible even though it wasn't a school official saying the prayer.
|
I'm pretty sure, Jinro, that the 'wall of separation' (or whatever it was dubbed back in the day) only applies to government-run institutions. The students can do their own prayers (I would be surprised if there were no religiously-centered student groups, even informally).
The grey area would be whether or not a student/student-group could lead one at an official school function, as part of it. That would require consent of the school, which may constitute endorsement, but I'm not sure.
afaik, there's nothing stopping those students who want to pray from praying right before the ceremony and then arriving at the ceremony shortly thereafter. In fact, I'm pretty sure Jesus would have wanted that-- he wasn't big on the whole "praying in public" thing. Frowned on the Pharisees for making a show of it, iirc.
Also, Flying Spaghetti Monster (Pastafarian) prayers must be allowed if other prayers are allowed.
|
The kid did everything right. He exposed the true colors of some so called christians, found out who he can really count on and who his friends are. He shed his old life and its lies and he can only go up from there if he's willing to work for it. He must have been devastated by the actions of his parents but at least his brother is there to help, great values these parents got from their religion. Fuck I can't even imagine how retarded you have to be to miss the whole idea of christianity and family so badly.
|
|
On May 27 2011 18:25 dakalro wrote: He must have been devastated by the actions of his parents but at least his brother is there to help, great values these parents got from their religion..
Christianity is against accepting those that fight against it. I also bet this kid really disrespected his parents, because he was let back in at first.
|
On May 27 2011 18:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: Question to US people:
So, its illegal for the school to lead prayers etc right? What about the students, are they also not allowed to lead one?
What Im saying is, could the school circumvent the legality by putting a student in charge of leading the prayer or is it more of a 'no praying in school' thing? It's illegal for the school to sponsor a prayer. In other words, since the graduation is a school-sponsored event, they cannot have a prayer on the list of stuff to do basically. If the school wished to say, set aside 10 minutes for "expressive time" or w/e and the students just happened to pray during that time, then that should be okay.
The issue is that the school basically scheduled a prayer during the graduation, which is unconstitutional and illegal because the school is a public school and thus funded by the state. If this was a private institution then there's no law preventing this. It's only because it's a public institution.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
On May 27 2011 18:24 Olinim wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:21 Pandemona wrote:On May 27 2011 18:16 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:15 Pandemona wrote: Think we should all agree to disagree to agree the disagrees!
In other words, BOTH partys are wrong, BOTH should have gone about the way they handled it differently, and it needs to be forgotten, forgiven whatever!
The one thing well all know, anyone can apologise and everyone can accept it and move on! What? The kid did nothing wrong. He went about it the wrong way! So many different ways he should of gone about it! It would be like someone standing up to stop christmas because he or she does not beleive in it! If you dont beleive in christmas you don't have to take part. If he didnt beleive in god then he doesnt pray, so he should of just not prayed and moved on, was his last few weeks of school! And the christians who are using him as a tool to inflict hatred into there religion should stop, step back and just ignore him for it, there is no law which means you have to communicate with someone, if you don't like something or someone you don't do it, you do not commit hate crimes cause of it. BOTH partys are wrong and both should forgive and forget. Like the bible says, like the court room says! Nope, what the school was doing was illegal and unconstitutional, he did nothing wrong, and they should not be forgiven for treating him like that.
Hmm, your not understanding both sides of the arguement i dont think. HE one person, took the liberty of getting a school tradition stopped because HE didn't like or beleive in it?
1 person vs the 150/200 other people in his year? or whatever it is in US. How can you blame a full christian community for one person who doesn't look like he was very popular anyway standing up for what he belives in during to the last days of his school life? You argue it was his right to stop a public praying which has been going on for god knows how long? But you should also see the counter argument it is within the right of others not to communicate or to listen to something so anti christian in a christian town? However yes i agree that it should not turn into a hate crime or a manhunt for christianity, but i stand by BOTH partys are wrong.
|
On May 27 2011 18:30 aap wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:25 dakalro wrote: He must have been devastated by the actions of his parents but at least his brother is there to help, great values these parents got from their religion.. Christianity is against accepting those that fight against it. I also bet this kid really disrespected his parents, because he was let back in at first.
If you think your religion is more important then your children you are seriously twisted.
Hmm, your not understanding both sides of the arguement i dont think. HE one person, took the liberty of getting a school tradition stopped because HE didn't like or beleive in it?
Majority doesn't overrule the law.
If i get a bunch of serial killers together in 1 town i can't suddenly alter the law to make it more killer-friendly. A town can choose not to enforce some things but in the end if push comes to shove the law is right.
Public schools, paid for by tax payer money, can't be used to fund something like religion. People are still free too express their religion on their own, just the school shouldn't be organising it.
|
On May 27 2011 18:32 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:24 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:21 Pandemona wrote:On May 27 2011 18:16 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:15 Pandemona wrote: Think we should all agree to disagree to agree the disagrees!
In other words, BOTH partys are wrong, BOTH should have gone about the way they handled it differently, and it needs to be forgotten, forgiven whatever!
The one thing well all know, anyone can apologise and everyone can accept it and move on! What? The kid did nothing wrong. He went about it the wrong way! So many different ways he should of gone about it! It would be like someone standing up to stop christmas because he or she does not beleive in it! If you dont beleive in christmas you don't have to take part. If he didnt beleive in god then he doesnt pray, so he should of just not prayed and moved on, was his last few weeks of school! And the christians who are using him as a tool to inflict hatred into there religion should stop, step back and just ignore him for it, there is no law which means you have to communicate with someone, if you don't like something or someone you don't do it, you do not commit hate crimes cause of it. BOTH partys are wrong and both should forgive and forget. Like the bible says, like the court room says! Nope, what the school was doing was illegal and unconstitutional, he did nothing wrong, and they should not be forgiven for treating him like that. Hmm, your not understanding both sides of the arguement i dont think. HE one person, took the liberty of getting a school tradition stopped because HE didn't like or beleive in it? 1 person vs the 150/200 other people in his year? or whatever it is in US. How can you blame a full christian community for one person who doesn't look like he was very popular anyway standing up for what he belives in during to the last days of his school life? You argue it was his right to stop a public praying which has been going on for god knows how long? But you should also see the counter argument it is within the right of others not to communicate or to listen to something so anti christian in a christian town? However yes i agree that it should not turn into a hate crime or a manhunt for christianity, but i stand by BOTH partys are wrong. No, he took the liberty of stopping a school tradition BECAUSE IT WAS ILLEGAL AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL, not just because he didn't like it. The kid did nothing wrong, legally, or morally, where the other party did both, so no they are not BOTH wrong.
|
On May 27 2011 18:32 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:24 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:21 Pandemona wrote:On May 27 2011 18:16 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:15 Pandemona wrote: Think we should all agree to disagree to agree the disagrees!
In other words, BOTH partys are wrong, BOTH should have gone about the way they handled it differently, and it needs to be forgotten, forgiven whatever!
The one thing well all know, anyone can apologise and everyone can accept it and move on! What? The kid did nothing wrong. He went about it the wrong way! So many different ways he should of gone about it! It would be like someone standing up to stop christmas because he or she does not beleive in it! If you dont beleive in christmas you don't have to take part. If he didnt beleive in god then he doesnt pray, so he should of just not prayed and moved on, was his last few weeks of school! And the christians who are using him as a tool to inflict hatred into there religion should stop, step back and just ignore him for it, there is no law which means you have to communicate with someone, if you don't like something or someone you don't do it, you do not commit hate crimes cause of it. BOTH partys are wrong and both should forgive and forget. Like the bible says, like the court room says! Nope, what the school was doing was illegal and unconstitutional, he did nothing wrong, and they should not be forgiven for treating him like that. Hmm, your not understanding both sides of the arguement i dont think. HE one person, took the liberty of getting a school tradition stopped because HE didn't like or beleive in it? 1 person vs the 150/200 other people in his year? or whatever it is in US. How can you blame a full christian community for one person who doesn't look like he was very popular anyway standing up for what he belives in during to the last days of his school life? You argue it was his right to stop a public praying which has been going on for god knows how long? But you should also see the counter argument it is within the right of others not to communicate or to listen to something so anti christian in a christian town? However yes i agree that it should not turn into a hate crime or a manhunt for christianity, but i stand by BOTH partys are wrong.
It doesn't matter it was one people or hundred, the prayer is illigal. If murder was a tradition, and everybody did it except one guy who complained would he eb wrong too?
|
imagine what the world would look like without religion
User was warned for this post
|
On May 27 2011 18:30 Ryuu314 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: Question to US people:
So, its illegal for the school to lead prayers etc right? What about the students, are they also not allowed to lead one?
What Im saying is, could the school circumvent the legality by putting a student in charge of leading the prayer or is it more of a 'no praying in school' thing? It's illegal for the school to sponsor a prayer. In other words, since the graduation is a school-sponsored event, they cannot have a prayer on the list of stuff to do basically. If the school wished to say, set aside 10 minutes for "expressive time" or w/e and the students just happened to pray during that time, then that should be okay. The issue is that the school basically scheduled a prayer during the graduation, which is unconstitutional and illegal because the school is a public school and thus funded by the state. If this was a private institution then there's no law preventing this. It's only because it's a public institution.
One time at my graduation a person held up some money. It says In God we trust on that stuff. CALL THE ACLU!!
|
On May 27 2011 18:35 aap wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:30 Ryuu314 wrote:On May 27 2011 18:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: Question to US people:
So, its illegal for the school to lead prayers etc right? What about the students, are they also not allowed to lead one?
What Im saying is, could the school circumvent the legality by putting a student in charge of leading the prayer or is it more of a 'no praying in school' thing? It's illegal for the school to sponsor a prayer. In other words, since the graduation is a school-sponsored event, they cannot have a prayer on the list of stuff to do basically. If the school wished to say, set aside 10 minutes for "expressive time" or w/e and the students just happened to pray during that time, then that should be okay. The issue is that the school basically scheduled a prayer during the graduation, which is unconstitutional and illegal because the school is a public school and thus funded by the state. If this was a private institution then there's no law preventing this. It's only because it's a public institution. One time at my graduation a person held up some money. It says In God we trust on that stuff. CALL THE ACLU!! You bring up a good point, that garbage should be taken out of the pledge and off our money as well.
|
On May 27 2011 18:32 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:24 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:21 Pandemona wrote:On May 27 2011 18:16 Olinim wrote:On May 27 2011 18:15 Pandemona wrote: Think we should all agree to disagree to agree the disagrees!
In other words, BOTH partys are wrong, BOTH should have gone about the way they handled it differently, and it needs to be forgotten, forgiven whatever!
The one thing well all know, anyone can apologise and everyone can accept it and move on! What? The kid did nothing wrong. He went about it the wrong way! So many different ways he should of gone about it! It would be like someone standing up to stop christmas because he or she does not beleive in it! If you dont beleive in christmas you don't have to take part. If he didnt beleive in god then he doesnt pray, so he should of just not prayed and moved on, was his last few weeks of school! And the christians who are using him as a tool to inflict hatred into there religion should stop, step back and just ignore him for it, there is no law which means you have to communicate with someone, if you don't like something or someone you don't do it, you do not commit hate crimes cause of it. BOTH partys are wrong and both should forgive and forget. Like the bible says, like the court room says! Nope, what the school was doing was illegal and unconstitutional, he did nothing wrong, and they should not be forgiven for treating him like that. Hmm, your not understanding both sides of the arguement i dont think. HE one person, took the liberty of getting a school tradition stopped because HE didn't like or beleive in it? 1 person vs the 150/200 other people in his year? or whatever it is in US. How can you blame a full christian community for one person who doesn't look like he was very popular anyway standing up for what he belives in during to the last days of his school life? You argue it was his right to stop a public praying which has been going on for god knows how long? But you should also see the counter argument it is within the right of others not to communicate or to listen to something so anti christian in a christian town? However yes i agree that it should not turn into a hate crime or a manhunt for christianity, but i stand by BOTH partys are wrong. I wouldn't say the kid was wrong. All he did was stop an illegal action from taking place. Let's say instead of a prayer, it was school-sponsored drinking. And let's also say that's been a tradition as well. No one has ever gotten hurt, 'cause let's say it's just half a cup of beer. So no harm. But it's still illegal. As a citizen, you have a right and obligation to stop illegal actions from occurring. Government-sponsored prayers are illegal. You can't ignore that.
HOWEVER, I will concede that the kid was extremely stupid and clearly didn't think through his actions.
|
On May 27 2011 18:33 zalz wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:30 aap wrote:On May 27 2011 18:25 dakalro wrote: He must have been devastated by the actions of his parents but at least his brother is there to help, great values these parents got from their religion.. Christianity is against accepting those that fight against it. I also bet this kid really disrespected his parents, because he was let back in at first. If you think your religion is more important then your children you are seriously twisted.
You are seriously twisted for thinking relationships are more important that your beliefs. This kid obviously thought that his beliefs were better than his relationships.
|
On May 27 2011 18:38 aap wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:33 zalz wrote:On May 27 2011 18:30 aap wrote:On May 27 2011 18:25 dakalro wrote: He must have been devastated by the actions of his parents but at least his brother is there to help, great values these parents got from their religion.. Christianity is against accepting those that fight against it. I also bet this kid really disrespected his parents, because he was let back in at first. If you think your religion is more important then your children you are seriously twisted. You are seriously twisted for thinking relationships are more important that your beliefs. This kid obviously thought that his beliefs were better than his relationships. They probably were, this kid's parents sound pretty horrible to me.
|
On May 27 2011 18:36 Olinim wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 18:35 aap wrote:On May 27 2011 18:30 Ryuu314 wrote:On May 27 2011 18:20 Liquid`Jinro wrote: Question to US people:
So, its illegal for the school to lead prayers etc right? What about the students, are they also not allowed to lead one?
What Im saying is, could the school circumvent the legality by putting a student in charge of leading the prayer or is it more of a 'no praying in school' thing? It's illegal for the school to sponsor a prayer. In other words, since the graduation is a school-sponsored event, they cannot have a prayer on the list of stuff to do basically. If the school wished to say, set aside 10 minutes for "expressive time" or w/e and the students just happened to pray during that time, then that should be okay. The issue is that the school basically scheduled a prayer during the graduation, which is unconstitutional and illegal because the school is a public school and thus funded by the state. If this was a private institution then there's no law preventing this. It's only because it's a public institution. One time at my graduation a person held up some money. It says In God we trust on that stuff. CALL THE ACLU!! You bring up a good point, that garbage should be taken out of the pledge and off our money as well. There's actually a justification for that. The phrase "in God we trust" doesn't actually specify which God. It can refer to Christian God or Ancient Greek God(s). As such, that phrase is more or less a loophole in the whole "religious freedom" clause.
In all honesty, if the prayer at this school was an ambiguous non-denominational prayer, it'd probably be okay.
|
|
|
|