|
On May 27 2011 15:09 GGTeMpLaR wrote: would the prayer have hurt anyone? no You really have no slight idea why that is illegal?
It's a public school funded by the government imposing religion on students. It hurts you even more than Reach punching you in the face.
It hurts your whole country's freedom. It's not a victim-less crime. All of you are victims.
|
On May 27 2011 15:15 atheistaphobe wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:08 krbz wrote:
Christianity is backed up by "stories" compiled into a book. The history is only of the stories and completely untestable. I would also like to add that they are stories from an age that had very little understanding of the world around them. They couldn't explain things so they created something to provide that explanation.
Scientific theory cannot take divine power into consideration as it cannot be subjected to testing and verified by multiple parties. It cannot stand in a scientific setting because all a religious follower can present is the book the have "faith" in. Social Sciences prove again and again that devout Christians live a healthier life and that prayer has an effect. Atheism is nothing. It cannot be proved. .
What about atheism have to be proved.
I actually really don't get that :S
|
Wow. That so many of you can actually be apologists for the actions of the community and the school is simply unbelievable. How shameful.
|
I good post sir data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
+ Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:48 Supamang wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 14:41 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 14:33 Probulous wrote:On May 27 2011 14:32 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 14:22 Zzoram wrote:On May 27 2011 14:20 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 13:50 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 27 2011 13:48 aguy38 wrote:On May 27 2011 13:47 EmeraldSparks wrote: Everybody involved should probably be sent to a gulag. including the kid? Well, he can go if he wants to. I heard atheists are big on gulags. This post has very great depth and I admire it. On May 27 2011 14:14 Zzoram wrote: I'm sure all of America would be outraged if a public school with a sizable Muslim population held prayers to Allah but not Christian prayers during graduation. Christianity holds an undoubtedly priviliged place in America despite claims of religious equality and freedom. Theres actually a practicing muslum in my class for graduation. Hes given a pass out of class at the proper times so he can pray in silence and during tests he just does it in class right there. The common consensus is "I don't give a shit" Its like America is Team liquid and the church is another poster. Its been around for so long and contributed so much (and done great sins as well) that the mods put him higher then the newer people. But really Guys its the deep south and the kid was being a smart ass the way he simply "demanded" that the prayer be canceled. They still have chaplains in the military and they still pray in the sport house's before each game in the successful schools. I'm not saying anything about the situation was right but the Person who wrote this (lets be honest) blog is horribly biased and acts like the majority of america is Christian still. Which it frankly isn't. TLDR: I don't want to study evolution and have to have that shuved down my throat to get a good grade in that class but I keep my mouth shut and get though it and don't call the ALCU. The Muslim student is doing a personal prayer, that's fine. The school could've had a moment of silence for all the students to do their own personal prayers. When an individual representing the school does an official prayer on behalf of the school, that's where the violation of the constitutional right occurs. Evolution is science, it's ok to teach science in science class. Prayers are religion, it's not ok for the school to have an official prayer since government isn't allowed to favor one religion over another. I find the theory of evolution as tought by the science elite to be personally offensive and strongly against my personal views. I find all the "science" behind it to be strongly painted against my religious views. Its the same as if the bible was made into the curriculum for English sense it was the first mass printed book. Except that you would probably look at its history, the way it was written. How events influenced its structure, the tone etc. You would not get up and tell everyone to believe everything in the book. As for evolution, there is evidence to back it up. The whole idea is for it to be examined and questioned. The foundation of science is questioning, hence if you do an science subject you are expected to question things. If you don't like it, don't go to science class. You mean It being written by a priest to explain how god created the universe and everything in it? What are you talking about its structure and tone? The modern theory of evolution isn't some single threat of thought about how animals developed into what we are today its been convoluted into a mess of Religious hate against god with assumptions like the big bang and carbon dating. Do you even realize how wildly inaccurate carbon dating is and how rock solid its used in "science" debates? Uhh, i highly doubt the argument for the theory of evolution was made for the purpose of hating religion lol. and how the fuck does the Big Bang theory get tied into human evolution lol? you sound like youre ranting and throwing all of the things that piss you off into one bundle. Just because they contradict your belief doesnt mean they were all created to attack your beliefs. Oh and how wildly inaccurate is carbon dating? I honestly dont know anything about carbon dating so if you could send me a link about its inaccuracies id greatly appreciate that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiocarbon_dating + Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:46 krbz wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 14:32 sermokala wrote:
I find the theory of evolution as tought by the science elite to be personally offensive and strongly against my personal views. I find all the "science" behind it to be strongly painted against my religious views. Its the same as if the bible was made into the curriculum for English sense it was the first mass printed book. Evolution is backed by studies, experiments, statistics, and is widely verifiable by many people. Christianity is backed by nothing but a 2000 year old book. The two are not in any way comparable. You're situation is flawed. Evolution is an constantly Argued on THEORY (like gravity lulz) that hasn't been nailed down to a series of facts sense Darwin published it in the first place. Its been "contradicted" and "supported" so many times that it wouldn't make sense to the guy anymore. You make such wild assumptions about Christianity it saddens me. the old Testament is a lot older then 2000 years old as its pretty much the tora and Koran with some changed and translations. It been backed up by pretty much every single part in the book. But your last point is correct. our Situation is flawed. My view Requires my Faith that I cannot physically share and yours requires facts that you are ever searching for. Perhaps this dance will always be done in our existence. Such things entertain me so much about our race. + Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:45 Zzoram wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 14:41 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 14:33 Probulous wrote:On May 27 2011 14:32 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 14:22 Zzoram wrote:On May 27 2011 14:20 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 13:50 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 27 2011 13:48 aguy38 wrote:On May 27 2011 13:47 EmeraldSparks wrote: Everybody involved should probably be sent to a gulag. including the kid? Well, he can go if he wants to. I heard atheists are big on gulags. This post has very great depth and I admire it. On May 27 2011 14:14 Zzoram wrote: I'm sure all of America would be outraged if a public school with a sizable Muslim population held prayers to Allah but not Christian prayers during graduation. Christianity holds an undoubtedly priviliged place in America despite claims of religious equality and freedom. Theres actually a practicing muslum in my class for graduation. Hes given a pass out of class at the proper times so he can pray in silence and during tests he just does it in class right there. The common consensus is "I don't give a shit" Its like America is Team liquid and the church is another poster. Its been around for so long and contributed so much (and done great sins as well) that the mods put him higher then the newer people. But really Guys its the deep south and the kid was being a smart ass the way he simply "demanded" that the prayer be canceled. They still have chaplains in the military and they still pray in the sport house's before each game in the successful schools. I'm not saying anything about the situation was right but the Person who wrote this (lets be honest) blog is horribly biased and acts like the majority of america is Christian still. Which it frankly isn't. TLDR: I don't want to study evolution and have to have that shuved down my throat to get a good grade in that class but I keep my mouth shut and get though it and don't call the ALCU. The Muslim student is doing a personal prayer, that's fine. The school could've had a moment of silence for all the students to do their own personal prayers. When an individual representing the school does an official prayer on behalf of the school, that's where the violation of the constitutional right occurs. Evolution is science, it's ok to teach science in science class. Prayers are religion, it's not ok for the school to have an official prayer since government isn't allowed to favor one religion over another. I find the theory of evolution as tought by the science elite to be personally offensive and strongly against my personal views. I find all the "science" behind it to be strongly painted against my religious views. Its the same as if the bible was made into the curriculum for English sense it was the first mass printed book. Except that you would probably look at its history, the way it was written. How events influenced its structure, the tone etc. You would not get up and tell everyone to believe everything in the book. As for evolution, there is evidence to back it up. The whole idea is for it to be examined and questioned. The foundation of science is questioning, hence if you do an science subject you are expected to question things. If you don't like it, don't go to science class. You mean It being written by a priest to explain how god created the universe and everything in it? What are you talking about its structure and tone? The modern theory of evolution isn't some single threat of thought about how animals developed into what we are today its been convoluted into a mess of Religious hate against god with assumptions like the big bang and carbon dating. Do you even realize how wildly inaccurate carbon dating is and how rock solid its used in "science" debates? Do you realize that carbon dating is only used for things 60,000 years old to things a few thousand years old? And that other dating methods are used for time periods outside that range? If it was just used for that then we wouldn't have a problem now would we? + Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:45 valedictory wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 14:41 sermokala wrote:
You mean It being written by a priest to explain how god created the universe and everything in it? What are you talking about its structure and tone? The modern theory of evolution isn't some single threat of thought about how animals developed into what we are today its been convoluted into a mess of Religious hate against god with assumptions like the big bang and carbon dating. Do you even realize how wildly inaccurate carbon dating is and how rock solid its used in "science" debates? I don't quite understand what you are trying to say anymore. Are you arguing against science in general? Specific fields of science? Are you suggesting scientific revisioning? Are you saying state should not be allowed to sponsor science when its results or conclusions are inconsistent with the religions or beliefs of individuals? I think your trying to complexify this too much. I don't want to be tought something I don't believe in in school and you don't either. this thread is about religion in schools and I'd like to keep it somewhere near there. + Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:54 Popss wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 14:43 sermokala wrote:On May 27 2011 14:36 KSMB wrote:On May 27 2011 14:32 sermokala wrote:I find the theory of evolution as tought by the science elite to be personally offensive and strongly against my personal views. I find all the "science" behind it to be strongly painted against my religious views. Its the same as if the bible was made into the curriculum for English sense it was the first mass printed book. What the hell? Please tell us you are trolling. Please. If not, that is so sad. You think that we're all nothing but a freak accident on the uncompromisable scale of the universe? How sad. See what I did there? Actually you sort of answered you're own question. Considering the uncompromisable scale of the universe chances are there's gonna be a freak accident somewhere. I was counter trolling you about how you think that we're nothing but a freak accident ala your parents didn't want you and you where an accident. I don't believe we're all an accident. Do you now see what I did there? + Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:55 valedictory wrote:Even if you proved irreconcilably that carbon dating is grossly inaccurate, you've still accomplished nothing. The data acquired from those methods are still the best explanation to date, the theory of evolution still stands, the scientific method is in tact, the government institutions of the US are still separated from religion, Fowler was still fully in the legal right and I have no idea how how whatever ambiguous point you are trying to make is effected. You're derailing so hard and with such an age old debate that you must be trolling. 1. Just because its the best explanation to date I should take it as fact? 2. the institutions are separate from the State and the influences of the church but the people never are. 3. Welcome to religion vs science. 4. Yes he Is in the legal right. But how does what he did make him any different then the kkk rally my dad has to risk his life protecting because they get the same freedoms that he does? + Show Spoiler +On May 27 2011 14:56 WGarrison wrote: Real quick rundown of the legal difference between evolution and creationism.
Creationism theory is a religious theory hands down. As such it is not available to be backed by a government funded venue.
Evolution theory is a scientific theory which is different. Let us suppose we take a small leap an say that atheism is a religion. Even if atheism is a religion the theory of evolution is not attributed to the atheist beliefs but is a scientific theory (science is not a religion, legally or otherwise). Attributing evolution theory to atheism is equivalent to attributing trigonometry to atheism.
Theory of evolution is not attributed to a religion or quasi religious (atheism) entity and is therefore not affected by the freedom of religion amendment. Trig was invented by the sun worshipers of Egypt to build the pyramids to them. Algebra was invented by the Arabs. Your point is moot.
Well wanted to get all that out of my system its now 1:20 in the morning and I really need to get this project done for tomorrow or my grade will die. I feel that Teamliquid has and will pretty much be the only place that debates like this will ever not just devolve into random flame fests that people just get banned from. I respect my opponents in this and I hope you give me the same. If you wish to respectfully debate it anymore please pm me.
|
On May 27 2011 15:15 atheistaphobe wrote:Social Sciences prove again and again that devout Christians live a healthier life and that prayer has an effect. Absolute horseshit.
|
On May 27 2011 15:15 hypercube wrote:
Except the prayer itself.
It's a matter of framing. You can say he was "shitting over an activity they loved". Or you can say he was complaining about an illegal practice.
Ok, I'll ignore the schools response as that is slightly more convoluted and I can make just as good an argument with the parents.
Why do we hate the parents when what they did is legal?
Because they are morally wrong, and I think Fowler was morally wrong to destroy an illegal practice.
On May 27 2011 15:13 Blindo wrote: To everyone who says the kid should have just pretended to pray or shut up, how many people here that are Christian would want to sit and have an Islamic or Jewish prayer at their graduation? I can't believe these parents wouldn't respect him enough to let him have his own beliefs.
In a predominantly Jewish/Islamic community yes I would.
|
On May 27 2011 15:15 StrangrDangr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:13 Zzoram wrote:On May 27 2011 15:10 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 IntoTheWow wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I don't believe his actions are altruistic at all
would the prayer have hurt anyone? no
he should have just let it be as a matter of respecting a community tradition illegal community tradiction* sure it's a crime, but it's a victimless crimeif there was a law against scratching your head with both hands at the same time and I saw someone do it, I wouldn't report it or care at all it's illegal, therefore it is wrong, right? oh wait But it's not. It's alienating the non-Christians by making them feel like they don't belong at their own graduation. Just like how our money alienates the non-Christians, fortunately I am willing to take any of that darn alenating money off your hands.
Our currency does in fact alienate non-Christians and is unconstitutional. The courts are dropping the ball on this one. Also, my money is mine thank you.
|
On May 27 2011 15:16 EmeraldSparks wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:15 atheistaphobe wrote:On May 27 2011 15:08 krbz wrote:
Christianity is backed up by "stories" compiled into a book. The history is only of the stories and completely untestable. I would also like to add that they are stories from an age that had very little understanding of the world around them. They couldn't explain things so they created something to provide that explanation.
Scientific theory cannot take divine power into consideration as it cannot be subjected to testing and verified by multiple parties. It cannot stand in a scientific setting because all a religious follower can present is the book the have "faith" in. Social Sciences prove again and again that devout Christians live a healthier life and that prayer has an effect. Atheism is nothing. It cannot be proved. christianity cannot be proved either dohohohoho [citation needed]
Christianity can be proved. Thats the whole point of it.
|
On May 27 2011 15:18 Zzoram wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:12 Slaughter wrote:On May 27 2011 15:11 Zzoram wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 valheru wrote: This is just disgusting behavior on that community's part. Absolutely disgusting, morally abhorrent and hypocritical there are times where I just lose any trust in humanity. It's odd you know I've been to parts of the bible belt (not louisiana but I imagine it is fairly similar) and they are some of the nicest and most generous people but then this shit happens...fuck. Until they find out you're not Christian. Really? As a Canadian citizen your familiar with the bible belt states and how they treat people? Even in Canada I had often felt like I didn't belong in my public high school (years ago) because of how Christian the administration was and how they kept doing prayers over the microphone at all sorts of ceremonies. A large chunk of the student body wasn't Christian and clearly felt very awkward during these prayers, but nobody had the courage to speak up because nobody wanted to be attacked.
Heh I am aware how the fanatical people can treat people (im spoiled in the way that my family is deeply religious but won't treat you like shit if you don't believe) Thats why these fanatics baffle me since its easy to just respect other people (you know like religion TEACHES). I was just being an ass because I dislike sweeping generalizations.
|
On May 27 2011 15:15 atheistaphobe wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:08 krbz wrote:
Christianity is backed up by "stories" compiled into a book. The history is only of the stories and completely untestable. I would also like to add that they are stories from an age that had very little understanding of the world around them. They couldn't explain things so they created something to provide that explanation.
Scientific theory cannot take divine power into consideration as it cannot be subjected to testing and verified by multiple parties. It cannot stand in a scientific setting because all a religious follower can present is the book the have "faith" in. Social Sciences prove again and again that devout Christians live a healthier life and that prayer has an effect. Atheism is nothing. It cannot be proved. .
did you seriously just make this account to troll people? if so, then well played.
EDIT:well played...
|
On May 27 2011 15:15 StrangrDangr wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:13 Zzoram wrote:On May 27 2011 15:10 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 IntoTheWow wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I don't believe his actions are altruistic at all
would the prayer have hurt anyone? no
he should have just let it be as a matter of respecting a community tradition illegal community tradiction* sure it's a crime, but it's a victimless crimeif there was a law against scratching your head with both hands at the same time and I saw someone do it, I wouldn't report it or care at all it's illegal, therefore it is wrong, right? oh wait But it's not. It's alienating the non-Christians by making them feel like they don't belong at their own graduation. Just like how our money alienates the non-Christians, fortunately I am willing to take any of that darn alenating money off your hands.
I have no idea what this means.
On May 27 2011 15:20 WGarrison wrote:
Our currency does in fact alienate non-Christians and is unconstitutional. The courts are dropping the ball on this one. Also, my money is mine thank you.
Oh, I forgot about that! I don't use cash anyways, but ya cash shouldn't have religious anything on it. I'm sure Christians wouldn't be happy if US dollars had "Praise Allah!" on it.
|
On May 27 2011 15:16 IntoTheWow wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:13 aguy38 wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 IntoTheWow wrote:On May 27 2011 15:09 GGTeMpLaR wrote: I don't believe his actions are altruistic at all
would the prayer have hurt anyone? no
he should have just let it be as a matter of respecting a community tradition illegal community tradiction* edit: Me being naked in the street isn't hurting anybody, they should just let me do it :O depends, are you a hot girl? all joking aside, sure I actually don't care. Yeah, but the law would. It's a victimless crime, but it's still a crime. And you know what, If I walked in the street naked, the police would be called and I would be arrested. So I hope that law is applied to them, the same way the law is applied on me data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" You should become a nudist first then sue for discrimination XD. anyway,I think overall the kid came out on top in this whole situation. He gets college paid for, he gets out of the town that no longer wanted him, and he gets away from his parents that are assholes. I do get your point about victimless crimes etc etc, but it seems to me that he actually gained a fair amount by doing what he did be it right or wrong.
|
Russian Federation3631 Posts
On May 27 2011 15:13 Blindo wrote: To everyone who says the kid should have just pretended to pray or shut up, how many people here that are Christian would want to sit and have an Islamic or Jewish prayer at their graduation? I can't believe these parents wouldn't respect him enough to let him have his own beliefs. Hmm...
Can I say that I wouldn't mind?
(I really don't see how people are suffering irreparable mental trauma as a result of religious activity...)
On another note, I don't see state taxpayers up in arms when their dollars that go to state universities are used to invite religious and humanist speakers. I know the Supreme Court precedents are different, but to what degree does government have to be severed from promoting religion in order not to violate the 1st Amendment?. Its not an easy question.
|
On May 27 2011 15:19 VIB wrote:You really have no slight idea why that is illegal? It's a public school funded by the government imposing religion on students. It hurts you even more than Reach punching you in the face. It hurts your whole country's freedom. It's not a victim-less crime. All of you are victims.
how is it imposing religion on students? if I listen to the prayer is there a 5% chance I get converted every second I listen?
my freedom is being hurt at all, I feel like the only victims here are the ones who have to have everything their way or no one can have anything at all
|
The thing is that it doesn't even matter what the kid's motivations for doing it are, the law is 100% on his side. The same people who use the glib justification that it's harmless are the same people who would be vehemently against it if it was a prayer from a different religion.
|
On May 27 2011 15:20 atheistaphobe wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:16 EmeraldSparks wrote:On May 27 2011 15:15 atheistaphobe wrote:On May 27 2011 15:08 krbz wrote:
Christianity is backed up by "stories" compiled into a book. The history is only of the stories and completely untestable. I would also like to add that they are stories from an age that had very little understanding of the world around them. They couldn't explain things so they created something to provide that explanation.
Scientific theory cannot take divine power into consideration as it cannot be subjected to testing and verified by multiple parties. It cannot stand in a scientific setting because all a religious follower can present is the book the have "faith" in. Social Sciences prove again and again that devout Christians live a healthier life and that prayer has an effect. Atheism is nothing. It cannot be proved. christianity cannot be proved either dohohohoho [citation needed] Christianity can be proved. Thats the whole point of it.
Not to derail, but, your proof then?
|
On May 27 2011 15:22 blah_blah wrote: The thing is that it doesn't even matter what the kid's motivations for doing it are, the law is 100% on his side. The same people who use the glib justification that it's harmless are the same people who would be vehemently against it if it was a prayer from a different religion.
yea, except you've got people like me who aren't even religious and aren't bothered by it at all
there are no prayers for me, therefore I should never be forced to listen to anyones prayers or it's wrong and destroying my freedom right?
is that how it works rofl
|
On May 27 2011 15:20 sermokala wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 14:56 WGarrison wrote: Real quick rundown of the legal difference between evolution and creationism.
Creationism theory is a religious theory hands down. As such it is not available to be backed by a government funded venue.
Evolution theory is a scientific theory which is different. Let us suppose we take a small leap an say that atheism is a religion. Even if atheism is a religion the theory of evolution is not attributed to the atheist beliefs but is a scientific theory (science is not a religion, legally or otherwise). Attributing evolution theory to atheism is equivalent to attributing trigonometry to atheism.
Theory of evolution is not attributed to a religion or quasi religious (atheism) entity and is therefore not affected by the freedom of religion amendment. Trig was invented by the sun worshipers of Egypt to build the pyramids to them. Algebra was invented by the Arabs. Your point is moot.
I don't understand how my point is moot.
|
On May 27 2011 15:16 EmeraldSparks wrote:Show nested quote +On May 27 2011 15:15 Zzoram wrote:On May 27 2011 15:11 exalted wrote: I hate how teamliquid is so large these days that a thread like this gets spammed with replies making each reply less meaningful as it is caught up in all the clutter.
What he did was something I wouldn't. Obviously speaking out would incur severe repercussions and possibly the wrath of many. However, if everyone was like me, no change would happen either. Reminds me of Rosa Parks and how she should have just "sat in the back". That's what I thought of too. An argument could be made that sitting in the back hurts nobody, and that she should've minded her own business and not bothered the majority of bus riders. Of course, it was morally wrong and she was couragous to stand up for herself, as was Damon Fowler. racism is bad and dehumanizing
Racism is discrimination based on race.
This situation is discrimination based on religious beliefs. (or more specifically, discrimination because his opinions don't agree with the majority)
Also, didn't want to say this initially, but female circumcision is a tradition too. However it's illegal in the US since 1996. If someone was performing female circumcision would you stand up and say something or just shut up since it's tradition?
|
Constitutional law does not exist in reality, so the execution of its code requires some sort of personal weight. A community such as this will not be the last to bend laws to suit their norms, and in general I find that if a vast majority of people agree on something then let it be so. Damon's actions could only be justified if he truly felt his liberties were impinged upon. Granted, as an eighteen-year-old, he may have many motivating factors. Perhaps he has always felt this way about the school, but saved his "stand" for graduation so he could pass easily through high school.
Standing up to this type of thing is common, but the story here is the reaction. The leak, teacher and student body responses, and the parent response are all noteworthy because of their severity. One would hope that others would have a passing interest on why Damon felt his liberty was affected, but the student received only malice.
|
|
|
|