|
Please guys, stay on topic.
This thread is about the situation in Iraq and Syria. |
I think people confuse several levels here. This isn't some gung-ho democratization.
The first level is stopping the breach of international conventions on chemical warfare.
The second level is avoiding a humanitarian crisis.
The third level is aiding a people being oppressed by their own government.
Only the fourth step is one where one might aid in the process of nation-building. And, call me a cynic, but I haven't heard a single statement regarding helping a democratic transition in Syria. In fact, no-one has credibly said anything about any step beyond 1. Which I find deplorable as I personally know people who have been driven out of their homes by the violence. But that's life.
|
On August 26 2013 05:10 Ghanburighan wrote: I think people confuse several levels here. This isn't some gung-ho democratization.
The first level is stopping the breach of international conventions on chemical warfare.
The second level is avoiding a humanitarian crisis.
The third level is aiding a people being oppressed by their own government.
Only the fourth step is one where one might aid in the process of nation-building. And, call me a cynic, but I haven't heard a single statement regarding helping a democratic transition in Syria. In fact, no-one has credibly said anything about any step beyond 1. Which I find deplorable as I personally know people who have been driven out of their homes by the violence. But that's life.
People have been disillusioned from the results of international intervention to find that previously propagandized and obvious morality are in reality ambivalent issues, to such a degree where now those who have the most influence in the world (the developed nations) are harboring extreme apathy regarding anyone not included in their social interest circle, to such a degree that even relatively open countries which were built on multiculturalism and immigration and integration of foreign entities (the US for example) are becoming closed off and xenophobic. It's been happening since the intervention in Rwanda in the 90s, no politician wants to tread the thin line when there is no clear villain to be made for political gain.
|
On August 26 2013 02:27 DeepElemBlues wrote: I'm not sure what planet it is where people act like the word of Russia is as good as gold and the word US, France, Britain etc. is obviously and automatically never true
you must have quite the telescope. at least it would be pretty obvious where the skepticism towards the US and the UK stems from on that planet.
Syria to allow inspectors to site of suspected chemical weapons attack
...a top Syrian official told CNN on Sunday that the government would allow U.N. inspectors full access to any site of a suspected chemical weapons attack. The agreement is effective immediately, Deputy Foreign Minister Faisal al Mekdad said. The U.N. secretary-general's office said inspectors hope to begin their probe Monday at the suspected chemical attack site. Before Sunday, U.N. inspectors in Syria attempting to gather information were not allowed to visit the site of the recent attack. source
hopefully a belated step forward.
|
|
On August 26 2013 05:02 maartendq wrote:Show nested quote +On August 26 2013 02:54 Nyxisto wrote: Democracy isn't an export product. It may sound cynic , but all these countries in the middle east actually need to go through this. The wish to stop the suffering and punish Assad for what he's doing and bringing the people peace and freedom and all that good jazz is obviously very natural, but it won't help in the long run. Every western country that we now consider free and democratic actually went through decades of bloodshed. The countries that were 'supported' by the west are now no more stable then they were under their despotic dictatorship.
The middle eastern societies are culturally and politically decades behind. Giving them ballot papers will not make them democratic (see: Egypt). If the west is interested in long lasting progress in those countries they need to stop intervening and let Syria figure it out themselves. It won't happen over night, not bei foreign force and it will probably cost a lot of lives but it's probably the only way. Wow, finally someone who gets it. I'm getting really tired of people thinking that it is possible to just "insert" democracy into a country or region that didn't evolve the necessary institutions to make democracy actually work. It took Europe and the US centuries of painstaking political development to get where they are now - and there are still large differences between each country - so why anyone thinks that Afghanistan, Iraq, Egypt or any other middle-eastern country can be democratised in less then a decade is completely beyond me. I saw a similar comment regarding another topic. Bloodshed and violence is not necessary for reforms. That might have happened that way in Europe and the U.S., but that's a bad thing and it was very volatile. What's going to happen afterwards? Millions of pissed of people, who remember which of their allies were killed and who want to take revenge. That will be the outcome for the next decades. A state of permanent violence.
|
The White House said Sunday it had "very little doubt" that the Syrian government was responsible for a chemical assault that killed hundreds of civilians, as U.N. inspectors prepared to access the site of the attack.
Syrian state television reported that the regime of Bashar al-Assad has now assented to international experts going to the Damascus suburb purported to have been hit by deadly nerve gas. A U.N. fact-finding visit is slated for Monday.
But a senior Obama administration official treated the Syrian decision with skepticism, saying it was "too late to be credible."
"If the Syrian government had nothing to hide and wanted to prove to the world that it had not used chemical weapons in this incident, it would have ceased its attacks on the area and granted immediate access to the UN - five days ago," the official said on condition of anonymity.
The developments come amid heightened tension between the Syrian regime and the wider international community, with the U.S. said to have Naval ships edging towards the strife-torn country as President Barack Obama weighs his options.
Earlier Sunday, U.S. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said the U.S. military was ready to take action against Syria if needed.
Source
|
It just shows what a resounding success corporate manipulation of popular media has been when no one in the debate is familiar with Eisenhower's closing speech of his presidency, but everyone thinks that a government is a group of people acting in the best interests of people they share no demographic links with.
Seriously, this whole thread is basically comprised of people who shouldn't even go near politics until they've at least read a couple of history books.
|
Royal Navy vessels are being readied to take part in a possible series of cruise missile strikes, alongside the United States, as military commanders finalise a list of potential targets. Government sources said talks between the Prime Minister and international leaders, including Barack Obama, would continue, but that any military action that was agreed could begin within the next week.
A Royal Navy nuclear-powered submarine is said to be in the region while a number of warships recently left Britain for exercises in the Mediterranean. Commanders may also need to make use of the RAF base at Akrotiri, Cyprus for air support. If military action is approved, the first wave of missiles could start within a week. Military sources suggested the early hours of the 2011 campaign against Col Muammar Gaddafi could form a template for any operation. The Libya campaign began with a blitz of Tomahawk cruise missiles from US warships and from a British Trafalgar Class submarine. The Royal Navy declined to comment on the current positions of its submarines, but they regularly pass through the area on their way to the Suez Canal. America’s Sixth Fleet currently has four guided missile destroyers in the area, each of which could join the attack. The Royal Navy also has its rapid response task force in the Mediterranean. The group includes two frigates and the helicopter carrier HMS Illustrious.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/10265765/Navy-ready-to-launch-first-strike-on-Syria.html
|
@stealth
didn't this exact thing happen back in may, ending up with the un accusing the rebels of using sarin gas?
|
On August 26 2013 06:57 nunez wrote: @stealth
didn't this exact thing happen back in may, ending up with the un accusing the rebels of using sarin gas?
a member of UN team accused the rebels but then back tracked, and 20 people or so died that time while up to 1200 people have died this time.
|
source to the backtracking? must have gone under my radar.
|
you must have quite the telescope. at least it would be pretty obvious where the skepticism towards the US and the UK stems from on that planet.
that's a half-response at best
it's not skepticism towards the US and UK (you left out france wonder why)
it's that skepticism towards the US for way too many people means zero skepticism for any country or person that is against the US
i mean really come on now but people (not you nunez) are honestly, with a straight face, going to accept without skepticism the latest offerings from the kremlin propaganda basement just because those offerings are 1) not from the US and 2) opposing the US
it just boggles my mind
|
If inflation goes up 3%, THEN the Syrians should worry. Until then, posturing about Gibraltar should keep the UK government out of trouble.
|
On August 26 2013 07:47 nunez wrote: source to the backtracking? must have gone under my radar. Never heard of it either
|
Christof Lehmann (nsnbc) ,- Abdola Al-Jaledi, a former high-ranking member of the Jabhat al-Nusrah front has revealed on his Twitter account @abo_almonthir, that his Jabhat al-Nusrah colleagues are in possession of chemical weapons, reports the independent Syrian Dampress Online Journal.
A former member of the al-Qaeda associated, foreign-backed Jabhat al-Nusrah front which is fighting the Syrian Armed Forces in an attempt to oust the Syrian government to establish an Islamic Sharia state, has admitted that Jabhat al-Nusrah is in possession of chemical weapons, to be used in attacks in Syria.
The Syrian Dampress Online Journal reports, that the Saudi Arabian terrorist, Abdola al-Jaledi has recently revealed on his Twitter account, @abo_almonthir, that his colleagues are storing toxic agents.
Al-Jaledi, who is a former, high-ranking member of the Jabhat al-Nusrah has reportedly left the al-Nusrah to continue fighting with another, also al-Qaeda associated brigade.
On his Twitter account, Al-Jaledi apparently said: “If it was not for confidentiality on this matter, I would reveal who was the fighter who made the said chemical bombs”.
Source
The governor of Hama province in central Syria was killed in a car bombing on Sunday, state television reported, in an attack it blamed on rebels.
"Terrorists assassinated Anas Abdel Razzaq al-Naem, the Hama governor, in a car bomb attack in the Jarajma district of Hama," it said.
The council of ministers said that Naem "died as a martyr, killed by criminal gangs."
Naem was appointed to the post in July 2011, four months after the beginning of the revolt against President Bashar al-Assad's regime.
He had replaced Khaled Abdel Aziz, who was sacked by Assad after massive anti-regime protests erupted in the town of Hama, where hundreds of thousands demonstrated against the regime before government troops arrived to crush the protests.
Source
|
On August 26 2013 02:42 DeepElemBlues wrote:Show nested quote +On August 26 2013 02:34 SilverStar wrote:On August 26 2013 02:04 radscorpion9 wrote:Very happy to see the USA and the UK considering taking strong action against Syria. Even though it took awhile, finally the US and its allies may end Assad's brutal dictatorship and the continued massacre of his own population rising up against him. Its sad to see so many people here believing what Assad has been saying because of some pre-existing bias against the US, but thankfully it won't impact the important decisions being made. Transition to a democratic government will clearly be painful, but I'm glad that we are helping our fellow human beings work towards this end rather than leaving them to a civil war that could continue to terrorize the entire region for a decade or more. This is a very positive development. Its just depressing that I feel like I'm in the minority in this thread now. Everyone has all these conspiracy theories that the US is behind everything  You mean when USA / UK presented false evidence and then invaded Iraq killing many civilians in the process? I'm not sure how terrorists killing 60%+ of the dead civilians in Iraq (which is of course blamed on the US because if the US is involved all responsibility automatically devolves upon Washington) gives Bashar al-Assad a free pass to slaughter Syrian civilians with or without poison gas.
Seeing as Iraq had hardly any problem with terrorism before (and Saddam wasn't massacring civilians left and right, either), and now it turned into a terrorism hellhole, full of sectarian violence, I don't see how this can't be blamed entirely on the USA. They turned a relatively stable dictatorship into a volatile war zone...
Also, don't forget about the casualties of the US sanctions. Namely, 100-500 thousand children dying from starvation, disease or such since 1990. And I seriously doubt that terrorists attacks consitute 60% of death. Americans are known to cover up their death toll - like with drone strikes in Pakistan, where they changed the definition of "enemy combatant" (or whatever they called them, precisely) in order to significantly lower the civilian death count.
|
Foreign minister: Turkey would join any coalition against Syria, even if a consensus is not reached at the UN Security Council - @Reuters
Assad: Failure awaits the US if it attempts to intervene in Syria - @guardian
France: No decision has yet been made to take military action against Syria; all options are open - @Reuters
Russia is deeply concerned over possible US military action in Syria; urges restraint: RIA cites Lavrov - @Reuters
White House official disputes British press reports that Obama and Cameron agreed on intervention in Syria in call yesterday - @markknoller
|
|
It's a fight between a dictator, and Islamic forces armed by an Americano-Zionist coalition which aim to destabilize the regime. There's absolutely no moral reason to intervene in this mess, even admitting a low usage of Sarin gaz by either parties. There might be Zionist or geopolitical interests though.
|
The 2009 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to U.S. President Barack Obama :3 What peace is this?
It looks like USA in last few years got more wars, than USSR in period after WW2 and untill 1990. And they want more, like World Eaters from Warhammer40k - BLOOD, BLOOD!11 Maim kill burn, maim kill burn, Kill Kill KILL!
But i like how US propaganda works, smooth and perfect, like they have Joseph Goebbels helping them.
|
|
|
|