EPT[M] The Dark Knight Rises (SPOILERS) - Page 101
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
GenesisX
Canada4267 Posts
| ||
|
hummingbird23
Norway359 Posts
| ||
|
corumjhaelen
France6884 Posts
On January 01 2013 05:34 ghrur wrote: Because it really doesn't make sense. If you give TDKR a 2/10, what do you give something like Catwoman, The Box, or The Grudge or some of those other terrible movies that come out every year? a -3/10? I can see 4/10 making sense if someone thinks it's average or slightly below average, but 2/10 is like... terrible. Among the worst movies ever, and I don't think it fits that at all. Maybe this guy consider it that bad ? Why not after all, it's no nearly as ridiculous as people giving it a ten and calling it the best movie ever... On January 01 2013 16:39 sc2superfan101 wrote: yeah that's exactly how I do it. I like to look at movies as if they are a homework project, and I grade them accordingly. 70% is average, 80% is above average, 90% is excellent. 100% is the Big Lebowski. for me, if the movie is a 5/10 or below it's an utter failure, with almost zero redeeming qualities. only thing worse is a "Did not complete assignment" (Mystery Science Theater 3000 status) I use this same scale for all ratings, including girls. if a girl is a 5/10 she's pretty horrendous. Oh ok, that starts to make sense. In France, a 10/20 is passing, and 14/20 is already pretty fucking good. I think this system makes more sense, at least for rating movie, because you get to use to full scale instead of only half of it... | ||
|
TheRealArtemis
687 Posts
Mine is (imdb style) 1-4 (pretty bad movie, though if it scores a 4, it had some entertainment value) e.g. looper, spiderman, star wars, phantom menace. 5-6 (average movie, not bad, but certainly not good. had certain stuff I liked, like narative, story, universe etc.) e.g. the counterfeiters, dark knight rises, prometheus, 7 (good movie, nice actors, decent plot. was missing something or had a terrible ending in order for it to score higher) e.g. do the right thing, 12 monkeys, the bucket list, the fugative 8-9 (Very good to excelent movie. Pretty much had everything to make a really really good movie with nice depth) e.g. Goodfellas, life is beatifull, unforgiven, changeling 10 (fav movies) e.g. Memories of murder, tonari no totoro, Heat Thats the scale I rate movies at imdb. ^^ To me it works | ||
|
Recognizable
Netherlands1552 Posts
On January 01 2013 07:46 alQahira wrote: I think people's ratings systems are biased by how grades in school work. So a 6/10 is like a D, or pretty terrible. That's why most people give bad movies 5s or 6s (I think). Agreed. But I believe 6/10 is a C right? | ||
|
zJayy962
1363 Posts
On January 02 2013 03:00 Recognizable wrote: Agreed. But I believe 6/10 is a C right? In America a 65% is a D. anything under is an F. | ||
|
Recognizable
Netherlands1552 Posts
On January 02 2013 03:36 zJayy962 wrote: In America a 65% is a D. anything under is an F. But like 90% is an A right? And a D is pretty terrible which is 65%, well that's the assumption I make from his post. Weird scale. | ||
|
RandomAccount#49059
United States2140 Posts
| ||
|
Recognizable
Netherlands1552 Posts
On January 02 2013 04:44 stormtemplar wrote: D's are 60-65% depending on the school, and yes a D is pretty bad. A 5/10 is an F, which is absolutely horrible. My rating system is something like 9-10: Really good 8-9:Good 7-8: Okay 6-7: Watchable 5-6: Bad 1-5: Horrible I agree it's probably because of how they grade in the US. I'd put this movie as an 8.5. Hmmm. A 6/10 in my country isn't bad; 6.5 is the average grade. But that probably has to do with the different high school systems. | ||
|
sambo400
United States378 Posts
| ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On January 02 2013 04:55 Recognizable wrote: Hmmm. A 6/10 in my country isn't bad; 6.5 is the average grade. But that probably has to do with the different high school systems. The US has its weirdly top-heavy scale, but it compensates by giving marks incredibly easily. British system (O/A levels) is based at 70% A, 60% B, 50% C, below that D E F on 5% intervals, all of which are failing grades. So I agree, I imagine my personal rating system would be similar - I'd pretty much never give 10/10, 8 or 9/10 is really good, and it'd take below 5/10 to really be bad. | ||
|
Recognizable
Netherlands1552 Posts
On January 02 2013 04:59 Dfgj wrote: The US has its weirdly top-heavy scale, but it compensates by giving marks incredibly easily. British system (O/A levels) is based at 70% A, 60% B, 50% C, below that D E F on 5% intervals, all of which are failing grades. So I agree, I imagine my personal rating system would be similar - I'd pretty much never give 10/10, 8 or 9/10 is really good, and it'd take below 5/10 to really be bad. 70% an A at A-levels? Looking at your A-level Physics test, maybe I should apply to English university's :p. However, what do you do with everything above 70% you get A+ and what happens then? | ||
|
Vaelone
Finland4400 Posts
I did not see the Miranda plot-twist coming although I guessed that there was something off with Bane being supposedly the child that escaped. Didn't really feel like a Batman movie with Bat himself being either crippled or jailed most of the movie. Anyway it provided solid entertainment for me, not the best movie ever but it's a super hero movie after all... | ||
|
Aerisky
United States12129 Posts
Perhaps people should be encouraged to give a brief description of their rating system before they drop the grade; it would clear up a lot of the confusion with regard to differences in everyone's systems :D | ||
|
Dfgj
Singapore5922 Posts
On January 02 2013 05:16 Recognizable wrote: 70% an A at A-levels? Looking at your A-level Physics test, maybe I should apply to English university's :p. However, what do you do with everything above 70% you get A+ and what happens then? Things get curved after that (often a lot, depending on the cohort), but that's a baseline! The rest of the space on the scale gives you options for still getting the full score but improving your work and comparing students. I found it annoying when I came to the US that every 'A' student occupied the same few percentages and there was no real way to recognize any difference within or past that, particularly because I feel that a student can fulfill all his expectations and be rewarded with the highest grade bracket but still have work to do. So I'd say an 8/10 movie fulfilled my expectations and I would be thoroughly pleased, while it still has potential space to be even better. As for TDKR: I enjoyed it but found there to be some parts that could use some work, mainly what's been mentioned time and time again in the thread. I'd give it around a 7/10 - a good movie, worth seeing, but with some flaws. | ||
|
sc4k
United Kingdom5454 Posts
| ||
|
TheSwedishFan
Sweden608 Posts
| ||
|
Mortal
2943 Posts
| ||
|
Sajaki
Canada1135 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17609 Posts
On January 03 2013 01:29 Sajaki wrote: 5/10 or 6/10. Fails in the shadow of the Dark Knight with a hectic plot, poor character development, mediocre acting and bland action. It was too long for the amount of "relevant" content, too many subplots (undeveloped at that), and most importantly it failed to deliver a powerful emotional experience. It's saving grace is while it has a lot of flaws, it doesn't utterly fail in any one thing, making it just a long, average grade film. DK had some pretty hectic plot and character development too. Joker seems like he's been gifted with awesome powers of precognition, especially after his line: "Do I look like a guy with a plan?". For a guy with no plan, he tends to create pretty elaborate schemes with tight timings, numerous failsafes and what not. He's a step ahead of everyone all the time, coincidence? Doesn't change the fact that TDKR was pretty bad (and I still think that Burton's Batman > Nolan's Batman). | ||
| ||
