• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 04:25
CEST 10:25
KST 17:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver4[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down0StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon97Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon?175Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)9
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon How do you feel about the StarCraft shooter announcement at BlizzCon 2026? Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Blizzard Classic Cup @ BlizzCon 2026 - $100k prize pool
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament KSL Week #92
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 542 The Ascended Mutation # 541 Binary Choice
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! Official StarCraft website teases new content ahead of BlizzCon? [D] Brainstorming a balance patch for Brood war Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game [ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro16 Group D [ASL22] Ro16 Group C [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group B
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread EVE Corporation Diablo IV [Maplestory Hardcore] Let's Play~!!
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread UK Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Virtual Romance, Real-Life C…
TrAiDoS
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 5809 users

NASA and the Private Sector - Page 210

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 208 209 210 211 212 250 Next
Keep debates civil.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2021-12-29 20:27:36
December 29 2021 20:26 GMT
#4181
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
December 29 2021 21:36 GMT
#4182
Whoa.

The U.S. government has requested that Max Polyakov, a wealthy Ukrainian tech entrepreneur, sell his stake in the rocket company Firefly Aerospace Inc., citing national security concerns.

Firefly, a private rocket maker based near Austin, Texas, has been backed for several years by Polyakov, who built a software empire in Ukraine. Government and aerospace industry officials have expressed objections to Polyakov’s control of the company amid fears that valuable technology could make its way to Ukraine, Russia or other nations trying to develop rocket programs. Despite putting more than $200 million of his fortune into Firefly, Polyakov agreed to step down from the company’s board and Firefly’s day-to-day activities in late 2020 to help make it easier for the company to win U.S. government and military contracts and ease some of the underlying tensions.

In late November, however, Polyakov received a letter from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S., or CFIUS, that called out national security worries and requested that Polyakov and his investment firm Noosphere Venture Partners sell off their roughly 50% stake in Firefly. Polyakov agreed to this demand, according to his spokespeople, while maintaining that his ownership of Firefly poses no national security threats. “Noosphere Ventures announced today that it intends to retain an investment banking firm to assist in the sale of Noosphere Ventures’ ownership interest in Firefly Aerospace,” Polyakov’s company said in a statement.

While educated as an obstetrician-gynecologist, Polyakov made his fortune through business software ventures and internet gaming, dating and marketing sites. He rescued Firefly from bankruptcy in 2017 and poured money into the company to revitalize it. In September, Firefly conducted its first rocket launch from Vandenberg Space Force Base in Southern California. The rocket didn’t reach orbit but performed well for an initial launch, and the company has been racing to fire up a second one.

The U.S. government halted Firefly’s current rocket launch operations at Vandenberg as the ownership issue with Polyakov plays out, according to two people familiar with the situation. The clashes between Polyakov and the U.S. haven’t been previously reported.

Polyakov has said he had dreamed of turning Firefly into a massive aerospace company that could benefit both the U.S. and Ukraine. During the Soviet era, Ukraine produced some of the world’s best rocket and engine technology, but much of those inventions have languished in recent years due to lack of investment. The hope was that Firefly could pair its best engineers from the U.S. and Ukraine together to make a fleet of large rockets capable of taking many satellites into orbit and later on missions to the moon. Polyakov wanted the U.S. to gain access to Ukrainian expertise, while also finding a way to boost the prospects of Ukrainian aerospace engineers, he has said.

Firefly made steady progress over the past couple of years. The company won contracts from NASA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency and the U.S. Air Force for various missions. It also obtained a technology sharing agreement between Ukraine and the U.S. The company has a large rocket manufacturing and testing operation in Central Texas and had operated a subsidiary in Ukraine to help with technology development.

While Ukraine is an ally of the U.S., its ongoing conflict with Russia has increased worries about what might happen to valuable technology inside of the country. Russia has been building up forces at the Ukrainian border, heightening fears that it will invade the country.

In November of 2020, Polyakov stepped down from Firefly’s board and then in May of 2021, he sold off a large chunk of his stake in Firefly, as the company raised $75 million and obtained a valuation of more than $1 billion. These moves, along with the appointment of former government officials to Firefly’s board, were meant to open the way for more government contracts. Polyakov pulled back from the company and has said he was leaving all of the business and technology decisions to Firefly Chief Executive Officer Tom Markusic, who previously worked at NASA and Elon Musk’s Space Exploration Technologies Corp.

“Dr. Polyakov and his companies were extensively vetted, and no security issue was identified,” Noosphere Ventures said in its statement. “Noosphere Ventures and Dr. Polyakov understand that CFIUS’s actions come amid rising tensions between Ukraine and Russia. Noosphere Ventures is working diligently to address CFIUS’s concerns in the most efficient and appropriate manner possible.” A spokesperson for the U.S. Treasury Department, which chairs CFIUS, declined to comment. A representative for Markusic didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Polyakov sits among the likes of Elon Musk and Jeff Bezos as the individuals who have risked huge portions of their personal fortunes on commercializing space. Firefly makes what is considered a mid-sized rocket capable of flying dozens of satellites into orbit on each launch. The company also has plans for a lunar lander and later a spaceplane.

Polyakov had moved his family to Silicon Valley and, in multiple interviews over the years, had characterized his large investment in Firefly as a patriotic gesture for the U.S. He voiced fears, which others in the aerospace industry shared, that Ukranian technology could make its way to North Korea, Iran or other enemies of the U.S. without an infusion of money and interest in the local aerospace industry.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 03 2022 16:38 GMT
#4183
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 03 2022 22:06 GMT
#4184
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 04 2022 00:56 GMT
#4185
It appears NASA is way ahead of schedule...

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-04 17:21:10
January 04 2022 17:14 GMT
#4186
Now what?

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-05 11:51:03
January 05 2022 11:45 GMT
#4187
So apparently the JWST still isn't done transforming into its full self. Not even to the half way point.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9064 Posts
January 05 2022 16:41 GMT
#4188
I hope that thing lasts forever. The hype is real.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-05 17:28:18
January 05 2022 16:48 GMT
#4189
It won't it has to be refueled in about a decade, which is why NASA has asked the private sector to come up with ways to launch a mission to get to it to one day and refuel or worse fix it.
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9064 Posts
January 05 2022 19:58 GMT
#4190
On January 06 2022 01:48 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
It won't it has to be refueled in about a decade, which is why NASA has asked the private sector to come up with ways to launch a mission to get to it to one day and refuel or worse fix it.

That was taken into account with my comment. Hopefully someone can figure out a way to do that and this thing surpasses the Hubble. I'm expecting to see some amazing images and data from the JWST so I just want it to last a very long time.
Jockmcplop
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
United Kingdom9999 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-05 20:05:23
January 05 2022 20:05 GMT
#4191
On January 06 2022 04:58 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2022 01:48 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
It won't it has to be refueled in about a decade, which is why NASA has asked the private sector to come up with ways to launch a mission to get to it to one day and refuel or worse fix it.

That was taken into account with my comment. Hopefully someone can figure out a way to do that and this thing surpasses the Hubble. I'm expecting to see some amazing images and data from the JWST so I just want it to last a very long time.

I don't know if we will see Hubble level images, because it isn't analyzing in the visual spectrum.
Any images would have to be extremely heavily processed.
I think new physics and cosmology developments to do with the extremely early stage of the universe is the priority, rather than spectacular images.
RIP Meatloaf <3
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9064 Posts
January 05 2022 23:32 GMT
#4192
On January 06 2022 05:05 Jockmcplop wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 06 2022 04:58 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On January 06 2022 01:48 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
It won't it has to be refueled in about a decade, which is why NASA has asked the private sector to come up with ways to launch a mission to get to it to one day and refuel or worse fix it.

That was taken into account with my comment. Hopefully someone can figure out a way to do that and this thing surpasses the Hubble. I'm expecting to see some amazing images and data from the JWST so I just want it to last a very long time.

I don't know if we will see Hubble level images, because it isn't analyzing in the visual spectrum.
Any images would have to be extremely heavily processed.
I think new physics and cosmology developments to do with the extremely early stage of the universe is the priority, rather than spectacular images.

Any image that is taken from deep space is heavily processed. It just depends on what they're looking for. The data returned will allow them to better understand the chemical makeup of early stage universe and compositions of planets. That will then allow them to model more accurately what planets they come across and other star clusters. So you can expect them to get more information on gaseous nebulas to get a better chemical understanding and then we could potentially see either updated renders or something completely different.

I agree that the primary mission isn't to give us Hubble quality images, but for them to continually market it as a replacement for Hubble, they should/could also deliver us spectacular images. If they're not going to do that, then I would like them to start on a true Hubble replacement because delivering images of deep space cannot stop. IMHO.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 07 2022 00:25 GMT
#4193
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-08 18:21:04
January 08 2022 17:02 GMT
#4194


"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 10 2022 16:05 GMT
#4195
If this thing manages to work then the Engineers that designed and built this thing will be able to write their own ticket anywhere in the World.

"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Lmui
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada6223 Posts
January 10 2022 16:19 GMT
#4196
Some really good news about Webb.

Because of how good the performance from Ariane was, the lifespan of Webb before refueling is over 20 years. The odds of us having a good way to refuel it, or even outright replace it (Assuming starship or any other big rocket is available in 20 years) is a pretty good bet.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/01/all-hail-the-ariane-5-rocket-which-doubled-the-webb-telescopes-lifetime/
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9064 Posts
January 10 2022 17:16 GMT
#4197
On January 11 2022 01:19 Lmui wrote:
Some really good news about Webb.

Because of how good the performance from Ariane was, the lifespan of Webb before refueling is over 20 years. The odds of us having a good way to refuel it, or even outright replace it (Assuming starship or any other big rocket is available in 20 years) is a pretty good bet.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/01/all-hail-the-ariane-5-rocket-which-doubled-the-webb-telescopes-lifetime/

That's dope. If you can place it further into orbit and save it from burning as much fuel, then that fuel can be used to keep it alive longer. I didn't know a lot about the Ariane 5 but it's good that it overdelivered on launching the JWST. Waiting for summer to come to get any information is going to be harsh lol.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
January 10 2022 18:09 GMT
#4198
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Lmui
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada6223 Posts
Last Edited: 2022-01-10 19:36:47
January 10 2022 19:36 GMT
#4199
On January 11 2022 02:16 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2022 01:19 Lmui wrote:
Some really good news about Webb.

Because of how good the performance from Ariane was, the lifespan of Webb before refueling is over 20 years. The odds of us having a good way to refuel it, or even outright replace it (Assuming starship or any other big rocket is available in 20 years) is a pretty good bet.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/01/all-hail-the-ariane-5-rocket-which-doubled-the-webb-telescopes-lifetime/

That's dope. If you can place it further into orbit and save it from burning as much fuel, then that fuel can be used to keep it alive longer. I didn't know a lot about the Ariane 5 but it's good that it overdelivered on launching the JWST. Waiting for summer to come to get any information is going to be harsh lol.


It's not just how much power it had, it's how precisely it delivered the power. The design of Webb meant that it could not, under any circumstance overshoot the L2 insertion. If it did, there is no way to turn Webb around and decelerate the vehicle. This meant Ariane needed to undershoot the L2 value, and have Webb's thrusters do the precision work. Ariane's engineers put the very best of the best into the vehicle, resulting in tighter error bounds for the vehicle than would otherwise be possible. That's paid off handsomely in getting it basically within spitting distance, so Webb had pretty much twice as much propellant as they were hoping for.
ZerOCoolSC2
Profile Blog Joined February 2015
9064 Posts
January 11 2022 02:01 GMT
#4200
On January 11 2022 04:36 Lmui wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2022 02:16 ZerOCoolSC2 wrote:
On January 11 2022 01:19 Lmui wrote:
Some really good news about Webb.

Because of how good the performance from Ariane was, the lifespan of Webb before refueling is over 20 years. The odds of us having a good way to refuel it, or even outright replace it (Assuming starship or any other big rocket is available in 20 years) is a pretty good bet.

https://arstechnica.com/science/2022/01/all-hail-the-ariane-5-rocket-which-doubled-the-webb-telescopes-lifetime/

That's dope. If you can place it further into orbit and save it from burning as much fuel, then that fuel can be used to keep it alive longer. I didn't know a lot about the Ariane 5 but it's good that it overdelivered on launching the JWST. Waiting for summer to come to get any information is going to be harsh lol.


It's not just how much power it had, it's how precisely it delivered the power. The design of Webb meant that it could not, under any circumstance overshoot the L2 insertion. If it did, there is no way to turn Webb around and decelerate the vehicle. This meant Ariane needed to undershoot the L2 value, and have Webb's thrusters do the precision work. Ariane's engineers put the very best of the best into the vehicle, resulting in tighter error bounds for the vehicle than would otherwise be possible. That's paid off handsomely in getting it basically within spitting distance, so Webb had pretty much twice as much propellant as they were hoping for.

I wonder if the Ariane group had the same design philosophy (or most other space outfits for that matter) as SpaceX, where would they be at the moment? I know they do a lot of launches, but I haven't heard of their heavy lift vehicles or any other plans besides the 5. If they have precision like this, then I can only imagine if they took to making larger vehicles for more ambitious projects.
Prev 1 208 209 210 211 212 250 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 35m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 459
PianO 192
Soma 185
Zeus 101
soO 87
Killer 61
sSak 53
Larva 28
sorry 26
Bale 23
[ Show more ]
JulyZerg 14
Terrorterran 4
Britney 0
Dota 2
ODPixel466
League of Legends
JimRising 430
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss941
olofmeister518
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King117
Other Games
summit1g11601
Grubby3230
ceh9628
Happy330
kaitlyn20
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick899
BasetradeTV61
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH305
• LUISG 16
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• iopq 4
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2169
League of Legends
• Rush1320
• Lourlo1000
• Jankos856
• Stunt462
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
1h 35m
Snow vs Shinee
Shine vs EffOrt
GSL
2h 35m
PiGosaur Cup
15h 35m
The PondCast
1d 1h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 15h
KCM Race Survival
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
GSL
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
GSL
5 days
Shopify Rebellion Sundays
5 days
Spirit vs Mixu
Replay Cast
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Monday Night Weeklies
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-09-14
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Calamity Invitational
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSA
Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
SC4ALL II: Brood War
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.