So his study was pointing out the average attractive person for race A is different for race B. with his compositions being there to exemplify what he was saying "the golden ratio idea is imperfect because different races have differing attractive ideals" "look at some example compositions i made - they all look different and favour different features"
Ideal Face types for some races, thoughts? - Page 6
Forum Index > General Forum |
TabyLing
Australia69 Posts
So his study was pointing out the average attractive person for race A is different for race B. with his compositions being there to exemplify what he was saying "the golden ratio idea is imperfect because different races have differing attractive ideals" "look at some example compositions i made - they all look different and favour different features" | ||
hsidori
United States116 Posts
http://soda-sybaris.quirk.biz/img.q?accountCode=QUIR01IA&id=3055 | ||
lindn
Sweden833 Posts
| ||
Wonderballs
Canada253 Posts
maybe I just don't know what the SC acronym means. | ||
Zhek
Canada342 Posts
| ||
omgbbq2
Canada169 Posts
![]() | ||
bumatlarge
United States4567 Posts
| ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
On October 25 2010 00:56 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Oh, I misunderstood the title. I thought it was asking what the stereotypical Zerg player would look like, or Terran player, or Protoss player. *Those* races, rather than Earth races. Your topic is very interesting, though I'd like to see what the stereotypical StarCraft-race players would look like too ![]() hAhha me too!! protoss ![]() zerg ![]() terran ![]() | ||
evanthebouncy!
United States12796 Posts
On October 25 2010 02:15 Slow Motion wrote: Stop complaining I would do all those faces. w3rd!! | ||
Applecakes
Australia319 Posts
Also amusing is the use of the word "race". Using the word "race" implies some kind of fundamental biological difference - rather than mere aesthetic variance. A more sincere title for the article should be something like "idealisation of beauty amongst different social groups". It may just be a translation so what I say could be be wrong. But I've heard some strange things about, for example, Chinese school biology textbooks which state the Chinese people have different origins from other "races" - something proven false by modern genetic analysis. | ||
snorlax
United States755 Posts
| ||
![]()
Rekrul
Korea (South)17174 Posts
| ||
Vz0
Canada378 Posts
The "perfect" face of course will never be perfect so long as humans have inaccurate perception so I think it is quite genius of this professor to branch it off to ethnicities. | ||
Railxp
Hong Kong1313 Posts
On October 25 2010 08:15 Supamang wrote: I agree, its kind of strange to lump all white and black people together but then separate 3 asian groups. but its even stranger that you go off and essentially say "chinese, japanese, and koreans all look the same" while protesting the generalization of racial appearances. So which is it? Do all races have significant national subcategories or just the non-east Asian ones? Or do no races have an significant subcategories? Oh and if thats the test that I think it is, that test is a little flawed. The sample size is less than 20 TOTAL people, not even just in those racial subcategories. Furthermore, with a sample size that small he could easily pick and choose those who looks are ambiguous, though I doubt he would go through the trouble to do this. You could probably do this with white people or black people, hispanics, or whatever and get the same result. I'm not protesting the generalization of all racial appearances. Nordic faces generally have higher cheek bones, deeper eye sockets, larger noses than asian faces. Asian including east and south asia. Undeniably, faces can be grouped into different types of "stuff that looks the same." Just that there is no difference between korea/chinese/japanese, but there sure is a difference from asia/whiteppl (putting aside skin color). To raise an analogy, there are plenty of colors in a color spectrum, and those colors are clearly different, but the boundaries between each color are subtle and blurry. But at the end of the day blue is very different from red. I'm saying hes picking out three reds and then calling everything else "dark colors" and "light colors". | ||
Sworn
Canada920 Posts
| ||
kindle139
United States128 Posts
| ||
johanngrunt
Hong Kong1555 Posts
That aside. The Chinese one is smoking 0.0 | ||
Latham
9555 Posts
| ||
nayumi
Australia6499 Posts
| ||
Grumbaki
Belgium141 Posts
| ||
| ||