• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 10:53
CET 16:53
KST 00:53
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10
Community News
[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win2RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket13Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge2[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation14
StarCraft 2
General
When will we find out if there are more tournament Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA Weekly Cups (Nov 10-16): Reynor, Solar lead Zerg surge RSL Season 3: RO16 results & RO8 bracket
Tourneys
Tenacious Turtle Tussle [Alpha Pro Series] Nice vs Cure RSL Revival: Season 3 $5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death
Brood War
General
Data analysis on 70 million replays Which season is the best in ASL? sas.vorti stream [BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D) FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group B - Sun 21:00 CET [BSL21] GosuLeague T1 Ro16 - Tue & Thu 22:00 CET [BSL21] RO16 Tie Breaker - Group A - Sat 21:00 CET
Strategy
Game Theory for Starcraft How to stay on top of macro? Current Meta PvZ map balance
Other Games
General Games
The Perfect Game Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Should offensive tower rushing be viable in RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread US Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Where to ask questions and add stream? The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Esports Earnings: Bigger Pri…
TrAiDoS
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2031 users

Mexico's Drug War - Page 45

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 43 44 45 46 47 65 Next
Cloud9157
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2968 Posts
March 17 2013 12:48 GMT
#881
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.
"Are you absolutely sure that armor only affects the health portion of a protoss army??? That doesn't sound right to me. source?" -Some idiot
HunterX11
Profile Joined March 2009
United States1048 Posts
March 17 2013 12:54 GMT
#882
On March 17 2013 21:48 Cloud9157 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.


People already do get their hands on them, and it is a catastrophe. That's the problem.
Try using both Irradiate and Defensive Matrix on an Overlord. It looks pretty neat.
Arnstein
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway3381 Posts
March 17 2013 13:01 GMT
#883
On March 17 2013 21:48 Cloud9157 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.


People already get their hands on them, the difference would be that the state would get the money, not the criminal drug cartels, and the government could make drug-programs to help people who are addicted etc.
rsol in response to the dragoon voice being heard in SCII: dragoon ai reaches new lows: wanders into wrong game
Cloud9157
Profile Joined December 2010
United States2968 Posts
March 17 2013 13:07 GMT
#884
On March 17 2013 21:54 HunterX11 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 21:48 Cloud9157 wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.


People already do get their hands on them, and it is a catastrophe. That's the problem.


So allowing them to be purchased with little difficulty is better? You're eliminating "competition" at the cost of more access to these drugs.
"Are you absolutely sure that armor only affects the health portion of a protoss army??? That doesn't sound right to me. source?" -Some idiot
Mazaire
Profile Joined July 2011
Australia217 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-17 13:49:05
March 17 2013 13:45 GMT
#885


I Thought that this might be relevant. As an outsider looking in, it baffles me that America is currently not looking at legalization models that have succeeded in the rest of the world. Just my 2c. Its obvious that the current system of dealing with drugs is not working and has not been working for a VERY long time. From my angle it looks like it is time to take on the status quo and take a risk on a new model.


On March 17 2013 22:07 Cloud9157 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 21:54 HunterX11 wrote:
On March 17 2013 21:48 Cloud9157 wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.


People already do get their hands on them, and it is a catastrophe. That's the problem.


So allowing them to be purchased with little difficulty is better? You're eliminating "competition" at the cost of more access to these drugs.



In short, yes. It means that yes the drugs are still available, but the money is going to the government and not drug cartels. Hence you are able to start pouring money into fixing the problem you otherwise would not have. And it makes the the trade not profitable anymore. Put it this way, at the end of the day people are still going to get their hands on these drugs. Its less harmful if there is some kind of control system in place, at the very least. Its the first step to solving the problem.
"No matter what event you go to there are so many koreans, like a swarm. Even if you beat three or four, there are like 10 others waiting." - Socke
HunterX11
Profile Joined March 2009
United States1048 Posts
March 17 2013 19:52 GMT
#886
On March 17 2013 22:07 Cloud9157 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 21:54 HunterX11 wrote:
On March 17 2013 21:48 Cloud9157 wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.


People already do get their hands on them, and it is a catastrophe. That's the problem.


So allowing them to be purchased with little difficulty is better? You're eliminating "competition" at the cost of more access to these drugs.


Actually, even going so far as actively facilitating existing drug use in a controlled environment the case of heroin is empirically better as long as you consider a reduction in human suffering and death to be better.
Try using both Irradiate and Defensive Matrix on an Overlord. It looks pretty neat.
Alala-P
Profile Joined June 2012
34 Posts
March 17 2013 19:57 GMT
#887
My personal opinion, just do what they've done in singapore.

less addicts and less drugs its a win win. instead of legalising and having to deal with the consequences.
OuchyDathurts
Profile Joined September 2010
United States4588 Posts
March 17 2013 20:01 GMT
#888
On March 18 2013 04:57 Alala-P wrote:
My personal opinion, just do what they've done in singapore.

less addicts and less drugs its a win win. instead of legalising and having to deal with the consequences.


Yes, mandatory death penalties and life imprisonment, amazing ideas. I don't think we have enough people in prison in the US!
LiquidDota Staff
Copymizer
Profile Joined November 2010
Denmark2096 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-17 20:25:49
March 17 2013 20:24 GMT
#889
America have TONS of guns and they're legal to own. mexico below has TONS of drugs and they're illegal, same with guns. i mean that's REALLY a bad mix. not to mention america produces so much ammunition too. Like he said in the vice video, they market for drugs is in america and the market for guns is in mexico.
~~Yo man ! MBCGame HERO Fighting !! Holy check !
BEARDiaguz
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
Australia2362 Posts
March 17 2013 20:28 GMT
#890
On March 18 2013 05:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2013 04:57 Alala-P wrote:
My personal opinion, just do what they've done in singapore.

less addicts and less drugs its a win win. instead of legalising and having to deal with the consequences.


Yes, mandatory death penalties and life imprisonment, amazing ideas. I don't think we have enough people in prison in the US!


Hey if you actively kill them through the death penalty you'll empty them out pretty quick!
ProgamerAustralian alcohol user follow @iaguzSC2
freewareplayer
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany403 Posts
March 17 2013 20:44 GMT
#891
On March 17 2013 21:48 Cloud9157 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?


You want to legalize some of the most addicting and destructive drugs known to the world? You must have a death wish for this country. Allowing people to get their hands on drugs like heroin will be a catastrophe.

please inform yourself about this topic, just look at countries who decriminalized drugs for personal use, and then look at what it did to them.

People who didnt bother informing themself yet call legalizing a "death wish for a country" are arguably part of why that problem exists in the first place...
iamthedave
Profile Joined February 2011
England2814 Posts
March 17 2013 21:07 GMT
#892
On March 17 2013 17:30 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 16:26 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
On March 17 2013 14:13 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:57 Influ wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Doing something good like fighting communism, terrorists weapons of mass destruction? I wish I could read something like that and still take people seriously.

First of all, Mexico is an allied country of the US, not an enemy, as the countries associated with your claim were. Right away, your snide remark falls through.
Continuing, the intent of that was never fighting communism, terrorists, or WMDs (the WMDs are a pure lie at that). The intent was imperialism. That other stuff was an excuse. However, there is some merit to the terrorism part in regards to Afghanistan.

If the intent of an incursion into Mexico was purely to remove the cartels without all the US corporate and political-instituted hegemony, as I specifically stated, it would be a very good cause, one practically unseen in history, since military conflict is almost always fought in the nation's own interest.

Let's not be ironic though. It took 75 years (since the official founding of Germany) and countless wars started and/or instigated by the Germans until war, destruction, and genocide, unseen in modern history, by Germany finally came to an end. This isn't even speaking on the various Germanic kingdoms before unification.

On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?

Theoretically, from the pot advocacy camp, would this happen. If it were true, action would have been taken long ago. Also, fyi, the cartels are based in Mexico, not the US. Even if it did affect their US operations by some margin, their operations in Mexico and everywhere else would be perfectly fine.

On March 17 2013 11:08 Jago wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

Attempts at overwhelming and killing off the cartels have been going on for what, 30 years now? How many more decades will it take for goverments to realize that it doesn't matter how many cartel members you kill and/or put in jail, because for as long as it is profitable new people will always step up.

Umm the overwhelming has been attempted by Mexico, the very country run by the cartels, meaning, nothing has been done. No action in Mexico has been taken by the US, and that's the kind of action that would make any sort of difference.

The only solution is a US force to annihilate the cartels and restore Mexican government to a position of stability and control such that any budding attempt at cartels are easily extinguished. Otherwise, Mexico is fucked for good.

That's a little insane. And to respond to your mid section, no. The cartels have something like 90% of their drugs going into the United States. This means that they would lose 90% of their business if it were legalized in the US. It doesn't matter where the business is based if the place you are selling isn't interested or has legal alternatives. You would functionally cut off their entire money supply.

And killing all of them is a stupid solution. Remember when the US dismantled the Medellin and Cali cartels? New cartels took their place. If there is a demand and there is money to be made someone is going to try to meet that demand and get rich.

THEIR drugs still come in. It just makes business a lot easier for them, which empowers them further. You're imagining that the cartels would suddenly lose out to someone else. No, they would adapt and keep their monopoly.

Killing them off is not a stupid solution. You don't defeat a problem by pulling out a couple weeds. That doesn't solve anything at all. Complete elimination is the resolution. Only by completely wiping them out in one fell swoop and restoring Mexican government can any future cartels be nipped right as they are budding. Taking out a couple while the rest thrive accomplishes nothing, since other cartels still exist to fill in the gap, or facilitate the growth of growing ones. That's why wrecking Medellin and Cali did nothing.


America can't afford that war. It'd get ugly fast, and there'd be a lot of dead soldiers equally as fast, and the war would become unpopular even faster. Not to mention that trying to get all of them would demand guerilla warfare on an unprecedented scale and be rife with the potential for civilian casualties, since the cartels are - obviously - entrenched in ordinary society.

Oh yeah, and there'd just be something new to replace them.

So long as people in America want drugs, there'll be someone in Mexico prepared to sell it to them.
I'm not bad at Starcraft; I just think winning's rude.
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 25 2013 03:20 GMT
#893
The bodies of seven men, all shot in the head as if executed, were found dumped in plastic chairs placed along the side of a street in the Mexican state of Michoacan, authorities have said.

Michoacan's attorney general's office said in a statement on Saturday that the victims had all been shot in the head and placed individually in the sitting position in chairs near a traffic circle in the city of Uruapan.

A placard nailed to one of the bodies with an ice pick reads: "Warning! This will happen to thieves, kidnappers, sex offenders and extortionists".

The office did not provide a motive for the killings.

It comes after seven people were killed in neighbouring Guerrero state when armed men opened fire in a bar in Ciudad Altamirano on Friday evening.

Four civilians and three off-duty federal agents were among those killed.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
aksfjh
Profile Joined November 2010
United States4853 Posts
March 25 2013 03:24 GMT
#894
On March 25 2013 12:20 {CC}StealthBlue wrote:
Show nested quote +
The bodies of seven men, all shot in the head as if executed, were found dumped in plastic chairs placed along the side of a street in the Mexican state of Michoacan, authorities have said.

Michoacan's attorney general's office said in a statement on Saturday that the victims had all been shot in the head and placed individually in the sitting position in chairs near a traffic circle in the city of Uruapan.

A placard nailed to one of the bodies with an ice pick reads: "Warning! This will happen to thieves, kidnappers, sex offenders and extortionists".

The office did not provide a motive for the killings.

It comes after seven people were killed in neighbouring Guerrero state when armed men opened fire in a bar in Ciudad Altamirano on Friday evening.

Four civilians and three off-duty federal agents were among those killed.


Source

Looks kinda like it's escalating on both sides now.
tokicheese
Profile Joined April 2011
Canada739 Posts
March 25 2013 04:02 GMT
#895
On March 18 2013 06:07 iamthedave wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 17 2013 17:30 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 16:26 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:
On March 17 2013 14:13 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:57 Influ wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Doing something good like fighting communism, terrorists weapons of mass destruction? I wish I could read something like that and still take people seriously.

First of all, Mexico is an allied country of the US, not an enemy, as the countries associated with your claim were. Right away, your snide remark falls through.
Continuing, the intent of that was never fighting communism, terrorists, or WMDs (the WMDs are a pure lie at that). The intent was imperialism. That other stuff was an excuse. However, there is some merit to the terrorism part in regards to Afghanistan.

If the intent of an incursion into Mexico was purely to remove the cartels without all the US corporate and political-instituted hegemony, as I specifically stated, it would be a very good cause, one practically unseen in history, since military conflict is almost always fought in the nation's own interest.

Let's not be ironic though. It took 75 years (since the official founding of Germany) and countless wars started and/or instigated by the Germans until war, destruction, and genocide, unseen in modern history, by Germany finally came to an end. This isn't even speaking on the various Germanic kingdoms before unification.

On March 17 2013 10:47 Arnstein wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

At least this time around, the purpose of the violence would be doing something good for a change and solely that, rather than exploitation and conquest. It would certainly be a first in human history.


Isn't legalizing drugs and then outselling the cartels a much better idea?

Theoretically, from the pot advocacy camp, would this happen. If it were true, action would have been taken long ago. Also, fyi, the cartels are based in Mexico, not the US. Even if it did affect their US operations by some margin, their operations in Mexico and everywhere else would be perfectly fine.

On March 17 2013 11:08 Jago wrote:
On March 17 2013 10:03 JudicatorHammurabi wrote:
On March 17 2013 09:38 Jago wrote:
Ah, yes, more violence will solve everything.

A snide and ignorant comment. Unfortunately, overwhelming and killing off the cartels is the only solution.

Attempts at overwhelming and killing off the cartels have been going on for what, 30 years now? How many more decades will it take for goverments to realize that it doesn't matter how many cartel members you kill and/or put in jail, because for as long as it is profitable new people will always step up.

Umm the overwhelming has been attempted by Mexico, the very country run by the cartels, meaning, nothing has been done. No action in Mexico has been taken by the US, and that's the kind of action that would make any sort of difference.

The only solution is a US force to annihilate the cartels and restore Mexican government to a position of stability and control such that any budding attempt at cartels are easily extinguished. Otherwise, Mexico is fucked for good.

That's a little insane. And to respond to your mid section, no. The cartels have something like 90% of their drugs going into the United States. This means that they would lose 90% of their business if it were legalized in the US. It doesn't matter where the business is based if the place you are selling isn't interested or has legal alternatives. You would functionally cut off their entire money supply.

And killing all of them is a stupid solution. Remember when the US dismantled the Medellin and Cali cartels? New cartels took their place. If there is a demand and there is money to be made someone is going to try to meet that demand and get rich.

THEIR drugs still come in. It just makes business a lot easier for them, which empowers them further. You're imagining that the cartels would suddenly lose out to someone else. No, they would adapt and keep their monopoly.

Killing them off is not a stupid solution. You don't defeat a problem by pulling out a couple weeds. That doesn't solve anything at all. Complete elimination is the resolution. Only by completely wiping them out in one fell swoop and restoring Mexican government can any future cartels be nipped right as they are budding. Taking out a couple while the rest thrive accomplishes nothing, since other cartels still exist to fill in the gap, or facilitate the growth of growing ones. That's why wrecking Medellin and Cali did nothing.


America can't afford that war. It'd get ugly fast, and there'd be a lot of dead soldiers equally as fast, and the war would become unpopular even faster. Not to mention that trying to get all of them would demand guerilla warfare on an unprecedented scale and be rife with the potential for civilian casualties, since the cartels are - obviously - entrenched in ordinary society.

Oh yeah, and there'd just be something new to replace them.

So long as people in America want drugs, there'll be someone in Mexico prepared to sell it to them.

It wouldn't just be dead soldiers, I'm sure the Cartels would start attacking civiliians in the US.

It's not like the wars in the Middle East where the US could "escape" once you open that can of worms it would be damn hard to close it.
t༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ށ
NIJ
Profile Joined March 2010
1012 Posts
March 25 2013 04:03 GMT
#896
Legalizing weed doesn't necessary mean everyone is free to smoke anyway. My company has a drug policy and im pretty sure that will stand even if it was legal by law. Just like drinking is legal but they can enforce none of that in the workplace. Or prohibiting uses of various legal prescription drugs depending on the nature of your job. You'll still have contractual obligations.

thats kinda why im not too worried if it does get legalized. its like saying you're against repealing prohibition because the minute that happens no one will get their work done. That turned out to be manageable just fine. All we probably need is to make DWH a criminal offense just like DWI is and it should be good to go.
Act of thinking logically cannot possibly be natural to the human mind. If it were, then mathematics would be everybody's easiest course at school and our species would not have taken several millennia to figure out the scientific method -NDT
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 28 2013 14:58 GMT
#897
ACAPULCO, Mexico -- Hundreds of armed vigilantes have taken control of a town on a major highway in the Pacific coast state of Guerrero, arresting local police officers and searching homes after a vigilante leader was killed. Several opened fire on a car of Mexican tourists headed to the beach for Easter week.

Members of the area's self-described "community police" say more than 1,500 members of the force were stopping traffic Wednesday at improvised checkpoints in the town of Tierra Colorado, which sits on the highway connecting Mexico City to Acapulco. They arrested 12 police and the former director of public security in the town after a leader of the state's vigilante movement was slain on Monday.

A tourist heading to the beach with relatives was slightly wounded Tuesday after they refused to stop at a roadblock and vigilantes fired shots at their car, officials said.

The vigilantes accuse the ex-security director of participating in the killing of vigilante leader Guadalupe Quinones Carbajal, 28, on behalf of local organized crime groups and dumping his body in a nearby town on Monday. They reported seizing several high-powered rifles from his car, and vigilantes were seen toting a number of sophisticated assault rifles on Wednesday, although it was not clear if all had been taken from the ex-security director's car.

"We have besieged the municipality, because here criminals operate with impunity in broad daylight, in view of municipal authorities. We have detained the director of public security because he is involved with criminals and he knows who killed our commander," said Bruno Placido Valerio, a spokesman for the vigilante group.

Placido said vigilantes had searched a number of homes in the town and seized drugs from some. They turned over the ex-security director and police officers to state prosecutors, who agreed to investigate their alleged ties to organized crime.

The growing movement of "self-defense" vigilante groups has seen masked townspeople throw up checkpoints in several parts of southern and western Mexico, stopping passing motorists to search for weapons or people whose names are on hand-written lists of "suspects" wanted for crimes like theft and extortion.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
March 30 2013 06:24 GMT
#898
At least seven people have been killed after a gunman opened fire in a bar in northern Mexico, which has seen a resurgence in drug-related violence in recent weeks.

The man, armed with an AK-47 assault rifle, killed four men on Friday night who were customers in the bar in Chihuahua state as well as three women who worked there, said a spokesman for the state attorney general's office.

"It has not been determined whether the attack is connected to drug trafficking, but by the type of weapon involved, it is to be assumed," said the spokesman, Carlos Gonzalez.

The attack occurred in the city of Chihuahua, the capital of the state that is also home to Ciudad Juarez, considered one of the most violent cities in the world until recently.

The attacker entered the bar with his face covered by a bandana, said the spokesman.

Chihuahua has seen heavy fighting between the local Juarez cartel and the Sinaloa cartel, led by Joaquin "Shorty" Guzman, who is seeking to control the city that is one of the main routes for trafficking drugs into the United States.


Source
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
TerribleNoobling
Profile Joined July 2010
Azerbaijan179 Posts
March 30 2013 07:04 GMT
#899
People who want to do drugs should be able to do drugs. It's their body and their life. The costs of the war on drugs, both in terms of enforcement, in terms of tax dollars spent trying to get people not to do the things they want to do, in terms of civil liberties, as the police routinely search people without probable cause, spy on us, tap our phones, search our homes, and in terms of people rotting away in prison cells not for hurting anyone else but for choosing to get high on something aside from alcohol, are enormous. Lots of people like doing drugs. So you want to lock them in a cage? Why not just let them live their lives and focus on stopping violent criminals?

The war on drugs is the perfect war for the state. Randolph Bourne remarked once "war is the health of the state". It is in war that the state comes into it's own, swelling in size and prestige and expanding it's scope of control. The war on drugs is the perfect war because it's unwinnable. Every year there are more people to lock up, more suckers to cage, and ever more resources can be redirected towards this conflict, more liberties will be given up to protect us from the evil drug users. The fact that this war cannot be won is what makes it so attractive for the etatists.

Legalization would mean millions of families don't need to be ripped apart, drug dealers and narcotics agents would have to find productive work in the private sector (large scale enterprise would out compete criminal drug dealers and an end to prohibition would drastically reduce the number of police necessary, ergo these people would have to get real jobs creating wealth like everyone else) and taxes could be seriously reduced, because we wouldn't have to waste so much money paying the police to spy on us.

The government cannot even keep drugs out of their prisons, where inmates are strip searched, cells are routinely checked and everyone is kept locked up every day. They will never be able to stop drug use. But they don't care. It's not about the drugs, it's about control, it's about justifying ever larger police budgets and about making people give up their liberty, because of the boogieman of drug addicts.
Fus Ro Dah
Profile Joined January 2013
Singapore141 Posts
March 30 2013 07:27 GMT
#900
On March 18 2013 05:01 OuchyDathurts wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2013 04:57 Alala-P wrote:
My personal opinion, just do what they've done in singapore.

less addicts and less drugs its a win win. instead of legalising and having to deal with the consequences.


Yes, mandatory death penalties and life imprisonment, amazing ideas. I don't think we have enough people in prison in the US!


I am from Singapore, and guess what, we really do have near-zero drug problems. Drug traffickers are too fucking afraid to even step into the country.
Prev 1 43 44 45 46 47 65 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 7m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
LamboSC2 307
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 37296
Bisu 6130
Horang2 1424
EffOrt 754
Shuttle 697
Mini 528
Light 409
Soma 404
ZerO 403
firebathero 379
[ Show more ]
PianO 329
BeSt 278
Soulkey 165
Hyun 155
Snow 128
Rush 119
Larva 85
Zeus 69
Barracks 50
Mind 36
Free 33
soO 32
sorry 26
ToSsGirL 23
Terrorterran 21
Aegong 21
ajuk12(nOOB) 20
scan(afreeca) 17
Mong 16
SilentControl 9
Bale 6
Dota 2
Gorgc3532
singsing3087
420jenkins134
XcaliburYe111
Counter-Strike
fl0m3906
Other Games
B2W.Neo998
crisheroes368
Mlord356
Pyrionflax264
RotterdaM229
Hui .223
FrodaN122
ArmadaUGS114
Mew2King106
KnowMe81
XaKoH 79
ZerO(Twitch)16
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream162
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 17
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos2895
• TFBlade929
Other Games
• WagamamaTV283
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
7h 7m
OSC
1d 1h
LAN Event
1d 2h
Replay Cast
1d 7h
Replay Cast
1d 17h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 20h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
3 days
[ Show More ]
Monday Night Weeklies
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
4 days
StarCraft2.fi
5 days
Wardi Open
5 days
StarCraft2.fi
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

SOOP Univ League 2025
RSL Revival: Season 3
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
Slon Tour Season 2
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.