EPTsadly im going to hold my nose while avatar cleans up
82nd Annual Academy Awards - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
TryThis
Canada1522 Posts
sadly im going to hold my nose while avatar cleans up | ||
|
jalstar
United States8198 Posts
critics loved hurt locker more (97 to 82 % on RT.com) but it made a lot less money | ||
|
GunSec
1095 Posts
 ? | ||
|
Emon_
3925 Posts
| ||
|
Phantom
Canada2151 Posts
I only know of her as a comedian tho, never seen any other serious dramas that she has ever done though, but she was good in Precious. | ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On March 08 2010 04:26 Koltz wrote: 2009 was a bad year indeed best one financially for the industry | ||
REDBLUEGREEN
Germany1904 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On March 08 2010 04:48 Piy wrote: Inglourious Basterds should win. If Avatar wins I'll shit. people say Avatar is overrated, but inglorious bastards is definitely more overrated best part about that movie was Christopher Waltz | ||
|
XsebT
Denmark2980 Posts
| ||
|
REDBLUEGREEN
Germany1904 Posts
On March 08 2010 05:42 GGTeMpLaR wrote: people say Avatar is overrated, but inglorious bastards is definitely more overrated how can you objectively value a movie by saying it is overrated when movies are a piece of art and can only be judged by subjective criteria? | ||
|
FireBlast!
United Kingdom5251 Posts
| ||
|
GGTeMpLaR
United States7226 Posts
On March 08 2010 05:45 REDBLUEGREEN wrote: how can you objectively value a movie by saying it is overrated when movies are a piece of art and can only be judged by subjective criteria? the guy I quoted started it =p but really, why even have the oscars and give out a "best picture" award since it's all subjective? | ||
|
Lefnui
United States753 Posts
On March 08 2010 04:26 Koltz wrote: 2009 was a bad year indeed Yes, this is the weakest year I've seen in a long time. The fact that Sandra Bullock has a chance to win lead and Mo'Nique win supporting is proof of how horrible this year was in film. | ||
|
DeathSpank
United States1029 Posts
On March 08 2010 04:12 BuGzlToOnl wrote: How can "A Serious Man" be on there? That movie was horrid. you're horrid. That movie was the most amazing thing I have ever watched. | ||
|
GunSec
1095 Posts
On March 08 2010 05:50 DeathSpank wrote: you're horrid. That movie was the most amazing thing I have ever watched. that movie was really bad, kinda american beauty wannabee movie, I am not saying that coen's brothers are bad directors but they failed at this one. | ||
|
uiCk
Canada1925 Posts
yep they have a very dificult algorithims and strategies, principle one is : conventional script (cheapest scripts!) + CGI + washed up actors = profit. | ||
|
DeathSpank
United States1029 Posts
On March 08 2010 05:55 GunSec wrote: that movie was really bad, kinda american beauty wannabee movie, I am not saying that coen's brothers are bad directors but they failed at this one. tell me why it was bad. | ||
ArvickHero
10387 Posts
| ||
|
Saturnize
United States2473 Posts
 | ||
|
GunSec
1095 Posts
Because I felt it was so average and too "dry", it was supposed to be a comedy, and as I wrote before, it was more like some kind of american beauty thing. I love the coen's brothers but not this movie, sorry | ||
| ||
