The European Debt Crisis and the Euro - Page 80
Forum Index > General Forum |
RCMDVA
United States708 Posts
| ||
50bani
Romania480 Posts
| ||
Gaga
Germany433 Posts
On June 07 2012 22:52 DeepElemBlues wrote: Everything he said is listed there, you're just being pigheaded because he disagreed with you. are you not able to read @paralleluniverse ? your name suggesting anything ? :> i mark the VERY clear ones he points out for you. The European sovereign debt crisis resulted from a combination of complex factors, including the globalization of finance; easy credit conditions during the 2002–2008 period that encouraged high-risk lending and borrowing practices; the 2007–2012 global financial crisis; international trade imbalances; real-estate bubbles that have since burst; the 2008–2012 global recession; fiscal policy choices related to government revenues and expenses; and approaches used by nations to bailout troubled banking industries and private bondholders, assuming private debt burdens or socializing losses. | ||
Recognizable
Netherlands1552 Posts
On June 07 2012 23:44 50bani wrote: Funny that Nazi is in fact Socialist so the doctrines are closer than you might think. They should all be friends, but you know, they like to vilify somebody in order to get points across to the people, might as well vilify each other. They all think they have this one truth which is superior to others, ofcourse they get mad at eachother. Much like religion actually. | ||
radiatoren
Denmark1907 Posts
On June 08 2012 00:22 Recognizable wrote: They all think they have this one truth which is superior to others, ofcourse they get mad at eachother. Much like religion actually. New Dawn was already known for heiling their leader, kicking out journalist not "standing straight" (military, not to be misunderstood!) while their leader entered, giving the finger to foreign journalists and their leader was already known by the police for being under suspicion of helping 5 men attack a student. The guy is a former special op in the Greek army and after the cameras were turned of, he appearently continued his rage-tantrum. I think it is needless to say that most of what they stand for are not inspired by democratic ideologies but anger, contempt for several groups of people and militaristic traditionalism. | ||
AmorFatiAbyss
51 Posts
On June 07 2012 23:44 50bani wrote: Funny that Nazi is in fact Socialist so the doctrines are closer than you might think. They should all be friends, but you know, they like to vilify somebody in order to get points across to the people, might as well vilify each other. Yes, this is true! People like to quibble though about the differences in ideology. Socialist, fascist, communist, authoritarian, totalitarian, dictatorship.... they are all fundamentally the same in that they all operate on the same primary premise: That the individual should be subordinated to the state. Liberals, and I mean liberals in the classic sense of the term, people who believe in liberty, believe that the government derives it's powers from the consent of the governed. Unfortunately many people are eager to give their consent to inevitable slavery. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
BRUSSELS, June 9 (Reuters) - Spain will request aid from its euro zone partners of up to 100 billion euros but not until it has a clearer idea of the amount of capital its banks needs from independent audits due to report in just over a week, EU sources told Reuters on Saturday. Spain indicated during a conference call of the euro zone's 17 finance ministers that it wanted aid for its banks but would not specify the amount until two independent consultants deliver their assessment of the capital needs some time before June 21. "They want the aid, but they'll only say how much in a few days' time," one of the sources said. A bailout for Spain's teetering banks, once requested by Madrid, could amount to as much as 100 billion euros ($125 billion), two senior EU sources told Reuters, although they emphasised that the final request could be much less than that. Earlier, Eurogroup chairman Jean-Claude Juncker called for a "quick solution" which, once it led Madrid to ask the currency bloc for help, would make it the fourth country to seek assistance since Europe's debt crisis began. One source who was on an earlier Saturday call to discuss the technicalities of a rescue said Spain did not want International Monetary Fund involved in the package for its banks. But it is unlikely to get its way with IMF oversight required even though it will not be putting up any money. Officials said there had been a heated debate over the IMF's role. In the end it was agreed that the IMF would help monitor reforms in Spain's banking sector, while EU institutions would ensure Spain stuck to its broader economic commitments. "It's not getting a programme as such, but there's still monitoring, especially of banking reform," one source said. Source | ||
kemoryan
Spain1506 Posts
On June 08 2012 01:26 AmorFatiAbyss wrote: Yes, this is true! People like to quibble though about the differences in ideology. Socialist, fascist, communist, authoritarian, totalitarian, dictatorship.... they are all fundamentally the same in that they all operate on the same primary premise: That the individual should be subordinated to the state. Liberals, and I mean liberals in the classic sense of the term, people who believe in liberty, believe that the government derives it's powers from the consent of the governed. Unfortunately many people are eager to give their consent to inevitable slavery. Oh boy... you both have no idea what you're talking about. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
| ||
Soliloquy.
United States29 Posts
| ||
relic
United Kingdom148 Posts
On June 11 2012 09:16 Soliloquy. wrote: There also seems to be trouble coming from ireland italy portugal and posssibly spain. This is the reason why europe should never had switched over to the euro they already had enough unity and being to unified is never a good thing because it ends up screwing over a great powerful country like germany hopefully they dissolve the euro but i don't see that happening in the near future Really? Problems in Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain!? Who would have known? /sarcasm | ||
sekritzzz
1515 Posts
On June 07 2012 23:44 50bani wrote: Funny that Nazi is in fact Socialist so the doctrines are closer than you might think. They should all be friends, but you know, they like to vilify somebody in order to get points across to the people, might as well vilify each other. A republican and a democrat(in America) are closer to each other than a Nazi and Socialist, but I guess whatever we don't understand we can make stupid comments about because they have one or two similiarities. Same goes for the religion basher who probably has nothing better to do than to tie religion to something completely unrelated and make a negative conclusion out of it. | ||
{CC}StealthBlue
United States41117 Posts
Begin with the poisonous links between the banks and the budget. Rather than injecting the funds straight into the banking system, Spain’s rescuers are lending them to the government. That could raise its debt by as much as ten percentage points of GDP. Moreover, if the money comes from the European Stability Mechanism, the EU’s permanent rescue fund, it will be senior to ordinary government bonds. As a result, Spain’s borrowing costs could rise further as investors fret both about the government’s solvency and about their place in the creditors’ queue. There is good reason to fear that the second problem—the lack of confidence in the single currency—is going to get still worse. On June 17th Greece goes to the polls again. If it elects a government determined to rip up the conditions of its bail-out, it could be out of the euro soon. That would exacerbate concerns not just about Spain’s future, but also about Italy’s. The yields on Italian bonds shot up this week because of fears of contagion. Source | ||
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On June 10 2012 04:45 kemoryan wrote: Oh boy... you both have no idea what you're talking about. In the 1920s when fascism was born it was regarded as a left-wing ideology. Because Mussolini was a former socialist who still believed in a lot of socialist ideas, and anti-capitalist economic populism was a big part of fascist rhetoric in Europe and policy in Italy. Only when Hitler made his main bogeyman "Judeo-Bolshevism," the Night of the Long Knives that overwhelmingly targeted socialist Nazis like Ernst Rohm, and the Spanish Civil War did fascism become associated with right-wing ideology. A republican and a democrat(in America) are closer to each other than a Nazi and Socialist, but I guess whatever we don't understand we can make stupid comments about because they have one or two similiarities. Nazi Germany had a "Four-Year Plan," from 1933-1937. National Socialism and regular socialism have a lot more in common (the solidarity concept - racial for Nazism, the proletariat and peasantry for socialism, economics dictated by the need of the state, the hatemongering on the Enemy whether it be capitalists or Jews, to name a few) than people think. There are a lot more than one or two similarities. | ||
Epocalypse
Canada319 Posts
These guys were also against implementing the Euro back before it started. | ||
lOvOlUNiMEDiA
United States643 Posts
| ||
WhiteDog
France8650 Posts
On June 15 2012 11:12 DeepElemBlues wrote: In the 1920s when fascism was born it was regarded as a left-wing ideology. Because Mussolini was a former socialist who still believed in a lot of socialist ideas, and anti-capitalist economic populism was a big part of fascist rhetoric in Europe and policy in Italy. Only when Hitler made his main bogeyman "Judeo-Bolshevism," the Night of the Long Knives that overwhelmingly targeted socialist Nazis like Ernst Rohm, and the Spanish Civil War did fascism become associated with right-wing ideology. Nazi Germany had a "Four-Year Plan," from 1933-1937. National Socialism and regular socialism have a lot more in common (the solidarity concept - racial for Nazism, the proletariat and peasantry for socialism, economics dictated by the need of the state, the hatemongering on the Enemy whether it be capitalists or Jews, to name a few) than people think. There are a lot more than one or two similarities. Certainly not... "left-wing ideology" didn't mean a lot back then. But, socialism and communism were both anti nationalist ideologies, far from Mussolini's facism and Hitler's national socialism. There is a huge difference between national socialism and socialism, it is in fact two completly different opposite. Even in a pure economic point of view, they are completly different : The fascists opposed both international socialism and liberal capitalism, arguing that their views represented a third way. They claimed to provide a realistic economic alternative that was neither laissez-faire capitalism nor communism.[13] They favoured corporatism and class collaboration, believing that the existence of inequality and separate social classes was beneficial (contrary to the views of socialists). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_fascism | ||
kevint
Denmark42 Posts
On June 15 2012 11:12 DeepElemBlues wrote: In the 1920s when fascism was born it was regarded as a left-wing ideology. Because Mussolini was a former socialist who still believed in a lot of socialist ideas, and anti-capitalist economic populism was a big part of fascist rhetoric in Europe and policy in Italy. Only when Hitler made his main bogeyman "Judeo-Bolshevism," the Night of the Long Knives that overwhelmingly targeted socialist Nazis like Ernst Rohm, and the Spanish Civil War did fascism become associated with right-wing ideology. Nazi Germany had a "Four-Year Plan," from 1933-1937. National Socialism and regular socialism have a lot more in common (the solidarity concept - racial for Nazism, the proletariat and peasantry for socialism, economics dictated by the need of the state, the hatemongering on the Enemy whether it be capitalists or Jews, to name a few) than people think. There are a lot more than one or two similarities. socialism is not about hatemongering against the the rich it is about equality ofcourse the only way to achieve equality is to take money from the rich and give it to the poor. But u cant compare that to the kind of racial hatred that nazi's have socialists don't kill the rich people they merely take power away from them. And it is true that Nazism and Socialism share a lot of similarities when it comes to the public sector, but you don't hear people criticize hitler for his healthcare plan do you? you sound like a smart person but your perception is warped read a little about European socialism in action today, the red-green, the social democrats or who ever you desire. | ||
xeo1
United States429 Posts
| ||
Holy_AT
Austria978 Posts
What is the basic concept of money ? To offer work you do or a service and you can exchange them for other peoples services. The problem today is that the system lacks of any real world connection. People make limitless amount of money by doing virtually nothing, one can describe as work. Some people get more money then they should. Who needs a million euros per year as income ? Nobody, this money is wasted on certain individuals who do craploads of shit with it. Instead of spending these recources elsewhere on the planet these recources are beeing spent on luxory shit. This is a waste of the planets recources and these people are to dumb enough to understand this. They should not get paid, they should get smacked in the face for not thinking. Human society its nations and its rules are a fail ! | ||
| ||