EPTOn February 07 2004 11:19 Commander[SB] wrote:
Fact is, any mu on war3 is about exciting to watch as a pvp game.
Fact is, any mu on war3 is about exciting to watch as a pvp game.
I've actually always enjoyed watching PvP's over most matchups.
What Mr.X aka Insomnia has to say about BW and WC3 - Page 10
| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Orlandu
China2450 Posts
I've actually always enjoyed watching PvP's over most matchups. | ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
On February 06 2004 19:56 Filthy. wrote: a ghoul army will beat a knight or abom army T_Trei pls if u think that destroyers or spellbreakers aren't good anti spell casters then u really dont know what u are talking about. i will admit that spirit walkers arent as a significant counter to spellcasters but ressurection makes up for that  the same goes with tier 3, bears are probably the best tier 3 unit in the game with roar/rejuv, aboms rip up a tier 1 army and knights are potentially the biggest tanks in the game - however this does not mean that everyone rushes to make these units every game and skip tier 1, just as in bw you don't rush to guards or carriers etc. its pretty well known that destroyers suck as an anti caster too =\, only use is vs orc where they have to use HH to kill them | ||
|
Filthy.
57 Posts
| ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
| ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
On February 07 2004 21:33 intotherei wrote: whatever im not about to argue war3 w/ you on a bw forum i concur! | ||
|
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
i can tell that you dont have a top 100 account with any of the races on any of the realms knights and destroyers dont suck. any good hu or ud would know that. they both serve a purpose. | ||
Waxangel
United States33450 Posts
On February 08 2004 09:47 mindspike wrote: intotherei you dont know what your're talking about i can tell that you dont have a top 100 account with any of the races on any of the realms knights and destroyers dont suck. any good hu or ud would know that. they both serve a purpose. this is true | ||
|
Heen
Korea (South)2178 Posts
| ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
On February 08 2004 10:34 Heen wrote: heen are knights great? tell these hasus...my micro is amazing | ||
|
pyogenes
Brazil1401 Posts
On February 08 2004 09:47 mindspike wrote: knights suck, destroyers suck as anti casters, but overall are mediocre units. good vs orc though.intotherei you dont know what your're talking about i can tell that you dont have a top 100 account with any of the races on any of the realms knights and destroyers dont suck. any good hu or ud would know that. they both serve a purpose. | ||
|
Heen
Korea (South)2178 Posts
 but they are also weak at the same time because they are only slightly better than a grunt. destroyers are pretty nice but I would never mass them. 3 at most. but what does it matter, BW is a more 'complete' game right now but many ppl play TFT because it is modern and has more attention. | ||
|
Pumpkin
United States1141 Posts
| ||
|
Heen
Korea (South)2178 Posts
spirit walkers banshees all serve no purpose. what else have I missed. | ||
|
radiaL
Andorra2690 Posts
 | ||
|
zdragon
United States150 Posts
BW is much better than WC3, but most people shrug off WC3 for the wrong reasons: The economic and fundamental balance of the game is VERY different from SC. There are simpler BOs, less units/techs, less economy, but ALL of this is offset by the addition of heroes (in terms of strategy/army) and creeps (economic). Angel (halpmeh) once pointed out correctly that WC3 is truly just about heroes. That's what it comes down to- balancing hero vs unit dynamics per matchup. Because of the consolidation of power into a few units, there seems to be less possiblities, while at the highest levels there still remains enough innovation to keep the game from falling flat on its face. WC3 is not a crappy game JUST because there are no hard counters- units are not the focus- counters have to work together with heroes (which greatly amplify any effect). It's not bad just because of virtually non-existant economy or macro- offset by new addition of RPGish creeping/creepjacking dynamics (creeping/creepjacking is equivalent in some ways to powering/peon dropping). Nevertheless, WC3 is innovative, but at the current state, there exist some weak areas where there just isn't enough room to excercise the potential of the game... | ||
|
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
without spirit walkers human could own a 20 tauren army with polymorph (i have done it myself vs orcs that dont know how to use spirit walkers) also spirit link is a viable option  gyrocopters are weak, but they can be used in certain situations they cant be shackled so thats a plus...and they have invisibility detection so they are GREAT scouting units banshees are great.. but seldom used mainly because ud players like to go the route of hero nuking | ||
|
STIMEY d okgm fish
Canada6140 Posts
| ||
|
mindspike
Canada1902 Posts
| ||
| ||
