|
|
lmfao what an idiot, imo. War3 is no where near the playing capability of SC.
|
....lets all bash on him cause he doesent think like us!
|
|
In Bulgaria the words of mr.X are law.
|
he says with bw it's impossible to play it at it's best, so i guess he means that with war3 its possible to play it at it's best? so that means if two players are both playing at their best then the game boils down to just luck?
|
oh well i posted and flamed t_t
|
France1270 Posts
On February 05 2004 09:08 sage.francis wrote: he says with bw it's impossible to play it at it's best, so i guess he means that with war3 its possible to play it at it's best? so that means if two players are both playing at their best then the game boils down to just luck? your very right. From what he says, playing perfectly at W3 is possible. So what is going to make the difference between the players who achieve to play the game "perfectly"? Plus I don't see the fun in playing a game in which you can't improve anymore.
|
He just wants to promote his game, Duh. Just like the time when Yellow and Hot said zerg needs ballance changes to bill ropper. Progamers are simply smart and couldn't care less about whats right.
And yes if the game can be played to its fullest, then it will come down to picking up the better item :D
|
He just contradicts himself, gg. :x
|
On February 05 2004 09:08 sage.francis wrote: he says with bw it's impossible to play it at it's best, so i guess he means that with war3 its possible to play it at it's best? so that means if two players are both playing at their best then the game boils down to just luck? it means that the one whos better wins. and what he said was "wc3 is easier to master".
|
United States33389 Posts
mmmmmmmmmm
I bet this thread will be closed -_-
|
United States33389 Posts
|
when will people realize that the two best RTS's shouldn't constantly be fighting each other T_T
|
i thought the two best rts's were bw and sc. or bw and war2. or sc and war2. or bw and sc shareware. where does tft fit into this? and roc def dont make the list.
btw how can the better person win if both ppl play perfect? according to him there is no best person, therefore it must come down to things other than skill.
|
well, no one ever plays perfect in war3... i'd like someone to show me a replay where someone plays 'perfectly' =/
how is SC (not BW) the second best RTS? it's not very balanced =/
neither is war2... lusted ogres anyone?
|
sc w/ bw is the best rts ever
second best rts i dont know
|
Braavos36375 Posts
what he means is he's not good enough at broodwar.
|
SC/BW is 2nd best, according to gamespy, but they have about as much clue about what they're saying as Mr.X does.
|
On February 05 2004 11:20 Hot_Bid wrote: what he means is he's not good enough at broodwar.
I think this guy is on to something.
|
|
|
|