|
On November 22 2009 09:31 Mango wrote:@ Captain Mayhem:
Compared to the normal flue young people have a higher chance of dying. That combined with the higher infection rate creates a risk for that group as well compared to the normal flu. Hehe, I'm not gonna believe you until I see some proof It's near impossible for me to find a credible source that says the swine flu is more lethal than the regular one (apart from being more easily caught), so I'm afraid I must ask one of you to be able to agree.
I don't doubt you that much, though. That chart was mainly for the people/person who said that the younger people who get infected are more likely to die than the older who are. So, it was a older vs younger comparison. Not a H1N1 vs seasonal flu comparison.
|
On November 22 2009 09:41 Captain Mayhem wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2009 09:31 Mango wrote:@ Captain Mayhem:
Compared to the normal flue young people have a higher chance of dying. That combined with the higher infection rate creates a risk for that group as well compared to the normal flu. Hehe, I'm not gonna believe you until I see some proof  It's near impossible for me to find a credible source that says the swine flu is more lethal than the regular one (apart from being more easily caught), so I'm afraid I must ask one of you to be able to agree. I don't doubt you that much, though. That chart was mainly for the people/person who said that the younger people who get infected are more likely to die than the older who are. So, it was a older vs younger comparison. Not a H1N1 vs seasonal flu comparison. You do realize that your wonderful pie-chart actually proves my point, not the other way around? I said it is more dangerous for young people than the normal flu. Your pie-chart has more than 50% of the deaths in the age group 0-49. Since I'm lazy I won't find you a pie-chart for the seasonal flu for you but I dare you to find one with more than 20% deaths in the aforementioned age group.
|
On November 22 2009 11:30 Zinbiel wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2009 09:41 Captain Mayhem wrote:On November 22 2009 09:31 Mango wrote:@ Captain Mayhem:
Compared to the normal flue young people have a higher chance of dying. That combined with the higher infection rate creates a risk for that group as well compared to the normal flu. Hehe, I'm not gonna believe you until I see some proof  It's near impossible for me to find a credible source that says the swine flu is more lethal than the regular one (apart from being more easily caught), so I'm afraid I must ask one of you to be able to agree. I don't doubt you that much, though. That chart was mainly for the people/person who said that the younger people who get infected are more likely to die than the older who are. So, it was a older vs younger comparison. Not a H1N1 vs seasonal flu comparison. You do realize that your wonderful pie-chart actually proves my point, not the other way around? I said it is more dangerous for young people than the normal flu. Your pie-chart has more than 50% of the deaths in the age group 0-49. Since I'm lazy I won't find you a pie-chart for the seasonal flu for you but I dare you to find one with more than 20% deaths in the aforementioned age group. 1: Consider how big the distribution is in the age groups. It has been stated earlier in the thread that young people catch the swine flu easier. 2: Consider how many people there are in each group. I don't think half of the world's population is over 50 years old, to be honest. Do you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Median_age.png
|
I've come down with something recently. I have both vaccines though, so it's obviously not H1N1 ^^
It isn't clearly and obviously more dangerous than the normal flu. I guess the main danger is the possibility of a mutating strain or the high communicability.
|
Sanya12364 Posts
On November 22 2009 09:31 Mango wrote:Also a med student here. In my oppinion you should just read Zinbiel's post as a summary, it explains the whole situation correctly in a nice manner. + Show Spoiler +On November 22 2009 03:28 TanGeng wrote: Taking to everyone is by far the better idea, although you will have to use proper judgement on discounting or discrediting the opinions of certain peoples.
Doctors might be medical professionals but it doesn't mean that they aren't trying to sell you something that you might not need. Advice on the internet also doesn't cost any money to get unlike your visit to the doctors.
The internet wouldn't be nearly as popular if everyone thought that advice should be bought out of people. But who do you believe on the internet? And your previous post about risks of getting mexican flu by the vaccination: it's a dead version of the virus they give you, with dead meaning you ain't getting the flu from it. @ Captain Mayhem: Compared to the normal flue young people have a higher chance of dying. That combined with the higher infection rate creates a risk for that group as well compared to the normal flu. Now I did get the vaccination as well and didn't have any side-effects from it besides a stiff arm for a day. But the vaccination is for free here, so why would you not get it? The risks of the vaccination are severly overrated, they used the same basis as all other vaccinations you got already, and you are still alive right? Do I think the virus is the most potent danger for the human race ever? Hell no, but I prefer having a stiff arm for a day over some serious flu infection. Who to trust? Use your judgment. Unconditionally trusting people is just asking for someone to take advantage of you.
Immunity derived from live/dead vaccine is very well perfect in theory, but the vaccine that the person on the street receives goes through industrial production and distribution. Dead vaccines may not be completely dead. Live vaccines may not be completely weakened. Probabilistically, it works well enough to grant some level of immunity. There's plenty of trade off though.
Dead vaccines should not reproduce so it's protection against whatever protein is there. Live vaccines are just weaker so it produces a more noticeable immune response, but usually results in a stronger immunity. Recipients can be mildly contagious during such a periods. Actual results vary depending on industrial process and many other factors.
Proteins don't just trigger immune responses just because they are there. There's plenty of protein in the human bloodstream and the immune systems has to be very discriminant as to avoid developing auto-immune disorders. Vaccines are usually packed with irritants designed to trigger an immune response and then carry along that immune response to the viral protein. If the immune response is too weak, then the inoculation will only be partially effective. Too few antigens will have been made for the body to be able to unconditionally fight off an invasion. It's better than nothing, but less than ideal.
Distributing the vaccine introduces the problem of preserving proteins until site of injection. The vaccines are packed with preservatives with various side-effects. The additives may produce a strong allergic reaction so those with known allergies to vaccines should avoid most if not all vaccines.
Now with respect to virus that mutate, the immunity doesn't last that long. If the virus partially mutates then the immunity is partially effective. Impossible to inoculate doesn't mean that the body can't develop an immune response to counter a disease. It just means that a virus mutates too quickly for vaccines to have effectiveness when they are available on the market.
When applied to the flu, the main benefit in the vaccine is the peace of mind. It's not a clear cut choice between getting the vaccine or getting sick. First of all, there is only a chance that a person will come down with the flu. After that, the flu may have already mutated enough to make the vaccine largely ineffective. Lastly, there are many risks involved in the industrial process required in producing these vaccines.
|
I really wonder whether or not I should take the vaccine...weeks of sick sounds horrible but I am quite lazy..
|
Anyone who gets the swine flu vaccine who wouldnt normally get a flu vaccine needs to stop giving into media hype and do some research.
|
There are no incurable diseases. The poisen of denatured processed so-called "food" is what causes diseases. It's not food though. It's a foreign substance that invokes a white blood cell attack. Cease ingestion of poisen and the body fully heals itself always.
|
.... people who think the vaccines themselves can be a sizable risk ( or even a small one) should simply realize the oath medical doctors have to make.
I could have the vaccine soon I guess, I´m not sure if I should but I´m going to army soon and I probably will get some disease there anyways.
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
Now my entire family & friends have taken the vaccine. Not one of them has had a single side effect.
|
Didnt read the thread, just wanna say that several of my friends got the vaccine, some little side effects, their arms hurt for a day but that was all, now their fine.
|
I am going to tell you my humble opinion... I am more afraid of the traffic than the H1N1.
What is the worst it can do? Kill you? dude you can die in your house with the most stupid shit... to be honest we all going to die. And no this is not a media hype it is what happens to the human body, it grows old and die or you get in to some stupid accident and thats it.
What concerns me is that this H1N1 things is a fear that is some how "injected" in to us. It is not normal, and the ones that are trying to scare us might do it for a reason... have you heard about any other vaccine being *mandatory*? why are they trying to force that on to the population?
and then this:
“It’s interesting to note that the President’s children have not gotten their shots and the explanation for this is it hasn’t been available to them – now that’s a little bit hard to buy when you think that probably anything the President wants can be available for their children,” said Paul, adding, “So in a way he’s made his decision not to give his children these inoculations – so if he has freedom of choice on this, I would like to make sure that all the American people have the same amount of freedom of choice.”
Others have echoed similar sentiments. “Surely if there is a national emergency and if the President and First Lady of the United States wanted flu shots for their daughters, they could get them. It is certainly connected to our national security right? I mean the president needs to have his wits about him 24/7 not worrying over sick children. Could this instead be yet another case of “do as I say, not as I do” from the Obama administration?” writes Cathryn Friar.
Paul compared Obama’s hypocrisy to politicians who lobby for the virtues of public education yet in every instance educate their own children privately.
“The biggest champions of public education make sure their kids never get public education, they always get private education where there’s a lot better choices than the kind of system they’re promoting,” said the Congressman.
Obama certainly isn’t stupid enough to inject his own kids with the same toxic soup that he encourages the idiot public to receive, and will probably be keen on getting access to the special additive-free swine flu shots produced by Baxter International that have been made available for the elite.
As Spiegel Online reported earlier this month, German Chancellor Angela Merkel and government ministers received a mercury and squalene-free H1N1 vaccine. “The Vakzin [vaccine] does not contain disputed additives — contrary to the vaccine for the remainder of the population,” reported the newspaper. Soldiers in the German army were also given the adjuvant-free vaccine.
Employees of the Paul Ehrlich Institute in Germany also received the “green” inoculation after their president Johannes Löwer labeled the vaccine a greater threat than the virus itself.
Löwer’s comment came after German lung specialist Wolfgang Wodarg said the vaccine increases the risk of cancer. The nutrient solution for the vaccine consists of cancerous cells from animals.
I mean those things look quite weird and I would rather QUESTION this vaccine thing until the bitter end.
on the side note... I am not a fan of David Icke and anything of the sort but that video about the vaccine brings up several things that we should at least *think* about. I don't buy the whole conspiracy theory (I think is silly and very similar to any other religion)but it is true that our immune system is being altered consciously or not with so many medicaments, additives in food and way too many vaccines even before your body has its system up and running.
Also note that they were already trying to scare people with the swine flu on the 70's!!!
The more I research the more I see that this whole thing is weird... I would rather be careful.
I do think that people on risk should be on the safe side but I wouldnt take this myself, I rather die letting my body fight this thing than going under some suspicious medicine that not even the doctors are sure if it works and the leaders are not willing to take under any circumstance.
|
On November 22 2009 11:56 Captain Mayhem wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2009 11:30 Zinbiel wrote:On November 22 2009 09:41 Captain Mayhem wrote:On November 22 2009 09:31 Mango wrote:@ Captain Mayhem:
Compared to the normal flue young people have a higher chance of dying. That combined with the higher infection rate creates a risk for that group as well compared to the normal flu. Hehe, I'm not gonna believe you until I see some proof  It's near impossible for me to find a credible source that says the swine flu is more lethal than the regular one (apart from being more easily caught), so I'm afraid I must ask one of you to be able to agree. I don't doubt you that much, though. That chart was mainly for the people/person who said that the younger people who get infected are more likely to die than the older who are. So, it was a older vs younger comparison. Not a H1N1 vs seasonal flu comparison. You do realize that your wonderful pie-chart actually proves my point, not the other way around? I said it is more dangerous for young people than the normal flu. Your pie-chart has more than 50% of the deaths in the age group 0-49. Since I'm lazy I won't find you a pie-chart for the seasonal flu for you but I dare you to find one with more than 20% deaths in the aforementioned age group. 1: Consider how big the distribution is in the age groups. It has been stated earlier in the thread that young people catch the swine flu easier. 2: Consider how many people there are in each group. I don't think half of the world's population is over 50 years old, to be honest. Do you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Median_age.png
You're really talking about things you don't know.
Young people ( <49 years old) don't die from regular flu. Your chart is showing half of the dead people are young. H1N1 will kill less people than regular flu, but old weak people die from regular flu every year, and from every single other kind of infections. Young don't, that 's where is the difference. Still the risk of dying from getting H1N1 is still low , but personnaly I'd prefer not to take it.
|
Norway28667 Posts
I started feeling the full effects of swine flu yesterday. to me, it was way worse than any regular flu ive ever had and well, I wish I had gotten the vaccine ;p
today i feel better but still pretty damn crappy.
|
On November 23 2009 08:38 amoxicilline wrote:Show nested quote +On November 22 2009 11:56 Captain Mayhem wrote:On November 22 2009 11:30 Zinbiel wrote:On November 22 2009 09:41 Captain Mayhem wrote:On November 22 2009 09:31 Mango wrote:@ Captain Mayhem:
Compared to the normal flue young people have a higher chance of dying. That combined with the higher infection rate creates a risk for that group as well compared to the normal flu. Hehe, I'm not gonna believe you until I see some proof  It's near impossible for me to find a credible source that says the swine flu is more lethal than the regular one (apart from being more easily caught), so I'm afraid I must ask one of you to be able to agree. I don't doubt you that much, though. That chart was mainly for the people/person who said that the younger people who get infected are more likely to die than the older who are. So, it was a older vs younger comparison. Not a H1N1 vs seasonal flu comparison. You do realize that your wonderful pie-chart actually proves my point, not the other way around? I said it is more dangerous for young people than the normal flu. Your pie-chart has more than 50% of the deaths in the age group 0-49. Since I'm lazy I won't find you a pie-chart for the seasonal flu for you but I dare you to find one with more than 20% deaths in the aforementioned age group. 1: Consider how big the distribution is in the age groups. It has been stated earlier in the thread that young people catch the swine flu easier. 2: Consider how many people there are in each group. I don't think half of the world's population is over 50 years old, to be honest. Do you? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Median_age.png You're really talking about things you don't know. Young people ( <49 years old) don't die from regular flu. Your chart is showing half of the dead people are young. H1N1 will kill less people than regular flu, but old weak people die from regular flu every year, and from every single other kind of infections. Young don't, that 's where is the difference. Still the risk of dying from getting H1N1 is still low , but personnaly I'd prefer not to take it. Just... wow.
I'm not even gonna bother anymore. Not a single one is even trying to back their shit up. As I've said before, go ahead and do whatever you want. I couldn't care less. All I was trying to do was give you guys some straight up FACTS to clear out some things in this thread, if you're still intent on getting a vaccination, then fine by me. But don't tell me that I don't know what I'm talking about if you're not going to prove that you do yourself.
And for the bolded part; yes, they do. Already weak young people have a high risk of dying from the regular flu if they get the full effect, just like with H1N1.
|
i think enough ppl have gotten the shot where i live so that the risk of me getting swine flu is now quite low
besides, frequently washing your hands and having an increased level of cautiousness can go a long way in preventing sickness...
|
I still don't get the difference between regular flu and this particular strain. I believe one of the only differences are respritory effects and I have yet to hear of a single person around me who has it.
I really just think this is your typical flu scare, good hygiene probably would be the best vaccine for anyone.
|
FML I have the flu again after having had it like 3 weeks ago. I didn't get either vaccine, so it's likely I had H1N1 and now have the seasonal flu, or the other way around, not sure. When I had the flu last time my temperature peaked around 100.4 (when I had taken it, but it could have been higher during one of those nights) and now it seems to be hovering around the same place, more or less, at 100.7.
Aaaand I'm flying to Hamburg, Germany tomorrow to attend a Model United Nations conference on Thursday. FML.
|
Just dose up on the Vitamin D. Helps significantly if not eradicate it completely within a couple days.
|
Planning to go get vaccinated tomorrow. I hate being sick...
|
|
|
|