| Forum Index > General Forum |
|
Sadist
United States7328 Posts
On October 15 2009 05:46 NoNameLoser wrote: imagine britney walking down there... all the guard would see is silicone... not like women really have anything to hide anyway. Unless it was an upskirt camera or something | ||
|
Itachii
Poland12466 Posts
| ||
|
HeaDStrong
Scotland785 Posts
On October 15 2009 05:40 {88}iNcontroL wrote: And when they explain that to Meghan Fox you think she will go "oh, ok" ? well the article said that you can simply refuse if you dont like to be scanned. i mean, would she rather prefer some scebbe guy frisking her? | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On October 15 2009 06:19 HeaDStrong wrote: well the article said that you can simply refuse if you dont like to be scanned. i mean, would she rather prefer some scebbe guy frisking her? Because it is in trial mode I bet. Yes. People would rather be frisked. | ||
|
HeaDStrong
Scotland785 Posts
| ||
|
MooCow
1434 Posts
On October 15 2009 04:27 FrozenArbiter wrote: Don't think I'd care tbh. Think people are blowing the "naked" part too much, if they keep the visual like that i don't think it'd be that big of a deal | ||
|
mucker
United States1120 Posts
On October 15 2009 06:21 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Yes. People would rather be frisked. people would rather other people be frisked. they can't frisk everybody and given the chance of maybe being frisked and for sure being seen naked it is obvious what is gonna be picked. they need to get the technology to total recall style where it is just bones on the screen. annoyed i can't find the old snl clip anywhere where sharon stone goes through airport security and they make her strip down... "arch your back for more security!" | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On October 15 2009 06:28 HeaDStrong wrote: seriously? isn't touching you everywhere more intrusive than looking at a b&w picture which can hardly be called "naked"? i'm so confused. Ever been frisked at the airport? They just run there hands down the side of your body and pad down the rest. They also use women for women and men for men. Not a big deal at all. | ||
DivinO
United States4796 Posts
Can't wait until this technology gets just a teensy bit better, if you know what I mean. All jokes aside this will meet with more disapproval from Americans than from anyone else, I think. I won't try to defend that, because I don't think I can. | ||
|
rredtooth
5464 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
HeaDStrong
Scotland785 Posts
On October 15 2009 06:31 {88}iNcontroL wrote: Ever been frisked at the airport? They just run there hands down the side of your body and pad down the rest. They also use women for women and men for men. Not a big deal at all. ok. apparently i mind be frisked and you wouldn't be happy with people looking at you naked. fine, lets just put it down to personal preferences. but the scanner thing is so much faster and convinient- no need to remove clothes or anything. i think it's a good idea. actually i think they worked on that technology in our university, so i might even be biased in this question :> | ||
|
ForSC2
United States580 Posts
You can look, but don't touch. | ||
|
Snet
United States3573 Posts
| ||
|
infinity21
Canada6683 Posts
| ||
|
uNcontroLable
United States1180 Posts
| ||
|
Japakazol
United States102 Posts
On October 15 2009 04:19 uNcontroLable wrote: Ew... I really would not be ok with that at all. Yeah, security is very important, but this is not necessary. Not to the point that I am okay with someone basically seeing me naked. That's a privilege I get to bestow! But you're okay with someone sneaking nonmetal explosives onto the plane and killing you. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On October 15 2009 07:50 Japakazol wrote: But you're okay with someone sneaking nonmetal explosives onto the plane and killing you. I dunno you ok with someone surgically implanting a bomb in themselves made from non metals? At a certain point we draw the line in favor of privacy, integrity and respect over "worst possible case scenario." We have other methods of detection that pick up the same/nearly the same amount of risk without exposing the person. | ||
KwarK
United States44382 Posts
On October 15 2009 07:46 uNcontroLable wrote: Think of the implications for especially conservative religious groups too, like Amish or Muslim women! No way this would be even remotely acceptable to them or their spouses. Yeah, they can opt out of the scan, but you know that means they will be put to even more rigorous security testing, plus TONS of embarrassment. Very not ok IMO. I'd rather this than a strip search. Imagine one of those for a conservative woman. | ||
|
iNcontroL
USA29055 Posts
On October 15 2009 08:11 Kwark wrote: I'd rather this than a strip search. Imagine one of those for a conservative woman. At least it'd be a woman conducting the search. And those are an absolute last resort.. very rare. Scanning _everyone_ that goes through is worse.. and I doubt they have men monitor the men and women monitor the women. Probably just whoever has that spot that day. | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Qualifier
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
IPSL
BSL Open Qualifier
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
