• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:50
CEST 21:50
KST 04:50
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10
Community News
Rollback Netcode in Brood War845.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 202622Weekly Cups Results (Sep 28-Oct 4)0SC4ALL: II SC2 Complete Invited Player Lineup10StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026)78
StarCraft 2
General
5.0.17 Patch Notes - October 7, 2026 ESL Pro Tour for SC2 discontinued [Old] StarCraft 3 Reportedly in Development StarCraft II 5.0.17 PTR Patch Notes (Sept 30, 2026) How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR?
Tourneys
ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier RSL 2026 Offline Finals LCQ Sign-Ups $3,500 WardiTV Not-Summer Championship ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Stellar Fest TWO the Moon (Dec 16-20)
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[M] (2) Sweltering Sands [M] (2) Frigid Storage
External Content
Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 545 And Drops and Rifts
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! GG Lan Fest Sofia, Bulgaria [this November] Sagi.gg Launcher Released ASL FINALS HYPE VIDEO 2X Rollback Netcode in Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Semifinal A [ASL22] Semifinal B [ASL22] Ro8 Day 4
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do?
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Total Annihilation Zero
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
The Link Between Gaming and …
TrAiDoS
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 15500 users

Obama Wins 2009 Nobel Peace Prize - Page 16

Forum Index > General Forum
Post a Reply
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next All
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
October 10 2009 06:55 GMT
#301
OMG. Further evidence that the Nobel Peace Prize is a joke.

And for those arguing about appeasement, the appeasement of the Soviet Union after World War II was about 30 times worse than of Germany by Chamberlain at Munich.

The only reason World War II became such a dire issue was because the French prepared to fight World War I again and didn't think the Germans would go through the forests and hills of the Ardennes.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
{CC}StealthBlue
Profile Blog Joined January 2003
United States41117 Posts
October 10 2009 07:09 GMT
#302
On October 10 2009 15:55 TanGeng wrote:
OMG. Further evidence that the Nobel Peace Prize is a joke.

And for those arguing about appeasement, the appeasement of the Soviet Union after World War II was about 30 times worse than of Germany by Chamberlain at Munich.

The only reason World War II became such a dire issue was because the French prepared to fight World War I again and didn't think the Germans would go through the forests and hills of the Ardennes.



...
"Smokey, this is not 'Nam, this is bowling. There are rules."
Kazius
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Israel1456 Posts
October 10 2009 07:22 GMT
#303
Obama got the prize because they hated Bush. There is no other reason to select someone who has been in office under a year and has yet to stop any wars.
Friendship is like peeing yourself. Anyone can see it, but only you get that warm feeling.
Kazius
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Israel1456 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-10 07:33:56
October 10 2009 07:30 GMT
#304
On October 10 2009 13:45 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2009 13:41 Kwark wrote:
I believe in democracy, you should look it up sometime since you seem to be unaware you live in one.

Actually, America is supposed to be a Confederacy. We were never meant to be a Democracy, nor are we. This is why we have laws. If we were a Democracy then the will of the Majority would be law.

America shares nothing, or is supposed to share, nothing in common with the British idea of Government. Why do you think we had a revolution against Britain?

Confederacy - A union of persons, parties, or states; a league.

Of course, the War of Southern Independance destroyed that, now didn't it?

Actually, the US is a democracy (a constitutional/regional democracy, if you want to be specific). Laws are in no way anti-democratic, they are anti-anarchic. The rule of majority is not democracy, it stamps out the rights of the minorities - the definition of the word democracy is "rule of the people", as in all of them. The US constitution and system of rule are based on a wide range of European and Native American philosophies and systems of rule, among them the British parliamentary system. The revolution against Britain was caused more by economic reasons than ideological ones. The civil war was a break in the confederacy, but in no way ended it, as all those states are still a part of the USA.

You did get the definition of the word confederacy right though.
Friendship is like peeing yourself. Anyone can see it, but only you get that warm feeling.
Savio
Profile Joined April 2008
United States1850 Posts
October 10 2009 08:34 GMT
#305
I agree with OP. The only thing awarding him the prize accomplishes is to diminish the meaning of the prize itself and to also propagate the image that Obama is a pretty picture and a pretty idea that people prop up but with no real substance under him.

Bad call giving him the prize before he has done anything other than just run a campaign.
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of the blessings. The inherent blessing of socialism is the equal sharing of misery. – Winston Churchill
SweeTLemonS[TPR]
Profile Blog Joined June 2003
11739 Posts
October 10 2009 09:26 GMT
#306
Really stupid person to give it to. He hasn't actually done anything yet.
I'm never gonna know you now \ But I'm gonna love you anyhow.
Arbiter[frolix]
Profile Joined January 2004
United Kingdom2674 Posts
October 10 2009 09:32 GMT
#307
On October 10 2009 13:35 Aegraen wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2009 13:29 Kwark wrote:
The history of the twentieth century is the history of the failure of appeasement and the tragedy of non intervention. I find it stunning that someone can look at the events, see the direct causes and not reach the logical conclusions.

How would you have seen the Japanese invasion of China resolved? They're in China, exploiting the vast natural resources, building up and training their army and testing biological weapons on civilians. America is currently their friend and business partner. How does this play out 100 years down the line?


Wrong. Appeasement is intervention. Britain and France allowed Germany to annex the Anschluss. What are the people of the Anschluss going to do if the Countries around them GAVE them the Anschluss? The right to self-defense is inherent from birth to all of us. No one can give away another person or their property. Absurdity.

The late 20th Century and the 21st Century will be the history of the failure of interventionism, just like the early 20th Century was the failure of interventionism.

The people of China would overthrow their tyrannous occupiers. America did the same thing. Some people volunteered to come help us (Foreign Generals, etc.), and we openly accepted them. It would be no different in their context. Sure, the French helped at the end of the War, but by then we had won it anyways. We didn't go around to countries begging for their invasion of America to liberate us, did we?


Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. That is very funny indeed. "Annex the Anschluss"?!? The "people of Anschluss"?!? Extraordinary ignorance for someone who speaks with such wild-eyed certainty.
We are vigilant.
Arbiter[frolix]
Profile Joined January 2004
United Kingdom2674 Posts
October 10 2009 09:37 GMT
#308
As for the Nobel award: well, given that Shimon Peres, Henry Kissinger and Woodrow Wilson all won the prize this is hardly the first time that the committee has dished it out to someone who stands in violation of the most basic principles on which the award is supposedly based.
We are vigilant.
Latham
Profile Blog Joined May 2007
9593 Posts
October 10 2009 09:59 GMT
#309
Such a stupid decision on their part. It just shows that Nobel Peace Prize is given out just for the sake of being given out.
For the curse of life is the curse of want. PC = https://be.pcpartpicker.com/user/LathamTK/builds/#view=CrqmP6
Loanshark
Profile Blog Joined December 2008
China3094 Posts
October 10 2009 10:17 GMT
#310
Nobel Peace Prize is a joke.
No dough, no go. And no mercy.
Kazius
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
Israel1456 Posts
October 10 2009 10:23 GMT
#311
On October 10 2009 18:37 Arbiter[frolix] wrote:
As for the Nobel award: well, given that Shimon Peres, Henry Kissinger and Woodrow Wilson all won the prize this is hardly the first time that the committee has dished it out to someone who stands in violation of the most basic principles on which the award is supposedly based.

You must be talking about a different nobel prize winning Shimon Peres, because on a list of things done for peace, he was the person who twisted the arms of both the Israeli prime-minister and PLO leader and life-long terrorist into negotiating. He was the heart of the peace process, Rabin and Arafat wouldn't have done anything without him.

Even though that peace process did not culminate in a long-term solution, the Palestinian people have their own government, police, laws, and so on due to his efforts, and would have had him to negotiate with if Arafat hadn't used suicide bombers as a negotiating tactic (which caused Peres's fall from political power).
Friendship is like peeing yourself. Anyone can see it, but only you get that warm feeling.
Flyingdutchman
Profile Joined March 2009
Netherlands858 Posts
October 10 2009 11:54 GMT
#312
well I heard the nomination was made when he was 10 days into his presidency...rofl, anyway, if Kissinger and Arafat get one you already know the prize is a bit meaningless...
affinity_12
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
172 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-10 11:54:38
October 10 2009 11:54 GMT
#313
he wins the nobel peace prize for? it means very little.
PobTheCad
Profile Blog Joined July 2006
Australia893 Posts
October 10 2009 13:54 GMT
#314
he set the plan in motion to withdraw from iraq , yet rattled sabres against pakistan and iran and is increasing troop numbers in afghanistan

i don't really see what is so peace friendly about the guy.to me he seems like bush-lite
Once again back is the incredible!
Arbiter[frolix]
Profile Joined January 2004
United Kingdom2674 Posts
October 10 2009 14:09 GMT
#315
On October 10 2009 19:23 Kazius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2009 18:37 Arbiter[frolix] wrote:
As for the Nobel award: well, given that Shimon Peres, Henry Kissinger and Woodrow Wilson all won the prize this is hardly the first time that the committee has dished it out to someone who stands in violation of the most basic principles on which the award is supposedly based.

You must be talking about a different nobel prize winning Shimon Peres, because on a list of things done for peace, he was the person who twisted the arms of both the Israeli prime-minister and PLO leader and life-long terrorist into negotiating. He was the heart of the peace process, Rabin and Arafat wouldn't have done anything without him.


Please spare me. I have debated the Israel/Palestine situation over and over again on this forum over many years and have no intention of doing it yet again. I will only point out that however one views Peres's involvement in the so-called peace process, and my own view is entirely different to your own I suspect, it would not even begin to outweigh his intimate involvement in many crimes against peace over such a long period such that his receiving the Nobel Peace Prize should destroy the credibility of those awarding it.
We are vigilant.
Mortality
Profile Blog Joined December 2005
United States4790 Posts
October 10 2009 14:20 GMT
#316
On October 10 2009 16:30 Kazius wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 10 2009 13:45 Aegraen wrote:
On October 10 2009 13:41 Kwark wrote:
I believe in democracy, you should look it up sometime since you seem to be unaware you live in one.

Actually, America is supposed to be a Confederacy. We were never meant to be a Democracy, nor are we. This is why we have laws. If we were a Democracy then the will of the Majority would be law.

America shares nothing, or is supposed to share, nothing in common with the British idea of Government. Why do you think we had a revolution against Britain?

Confederacy - A union of persons, parties, or states; a league.

Of course, the War of Southern Independance destroyed that, now didn't it?

Actually, the US is a democracy (a constitutional/regional democracy, if you want to be specific). Laws are in no way anti-democratic, they are anti-anarchic. The rule of majority is not democracy, it stamps out the rights of the minorities - the definition of the word democracy is "rule of the people", as in all of them. The US constitution and system of rule are based on a wide range of European and Native American philosophies and systems of rule, among them the British parliamentary system. The revolution against Britain was caused more by economic reasons than ideological ones. The civil war was a break in the confederacy, but in no way ended it, as all those states are still a part of the USA.

You did get the definition of the word confederacy right though.


America was initially supposed to be a confederacy.

Read here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Articles_of_Confederation

The link takes you to the Wiki article about America's first attempt at a constitution. What we know today as the United States Constiution was a second attempt.


Even after we formed the current consitution, many people were strongly opposed to the idea of a powerful central government, and ideas about exactly how strong or weak it should be formed the major differences between the first two political parties: the Federalists and the Democratic-Republicans, the latter of which later split into the two parties we know today.

Up until the American Civil War, we referred to ourselves not as "the United States," but as "these United States," in other words, power was supposed to be predominantly at the state level. The Civil War itself was not fought simply because of slavery, but because of state's rights. Slavery just happened to be one of the more significant bones of contention (and probably not for the reasons you might believe -- it really was at heart an economic struggle, far more so than it was a moral one; most northerners didn't see black people as equals either).


Our government, by the way, is typically considered to be a democratic republic.
Even though this Proleague bullshit has been completely bogus, I really, really, really do not see how Khan can lose this. I swear I will kill myself if they do. - nesix before KHAN lost to eNature
TanGeng
Profile Blog Joined January 2009
Sanya12364 Posts
October 10 2009 17:39 GMT
#317
Well the idea behind the Constitution was a more perfect union above and beyond what could be possible in the Articles of Confederations. In modern words, it would be called a permanent alliance of states. The federal government while stronger than that created by the Articles of Confederation still exemplified the idea of divided sovereignty.

In the 72 year run up to the Civil War, the federal government had already significantly overstepped the Constitution and violated its spirit. But the American Civil War and the resulting 14th Amendment, destroyed sovereignty of the states in a brutal bloodbath. The American government was always a democratic republic, but the founders were rightfully very pessimistic about it remaining a republic.
Moderator我们是个踏实的赞助商模式俱乐部
_mILKy_
Profile Joined September 2009
5 Posts
October 10 2009 18:09 GMT
#318
Is this a forum on the prize or a history class?
Smack a Baby
sith
Profile Blog Joined July 2005
United States2474 Posts
October 10 2009 18:11 GMT
#319
Today I logged on to TL.net and I saw this thread had grown to 300 replies. Inside, I knew it would be a clusterfuck.

I was correct.
Mindcrime
Profile Joined July 2004
United States6899 Posts
Last Edited: 2009-10-10 18:53:58
October 10 2009 18:49 GMT
#320
On October 10 2009 23:20 Mortality wrote:
Up until the American Civil War, we referred to ourselves not as "the United States," but as "these United States," in other words, power was supposed to be predominantly at the state level. The Civil War itself was not fought simply because of slavery, but because of state's rights. Slavery just happened to be one of the more significant bones of contention (and probably not for the reasons you might believe -- it really was at heart an economic struggle, far more so than it was a moral one; most northerners didn't see black people as equals either).


The South seceded because a president who, while he would not have interfered with slavery in the south anymore than Stephen Douglas, would have opposed the spread of slavery that the south had been fighting for in the territories. And do realize that the southern position was that owning a slave was a right no matter what a state government decided. They wished to extend slavery into the territories no matter what the territorial governments wanted.

states' rights my ass

If it were about "states' rights," the southern states would have rallied behind Stephen Douglas.
That wasn't any act of God. That was an act of pure human fuckery.
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 15h 11m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech178
UpATreeSC 142
BRAT_OK 79
EmSc Tv 22
ForJumy 22
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 2530
Shuttle 414
Dewaltoss 155
actioN 95
Aegong 15
Dota 2
qojqva2910
monkeys_forever108
Counter-Strike
fl0m1755
pashabiceps1650
Heroes of the Storm
Grubby4233
Liquid`Hasu752
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2212
ScreaM1097
FrodaN1042
RotterdaM555
mouzStarbuck377
C9.Mang0190
Pyrionflax141
Mew2King55
MindelVK6
Organizations
StarCraft 2
EmSc Tv 22
EmSc2Tv 22
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta6
• niya90s 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Eskiya23 38
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Shiphtur1478
• imaqtpie1295
Upcoming Events
WardiTV Weekly
15h 11m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 4h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 15h
The PondCast
2 days
Online Event
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
BSL Open Qualifier
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Open Qualifier
5 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Copium Cup

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Acropolis #5
HCC Season 3
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.