| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Miss_Cleo
United States406 Posts
On August 31 2011 05:20 youngminii wrote: lol Can't believe how many of you are holding out because of its 'hefty' price tag. Will be picking this up asap. Can't believe you're willing to shell out your hard 'earned' money on a game with such mediocre reviews. | ||
|
Brethern
231 Posts
On August 31 2011 05:45 Miss_Cleo wrote: Can't believe you're willing to shell out your hard 'earned' money on a game with such mediocre reviews. As I recall starcraft received a rather weak response when it was first unveiled. | ||
|
Shockk
Germany2269 Posts
On August 31 2011 06:00 Brethern wrote: As I recall starcraft received a rather weak response when it was first unveiled. It basically received universal praise upon release, was applauded for the campaign, the interface, the gameplay and the multiplayer, and got some minor criticism about the mediocre graphics. The only critics / magazines that rated otherwise were those that would write non-mainstream reviews all the time anyway to "not go with the masses". (I know all that because our cellar was flooded some weeks ago, I had to move everything out and took the time to read some old computer magazines, some of which were from 1998 and happened to include StarCraft reviews). | ||
|
koreasilver
9109 Posts
On August 31 2011 06:07 Shockk wrote: It basically received universal praise upon release, was applauded for the campaign, the interface, the gameplay and the multiplayer, and got some minor criticism about the mediocre graphics. The only critics / magazines that rated otherwise were those that would write non-mainstream reviews all the time anyway to "not go with the masses". (I know all that because our cellar was flooded some weeks ago, I had to move everything out and took the time to read some old computer magazines, some of which were from 1998 and happened to include StarCraft reviews). He's talking about the first reveal when it was completely different from the SC that we know now, and people just brushed it off as a "warcraft in space". | ||
|
Shockk
Germany2269 Posts
On August 31 2011 06:14 koreasilver wrote: He's talking about the first reveal when it was completely different from the SC that we know now, and people just brushed it off as a "warcraft in space". If that actually is the case (not sure about it - if not, what I've written above applies), then we're talking about comparing pre-alpha stage StarCraft 1 to already-released Achron ... which makes no sense at all. | ||
|
Simberto
Germany11982 Posts
On August 31 2011 05:45 Miss_Cleo wrote: Can't believe you're willing to shell out your hard 'earned' money on a game with such mediocre reviews. To be honest, so far i have seen very few mediocre reviews. There are some saying this game is very good, and others saying it is very bad. But strangely enough not many in between. | ||
|
Brethern
231 Posts
On August 31 2011 06:15 Shockk wrote: If that actually is the case (not sure about it - if not, what I've written above applies), then we're talking about comparing pre-alpha stage StarCraft 1 to already-released Achron ... which makes no sense at all. Achron is made by a two man dev and community submissions. If they had a fraction of the budget blizzard had for SC2 then we'd see a different game. The mechanics are there and it plays well enough to show that it works. all it needs is polish and a dedicated community then we'll see a revolution in gaming. | ||
|
Quotidian
Norway1937 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 101379
4849 Posts
I don't know if it's worth that much money, i'd rather see it in the 10 euro range, but it's definatly not a bad game once you grasp the mechanics. However, i can't see a competitive scene developing for it due to the too complex time mechanics and uninteresting graphics. | ||
|
Serejai
6007 Posts
| ||
|
Durak
Canada3685 Posts
On September 01 2011 03:36 Serejai wrote: Will be giving away some copies of this later. Keep an eye out for a thread. Yeaaaaah Serejai! Too bad I never win any of your giveaways.  | ||
|
Lomak
United States311 Posts
| ||
|
PassiveAce
United States18076 Posts
On September 01 2011 03:36 Serejai wrote: Will be giving away some copies of this later. Keep an eye out for a thread. Why are you so awesome? | ||
|
Serejai
6007 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=261660 | ||
|
John Madden
American Samoa894 Posts
On September 01 2011 03:36 Serejai wrote: Will be giving away some copies of this later. Keep an eye out for a thread. Yes am on the lookout | ||
|
bITt.mAN
Switzerland3693 Posts
Thanks Serejai, how do you afford to keep doing these giveaways!??! AWESOME | ||
|
triumph
United States100 Posts
| ||
|
muse5187
1125 Posts
On August 31 2011 06:15 Shockk wrote: If that actually is the case (not sure about it - if not, what I've written above applies), then we're talking about comparing pre-alpha stage StarCraft 1 to already-released Achron ... which makes no sense at all. He said it had a weak response when it was first (keyword) unveiled. And no that wouldn't make sense. What also doesn't make sense is why you are putting words in his mouth. | ||
|
Goldfish
2230 Posts
On September 04 2011 08:24 muse5187 wrote: He said it had a weak response when it was first (keyword) unveiled. And no that wouldn't make sense. What also doesn't make sense is why you are putting words in his mouth. When Starcraft 1 was first "unveiled" it was the pre alpha version (SC1 was using the WC2 engine with purple graphics for the most part) hence it's weak response. They then changed it to its own engine and updated the game immensely from that point on (so that it was no longer just purple Warcraft in Space). | ||
|
muse5187
1125 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Replay Cast
KCM Race Survival
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Cure vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Percival vs Classic
ByuN vs Rogue
OSC
Replay Cast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Replay Cast
GSL
Replay Cast
GSL
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
