|
|
On October 10 2014 07:27 Wild Things wrote: Today will go down in history as the day the eve community shook off the chains of dirty blobber oppression.
And donned the yoke of the dishonorable awoxing overlords
|
|
Anyone going to nyc meetup?
|
EVGA sent a new GTX 760 to replace my GTX 570
|
On October 11 2014 04:06 Body_Shield wrote: EVGA sent a new GTX 760 to replace my GTX 570 Bank error in your favor, collect $200.
Also, unlimited skill queue is going to make keeping track of my bomber alts a whole lot easier.
|
United States41984 Posts
Body, if you now have an extra card I could use one.
|
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/mAZn6Zj.jpg)
Now all I need is internet. Comcast is probably going to take forever to get it set up though
|
|
Lalalaland34484 Posts
Three monitors, that's more than the two that I have.
|
Late grats on making it to the seat of powar, Gorski
|
Netherlands19129 Posts
Timber .
|
Lalalaland34484 Posts
Are you some tree loving hippy or something
|
United States41984 Posts
|
Put it on reddit, they love battle procs shitting on nerds. (as long as its someone shitting on the cfc)
|
United States41984 Posts
the fuck you talking about?
|
Kwark I have 2 9800GTs lying around if you are running on integrated graphics or something currently.
|
I took a wormhole from lowsec into dronelands where I ran a drone data site. This escalated into another drone data site, which confused me as I was previously unaware that drone data sites could escalate at all. The escalation gave me 30 runs of augmented infiltrators, valued at over 100m each. Sold the bpcs for a bit over 3b. Had it been any other drone I would've only been able to sell for anywhere from half to a tenth as much as the augmented infiltrators so I got incredibly lucky.
|
Saw this and thought of kwark
|
United States41984 Posts
The $100 is given to A on the condition they make the split and that B accepts it. A doesn't yet have the $100, instead the situation is that A and B need to work together to collectively earn $100. If anything B's labour is more valuable, they control if the money is paid out. In that scenario if A tries to overvalue himself and undervalue B then it creates resentment which in turn creates spite value. If the spite value is worth more to B than the split then the split is entirely logical. Either way though, the perspective by which A already has it all, B already has none and any offer is reasonable is misreading it. Neither of them have anything, both of them have potentially up to $100 if they work together, A offering B $5 is no more reasonable than B holding out for $95, neither of them have any claim to any of it alone.
|
for me the most logical solution would be to offer 50$
|
|
|
|