• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 06:18
CEST 12:18
KST 19:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway132v2 & SC: Evo Complete: Weekend Double Feature3Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy9uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event18Serral wins EWC 202549
Community News
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris12Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again!13Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6
StarCraft 2
General
Hire a Trusted Full-Service Digital Agency in Luck Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Weekly Cups (Aug 11-17): MaxPax triples again! What mix of new and old maps do you want in the next 1v1 ladder pool? (SC2) :
Tourneys
Maestros of The Game—$20k event w/ live finals in Paris Monday Nights Weeklies Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 487 Think Fast Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Maps with Neutral Command Centers Victoria gamers [ASL20] Ro24 Preview Pt1: Runway
Tourneys
[ASL20] Ro24 Group A [ASL20] Ro24 Group B Small VOD Thread 2.0 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV General RTS Discussion Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
High temperatures on bridge(s) Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment"
TL Community
The Automated Ban List TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale
Blogs
Breaking the Meta: Non-Stand…
TrAiDoS
INDEPENDIENTE LA CTM
XenOsky
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2652 users

Beyond All Reason - Page 2

Forum Index > General Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Southlight
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States11767 Posts
April 20 2023 17:12 GMT
#21
I'd say that's because the game is not faction-based but rather unit and strategem-based... also I disagree about TA's units being less unique. Each unit was quite distinct from all other units, and even their 'counterparts' between ARM and CORE were extremely different. The main balancing difference is that by having only two factions players are less hard-locked out of combinations and strategies.

Also... if the units look the same to you in TA/BAR I think that's because you're not familiar with the game. I can understand that they look similar visually, but in terms of capability there're very few units that act particularly similar. It's like saying dragoons hydralisks and marines are basically the same unit.
oraoraoraoraoraoraoraora
ZeroByte13
Profile Joined March 2022
768 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-04-20 20:46:00
April 20 2023 20:43 GMT
#22
I never said that units look the same to me
I played TA and SupCom quite a bit, they are great games and rightfully are 5th most important classic RTS family together with Blizzard, Westwood, Relics and AoE families.

And units do differ of course - but Blizz RTS units differ much more, at least in my experience.
The amount of diversity that Blizz RTS games share across ~40-50 units, TA/SupCom share across 170+.

Marine vs Zealot or Marauder vs Stalker (same "positions", if such concept would even exist in SC2) feel significantly more different to me than any T1 units from TA.
TA units of the same tier/role are different of course, and quite a bit, but not nearly as much in my experience.
Southlight
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States11767 Posts
April 20 2023 21:31 GMT
#23
? just taking ARM kbot units:
  • Peewee: B&B marine counterpart (low/mid range, good velocity but straight-light projectile, high DPS, great mobility)
  • Rocko: StS missiles (mid range, decent velocity with negligible arc, horrific DPS, meh mobility - mostly for trying to kite things down)
  • Hammer: StS plasma laser (mid range, low velocity but good arc, allows for decent blind fire, meh DPS, no mobility - basically the siege tank equivalent)
  • Jethro: StA missiles


That also goes top to bottom in terms of the hard->easy in dodging the projectiles. Each unit leads to a different opener direction and deals with each other (for mirrors/team matches) and their CORE counterparts in varying ways, including that the counterparts don't even necessarily have the same weapon/projectile archetype.
oraoraoraoraoraoraoraora
ZeroByte13
Profile Joined March 2022
768 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-04-20 21:52:14
April 20 2023 21:41 GMT
#24
And how many of these T1 kbots are unique enough that you actually use them late-game - like you use marines/marauders or zerglings, because there's literally nothing that replaces them or even overlaps with them in any significant way?

TA has 85 units per side, and in a late game when you have enough production capacity and money, you usually use a small part of your arsenal and basically stop using many if not most T1 units, don't you? That's what I noticed for myself, at least.

But I'm not a great TA player at all, of course, so I might be wrong and maybe most of these 85 units are actually used by good players thoughout most of the game. I might be clueless here, and can only speak from my own experience and my friend's. Who btw loves TA, SupCom and B.A.R. much more than he loves SC2, but his feeling about faction/units uniqueness is more or less the same as mine. (though FAF did quite a bit of rebalance to make it better).

Then again, I saw a guy claiming (seriously) that factions in AoE2 are more unique than factions in SC2, so beauty is in the eye of beholder, I guess.
Southlight
Profile Blog Joined August 2007
United States11767 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-04-20 21:57:55
April 20 2023 21:54 GMT
#25
It's a different type of game - but also BAR handles it better. With that said, ARM Kbots have a very distinct direction for facilitating expansion and skirmishing, which is never going to be a late-game centerpiece. Incidentally, the CORE Storm and Thud could hold their own late-game. The reason why comp TA players never really liked the transition to SupCom (and why stuff like Balanced TA remained popular) is because SupCom went much harder in terms of T2>T1, whereas TA T2 units tended to be more specialized.

BAR takes it further - as far as I can tell in the tournaments with "pro" players 80-90% of armies are comprised of T1 units... T2 tech happens relatively later in the game and generally creates specialized units that help strengthen or push a certain scenario (ie. hold a siege, break a siege, attempt a hail-mary bombardment, etc.).

Edit:
To add to that CORE Kbot thing, T2 Kbots were:
  • Pyro - I mean it's basically a firebat in the context of the crazy kiting and ranged weapons in TA.
  • Can - basically a literal battering ram.
  • Roach - it's a baneling.
  • Spectre - jammer.
  • Freaker - a raider, similar to SC2 reapers.

Not one of these are going to form the basis of your army late-game. Hence, the Storm and Thuds continuing to comprise the bulk of your army.
oraoraoraoraoraoraoraora
ZeroByte13
Profile Joined March 2022
768 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-04-20 22:00:18
April 20 2023 21:56 GMT
#26
On April 21 2023 06:54 Southlight wrote:
T2 tech happens relatively later in the game and generally creates specialized units that help strengthen or push a certain scenario (ie. hold a siege, break a siege, attempt a hail-mary bombardment, etc.)..
Which is how I'd balance T1 and T2, so I like this approach.
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17282 Posts
April 21 2023 00:49 GMT
#27
On April 21 2023 06:54 Southlight wrote:
It's a different type of game - but also BAR handles it better. With that said, ARM Kbots have a very distinct direction for facilitating expansion and skirmishing, which is never going to be a late-game centerpiece. Incidentally, the CORE Storm and Thud could hold their own late-game. The reason why comp TA players never really liked the transition to SupCom (and why stuff like Balanced TA remained popular) is because SupCom went much harder in terms of T2>T1, whereas TA T2 units tended to be more specialized.

BAR takes it further - as far as I can tell in the tournaments with "pro" players 80-90% of armies are comprised of T1 units... T2 tech happens relatively later in the game and generally creates specialized units that help strengthen or push a certain scenario (ie. hold a siege, break a siege, attempt a hail-mary bombardment, etc.).

Edit:
To add to that CORE Kbot thing, T2 Kbots were:
  • Pyro - I mean it's basically a firebat in the context of the crazy kiting and ranged weapons in TA.
  • Can - basically a literal battering ram.
  • Roach - it's a baneling.
  • Spectre - jammer.
  • Freaker - a raider, similar to SC2 reapers.

Not one of these are going to form the basis of your army late-game. Hence, the Storm and Thuds continuing to comprise the bulk of your army.


You forgot to mention that quite often cheap T1 units in BAR are being produced en-masse late game for several purposes:
1. creating a mobile patrol wall around your territory to warn you of potential flanking maneuvers
2. field saturation during bigger pushes so that enemy units that have powerful single-target shots need to be manually aimed as to not waste their shots against all the chaff
3. probing attacks to test enemy defenses, clear minefields etc. (I mean, if you manage to sneak even a few T1 units behind enemy lines and into their base they can wreck total havoc on their economy, especially in the later stages when you have massive chain-reactions when your eco gets blown up)

From the games I've seen so far it's not uncommon for players to mass spam Ticks and such for those purposes.

It even says so right on the main website:

The Tick is a fast scout bot that's cheap to build and perfect for gathering intel on your enemy.

Use a few of them to take out your opponents metal extractors at the start of a game.

It's far from ideal for fighting other non-scout combat units, however, in large numbers a Tick swarm is an effective way to draw enemy fire or even take out unprotected expansions.
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
ShloobeR
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Korea (South)3809 Posts
Last Edited: 2023-04-24 02:57:24
April 24 2023 01:54 GMT
#28
Having some fun with this game but I think the radar jamming mechanics are somewhat bizarre.
in Supcom for example, if you had scouted a building but then lose radar coverage (or it's jammed), you lose the ability to target units but your units know where the buildings are.
in B.A.R, unless I'm just missing something very obvious (and this is totally possible after only playing like 5 games) your units just completely forget what buildings are or where they are. It's kind of just a weird (and annoying) design choice.

Also units don't have a 'target ground' function? Again I'm probably missing something but I was looking for it on my Navy units but I just couldn't find one.
: o )
AmericanUmlaut
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Germany2577 Posts
April 24 2023 04:35 GMT
#29
On April 24 2023 10:54 ShloobeR wrote:
Also units don't have a 'target ground' function? Again I'm probably missing something but I was looking for it on my Navy units but I just couldn't find one.

They do, it's just called "attack." Hit "A" and click anywhere, and your units will fire at that spot.
The frumious Bandersnatch
ShloobeR
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
Korea (South)3809 Posts
April 24 2023 06:15 GMT
#30
On April 24 2023 13:35 AmericanUmlaut wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 24 2023 10:54 ShloobeR wrote:
Also units don't have a 'target ground' function? Again I'm probably missing something but I was looking for it on my Navy units but I just couldn't find one.

They do, it's just called "attack." Hit "A" and click anywhere, and your units will fire at that spot.


oh god really? I swear I tried that multiple times
I'll try again I guess
: o )
Manit0u
Profile Blog Joined August 2004
Poland17282 Posts
March 12 2024 17:13 GMT
#31


The devs are talking about some upgrades they're making and polishing the game. They're also planning to release it on Steam but there's still work to be done before that and it's quite an undertaking.

Considering the state some games release on Steam I think it's very admirable for them to pursue such high quality goals as a team of basically just volunteers.

https://www.beyondallreason.info/development/steam-release
Time is precious. Waste it wisely.
PunkSkeleton2
Profile Joined July 2019
Poland2 Posts
October 14 2024 21:02 GMT
#32
What I will write here is probably obvious for people familiar with TA style games but people here are talking about unit design but that's not what makes BAR unique. Of course the factions are similar (but still play very differently in 1v1), the units more similar to each other. I also do not agree that T2 is just more specialized, not better - yes, there are more specialized units in T2 but overall T2 is just much better. Take T2 main tank for example - it is just better version of T1 tank but you do have better options to support it (Armada Starlight for example).
The unique things about BAR and other TA style games are macro, interface (this one is mostly BAR specific), moving shot and reclaim/ressurect.
The resource flow is continuous not discrete. There are no workers bringing minerals, you build metal (mainly mines) and energy generating structures and they generate X amount of resource per second. When you build something you don't pay in advance - you pay continuously as the structure is being built. How fast you build depends on assigned build power (which is in fact 3rd resource which you must expand). The macro in BAR is not easy, maybe there's less clicking but certainly more thinking as you try to balance the 3 resources in the most efficient way. Add the fact that wind is usually the most cost efficient (depends on map) but changes during the game and you really have a puzzle to solve.
The interface... Let me say that after I tried BAR I immediately considered StormGate to be obsolete. Uncapped camera movement, rotation and zoom-out (yes, you can zoom out so you see the entire maps and icons instead of units that are too small to see). Drag-move command that auto-split destination of your units. Grid build. Auto-repeat on factories. Working and easily assignable auto-grouping...
Moving shot makes it that if some units sneak past defenses the damage can be catastrophic. It is impossible to catch them if your units are not faster. They don't have to stop when they destroy your mines, windmills etc.
Units also leave wrecks when destroyed (unless there is a significant overkill but that does happen very often) which can be reclaimed using any construction units granting some metal back (I think it's 75% but I might be wrong) or resurrected with T1 reclaim/ressurection bots. Resurrection costs only 50% energy and 0 metal and does what the name suggests - you get the unit. Reclaim bots are not cheap and resurrection is rather slow but it is still just broken in my opinion. Fights over wreck fields often decide games.
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11856 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-02-14 22:53:01
February 14 2025 22:51 GMT
#33
Been playing this a bit recently and enjoying it. Still have not played a single 1v1 PvP game so no idea how that area of the game performs. The vs AI modes are a lot of fun, 8vs8 with AI bonuses that you tweak for rough player strength is fun. Then there are two more custom vs AI modes for coop games.

They did some 160 player trial runs recently and it works somewhat decently, the lobby system having more issues than the game itself. 40vs40 actually works fine on a modern computer, surprised me in a RTS. Though even in 8vs8 you will hit stutters or FPS drops if you move 1k+ units at once.

I think the game suffers from too many options when you come in. You have action queues, which you can add or remove things to if you know the hotkeys as just one example. Pages of options in settings, widgets for extra options and so on. Setting the default options and only showing the most commonly changed in the default views would probably be nice.

No match making is both a pro and a con. Lobbies has the downside of causing a lot of delays on getting the games started and boosting the best player to kill opponents worst one faster than theirs kills yours. Which isn't really how you would normally play a team game but I find that challenge gives more variation than if everybody was at similar skill level. You have your part of the map, covering your weak player and supporting your strong player.

Economy sharing from minute one works fine in random public lobbies but I honestly think it is a broken mechanic if it ever got competitive. Since higher tier units are more efficient than lower tier units it is strictly better to do "Archon" mode from SC2 than both players playing. Scaling that up you probably want 1 person going tech/economy per team in an optimal setup and building units for the entire team. Which would turn team games into something most RTS players would not enjoy since base building is part of the fun.
sophisticated
Profile Joined October 2021
58 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-02-16 18:18:32
February 16 2025 18:16 GMT
#34
On February 15 2025 07:51 Yurie wrote:
Scaling that up you probably want 1 person going tech/economy per team in an optimal setup and building units for the entire team. Which would turn team games into something most RTS players would not enjoy since base building is part of the fun.


I don't play but have watched some youtubes and afaik this is pretty much how 8v8s are played on what are called role maps:

edit: or do you mean, like only one guy builds literally everything? That doesn't seem likely, though again I don't play.
Velr
Profile Blog Joined July 2008
Switzerland10730 Posts
February 17 2025 08:40 GMT
#35
I recently started watching this a bit more and i'm still unsure about buying it...

My main gripe is... Why play this over Supreme Commander FA? I just don't really see what this does really better?
There seem to be more units on each tier than you would ever need or want? Subcom was a bit on the low side but this seems to go way too far? I just checked and one faction seems to have... 31 Bots, 22 vehicles, 20 flyers, 20 boats, 7 hovercrafts and ~30 towers/defenses?... The fuck?

What i find most worrying is, that it seems to have the same issues as Subcom in 1on1/low player games with a big likelyhood of them just becoming T1 spam but somehow that issue seems to be even bigger and the macro part smaller?


Please, sell it to me
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11856 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-02-17 18:46:14
February 17 2025 18:42 GMT
#36
https://www.beyondallreason.info/faq/how-does-bar-compare-to-supreme-commander-faf They actually list that on their own FAQ.

Basically it is a more modern engine with some different features and more modern graphics. It is still in development and thus will likely gain more there.

It feels responsive but havn't done supreme commander in a while. Basically similar but feels fresh.

A few of the maps are pretty much clones as well. So the major argument would be that it is a similar game with a hopefully better engine and feature set.
sophisticated
Profile Joined October 2021
58 Posts
February 20 2025 23:57 GMT
#37
On February 17 2025 17:40 Velr wrote:
still unsure about buying it...
Please, sell it to me

it's free and open-source software, doesn't cost you a dime.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25501 Posts
February 22 2025 23:05 GMT
#38
I think it’s a fun game and the collaborative, open-source aspect is awesome!

However like, why are there so many units? There’s tons and tons of overlap. IDK I feel it makes it much more daunting to a newcomer without really adding a ton of variety
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Yurie
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
11856 Posts
Last Edited: 2025-02-23 13:48:38
February 23 2025 13:45 GMT
#39
The separate factories and then separate tiers multiply units. If that is a good core design can of course be discussed, but for each to be viable they need to cover some basic things.

A tier 1 plant needs to have some type of skirmishing fast unit, some main line fighter, anti defence and some type of uniqueness to separate it out. They seem to want to have options inside each factory as well, so you end up with 6-7 units multiplied over 5 sets of factories.

Where something like the mainline bot fighter loses against the mainline vehicle fighter but is better at flanking. Differences are there but I would agree are often small.

The also keep a ton of unique units in. The entire EMP concept could for example be dropped to simplify the game and remove a ton of units. But then you lose your unique units, your SC2 storm or similar option.

In tier 2 I agree they try a bit too much. Often 10 units per factory since there aren't as many types of factories and they still want all the unique stuff in there.

Overall I think that is a sign of collaborate development. People have their favorite stuff that doesn't get removed.
WombaT
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Northern Ireland25501 Posts
February 23 2025 15:41 GMT
#40
On February 23 2025 22:45 Yurie wrote:
The separate factories and then separate tiers multiply units. If that is a good core design can of course be discussed, but for each to be viable they need to cover some basic things.

A tier 1 plant needs to have some type of skirmishing fast unit, some main line fighter, anti defence and some type of uniqueness to separate it out. They seem to want to have options inside each factory as well, so you end up with 6-7 units multiplied over 5 sets of factories.

Where something like the mainline bot fighter loses against the mainline vehicle fighter but is better at flanking. Differences are there but I would agree are often small.

The also keep a ton of unique units in. The entire EMP concept could for example be dropped to simplify the game and remove a ton of units. But then you lose your unique units, your SC2 storm or similar option.

In tier 2 I agree they try a bit too much. Often 10 units per factory since there aren't as many types of factories and they still want all the unique stuff in there.

Overall I think that is a sign of collaborate development. People have their favorite stuff that doesn't get removed.

Yeah for sure, I think you even see a bit of that in Stormgate as well, albeit in that case it’s devs trying to please everyone, versus that kind of direct collaborative development.

I’m still overall pretty positive about the game for sure, there’s a lot right that’s in there!

I think you see a lot of the strengths of the open source/collab approach in other areas. A lot of the UI stuff is top-notch for one. Want a feature? Well request it, or even build it yourself and if it’s good it’ll end up in the game. I think you see the benefits there for sure.

More stuff, provided it’s good and doesn’t interfere with other things, is generally gonna be a good thing.

This doesn’t necessarily apply to mechanics or components like units.

That said I will add the caveat that I’m a relative newbie to the TA/SC lineage of RTS, perhaps for veterans this is way less of an issue. I’m just quite used to relatively small rosters of very divergent units.
'You'll always be the cuddly marsupial of my heart, despite the inherent flaws of your ancestry' - Squat
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 43m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Trikslyr25
EnDerr 9
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 10536
Bisu 960
Shuttle 786
Jaedong 724
PianO 589
firebathero 428
Pusan 356
actioN 330
hero 309
Stork 282
[ Show more ]
ggaemo 262
Mini 244
BeSt 240
Mind 125
ZerO 90
Hyun 89
Mong 79
Nal_rA 73
ToSsGirL 68
Soulkey 65
EffOrt 63
Snow 51
TY 51
Soma 45
Hyuk 44
Aegong 42
Light 36
Liquid`Ret 31
Backho 29
soO 27
Sharp 23
Movie 22
Sacsri 18
Bale 14
sorry 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 13
JYJ11
scan(afreeca) 8
Hm[arnc] 7
HiyA 7
Free 6
zelot 5
Terrorterran 1
Dota 2
XcaliburYe465
Fuzer 159
League of Legends
Dendi834
JimRising 384
Counter-Strike
oskar202
allub185
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King62
Other Games
summit1g6634
Happy309
SortOf133
mouzStarbuck126
NeuroSwarm52
ZerO(Twitch)6
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 35
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH142
• LUISG 20
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2186
Other Games
• WagamamaTV209
Upcoming Events
LiuLi Cup
43m
BSL Team Wars
8h 43m
Team Hawk vs Team Dewalt
Korean StarCraft League
16h 43m
CranKy Ducklings
23h 43m
SC Evo League
1d 1h
WardiTV Summer Champion…
1d 2h
Classic vs Percival
Spirit vs NightMare
CSO Cup
1d 5h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 7h
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 23h
SC Evo League
2 days
[ Show More ]
BSL Team Wars
2 days
Team Bonyth vs Team Sziky
Replay Cast
2 days
Afreeca Starleague
2 days
Queen vs HyuN
EffOrt vs Calm
Wardi Open
3 days
RotterdaM Event
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Rush vs TBD
Jaedong vs Mong
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
herO vs TBD
Royal vs Barracks
Replay Cast
5 days
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Jiahua Invitational
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
ASL Season 20
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
SEL Season 2 Championship
WardiTV Summer 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

Acropolis #4 - TS1
CSLAN 3
CSL Season 18: Qualifier 2
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
Chzzk MurlocKing SC1 vs SC2 Cup #2
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
EC S1
Sisters' Call Cup
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.