EPTAdd my username on there - it's my orc warrior.
World of Warcraft Classic - Page 9
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Gaskal
Canada241 Posts
Add my username on there - it's my orc warrior. | ||
|
Stancel
Singapore15360 Posts
rofl | ||
|
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
| ||
GTR
51448 Posts
| ||
|
Duka08
3391 Posts
I honestly can't remember what WoW 1.13 was like with regards to queues and cross-realm and pvp and any of that stuff. I don't think we really care about being on a "dead" server, we're not taking anything that seriously, but I don't want to be waiting hours for BGs in a couple months when we happen to have a little free time to play together | ||
|
Ryzel
United States529 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
In line with what we shared at BlizzCon last year, we intend to be very careful about allowing add-on functionality that might undermine aspects of the social dynamics that are core to the Classic experience, even in cases like this where it’s clear that the addon author had no ill intent and was simply trying to provide a service to the Classic community. Ultimately, if a streamlined group-finding system was something we considered compatible with Classic, we would have kept the modern Premade Group Finder tool rather than choosing to remove it from the Classic client. It’s difficult to articulate a clear-cut rule for exactly when an add-on crosses the line. However, when an add-on goes beyond presenting information or providing aesthetic customization, and attempts to create an interconnected social network that relies on other players also using that same add-on, we are likely to scrutinize it particularly closely." | ||
|
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
| ||
|
ThaddeusK
United States231 Posts
| ||
|
TheFish7
United States2824 Posts
| ||
TheEmulator
28089 Posts
| ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
The response time for even simple issues like appealing an automatic silence/ban due to a mistake in the system or a clique of players abusing the report functions is also 72 hours at the moment (GM's citing pre-classic traffic.. yikes when the actual launch happens) and those same systems are being applied to Classic. This is one area that's practically guaranteed to fall way short of the classic experience in a way that matters to me, yet almost nobody talks about it. I'd pay double sub for a dedicated GM team that plays the game and has live chat with a same-day response during certain business hours! | ||
|
Warri
Germany3208 Posts
00:49 @cyro Ill probably start on one of the new english pvp servers and play alliance with some friends. I was really considering playing mage for a bit but then i remembered how annoying it was to be mage in vanilla with everyone begging for tps and water. Having to arrive at the raids early to start the waterfall for every single healer and caster in the raid zzz. So im still undecided what class to play as of now. Kinda wanna do tank but i dont like warriors :/ | ||
|
ThaddeusK
United States231 Posts
On August 24 2019 12:21 TheEmulator wrote: People wanting retail quality of life stuff should just play retail. Similar addons existed in vanilla, everquest1 even added a similar LFG system back in 2003. The core of it is a listing of groups that are looking for people, thats not even vaguely a modern wow idea. | ||
|
Duka08
3391 Posts
That being said, I don't personally care either way. I have no idea what addons to expect to work, so I'm going in with assumptions that I might not use any at all. I will be interested to see where they keep drawing the line moving forward though, out of curiosity. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
On August 24 2019 20:18 Warri wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahWiIOm4uXw 00:49 @cyro Ill probably start on one of the new english pvp servers and play alliance with some friends. I was really considering playing mage for a bit but then i remembered how annoying it was to be mage in vanilla with everyone begging for tps and water. Having to arrive at the raids early to start the waterfall for every single healer and caster in the raid zzz. So im still undecided what class to play as of now. Kinda wanna do tank but i dont like warriors :/ Perfect! Lol On August 24 2019 23:54 ThaddeusK wrote: Similar addons existed in vanilla, everquest1 even added a similar LFG system back in 2003. The core of it is a listing of groups that are looking for people, thats not even vaguely a modern wow idea. The addon that they're talking about acted as a replacement for the LFG dungeon queue in modern WoW, where you just told it that you wanted to run e.g. deadmines and your role and it would invite 4 other people for you who happened to queue up. | ||
|
farvacola
United States18826 Posts
| ||
|
ThaddeusK
United States231 Posts
On August 25 2019 02:53 Cyro wrote: Perfect! Lol The addon that they're talking about acted as a replacement for the LFG dungeon queue in modern WoW, where you just told it that you wanted to run e.g. deadmines and your role and it would invite 4 other people for you who happened to queue up. The curseforge description of the addon mentioned by name in the blue post (ClassicLFG) specifically says it doesn't do that. www.curseforge.com I suppose they could be lying tho. edit: none of this is helped by the fact that blizzard gave almost no detail about what exactly is wrong with the addon in question. What I got from the blue post is the that they object to addons which communicate with each other using custom chat channels because it excludes people without the addon, but not only is that not particularly necessary for this addon to function, if they disallow that they are gonna hit alot more than just LFG addons. | ||
|
Warri
Germany3208 Posts
On August 25 2019 00:07 Duka08 wrote: A simple addon that lets you purely list "looking for more for X Y Z" in lieu of spamming trade/LFG in game seems harmless enough. You still need to manually contact, manually invite, get everyone to the instance/raid, etc. You're just cutting out the trade spam lol, and as a bonus maybe letting people filter the search by the instance or activity they're interested in. More extraneous things like some sort of gear level or automatic raid populating I can see why they'd be toeing the line. That is literally no different from retail mythic dungeon lfg. | ||
|
Cyro
United Kingdom20285 Posts
On August 25 2019 03:07 ThaddeusK wrote: The curseforge description of the addon mentioned by name in the blue post (ClassicLFG) specifically says it doesn't do that. www.curseforge.com I suppose they could be lying tho. Here is footage showing the functionality ingame, it did indeed do that and those functions are what started the big debate a few days ago. It might not any more, i imagine the author would rather remove a few offending features than throw all of their work in the trash | ||
| ||
