EPTLiquid Civilization Announcement Discussion - Page 6
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
saltis
159 Posts
| ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
Competitive Civ, next we will pick up a Settlers of Catan team. | ||
|
washikie
United States752 Posts
| ||
|
opisska
Poland8852 Posts
On October 22 2016 17:38 FueledUpAndReadyToGo wrote: We are about as far from april first as we can be but I still had to check the date Competitive Civ, next we will pick up a Settlers of Catan team. Say what you want but with the expansion pack with knights and cities, Settlers is an incredibly deep game for how little bookkeeping it needs in the paper form | ||
|
FueledUpAndReadyToGo
Netherlands30548 Posts
On October 22 2016 17:50 opisska wrote: Say what you want but with the expansion pack with knights and cities, Settlers is an incredibly deep game for how little bookkeeping it needs in the paper form Oh, I like Settlers of Catan and Civ. I just don't see it getting an audience  Also from the article "MrGameTheory currently plays for Team Liquid's Clash Royale team" Wait what? When did this happen | ||
|
maze.
Germany1392 Posts
On October 22 2016 11:29 Manit0u wrote: Civ IV was so much better than Civ V... I'm hesitant to pick up Civ VI just now. Rule of Civ games: Always wait for the first expansion. | ||
|
Duckman
United States158 Posts
| ||
|
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On October 22 2016 19:13 ZenithM wrote: Wait, isn't Civ VI still a turn-based game? We're not exactly talking chess or go kind of turn-based either. Can we somewhat play the turns simultaneously because otherwise it'll truly be a bore to watch. i dont know about civ VI but simultanous turns were "the standard" way to play Civ IV and it still took weeks to finish a single game | ||
|
wilio1
1 Post
And for those of you who complain that it's too long: Come on, a BO5 of Lol can take up to 4+ hours. A competitive match of Civ with the new "online" speed will last much shorter than this. | ||
|
SinO[Ob]
France898 Posts
| ||
|
OtherWorld
France17333 Posts
| ||
|
Clonester
Germany2808 Posts
On October 22 2016 19:14 Ej_ wrote: i dont know about civ VI but simultanous turns were "the standard" way to play Civ IV and it still took weeks to finish a single game Normally you got simultaneosly turns till you are at war with each other and then it is one after another. But can anyone who actually knows how CIV esports work, tell me what setups are played? Team games? Mapsize? Mapconfig? From stone age to modern age? What are the key elements of a "standard" match? | ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
BaneRiders
Sweden3630 Posts
..and yeah, unless something has changed dramatically with how the game is played, a match could go on for many days, no? Which isn't necessarily a problem. We just have to learn to follow a game over days, much like cricket fans I suppose? | ||
|
Aceace
Turkey1305 Posts
On October 22 2016 19:16 wilio1 wrote: And for those of you who complain that it's too long: Come on, a BO5 of Lol can take up to 4+ hours. A competitive match of Civ with the new "online" speed will last much shorter than this. You are right about Bo3-Bo5-Bo7 format. (In AoE2 final matches playing Bo11 regularly) but still you are missing a point. These are completely independent matches. Every round matters, every round plays differently, every round has its own story. | ||
|
Gwavajuice
France1810 Posts
On October 22 2016 20:54 BaneRiders wrote: I still miss a game of CIV II (that's how old I am) and no version came close to it in terms of entertainment for me, but I haven't seen the latest versions to be fair. ..and yeah, unless something has changed dramatically with how the game is played, a match could go on for many days, no? Which isn't necessarily a problem. We just have to learn to follow a game over days, much like cricket fans I suppose? I would about to write exactly the same thing, civ 2 is the broodwar of the franchise, sorta  | ||
|
TwiggyWan
France336 Posts
Or Go lol :p | ||
|
No Swear
51 Posts
 | ||
|
neutralrobot
Australia1025 Posts
On October 22 2016 18:02 maze. wrote: Rule of Civ games: Always wait for the first expansion. I dunno, I thought Civ II and Civ III were great right out of the box. Civ IV was also pretty good, but buggy for me. But Civ V didn't grab me at all somehow. | ||
| ||
