EPTTotal War: Warhammer - Page 42
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
plated.rawr
Norway1676 Posts
On July 21 2016 09:04 Jerubaal wrote: So apparently if you're sieging a city and that city confederates with another faction, you lose all your siege equipment. Thanks! Yea, that's pretty annoying. I've lost quite a bunch of AFK-rounds due to filthy enemies confederating the round before attrition. | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17261 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
On July 22 2016 00:02 Manit0u wrote: Just bring siege weapons (cannons and such) if you can and I think you then don't have to build the equipment (I also think that you can then attack the city immediately without the need for siege but I'm not sure). Yeah, I always have at least one siege weapon embedded in my army, so I basically never lay siege to cities. Most of the time there's nothing there but the garrison anyway, so I just auto-resolve the battle and move on. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
Artesimo
Germany546 Posts
On July 22 2016 16:50 Jerubaal wrote: Was playing as Vampire Counts so...no siege weapons. Pretty sure you can't just attack without it, as it wasn't giving me the option. You could destroy the walls with an agent, thats what I do a lot. | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17261 Posts
On July 22 2016 22:01 Artesimo wrote: You could destroy the walls with an agent, thats what I do a lot. I believe that flying units might help you out in this case. I wouldn't leave home with vamp army without at least one TG and 2 VG units  | ||
|
Artesimo
Germany546 Posts
On July 23 2016 04:24 Manit0u wrote: I believe that flying units might help you out in this case. I wouldn't leave home with vamp army without at least one TG and 2 VG units It wont let him attack without building siege weapons though, right? | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17261 Posts
On July 23 2016 05:42 Artesimo wrote: It wont let him attack without building siege weapons though, right? Don't remember. After beating Empire campaign and starting a bunch of other I pretty much play MP exclusively in TWH. | ||
|
Artesimo
Germany546 Posts
On July 23 2016 06:04 Manit0u wrote: Don't remember. After beating Empire campaign and starting a bunch of other I pretty much play MP exclusively in TWH. I see, a polish masochist  I find the MP not very fun at all while playing matchmaking. Atthe beginning I had some fun building countercheese armies, but overall the lord sniping is a bit tedious. Playing it with friends is super fun though. | ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17261 Posts
| ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
| ||
|
Archeon
3253 Posts
I think having 1 or 2 in the army is pretty good. Unless you are fighting trash only I'm not sure if more is better. I don't think that they let you skip sieges. They definitely beat Vargeister in every way imaginable though. Sieges in general are really stupid and really could use a rework. It doesn't make any sense to wait for siege equipment in the first place if it's so bad that you pretty much never use it since everyone can just climb up walls or attack the gate without moving at 50% speed. Also it takes so long that I've done it like three times in roughly three campaigns. | ||
|
CuddlyCuteKitten
Sweden2620 Posts
| ||
|
Manit0u
Poland17261 Posts
On July 23 2016 11:47 Jerubaal wrote: No, I do usually have two Vargheist units in my armies, but it still won't let you attack. Are Terrorgheists really worth it? I find them really good. They wreck most things (they can even tackle steam tanks) and cause terror. It's also nice that you can get them out relatively early (T3) and in the campaign Templehof has a special building that lets you get them at vet 3 instantly. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
It is funny how stupid ridiculous the Vampire Lords are, though, My level 2 Lord with nothing but Hunger and Nehek outdueled a level 16 barbarian lord even with half his army helping. | ||
|
B.I.G.
3251 Posts
| ||
|
xDaunt
United States17988 Posts
| ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
On July 24 2016 03:19 Jerubaal wrote: Ugh, just got into Turn 90 of my VC campaign and the bloody Skaeling/Shitty Chaos armies are sooo annoyng in the wide open space of the Empire. I'm getting ready to quit I think. Vamps are fun but get a little one dimensional. It is funny how stupid ridiculous the Vampire Lords are, though, My level 2 Lord with nothing but Hunger and Nehek outdueled a level 16 barbarian lord even with half his army helping. I think the biggest issue with the game is that lords and agents of a variety of types are too strong. I'd like to see everything nerf'd across the board. Early in my VH Vampire counts campaign I had Manfred and Varghulf and 2 skeleton units beat a full stack of empire troops. | ||
|
Archeon
3253 Posts
On July 24 2016 03:19 Jerubaal wrote: Ugh, just got into Turn 90 of my VC campaign and the bloody Skaeling/Shitty Chaos armies are sooo annoyng in the wide open space of the Empire. I'm getting ready to quit I think. Vamps are fun but get a little one dimensional. It is funny how stupid ridiculous the Vampire Lords are, though, My level 2 Lord with nothing but Hunger and Nehek outdueled a level 16 barbarian lord even with half his army helping. Not surprised, the ai levels heroes in the most braindead way possible. If the rest of his army doesn't have armor pierce and is low tech they deal practically no damage because only like 6 of them can attack at the same time. Means he's almost fighting a 1v1 against a barbarian, with nehek being reportedly pretty broken. Unless the chaos brings chosen or giants or sth. Maybe marauder with great weapons. I agree to agents and lords being too strong in the game. I'm okay with high level lords being wrecking machines, but lvl 1 non-magician lords can 1v2 most low tier stack without problems. | ||
| ||
