EPTNintendo Announces Smash Bros Invitational Tourney - Page 18
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
Kishin2
United States7534 Posts
| ||
|
rabidch
United States20289 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:19 Shikyo wrote: In Brawl you would have 3 stocks in a 8 minute match which would have been perfect. In Brawl 4 stock matches would time out all the time as well. yes, exactly. the thing is, im not looking for a sequel to brawl, im looking for a sequel to melee. | ||
stuchiu
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
| ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
| ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:19 Shikyo wrote: In Brawl you would have 3 stocks in a 8 minute match which would have been perfect. In Brawl 4 stock matches would time out all the time as well. While it is WAAAAAAAAAAAY too early to make assessment based on a single no-items 1v1, it seems that 3-stock might be a perfect setup for Smash 4, with few to no timeouts. We'll see what develops when MikeHaze and Keitaro and the like get their hands on it. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:21 Kishin2 wrote: Anyone still have hope for things like melee airdodge and etc. as optional game settings? It's so simple to make the game a competitive success(diagonal airdodges and dash dancing) without hurting casual players at all *Yawns* | ||
GTR
51500 Posts
| ||
|
WakaDoDo
Sweden1183 Posts
| ||
|
chipmonklord17
United States11944 Posts
| ||
|
Tresher
Germany404 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:18 Circumstance wrote: Because there is a clock on every competitive Smash match in every tournament ever. Im not a Smash brothers follower , but that Sudden Death didnt looked very good. Was it always like that? The one who gets a lucky hit first wins. Looks really bad for a competitive scene. If they really want to build up a big scene they should change that. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:21 amazingxkcd wrote: The one fucking brawl player won. Playing like a god damn pussy. Confirmed Brawl players > Melee players, then? | ||
|
amazingxkcd
GRAND OLD AMERICA16375 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:23 Shikyo wrote: Confirmed Brawl players > Melee players, then? Brawl 2.0, I dont see why not? | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:23 Tresher wrote: Im not a Smash brothers follower , but that Sudden Death didnt looked very good. Was it always like that? The one who gets a lucky hit first wins. Looks really bad for a competitive scene. If they really want to build up a big scene they should change that. Competitive SSBM never has sudden death, games are decided by who has higher % at the end(Which is stupid as well since Snake for example would naturally tend to have higher % than Jigglypuff) | ||
|
rabidch
United States20289 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:21 amazingxkcd wrote: The one fucking brawl player won. Playing like a god damn pussy. zero is a melee player too. he just had better results in brawl. | ||
|
ketomai
United States2789 Posts
| ||
imallinson
United Kingdom3482 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:23 Tresher wrote: Im not a Smash brothers follower , but that Sudden Death didnt looked very good. Was it always like that? The one who gets a lucky hit first wins. Looks really bad for a competitive scene. If they really want to build up a big scene they should change that. Tournament rules just take the %age when the time runs out. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On June 11 2014 10:24 ketomai wrote: Competitive SSBM doesn't really reach that stage often. Most matches are over in less than 3-4 minutes. Peach vs Samus on DL64 always times out, though. | ||
|
GhandiEAGLE
United States20754 Posts
| ||
|
Talron
Germany7651 Posts
I'm somewhere around 6. 7 if I'm being generous. | ||
| ||
