EPTe: Apparently the province religion isn't a factor, just the country's religion is. This is probably going to be awful.
Europa Universalis IV - Page 146
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
nimbim
Germany983 Posts
e: Apparently the province religion isn't a factor, just the country's religion is. This is probably going to be awful. | ||
|
cythaze
830 Posts
how and why?  | ||
|
nimbim
Germany983 Posts
| ||
|
cythaze
830 Posts
On August 17 2015 00:15 nimbim wrote: You have to wait for the game to finish loading the save before you click on play. Once you've lost ironman to this it cannot be restored. i definitly did this. it happened mid play. I formed HRE, did my tedious micro managment if organizing my troops, forts, colonies and such, then clicked save game (out of habit) when i was done with that. The standard save game window pops up and asks me to name my savestate. closed that window again to let the game autosave on 1st of the month, which it did, so i thought i´m fine. turns it the autosave was a yearly one and now i am left with a ironman-less autosavestate... | ||
|
MaCRo.gg
Korea (South)860 Posts
I've been trying to take Japan while slowly compromising the Ming but I haven't found a way to beat the Ming yet. Is it possible to take on the Manchu from the beginning? | ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
On August 17 2015 00:43 MaCRo.gg wrote: Whats the best way to play Korea? I've been trying to take Japan while slowly compromising the Ming but I haven't found a way to beat the Ming yet. Is it possible to take on the Manchu from the beginning? Manchu doesn't exist at the 1444 start anymore? If you mean the tribes, yeah sure that shouldn't be a problem. | ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On August 17 2015 00:43 MaCRo.gg wrote: Whats the best way to play Korea? I've been trying to take Japan while slowly compromising the Ming but I haven't found a way to beat the Ming yet. Is it possible to take on the Manchu from the beginning? It was a while since, but I played an ironman game as Korea on (I think) the Art of War patch. I remember that I played very defensively vs. Japan and instead focused on the Asian mainland. I think my strategy in that game was to ally Ming early on (and eventually Buryatia) and use that as a tool to win wars vs the Machurian nations and Korchin. Then I proceeded to taking advantage of Ming imploding to get their lands. After that point I remember that I had some back-and-forth wars with Oirat while being in general on the defensive side, mostly since Russia had arrived and Russias opinion of me switch back-and-forth quite a bit | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
On August 17 2015 00:54 Bojas wrote: Manchu doesn't exist at the 1444 start anymore? If you mean the tribes, yeah sure that shouldn't be a problem. Did it ever? I thought it was always the three tribes that can form them but not Manchu itself. | ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
On August 17 2015 02:17 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Did it ever? I thought it was always the three tribes that can form them but not Manchu itself. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/QZtL35C.png) old 1444 start | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
What's the green thing between Tunisia and Mamluks? | ||
|
MaCRo.gg
Korea (South)860 Posts
On August 17 2015 00:58 WindWolf wrote: It was a while since, but I played an ironman game as Korea on (I think) the Art of War patch. I remember that I played very defensively vs. Japan and instead focused on the Asian mainland. I think my strategy in that game was to ally Ming early on (and eventually Buryatia) and use that as a tool to win wars vs the Machurian nations and Korchin. Then I proceeded to taking advantage of Ming imploding to get their lands. After that point I remember that I had some back-and-forth wars with Oirat while being in general on the defensive side, mostly since Russia had arrived and Russias opinion of me switch back-and-forth quite a bit Do you think the tribes are easier to exploit or the shogun system of Japan is easier to exploit? I thought that I could use my superior navy to really break apart Japan by using the Osaka choke-hold. This part of the world seems to be a bit more difficult than I originally thought. | ||
|
Broetchenholer
Germany1840 Posts
| ||
|
WindWolf
Sweden11767 Posts
On August 17 2015 04:31 MaCRo.gg wrote: Do you think the tribes are easier to exploit or the shogun system of Japan is easier to exploit? I thought that I could use my superior navy to really break apart Japan by using the Osaka choke-hold. This part of the world seems to be a bit more difficult than I originally thought. Since I also did a game as Japan (where I was able to get a hand on Korea and a bit of (present day) China) I'd say it depends. If I had to say something, it is easier to focus on the Asian mainland but this depends on things like your current situation, what allies you and your enemies currently have and so on After a daimyo-independence war Japan will most likely be rather weak because those wars will cost lots of manpower from my experience. But on the other hand you will need a rather strong navy if you're going to initiate a war on Japan. | ||
|
RvB
Netherlands6188 Posts
On August 17 2015 03:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: What's the green thing between Tunisia and Mamluks? Tripoli | ||
|
MaCRo.gg
Korea (South)860 Posts
On August 17 2015 05:10 WindWolf wrote: Since I also did a game as Japan (where I was able to get a hand on Korea and a bit of (present day) China) I'd say it depends. If I had to say something, it is easier to focus on the Asian mainland but this depends on things like your current situation, what allies you and your enemies currently have and so on After a daimyo-independence war Japan will most likely be rather weak because those wars will cost lots of manpower from my experience. But on the other hand you will need a rather strong navy if you're going to initiate a war on Japan. My friend told me it was possible to create a big enough distraction on the Shikoku Island then pull out and trap a large force on the island. I usually can get a good navy lead so I can blockade those units on that Island while taking out chunks of the mainland Japan. Is that strategy still viable? | ||
|
Sermokala
United States13700 Posts
On August 17 2015 04:53 Broetchenholer wrote: Is anyone excited about Stellaris? I trust Paradox way more to do a Master of Orion then Wargaming. So, lease let it be good. Hypeeeeee-u!!!!!!! The thing's they're talking about has my fable hype/spore hype radar blaring pretty loudly. They're talking about things that not only have never been seriously attempted before but also includes the potential for every single scifi property to show up in some not copyright infringing way or another. | ||
|
Bojas
Netherlands2397 Posts
On August 17 2015 03:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: What's the green thing between Tunisia and Mamluks? Tripoli, under a personal union with Tunisia. Why do I remember these useless things LOL. | ||
|
Sermokala
United States13700 Posts
On August 17 2015 05:54 Bojas wrote: Tripoli, under a personal union with Tunisia. Why do I remember these useless things LOL. If I remember correctly it was said it was there beacuse "one of the beta testers was a marine and thought that there should have been a tripoli state about that time". | ||
|
nimbim
Germany983 Posts
On August 17 2015 05:42 MaCRo.gg wrote: My friend told me it was possible to create a big enough distraction on the Shikoku Island then pull out and trap a large force on the island. I usually can get a good navy lead so I can blockade those units on that Island while taking out chunks of the mainland Japan. Is that strategy still viable? Yes.+ Show Spoiler + On August 17 2015 06:21 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Is it still in the game and releasable, like Aquileia? If it isn't, I kinda want to make a custom one and get a WC with the Gaddafi dynasty. Yes, I used them in my Mzab campaign. | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
Is it still in the game and releasable, like Aquileia? If it isn't, I kinda want to make a custom one and get a WC with the Gaddafi dynasty. | ||
| ||
