EPTSimCity 5 - Page 73
| Forum Index > General Games |
[TL]Hanabi - US West 4 [TL]Ohana - US East 4 [TL] Destination East 4 | ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
| ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
Have fun! Please don't make res only towns. | ||
|
Disregard
China10252 Posts
| ||
|
noeljones
Australia119 Posts
 | ||
|
Arkless
Canada1547 Posts
On March 30 2013 07:58 Abraxas514 wrote: OK I invited delamay. Anyone who wants in add me. Please only start one city/person unless you're taking one of the "mining" spots. Have fun! Please don't make res only towns. Send an invite, my origin ID is 4rk1355 | ||
|
rod409
United States36 Posts
| ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
| ||
|
Chillax
England585 Posts
imgur.com/a/gW7F9 | ||
|
Hadley88
Germany267 Posts
On March 31 2013 07:36 Chillax wrote: This just in, this game is extremely broken imgur.com/a/gW7F9 This game is so terrible. HAHAHA. They should rename it to "Casual SimCity Online". | ||
|
ztranger
Sweden57 Posts
| ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
On March 31 2013 07:36 Chillax wrote: This just in, this game is extremely broken imgur.com/a/gW7F9 Everything will be fixed by the end of April. But since Sim City is a game where you always attempt to challenge yourself, and there is no "end goal" apart from your self-imposed challenges, these sorts of bugs don't ruin the game. | ||
|
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
On March 31 2013 08:00 ztranger wrote: If you play with 0% tax, yes the game is broken, but as soon as you increase tax to a decent level the game becomes a lot more challenging. So it's not an issue for players that don't abuse the low tax happiness. What. That's like saying... Ok, I'm stumped. I actually sat here for 5 whole minutes trying to think of a game where there was a completely abusable strategy that everyone agreed was good if you didn't do that, and I couldn't think of one. Not a single game. Like, I really can't think of any other game that is even considered decent that has a broken strategy. | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On March 31 2013 07:36 Chillax wrote: This just in, this game is extremely broken imgur.com/a/gW7F9 No crime no fire? he's playing in sandbox mode and turned it off you can get the buildings like that and the pop but without crime fire etc even at 0% and no body else in the region that doesn't create super sims... You can get that raw population though. edit: confirming it yeah you do get the population at 500k atm but the place is consistently on fire. Also you can't have power or water because then residence get put on sale if you don't give them anything they wont move out and put the building on sale. | ||
|
woody60707
United States1863 Posts
| ||
|
TheRabidDeer
United States3806 Posts
On March 31 2013 07:36 Chillax wrote: This just in, this game is extremely broken imgur.com/a/gW7F9 Charge 0 taxes until population reaches 1.8 million Charge 20% taxes Bulldoze everything | ||
|
Mambo
Denmark1338 Posts
MamboNo1 | ||
|
semantics
10040 Posts
On March 31 2013 11:18 TheRabidDeer wrote: Charge 0 taxes until population reaches 1.8 million Charge 20% taxes Bulldoze everything Doesn't quite work like that it's an obvious troll, even at 0% taxes you still get crime and fire he did it in sandbox mode and turned those things off, fire esp slows this down. I've been running a city for about 2 hours now outside of sandbox mode and stuck around 800k because of fire, the city is always on fire all the time. Although oddly enough you have to not give them power or water because if you do they abandon the house much quicker and you don't get the population lol. It also has to be done essentially on a new region if there are other cities connected you get too much traffic off the visitor bug | ||
|
noD
2230 Posts
overall the game is pretty much dumbed down from sc4, those are the cons the pro is that it's awesome and relaxing game. If i dont think of sc but more of a farmville it's perfect | ||
|
upperbound
United States2300 Posts
| ||
|
Abraxas514
Canada475 Posts
On April 01 2013 00:30 upperbound wrote: I think if you look at the region as a "city" and the cities as "boroughs" a la New York the game makes much more sense, though it would be great if these boroughs connected and were not necessarily square shaped as in the current iteration. This would allow two people to feel like they were working on the same city as well in a way that made sense, or it would allow players to work on their own private cities in a more satisfying way. Agreed. You would want one "mayor" like Bloomberg, for example, and then five or 6 city planners for each borough. But lets wait until they fix what's broken before adding more  | ||
| ||
