|
On August 24 2011 07:59 Empyrean wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 07:54 wuBu wrote:+ Show Spoiler +Hmm, now you got me thinking more. Interesting how many top GMs favor the 5. d4 lines, and now I should probably do more research.
And Empyrean, you're right that we're not following the main line Ruy Lopez. But, 4...Nf6 is considered the main line of the Classical Defence., in which white's usual response (assuming we're following the main line of the Classical) is to castle. Note: I'm not saying that following this line is the correct way to play because it is not. I'm just giving a reason as to why I chose this move because I'm the type of player that likes to play a more safe, positional game (d4 player at heart XD).
This is the line I'm looking at as my reasoning for 5. 0-0:
4.c3 Nf6 5.0-0 0-0 6.d4 Bb6 7.Re1 d6 8.Bg5
But I'll reconsider the position after I take my final this week x_x. + Show Spoiler +This assumes that black castles right after we do. What if he answers with 5 ...a6? + Show Spoiler + 4.c3 Nf6 5.0-0 0-0 6.d4 Bb6
is actually standard(in the sense of mentioned everywhere as normal line in Classical defense) play. It even has its own name, Benelux variation. It is possible that it fell out of use in current GM play.
As for 5. .. a6 , why would he do that and what problems do you see for us in that move ? I do not want to think about it too much if you are just throwing random move out there. On the first glance it makes no sense for him to do that, as he develops nothing while we just castled and our bishop moves to pretty good spot.
|
On August 24 2011 08:35 jdseemoreglass wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 08:28 Picklesicle wrote:On August 24 2011 08:22 jdseemoreglass wrote:Response to picklesicle the line 5. d4 exd4 6. e5 Ng4+ Show Spoiler + There are a few problems with this move.
1) It removes the knight from defense of the c3 square, allowing white to develop his knight there against the bishop check.
2) It removes the knight from the defense of the e7 square, which weakens the defense against white's eventual threat of Bg5.
3) It discourages black from being able to castle king-side. Castling would lead to h3 Nh6 Bxh6, busting the king-side open.
Done. You have fully convinced me that neither 6. e5 Nd5 nor 6. e5 Ng4 work. I stand corrected. My vote is now 5. d4I will obliterate my earlier post arguing for 5. 0-0, or at least add a note to the top pointing out my change of heart. Again, 5. d4 I'm glad we are having this debate, I think it's fun. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I just want to clarify, I never said Nd5 doesn't work, because it certainly can. I was simply trying to debate the people arguing that 5. d4 puts white at a disadvantage, or wins a pawn. I think both sides still have good chances in that position.
Me too! I love chess and don't play enough of it any more. This is perfect for me.
I shall correct my language. I understood what you were saying and I agree. I just used English poorly. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
+ Show Spoiler +I think at one point I argue that the positions end up at basically equal, with White having dynamic advantages in development and initiative, but having a weak d-pawn and weaker queenside pawns. My fear was that Black would have time to capitalize on those as the dynamic advantages fade away over time. Amusingly, my original vote for 5. 0-0 actually gives Black more time to do precisely that.
I actually still think 5. 0-0 is an acceptable move, 5. d4 is just much much sharper and keeps the initiative. You've successfully shown at least me that it is not at all as risky as I had originally believed.
|
Blazinghand
United States25550 Posts
On August 24 2011 08:42 Picklesicle wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 08:35 jdseemoreglass wrote:On August 24 2011 08:28 Picklesicle wrote:On August 24 2011 08:22 jdseemoreglass wrote:Response to picklesicle the line 5. d4 exd4 6. e5 Ng4+ Show Spoiler + There are a few problems with this move.
1) It removes the knight from defense of the c3 square, allowing white to develop his knight there against the bishop check.
2) It removes the knight from the defense of the e7 square, which weakens the defense against white's eventual threat of Bg5.
3) It discourages black from being able to castle king-side. Castling would lead to h3 Nh6 Bxh6, busting the king-side open.
Done. You have fully convinced me that neither 6. e5 Nd5 nor 6. e5 Ng4 work. I stand corrected. My vote is now 5. d4I will obliterate my earlier post arguing for 5. 0-0, or at least add a note to the top pointing out my change of heart. Again, 5. d4 I'm glad we are having this debate, I think it's fun. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" I just want to clarify, I never said Nd5 doesn't work, because it certainly can. I was simply trying to debate the people arguing that 5. d4 puts white at a disadvantage, or wins a pawn. I think both sides still have good chances in that position. Me too! I love chess and don't play enough of it any more. This is perfect for me. I shall correct my language. I understood what you were saying and I agree. I just used English poorly. + Show Spoiler +I think at one point I argue that the positions end up at basically equal, with White having dynamic advantages in development and initiative, but having a weak d-pawn and weaker queenside pawns. My fear was that Black would have time to capitalize on those as the dynamic advantages fade away over time. Amusingly, my original vote for 5. 0-0 actually gives Black more time to do precisely that. I actually still think 5. 0-0 is an acceptable move, 5. d4 is just much much sharper and keeps the initiative. You've successfully shown at least me that it is not at all as risky as I had originally believed. I went for a period believing it was a gambit: material for initiative and position. Given my own nature as a player, I shied away from it. I was so so wrong. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
I'm not saying this will let him instantly beat us, but could we possibly spoiler when we talk about tactics? I'm sure the OP appreciates it as well.
|
On August 24 2011 06:27 jdseemoreglass wrote:I can't wait for the opening to be over with so people can actually think about their moves instead of spamming the word "standard" as an argument. I don't know if you guys are using wikipedia or something, but 5. d4 is far more popular among top grandmasters from the database of games I am skimming through... Alexei Shirov, 2751 ELO vs. Peter Leko, 2725 ELO, 5. d4 Bb6Vassily Smyslov (former world champion) vs. Gedeon Barcza, 5. d4 Bb6Boris Spassky (former world champion) vs. Leonid Stein, 5. d4 Bb6Mikhail Tal (former world champion) vs. Dirk Van Geet, 5. d4 Bb6Nigel Short 2650 ELO vs. Boris Gulko 2610 ELO, 5. d4 Bb6There is a reason in game after game in my database, white usually chooses to play d4 and black usually responds with a simple bishop retreat: it's because trading the e-pawn does NOT lead to positional weaknesses for white. It usually leads to rapid development and strong initiative for a potential attack. If you want to choose and argue for 5. O-O, go ahead, but saying "standard line, standard line" over and over is nonsense. If 5. d4 is good enough for top grandmasters, it is certainly good enough for us. Show nested quote +On August 23 2011 15:59 Sandwhale wrote:5. O-O+ Show Spoiler +Standard line is standard. On August 23 2011 15:37 jdseemoreglass wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/8Iddy.png) This is actually the type of position that feels like a strength because of the increased space we gain in the center, but is actually a weakness. We don't want to have an overextended center which will be undermined by the [d6] move that you outline. Committing our pawns to a d4-e5 formation means that our pawn center will have to be traded off very soon, resulting in a game where we have minimal advantages. + Show Spoiler +This is actually the type of position where the extended pawn looks like a weakness, but actually it isn't.
Look at all of the factors. White has an advantage in space, central control, better development (his pieces are on their ideal squares), and his king is safely castled. Now look at black. His position is cramped, his king is still in the center, he wasted a tempo retreating the bishop, his dark-bishop is temporarily hemmed in by his own pawn, his c6 knight is currently pinned and is practically useless... his only active piece, the knight on d5, is currently being attacked and must be defended immediately.
The point is white has a strong initiative, and can decide when and how to resolve the central tension. Even if we end up with an isolated queen pawn is not much of a weakness, in fact in many cases it can result in a very strong game for white. Kinda funny that the move that is the favorite among world champions and challengers to world champions is not considered "standard," and is about to lose the vote. lol data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
+ Show Spoiler +If you want to use databases as an argument, then here it goes. http://chesstempo.com/gamedb/opening/2374#http://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=9&n=7059&ms=e4.e5.Nf3.Nc6.Bb5.Bc5.c3.Nf6&ns=3.5.5.6.5.993.1101.7059Within these two popular, public databases (I had to skip chessgames.com's database, since I can't browse far enough in), 5. O-O is far more popular than 5.d4 amongst, at least, expert+ level play. And narrowing down to any range for chesstempo's database, 5. O-O remains 5 times more popular than 5. d4. Using individual games as your representative group doesn't cut it, since I would have no problem finding 5 equally skilled GMs who used 5. O-O instead, not to mention most of your game examples are from before the true "computer generation" of chess, in which openings have been far more scrutinized since. In fact, the most recent game played between two 2700+ players is http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1531081Now going back to the actual position in the spoilers, black can simply just follow [9.. Nc3 10. bxc3 O-O 11. Bxc6 bxc6] and have a completely even game. His doubled pawn weakness is simply mirrored by our overextension. The line that I think will be most common is similar to ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/TVY3V.png) in jdseemoreglass' post, though 8. Nbd2 is the most common response in place of 8. Bd2, as shown in http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1564018. After 8. Nbd2 d5 9. O-O O-O 10. Qa4 Bxd2, and the game feels extremely equal and passive, since neither player really has counterplay on either side. After 8. Bd2, as suggested, 8... Nxd2 leads to counterplay for black very quickly. i.e: 9. Nxd2 a6 10. Ba4 b5 11. Bc2 Bb7 +/-, but with equal winning chances.
|
5. d4
+ Show Spoiler +I've never liked castling, I don't give a shit what the 'standard' is because playing my own way is how I win all my games. Let's get aggressive here.
|
5. d4
+ Show Spoiler +And white has gained his strong center with the two pawns on d4 and e4. Black's possible responses:
5...exd4 6. e5 Nd5 (or Ne4) 7. cxd4 Bb4+ 8. Bd2
5...Bb6. Here we can either go 6. Bxc6 d6 7. Nxe5 or 6. Bg5
|
On August 24 2011 11:41 enigmaticcam wrote:5. d4+ Show Spoiler +And white has gained his strong center with the two pawns on d4 and e4. Black's possible responses:
5...exd4 6. e5 Nd5 (or Ne4) 7. cxd4 Bb4+ 8. Bd2
5...Bb6. Here we can either go 6. Bxc6 d6 7. Nxe5 or 6. Bg5
+ Show Spoiler + 5...Bb6. 6. 0-0 I guess you don't like to castle also? If we play 5. d4, we probably get to castle on move 6, but it is still a risk. Castling not only put the king to safety, also develop the rook.
|
|
On August 24 2011 11:54 chesshaha wrote:Show nested quote +On August 24 2011 11:41 enigmaticcam wrote:5. d4+ Show Spoiler +And white has gained his strong center with the two pawns on d4 and e4. Black's possible responses:
5...exd4 6. e5 Nd5 (or Ne4) 7. cxd4 Bb4+ 8. Bd2
5...Bb6. Here we can either go 6. Bxc6 d6 7. Nxe5 or 6. Bg5 + Show Spoiler + 5...Bb6. 6. 0-0 I guess you don't like to castle also? If we play 5. d4, we probably get to castle on move 6, but it is still a risk. Castling not only put the king to safety, also develop the rook.
+ Show Spoiler +Yeah, I think we have the initiative, and we have to continue the pressure in the center. I don't quite see any way yet for Black to take advantage of our center king (although I did see one line go: 5. d4 Bb6 6. Nxe5 Nxe5 7. dxe5 Nxe4 8. Qg4 Bxf2+, which leads to a weird position that I haven't yet determined if either player is better. At a glance, it looks bad for white, but I think there are some strong tactical advantages white has in this position).
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. d4
+ Show Spoiler +Although I like 5. 0-0, I think d4 is a much more tactical and sharp move. If we decided to play c3 last turn, we can't simply put our plans on hold. Otherwise, what was the purpose of playing c3?
|
Votes 5. 0-0: 16 (Misder, Babyfactory, wuBu, Empyrean, Picklesicle, noclaninator, Sandwhale, chesshaha, Raysalis, wizard944, Ikari, Varpulis, Blazinghand, mcc, NoobieOne, Rybread, aphorism, KingStuart, Malinor) 5. d4: 19 (qrs, imBLIND, itsjustatank, ParanoiaHoT, jdseemoreglass, Malli, pburns, Empyrean, LaxerCannon, Sc1pio, Picklesickle, GreatestThreat, enigmaticcam, Jumbled, shackes, timh, EnderSword, mastergriggy, aphorism)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/R4fd9.png)
This time it seems to be coming down to a choice of two moves. There's been a quite a lot of discussion about both, and some good points made on either side. Many posts have been heavy in detailed analysis, and I haven't had time to go through every single one, but a few points seem clear:
1. Both moves are playable and have been played, on the highest of levels. Arguments like "the textbook says this", or "this loses a pawn/gives one side a clearly inferior position" have been refuted. Therefore, it comes down to a preference of style. 2. In general terms: 0-0 is a safe move. It refrains from kick-starting anything, and gives both sides another move to martial their forces before initiating conflict. d4, on the other hand, is a more forcing move. It forces Black to respond to us; at the same time, it commits us to an extent as well. For instance, if you want to avoid the possibility of having to play an early e5, you probably don't want to play d4 yet.
In general, therefore, I'd say that d4 is the move to choose if you feel confident in our ability to continue to dictate the flow of play and want to give Black the least possible room to breathe. 0-0 is the move to choose if you are feeling quiet and want to get all your ducks in a row before starting the fireworks.
Most relevant here, however, would be a summary of what each move can lead to that the other one can't. I don't feel up to this yet, but if anyone feels they can do that, that would be a great contribution.
|
I thought 0-0 was going to win, but looks like d4 is majority vote. + Show Spoiler +I guess d4 could be more tactical. I voted for 0-0 and expect black to castle as well, and then play d4 on move 6. But if we play d4 now black could play exd, which is fine and will be interesting already. I think most people not use to email chess and want some action right now, lol.
|
16950 Posts
|
On August 25 2011 05:46 Empyrean wrote: (quickly, vote for a4!)
I'll change my vote to a4 if votes are not close between d4 and 0-0. lol
|
On August 25 2011 05:45 chesshaha wrote:I thought 0-0 was going to win, but looks like d4 is majority vote. + Show Spoiler +I guess d4 could be more tactical. I voted for 0-0 and expect black to castle as well, and then play d4 on move 6. But if we play d4 now black could play exd, which is fine and will be interesting already. I think most people not use to email chess and want some action right now, lol.
I don't disagree. + Show Spoiler +You might recall that I originally was a proponent for 5. 0-0 as a quieter play (my strength), also with the intent of 6. d4 if Black plays 5. ... 0-0, with a developed rook and an eye to an eventual Qe2.
5. d4 is certainly a lot more tactical, but I personally feel convinced that it isn't as risky as I originally believed in no small part because a6 hasn't been played [yet?].
Also, jdseemoreglass has me convinced that there is time for 0-0 later before the position blows wide open.
I'd actually go even further than your statement and say that 5. d4 exd is, by my estimation, Black's best play (i.e. much more than a remote possibility of it being the response).
qrs is spot-on in that at this point if anyone wants to post further side-by-side analysis it would be welcome. I am very busy tonight and sadly won't have time.
|
|
|
|