EPTCod:MW2 vs. Black Ops - Page 2
| Forum Index > General Games |
|
WniO
United States2706 Posts
| ||
|
Azerbaijan
United States660 Posts
MW2 is garbage; always was Black Ops is meh MW1 was probably my favorite multiplayer fps ever, except for goldeneye 007 of course (yay nostalgia) If I do play a CoD I play black ops; game actually feels balanced compared to MW2. | ||
|
HunterX11
United States1048 Posts
Black Ops took out many of the excesses, but I think is less fun. CoD4 ofc is the best of them all. | ||
|
Gak2
Canada418 Posts
-better weapon balance -better perk balance -better maps campaign was better too mw2 campaign was just trying to be overly dramatic for the sake of being overly dramatic the killstreaks in mw2 were absolutely ridiculous and i agree with what sega92 said about quickscoping edit: but still mw2 was fun thanks to all the gimmicky stuff you could do | ||
|
Brotatolol
United States1742 Posts
| ||
|
Serendipityx
United States595 Posts
| ||
|
LecheS
Mexico21 Posts
and the COD4 at the begining was so huge and intense but MW2 and black ops are sometimes really annoying and boring I hated CoD Mw2 so much, just the campaign was actually awesome black ops campaign is awesome but the ending is the worst of all EDIT: Modern warfare 2: i started hating it when i saw that you get the last thing at lvl 40 and you must need to get to 70 to prestige that was really annoying. by far the best CoD on prestiges symbols are black ops thus far. and WaW for sure. | ||
|
Ferrose
United States11378 Posts
On March 06 2011 16:02 MOARpylons wrote: MW2 was great just for the... well modern-ness of it. I cant stand the constant noob tubes and quickscoping. Other than that i dont have too much of a problem I personally hate black ops multiplayer for the fucking killstreaks. Theyre all terrible. Cant stand the rc-xds. And how you seem to catch fire from napalm strikes 50 miles away LOL That's why I hate MW2 multiplayer. The map design was TERRIBLE, and the killstreaks were so completely broken. Have fun not being able to spawn once the enemy gets a Chopper Gunner -_- And don't even get me started on bullshit like OMA and the combo of Marathon/Lightweight/Commando. | ||
|
arterian
Canada1157 Posts
| ||
|
Existential
Australia2107 Posts
| ||
|
DrainX
Sweden3187 Posts
| ||
Kipsate
Netherlands45349 Posts
Also hip-firing is incredibly effective in Black Ops(too effective). | ||
|
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
 MW2 was over the top, but it turns out that over the top was actually fun. So action packed :D Not the biggest fan of either though, but MW2 was fun if you had nothing else to do. | ||
|
cHaNg-sTa
United States1058 Posts
| ||
|
RxN
United States255 Posts
On March 06 2011 15:14 NIIINO wrote: I played MW2 on PC and have played BO just once but i think that there is no difference, When i played MW2 we were 13th on ClanBase EU. (its playing without attachments and perks) it was fun to play with friends. So i asked my ex clan mates what they think about BO so far and they were disappointed. MW2 is just year older than BO, its like what is more fun fifa 2010 or 2011 ? OT: 2 days ago i played QL against some dude who plays also BO and he told me that there are some tournaments. is it true ? he also told me that its on IEM :o and it got the biggest prize pool and SC2 is dieing. is it true ? Yup, QL is played at IEM but it doesn't have the biggest prize pool and SC2 isn't dying. You can watch VODs of the games on the ESLTV. QL has a pretty devoted following of players that have been around for years and is free to play. It also takes a ridiculous amount of skill and if you can make it past the urge to rage quit when you're getting destroyed early on then you'll find there's no better fps out there. As for MW2 and BO, I've played every CoD since the first one came out on PC up to MW2 but I've never played BO. MW2 was one of the worst multi-player fps games I've ever played and felt like little more than an arcade game. No skill involved, no strategy. Just camping and spraying. It represents, to me at least, everything that's wrong with fps games. It says a lot when games like counter-strike and Quake are still considered better games. | ||
|
Clickety
Portugal196 Posts
On March 07 2011 00:09 Deadlyfish wrote: I'm a sniper and quickscoping was pretty fun Definitely not a sniper. | ||
|
Pads
England3228 Posts
On March 06 2011 23:49 arterian wrote: why would anyone play a fps on console when they have the option to play it on pc consoles are cheaper? stop with the pc elitism anyway, people play this for fun not for a full time job. everyone know competitive console gaming will never be as high skilled as pc but its just a pass time and a bit of fun so who cares right? anyway, black ops sucks, im literally just playing it to get 15th prestige. the addition of 24/7 nuketown and merc playlists helped a lot though. im just hoping mw3 will be awesome. | ||
|
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
Hmm? I dont get it. Or you mean that sniping is sitting back and waiting? | ||
|
Pads
England3228 Posts
On March 07 2011 00:49 Deadlyfish wrote: Hmm? I dont get it. Or you mean that sniping is sitting back and waiting? good snipers can do both. | ||
|
Deadlyfish
Denmark1980 Posts
Well yea if you can snipe fast you can snipe slow aswell. I just dont find it fun to camp out in the back of the map picking people off  But CoD has always had quickscoping, it's one of the more unique things about the game, but then they "removed" it in Black Ops, which made the game boring for alot of people. | ||
| ||
